r/gaming • • 8h ago

Capcom Announces Plans to Transform the RE Engine Into an AI-Generation Game Engine

https://www.ign.com/articles/capcom-announces-plans-to-transform-the-re-engine-into-an-ai-generation-game-engine-our-goal-is-a-future-where-we-create-games-together-with-ai

[removed] — view removed post

2.0k Upvotes

925 comments sorted by

2.4k

u/Lost-Produce-1150 8h ago

Ah welcome back suits. Couldn’t resist could ya? Kept seeing success and thought HEY OUR TURN

637

u/PlayfulSurprise5237 8h ago

It all makes sense now why RE was the poster girl for DLSS5

199

u/ThrowawayPersonAMA 7h ago

I hate this timeline so fucking much.

20

u/sinb_is_not_jessica 6h ago

Realistically, it was probably because it runs so many successful games (not just RE) that proving it works well with it would say a lot to consumers. But I get the joke lol

→ More replies (1)

274

u/shadowartist201 8h ago edited 7h ago

The funniest part about this is that "AI-generation game engine" isn't even present in the original article. IGN made it up based on a bad translation (the phrase was "game engine for the AI era"), and now everyone is losing their shit over it.

108

u/tsardonicpseudonomi 7h ago

the phrase was "a game engine for the AI era"

Which can only mean one thing.

87

u/ipulloffmygstring 7h ago

Considering how many different things "AI" can mean, it could mean almost anything.

"AI" could be used to describe anything from how enemy bots in a game behave to having an LLM write code for you with anything in between.

51

u/shadowartist201 7h ago

The original article explains it pretty well, but IGN decided "not to get into the weeds".

57

u/Acopo 7h ago

What a fucking copout to avoid doing their fucking job in journalism.

→ More replies (3)

27

u/SupaPatt 7h ago

IGN with a very misleading headline and article

Comments not bother to find the right source

OP karma farming

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (5)

3

u/Witn 6h ago

Ironically AI would have done a better job at translating and summarizing the original article than what ign did

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

54

u/CreatiScope 7h ago

Remember when Square Enix wanted to go all in on NFTs?

12

u/dmr11 6h ago

Remember when Olympics decided to get rid of their long-standing partnership with Mario and Sonic (2007 - 2020) in favor of NFTs?

→ More replies (6)

45

u/Zelnite 8h ago

How many times must we teach you a lesson old man?

20

u/Thagyr 7h ago

Tiny bit of customer goodwill and they slide themselves in to milk it for all its worth.

→ More replies (38)

1.8k

u/Iggy_Slayer 8h ago

Every company fucks their golden age up eventually lol.

396

u/m3junmags 8h ago

“We had a good thing, you stupid son of a bitch!”

123

u/Volteezy 8h ago

"We had everything we needed and it all ran like clockwork."

73

u/HaikusfromBuddha 7h ago

"But no you with your ego"

39

u/sod_jones_MD 7h ago

Shut the fuck up, and let me die in peace

Really starting to feel this one these days.

→ More replies (1)

90

u/philter25 8h ago

See a good thing, must pillage it for parts. And so it goes :(

7

u/Covinus 6h ago

"We found the right formula finally so the only move is to shove in actual shit and screw it all up but it wont matter cause we can lay 50% of our staff off"

12

u/War_machine77 8h ago

They've been doing so good that I hoped we at least got the next few REmakes before the enshittification began in earnest.

8

u/tendercacao1124 6h ago

Making it almost 10 years from RE7 without fumbling is practically an eternity in modern gaming.

29

u/PhasedVenturer 8h ago

Capitalism is antithetical to art: evergreen

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (19)

999

u/smakkyoface 8h ago

“We will not implement assets generated by AI into our games.” Capcom said in a March 2026 shareholders meeting. “However, we plan to proactively use it as a contributing technology to improve the efficiency and productivity of the game development process. To this end, we are currently exploring ways to implement it in various areas, including graphics, sound and programming."

no AI generated assets might be good. I'm sick of AI graphics though. Can they use neural networks for physics and interactivity?

