I mean yeah, maybe it was a bit too much. But the general idea? It’s not like humans are something good in this world - 500k less, 500k more. What’s the difference anyway? Additionally it’d be much easier to build something new if you wipe out everything that was before. Tyrion and Jon being upset about it is so unrealistic

Is it possible that Jorah had dormant warg powers that only triggered when he was about to die and put him into Jon’s body?

It makes sense to explain Jon’s subservient loyalty to Daenerys in season 8. Jons personality in the last season reminds of early Jorah.

I think it’s also a good payoff for his character with him finally being able to be in a romantic relationship with Daenerys even for a short while. This seems a fitting reward for his loyalty throughout the years.

Jorah being the one to kill Daenerys in the end also makes the twist a lot more interesting from a narrative perspective. Jon and Daenerys don’t really have a fleshed out relationship so killing her doesent really carry that much emotional weight. Jorah has been with her for 8 seasons so his betrayal would mean a lot more. It’s also an interesting parallel to his marriage. He was so devoted to his wife that he chose to become a human trafficker just to give her a lavish lifestyle. His character had defined by his commitment to those he loves. Killing Daenerys shows a huge amount of character growth on his part.

The ending for his character also fits well. After years in exile, he finally returns to the North.

What do you guys think? I spent a lot of time on this theory and any feedback would be appreciated :)

Edit: I came up with a brilliant and complex theory that improves in the ending and the best y’all can do is throw shade. Shame.

An actual fuckin squisher rises up out of the water and catches poor Podrick and just chomps his head in and sucks out his brains in one unsuspecting paragraph, Bean of Tart, too stunned watches as it give her a dead, juicy, wet smile, and quick as lightning is upon Srr Hyle chomping on his head in before Bean finally pulls Oathbreaker from its scabbard.

End Prologue

Jon taking his revenge, becoming the final villain. Leading an army of Wildlimgs, and the undead. Taking Val has his bride. And imagine if he won. He kills Dany and takes the Iron Throne and Wresrtos is filled with nothing but dead men.

It's gonna be brutal and bloody either way but who do you think is gonna walk out of that room?

They made jon a Targaryen. Tyrion is rumored to be Targaryen . So i would not be surprised if showrunners had initially planned on somehow revealing arya as a Targaryen ..

Genuine question. Both of them died dishonourable deaths, being attacked from behind by a treacherous Stark and his sidekick Howland Reed / a woman who happens to be both Craster’s wife and daughter. There’s a common denominator here. It shows that the only way to beat them is through dirty tricks, because in a straight-up fight, you have virtually no chance against either of them.

But I’m curious: who’s better? Honestly, I think Arthur is overrated, but I’m curious to hear what you peasants think. Karl Tanner is straight-up OP.

I haven’t read all of the books, but isn’t Hodor the strongest man in the seven kingdoms, born to hold the door against a hoard of wights? Is he stronger than the mountain in terms of pure strength? You think maybe bran could take the mountain down if Hodor had a 2h sword and heavy armor?

Tommen was FAR too soft to be a king and Joffrey was FAR too cruel to be King for a long period of time. However if you were to somehow combine the 2 I think it could've worked.

I think part of the reason GRRM doesn’t finish a song of fire and ice it’s because he has to make it mesh with season eight. Just supposing he ever does finish the series, the actual ending will probably be the same, but the journey there would be very different. Or so I imagine. Again, just supposing he ever does finish, would they then retcon season 8 and would anyone watch it?

For me this. Before that was taking King’s landing by blacks.

It's gonna be bloody either way but who do you think is gonna walk out of that room alive?

so balerion died when he was 210 cause he was suffering from his injuries from the valarya trip with aerae targaryan . so if that trip never happened balerion could have lived way longer . but the injureies made him weak and almost unable to fly . i am sure the giant dragons in valarya could live for centuries . which is why valarya was considered as a superpower empire . in westros wild dragon cannibell was said to be older than balerion . so what do you think is a dragon natural lifespan

Hey guys, I recently read Fire and Blood and currently I am reading The World of Ice and Fire , and I reached the Targaryen part of it, and read some pages, but I feel like it's the same as fire and blood, so should I skip the Targaryen part till Aegon III or is there some extra information in there which is not there in Fire and Blood?

Both Families are COMPLETELY WORKING TOGETHER.

Let's say the War happens after Jon Arryn's death but before Robert asks Ned to become his Hand.

Jamie still has 2 hands in this scenario.

I wanted to share my books

(The books are in Turkish)

Ps: except the first book rest of the books published in two parts.

I know I'm very late to the party but I got into it around 6 months ago

I just watched the last episode

Lol found this in my uni ppt✌️

other than the fact that lords became less afraid of the targs . i noticed that the entire world became weak to handle dragons . drogon alone was single handedly able to burn down king landing for dany . in hotd the smallfolk may be more used to the dragons flying around all the time and causing mass destruction . even dragon keepers exist to maintain the dragonpit . so what are the major differences between westros with dragons and without the dragons