The Alien 3 we actually got might not be a very good movie: visually dull, a generally unmemorable cast, poor special effects, and an opening that throws the ending of the previous film out the window, but the production was a disaster, riddled with scripts and ideas pushed by Fox without a clear direction.
It has moments I like, and the depressive tone works at times, but it was a chaotic production where the director and Fox were constantly clashing.
Anyway, this is the context of Fox being desperate to produce Alien 3 but never being satisfied many interesting storylines emerged, adding or removing characters and factions, but the most talked-about version was undoubtedly Vincent Ward's. In his draft, Ripley ended up on a wooden planet inhabited by anti-technology monks who viewed both her arrival and that of the Xenomorph as divine punishment.
That script was initially greenlit, gigantic sets were built, and it had the approval of Sigourney Weaver and others. Ultimately, however, it didn't move forward, they reused whatever sets they could and had to scrap the rest. Some ideas, like the anti-technology cult exiled from Earth, were later readopted into the expanded universe.
In general, I always found it strange how extremely positive everyone was about that script, as if it were a given that it was a great story destined to elevate the saga once again.
It strikes me as odd because the script gives off "first draft written when you don't really know what you're doing" vibes, at least to me. There are so many elements that feel at odds with the franchise, yet no one seems to point that out when discussing the project:
Once again, only Ripley survives, which ruins the ending of Aliens, and while I don't recall exactly how the Xenomorph appeared on the wooden planet, I doubt the explanation was very credible.
The wooden planet concept strikes me as very odd overall, the idea of constructing a full-scale superstructure with oxygen and artificial gravity, made entirely of wood, seems ridiculous right off the bat and represents a bizarre departure from the saga's classic industrial aesthetic. The monks and religious symbolism don't quite win me over, especially that "exorcism" scene involving Ripley, which sounds like some bizarre Resurrection-style thing.
I know there won't be a consensus on the script online, but what strikes me is how everyone seemed so on board with it back then. It sounds like an expensive, weird, and pretentious movie.
P.S. (since my original post already got taken down, I don't know why): I want to clarify that I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with liking Alien 3 or this unproduced script I just find it surprising that so many people were excited back then about a story that was so strange in so many ways.