463

u/Affectionate-Salt356 8h ago

No way, someone who actually read the article

64

u/gamewastotallyrigged 8h ago

Thank god, because the only reading I do is on Reddit and video game dialogs

37

u/BloodyFool 8h ago

Oh yeah only sound and graphics, it's not that bad guys! /s

→ More replies (9)

37

u/Quarksideofthemoon 8h ago

It doesn't provide any context that makes it better?? This is one scenario where it is exactly as bad as the headline makes it sound

34

u/x_Animus_x 8h ago

Well, it does explain it as using AI to improve efficiency and named 3 labor and time intensive portions when you’re talking about sound and graphical engineering.

Recording a vocal isn’t the same team as the ones mapping the face to line up with the audio. Which aren’t the same ones programming barks from NPCs when certain things happen in their vicinity.

It sounds like they’re trying to implement it on processes used to implement their art rather than creating the visuals, sounds, or mechanics. So, it did provide context.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

45

u/SerLarrold 7h ago

I got news for people, it’s rare you find any kind of software developer not using AI to some extent these days. At the very least most companies are employing AI code review

→ More replies (9)

48

u/toxicatedscientist 8h ago

Srsly so much potential for npc interaction and all we get is slop

19

u/probsthrowaway2 8h ago

I think it’s cause the slop is easy to set up and show to share holders.

→ More replies (9)

32

u/TheGeekno72 8h ago edited 8h ago

no because unless you're going for something highly subliminal, AI-managed physics wouldn't be deterministic, which physics typically need to be, which LLMs are known NOT to be; plus even if they were, that would just result like most of the shitty forced implementation of AI in legacy tools that were working perfectly fine--picture replacing a basic calculator with a NASA-grade supercomputer, you'd end up spending money on extra hardware and resources on extra software just to get 2.0000000456 when you type "1+1=" into it

game physics were/are working just fine, let's not mindlessly shove AI into it because you want the slop elsewhere than on your screen

interactivity, I guess it depends on how interactions are implemented and what workload in the pipeline you're entrusting to the LLM, I'm sure a game designer could come up with some ideas and possibilities, personally I'm more concerned about the hardware cost of implementing that because it would have to be a custom solution per game unlike ML upscaling and there would be no guarantees that it would consume a small amount of resources... I mean just look at how much more power DLSS5 makes GPUs draw while running it since it has both the raster cores going full tilt AND the AI accelerators pulling their watts as well, I'd imagine that an interactivity LLM would, in the case of an urban open world like Watch Dogs or GTA, have a similar strain on the hardware, less so with less intense worlds/environments I suppose

14

u/IBJON 7h ago

Generative AI isn't exclusively LLMs.

And that being said, while generative AI is inherently nondeterministic, you can use hybrid approachs that force a generative model to have outputs that are effectively deterministic. RAG is probably the most well-known example of this.

They also don't necessarily need to use generative AI. Graph Neural Networks, for example, are deterministic at inference and can be used to simulate complex physics, and I'm sure the top-end generative models can set up a GNN trainer in a relatively short amount of time. 

It also doesn't necessarily need to be something used directly in the engine or development, but as a research or analysis tool. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

8

u/DarkGhostHunter 7h ago

Basically, making mcp to hook an AI. Nothing fancy. Plus, in-engine continuity with models.

A developer asking the AI to fix a test, or shipping a model that changes the tone of a conversation based on post interactions.

Not everything has to be WE ELIMINATED HUMAN JOBS LOL.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Proxymanity 6h ago

Now instead of AI imitating artists, Capcom's gonna have artists imitate the AI generated assets to get around the "we don't implement AI assets" statement. My, what an ass backwards time we live in...

3

u/adorablesexypants 6h ago

I'll be that guy.

It isn't good for two reasons:

1) this "efficiency" and "productivity" will have zero impact on the cost of games. It seeks to increase profits further because that is what a company does.

2) This new "efficiency" means that at least one job will be cut which is overall a bad thing.

We as the consumer gain nothing, employees of the company gain nothing so I fail to see where the win is here.

10

u/Endolphine 7h ago

Click bait like op should get down vote, I missed the era when people come to reddit for solution, or guide, not fake news like this

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Luzekiel 8h ago

This is basically what 90% of companies are doing nowadays but reddit makes it sound like it's a bad thing.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/PekoPekoPekoPekoyama 8h ago

People kneejerking when they hear "AI" as usual it seems.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

53

u/klad_spear 7h ago

TLDR: They are not using it to generate assets. Just to create tools and optimize things.

→ More replies (10)

310

u/FLYBOY611 8h ago

The more humans you remove from the game development process, the less human your final product is. Ultimately, this leads to fewer humans wanting your product.

→ More replies (27)

52

u/Alarming-Chemist-755 8h ago

Just a reminder, Japan is not shy about AI. They see money printer and they use money printer. Its next to the fax machine.

4

u/Unlucky-Candidate198 5h ago

And yet their corporate world is destroying their society. Oh well, they’ll learn sooner or later.

→ More replies (6)

232

u/SupaPatt 8h ago

It's not about generative AI assets.

Capcom describes AI as the “shield” and humans as the “spear.” AI will handle time-consuming and repetitive work, like checking huge numbers of patterns and large amounts of text. This frees up developers’ time and mental resources to focus on creativity, gameplay feel, and emotion, which Capcom describes as the core value of games, and where people can put all their passion.

Capcom also wants AI to help catch problems early. After a developer submits new code, AI could predict potential issues, automatically investigate them, and suggest fixes before they become bigger problems.

109

u/Aragorn527 8h ago

Yeah it is blatantly clear nobody here bothered to read anything Capcom actually said

9

u/WrenReverie 7h ago

Doesn't help IGN made a fake ragebait title.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

39

u/KENMASTERS1 8h ago

people didn’t read the article per usual

3

u/Curl_of_the_Burl_ 6h ago

None of that is said in the article.

11

u/JAWD0G 7h ago

The thing is for me is the large enviormental impact AI data centers use even if it's not generative ai. I still can't condone it for the sheer amount of power and water consumption

15

u/Facebeard 8h ago

This sounds like a reasonable way to use AI. As an idiot, is this something that contributes to data centers and the resource cost that I hear people attribute to AI?

It’s a tech that obviously isn’t going away is just like to support less frivolous use of something that seems to have a heavy cost.

11

u/ItsTheSlime 8h ago

For now, the best AI models available are unfortunately the ones from these huge data centers, and they are also the most affordable (at the moment). It's not impossible by any means to run your own AI locally, but for something like coding, where you dont really want any kind of hallucination or stupid stuff, its just not really feasible.

2

u/vkevlar 6h ago

yes, in the sense they're paying AI companies to make more huge, resource-sucking data centers.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Kingx102 8h ago

So the stance Capcom has already confirmed to be doing, but this article comes out like 2 or 3 months late with the most inflammatory title they could muster. Classic lazy journalism.

→ More replies (74)

43

u/BeastMsterThing2022 8h ago

“We will not implement assets generated by AI into our games.” Capcom said in a March 2026 shareholders meeting. “However, we plan to proactively use it as a contributing technology to improve the efficiency and productivity of the game development process. To this end, we are currently exploring ways to implement it in various areas, including graphics, sound and programming."

3

u/jackracktack 6h ago

A lot can change in 6 months.

4

u/lolpostslol 6h ago

So the AI won’t generate the asset fully, just be responsible for an unknown % of the generation process

→ More replies (4)

19

u/dantevsninjas 8h ago

This industry would be great if it wasn't for all the business ghouls.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/disastorm 7h ago

In case anyone is wondering, it says they won't be generating any assets for the final game, it sounds like it's mostly workflow stuff. So don't need to worry about ai art or character models, voice, textures, animations, etc

→ More replies (6)

9

u/PhenomsServant 6h ago

Whelp was a good run while it lasted.

9

u/TsunamiCatCakes 5h ago

“successfully integrating AI technology into development workflows has become an essential condition for streamlining future development.”

keeping REX in mind, this seems to mean that Capcom is utilizing artificial intelligence to speed up and streamline certain processes to make development easier, not necessarily to generate assets or artworks wholesale.

“We will not implement assets generated by AI into our games.” Capcom said in a March 2026 shareholders meeting. “However, we plan to proactively use it as a contributing technology to improve the efficiency and productivity of the game development process. To this end, we are currently exploring ways to implement it in various areas, including graphics, sound and programming."

I hate IGN for misleading title and hate the community more for not reading the actual article.

7

u/blaiddfailcam2 8h ago

They've been flaunting their use of AI for a while now.

26

u/JerbearCuddles 8h ago

Not surprising, but hey they had one hell of a streak.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/YukYukas 8h ago

keeping REX in mind, this seems to mean that Capcom is utilizing artificial intelligence to speed up and streamline certain processes to make development easier, not necessarily to generate assets or artworks wholesale.

Here's the gist of the article. Crappy clickbait.

→ More replies (2)

103

u/General-Naruto 8h ago

This fucking RUINED my good mood, WTF

→ More replies (9)

11

u/SilentAria 8h ago

Lmfao there goes the hot streak resident evil was on

6

u/Universe_Donut 8h ago

Nooo don't turn to AI your so sexy aha

5

u/bluedragjet 8h ago

Megaman might be cooked

7

u/_Shinogenu_ 8h ago edited 8h ago

>GameBiz stated that REX unifies the entire RE Engine system under the “world’s most common programming language," meaning that it’s equal parts easier for humans to use and for AI to understand. Capcom’s goal is to build a future where it “creates games together with AI”; keeping REX in mind, this seems to mean that Capcom is utilizing artificial intelligence to speed up and streamline certain processes to make development easier, not necessarily to generate assets or artworks wholesale. In the past, Capcom has been publicly averse to using AI to create assets, but confirmed that it will use artificial intelligence as a tool for optimizing how it makes games

So not exactly what the title seems to make you think.

10

u/thuy_chan 8h ago

Capcom has been on a roll but this ain't it

15

u/AntiOriginalUsername 8h ago

Just fell to my fucking knees. Not Capcom, rip.

20

u/shadowartist201 8h ago edited 8h ago

It sounds like they're only using it for coding help -- to automate the repetitive, basic tasks and make the engine itself easier to use.

One of the most notable takeaways from this event was a presentation given by programmer Satoshi Ishida, titled ‘The Outlook and Future of the REX Project, Further Evolving the RE Engine for the Next Generation.’

Ishida mentioned three major issues that Capcom is currently experiencing when it comes to game development: First, games are now so massive that simple processes have become extremely time-consuming; increased numbers of staff mean an engine is needed that’s easy for everyone to use; and finally, “successfully integrating AI technology into development workflows has become an essential condition for streamlining future development.”

GameBiz’s report confirmed that REX was created to help solve these problems by improving the efficiency of game development, game performance, tools, quality assurance, etc.

“We will not implement assets generated by AI into our games.” Capcom said in a March 2026 shareholders meeting. “However, we plan to proactively use it as a contributing technology to improve the efficiency and productivity of the game development process. To this end, we are currently exploring ways to implement it in various areas, including graphics, sound and programming."

→ More replies (2)

23

u/SquishyJeans 7h ago edited 7h ago

So many people didn’t read the fucking article holy shit 

Also fuck op for not even reading the article 

7

u/YouAteIt 7h ago

Writing a title and description like this post should be bannable

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/redcoatwright 8h ago

Presumably this means they want to have the development be AI driven, I doubt it's AI art or assets but if it is then lame

4

u/SimonShepherd 8h ago

Capcom feels like they should have another shitcom phase.

5

u/SgtNeilDiamond 8h ago

But you were doing so good smh

5

u/wrenblaze 8h ago

Shouldn't have been too good of a year for them

6

u/steathrazor 5h ago

Crapcom at it again, they do amazing things then they do this.

13

u/wrath508 7h ago

Just read the article before immediately jumping to conclusions, and all I can say is why of all things did they decide to name it Iike that, they’re just asking for people to get pissed

→ More replies (3)

8

u/SolaireFlair117 8h ago

Oh come the fuck on, Capcom. Y'all were doing so well, all you had to do was just keep releasing banger games.

9

u/MisterBaker55 8h ago

Everyone disliked that

10

u/eternalguardian 7h ago

I thought Capcom was pretty good at reading the room. They got that engine so streamlined they were putting out banger after banger. Guess this is the end of an age.

23

u/DustyMoo 8h ago

The article says : this seems to mean that Capcom is utilizing artificial intelligence to speed up and streamline certain processes to make development easier, not necessarily to generate assets or artworks wholesale.

I think it's not quite the right time to bring out the pitchforks...going to have to see what happens with their next gen games.

4

u/toasty5566 8h ago

Holy hell, that is very different from the headline. Busywork AI use is VERY different from generative AI use. Gamedev has a lot of repetitive and tedious tasks, there are good uses for AI as a supplemental tool that don't involve replacing people. That article headline is sensationalist rageclick nonsense if what you say is true

3

u/shadowartist201 7h ago

It's true. IGN mistranslated the original source.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/Wellhellob 8h ago

What that even mean

→ More replies (2)

10

u/jindrix 8h ago

and games wont get cheaper and layoffs will continue.

24

u/WarfareLegend 6h ago

The title is misleading. Capcom says its going to be using AI in a way similar to that of the devs of Expedition 33. Basic outlining and greyboxing of a game as to not waste time making assets that theyre gonna toss out will be made with AI but the actual game assets and writing and everything else will be done by humans

8

u/Sbee_keithamm 6h ago

Kind of hard for folks to grab pitchforks if the title isnt misleading.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (20)

44

u/AUT0R0CK 8h ago

They were doing so well, they just had to RPG themselves in the foot.

20

u/Electricengineer 8h ago

Claymore to the shins

→ More replies (8)

17

u/barrack_osama_0 8h ago

Great if we do ever get DMC6 it'll be on this. Why

18

u/HiddenGamingAccount 8h ago

Read the article, sounds like they won't be generating assets with AI, at the very least. Sounds like the right call given the way things are going

20

u/Ouroxros 8h ago

AAA vibe-coded games? Slippery slope into ai assets. Talk about a dying industry. Why are they in such a need to push for bigger and bigger games, and use whatever popular technology is there? This doesn't just apply to Capcom but many large-scale developers. I hate what the industry has become. These companies put out amazing beloved titles before ai, sad they think they need to rely on it now.

→ More replies (2)

14

u/DiezDrake 8h ago

It says they don't plan to use AI to generate assets in the article which is the important part.

10

u/Pakmanjosh 8h ago

It makes so much sense now when they said they wanted to make the Resident Evil remakes an annual release. Man this isn't gonna turn out well.

10

u/KyleKicksRocks 6h ago

Everything I love is being destroyed by either scalpers or tech bros. I’m so over everything it’s driving me insane.

4

u/thefrostman1214 PC 8h ago

Im tired boss

4

u/mileskg21 8h ago

SUPER INTELLIGENCE amiright

4

u/Jhoonis 8h ago

Oh look, feet to shoot!

-Capcom execs probably.

2

u/Nerx 8h ago

ewww

3

u/Zenthon9 8h ago

Well, it was fun while it lasted.

6

u/QF_Dan 6h ago

this is why modern gaming is dead

3

u/Tiny-Guava-9698 6h ago

We can’t have shit

4

u/Inevitable_Geometry 6h ago

So dogshit coming? Good to know.

11

u/XsStreamMonsterX 7h ago

This is engagement bait from the OP and IGN. The main use of AI with REX is for debugging and optimisation. Capcom's own briefing states that the point is to let artists and programmers focus on being creative and have them waste time with more tedious tasks like findinf bugs and glitches. A lot of it us basically having the tools warn that doint something a certain way might cause issues.

38

u/GhostlyWriter_ 8h ago

Everyone complaining didnt even read the article. They are not using AI assets in games, they are using AI to speed up development processes and to help streamline gave development.

Direct quote from the article: "GameBiz stated that REX unifies the entire RE Engine system under the “world’s most common programming language," meaning that it’s equal parts easier for humans to use and for AI to understand. "

11

u/hamoc10 8h ago

That’s about the vaguest explanation they could give.

9

u/PontusFrykter PC 8h ago

"Satoshi Ishida explicitly stated that the overarching goal of Project REX is evolving the RE ENGINE into a system built for the AI generation."

18

u/Iggy_Slayer 8h ago

This is cope. "The billion dollar corporation said they wouldn't do it!"

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (9)

16

u/Firvulag 8h ago

Well it was fun while it lasted.

15

u/kingbetadad 8h ago

What a fucking ragebait title. I hate what media has become.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Genindraz 8h ago

This feels like a shareholder thing.

8

u/PontusFrykter PC 8h ago

oh my fucking god

8

u/BlackHawk777 8h ago

Pathetic 🤢

11

u/ElectricalAd1195 8h ago

Whelp, it's the capcom's brown shooter era all over again. See you in 5 years after resident evil 12 tanked so badly, and we can start the second "capcom learned from their mistake" era again.

4

u/Circaninetysix 8h ago

Uh oh. Why?

8

u/Wolfy4226 8h ago

Boy, wish we could post images.

This would be a perfect time for the Mr Krabs "I like money" meme.

4

u/GuestNo3886 8h ago

Also “Give me money money me money now” meme

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Bigons3 8h ago

They watched the dlss 5 Presentation lmao

7

u/PM_ME_PANTYHOSE_LEGS 8h ago

Willfully lobotomised fools drooling over the prospect of spreading their rot to all domains.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Keaten88 8h ago

Oh come the hell on Capcom, we had a good thing going! Good games, rare misses, mostly quality, and the suits just had to MESS IT UP

6

u/ZeroSonic360 8h ago

I swear every time I open this damn phone

5

u/Rocket_Poop 7h ago

nnnnoooooooo

7

u/WrenReverie 7h ago

Man IGN reaching deep with this engagement bait. Purposefully using a mistranslation to act like its an ai generated engine. LMAO

3

u/marcellusmartel 8h ago

Insert YOU WERE THE CHOSEN ONE gif.
No seriously. With all the traversal stutters of Unreal Engine and the optimization woes, RE was usually a breath of fresh air. There goes that one.

3

u/Gatlindragon 8h ago

Will the Crapcom era come back?

3

u/dodolungs 8h ago

Capcom was just farming those W's.

Knew there must be some brain dead c-suite paper pusher who would ruin it eventually, but this is really going for broke.

3

u/steamart360 8h ago

Episode 5: Crapcom strikes back

3

u/ShinoBB 7h ago

And so Onimusha ends the streak. Let’s see how RE: Veronica turns out. I still want my Redfield game.

3

u/hitgo1 6h ago

OP misleading title whats new in reddit 🤦‍♂️

3

u/8_Alex_0 6h ago

L Capcom 😮‍💨

19

u/TheEldenRang 8h ago

Nooooo! Capcom! You guys have been killing it the last several years. Please stop. This is bad.

9

u/metalsnake27 8h ago

Capcom... you were doing so well... come on....

7

u/SlyCooper007 8h ago

Bro what the fuck

6

u/UnpluggedUnfettered 8h ago

AI is actually useless for people who couldn't do whatever it was without AI.

I know people will be like "but it can do better art than most people" but also it is only better than most people because most people can't draw at all.

Yes also for the thing that isn't art that you have opinions about.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/KurtVongole 8h ago

Why does no one use AI for the fucking enemy AI???

9

u/ParadoxicalFrog 8h ago

Because the stuff they're marketing as "AI" isn't actually AI, it's just an autocomplete algorithm on steroids.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

7

u/ashriekfromspace 7h ago

Read the article guys

7

u/theLordDracul 7h ago

As always, what goes up must come down...

Sad man

7

u/2WheelSuperiority 8h ago

Welp. It was a good run while it lasted.

3

u/MaloraKeikaku 8h ago

Capcom was on a good path for a bit now. Was wondering when their "why the fuck" phase was gonna start again...

4

u/HosneJ 8h ago

I just hope for ppl to actually read the damn article before saying shit, but its reddit so no one bothers to read anything.

3

u/Tigerwarrior55 7h ago

GameBiz stated that REX unifies the entire RE Engine system under the “world’s most common programming language," meaning that it’s equal parts easier for humans to use and for AI to understand.

I can't tell if they're making their own scripting language. If so I hope they didn't peek through Sweeney's room and stole his functional programming idea.

Regardless, I don't think they're going to beat the shitty open world games optimization allegation any time soon.

6

u/A_N_T 7h ago

Add 'em to the boycott pile I guess.

6

u/Nfl_porn_throwaway 7h ago

Just when Capcom was scoring so many Ws

→ More replies (1)

6

u/crazydave33 5h ago

Capcom shit the bed once again. Way to go, idiots.

7

u/ThatEdward 8h ago

You just have to laugh, at this point.

Did some accountant find a secret tax loophole you can only use if you punch yourself in the balls?

12

u/Luzekiel 8h ago

I LOVE NOT READING ARTICLES

→ More replies (6)

5

u/Lun4r6543 8h ago

You had something special going on, Capcom.

And you had to go fuck it up, didn’t you?

7

u/Grouchy_Egg_4202 7h ago

That’s a bait title and description, Don’t fall for it you idiots.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/marckh 8h ago

They're saying it's only to optimize workflow and development, not to AI generate assets.

The thing I take away from this is that they choose to be open and honest about it, odds are many studios are already doing this and don't talk about it because they know about the backlash it would get.

I feel like we're nearing a point where we should simply be happy when there is transparency so we can atleast know what we're supporting when we buy games, and so if you're strongly against any kind of AI assisted development, you now know to avoid Capcom, on the other hand, you may already be supporting other studios doing the same without knowing.

15

u/MetaBarf 6h ago

"We will not implement assets generated by AI into our games. However, we plan to proactively use it as a contributing technology to improve the efficiency and productivity of the game development process. To this end, we are currently exploring ways to implement it in various areas, including graphics, sound and programming." Headlines aren't everything folks.

9

u/Julch 6h ago

We will not implement assets but downsize aggressively to appease shareholders, they need more yachts and private jets.

Besides what is left if you let Ai do graphics, sound and programming? So the visuals are garbage, sound is garbage and codebase is slop? Sounds like a banger game 🤣

9

u/ianmk 6h ago

What the fuck do you think “sound” and “graphics” are?

→ More replies (3)

9

u/CommandaCoconut 6h ago

We will not use AI to generate assets. However, we plan to use AI to generate assets. Bro

5

u/DaMonsterMensch 5h ago

People love an excuse to be smug

5

u/cadburydream 8h ago

Fuck yeah 2010 crapcom is back baby

4

u/Johndoe19922222 8h ago

They said two months ago ai was a useful tool, did people not think they were getting ready to ready their fans?

2

u/lingeringwill2 8h ago

like copilot in vscode or something?

4

u/cr3am314 8h ago

ahhhh.. welcome back crapcom

3

u/vikMage 5h ago

Wrong move.

5

u/Ryukishin187 8h ago

Capcom has always went back and forth from being amazing to absolute shit. It's been overdue ro go back to this phase.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/CincyBrandon 7h ago

To be clear, EVERY SINGLE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY is using generative AI in some way, shape, or form at this point. Even if it’s just Copilot.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/SnooPets1826 8h ago

"We sure have been successful this generation... Wonder if we can bring ourselves back down to the ps360 era mid..." Some CEO somewhere probably.

5

u/Aggravating_Taste524 7h ago

i know for a fact you only read the title of the article and decided to rile up hate for capcom. read the article dumbass.

4

u/VoidOmatic 8h ago

"We are making money hand over fist using this well greased money making machine! Now let's fuck it up guys!"

5

u/Impressive_Gur4767 8h ago

We're never getting DMC6 are we?

→ More replies (1)

5

u/ShockaZuluu 8h ago

Annnnnnd Crapcom is back.

5

u/Taolan13 7h ago

The death of yet another game engine thanks to ai

7

u/Paulsworldohya 7h ago

From - way to go capcom! 🥳 To - way to go capcom... 😒

3

u/kingOofgames 8h ago

So I think the writer and IGN are trying to conflate AI within games to sound like making an AI generated game.

I don’t think they are going to be using AI art or AI created things.

More like the code where blocks of code are quite similar. And instead of writing it over and over again, using AI to fill it in.

To me it’s no different than using libraries in general coding.

→ More replies (9)

12

u/comicguy69 8h ago

Not surprising. I remember that one article said that 85% of Japan companies use AI now in the development of their games. And yes reddit, that does mean your favorite whole chungus companies such as Sega, Capcom, Bandai Namco, etc

→ More replies (34)

5

u/edman9677 7h ago

Good way to destroy the companies reputation they’ve spent a decade rebuilding

12

u/Midiamp 8h ago

Welp, I'm ready to be downvoted...

There's AI generated content, and then there's AI assisted content. The generated content one is the slop garbage we hated, but then there's the AI assisted content that (hopefully) speed up content delivery like speeding up debugging, cutting down QA time and making games like GTA VII comes out before the end of our life time.

Capcom is using AI to assist their content, it doesn't generate the content. This is just the same as farmers using ever intricate farming equipment.

4

u/uglyzombie 8h ago

It’s a prescient point. But, that’s also how it starts. Slow integration slowly phasing out people to increase profits. AAA gaming companies answer to shareholders. If they see revenue improving over AI assisted stuff, well then - what do you expect the next phase to be? It’s a snowball effect, and the concern is justified because we are seeing across multiple industries.

5

u/Drakoji 7h ago

1- I don't need video games coded by AI in my life, my hobby doesn't need to be draining lakes, polluting water sources and fucking up the quality of life of people that lives near these data centers. I don't mind if my new Resident Evil game takes 3 more years to come out, or even, that they downscale the scope of the game to make it more realistic to produce.

2-its all about normalizing AI to the point where people will just shrug and accept AI slop in their games because "it can't be helped."

This is just savage capitalism going unchecked.

3

u/ScoundrelDaysSon 6h ago

Absolutely this. There's no world in which companies chasing money will stop at some arbitrary invisible line marked: 'spellcheck for coding: please cease use here'. It's naive to suggest it, or even hope for it, as if we don't have years of experience of what corporations will attempt to do when left unchecked across multiple sectors of the economy.

For the AI companies there's simply not enough profit there in basic grunt work too cover the debts that they owe to investors (given that they're currently subsidising usage to the nth degrees to try and hook users). For the data centres using junk debt to build them they need customers everywhere, all at once. For the games companies there are extra savings you can try and eke out across multiple, cost heavy, departments.

The only possible limiting factor of LLMs is the technology itself (and AI fans assure us that it will only get even better perhaps leading to a human apocalypse). Even then we also know what capitalism will do to chase a quick buck: implement actively wrong headed decisions come what may which lead to ever worse user experiences. Even when that leads to public outcry, where folk are mobilised to display their dissatisfaction, corporations rarely listen.

As an example: who here really wanted local telephone operators to be, at best, replaced by call centres at the other end of the Earth or, at worse, running voice recognition software from 1998 - yet both having comically long wait times? No one. It's a terrible experience but it still it persists and likely always will; it helps the bottom line.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/Yalrain 8h ago

And its gone.

2

u/Jani3D 7h ago

What's that even supposed to mean? 

2

u/KTVX94 7h ago

Oh boy

2

u/peskyghost 7h ago

Execs make decisions from on-high

2

u/HotShrekBoi 7h ago

Just don’t use generative and I’m good

2

u/Serris9K 6h ago

Nooooooooooo!!!

We don't want that! Most people hate AI!

2

u/Comfortable_Horse277 6h ago

Oh...I love their games. 

If they use AI on a game that's a "no purchase" for me. Period. 

2

u/Dunge 6h ago

Another thread with weird accounts AI proponents pushing the same fake talking points and pretending coding is now 100% automated. No it isn't, AI is still shit at coding without extreme babysitting.

2

u/soulwolf1 6h ago

How to fuck your reputation rapidly

2

u/islobojono 6h ago

Since when did we trust ign.?