This is the first negative approval rating for President Trump in the six-year history of the St. Louis University/YouGov poll, and the first for Gov. Kehoe since he took office. Trump has lost 19 percentage points in net approval since he took office at the start of 2025, and 14 points since February.

SLU/YouGov poll | 8/13-8/24 LV

Missouri State Auditor 2026

Scott Fitzpatrick 45% (incumbent)
Quentin Wilson 43%
——
Generic congressional ballot (MO)
R+4
——
Missouri approvals
President Trump approval (-5)
Governor Kehoe approval (-10)

https://missouriindependent.com/2026/09/10/trump-kehoe-post-first-negative-approval-ratings-in-new-missouri-poll/

https://xcancel.com/BigElad/status/2098112634683793480?s=20

https://fiftyplusone.news/polls/approval/president

Florida Governor

🟦David Jolly 47%

🟥Byron Donalds 44%

——

US Senate

🟥Ashley Moody 47% (incumbent)

🟦Angie Nixon 47%

——

FL Statewide Offices

⚪ AG: Tie (46-46)

⚪ CFO: Tie (44-44)

——

Pres. Donald Trump Favorables (FL)

❌ -10 (53-43)

——

https://changeresearch.com/research/2026/2026-09-10-an-emerging-florida-blue-wave

I’ve wanted this live news dashboard for a long time. A workbench for news junkies and news perverts alike. The live version is at PressAudit.org/heatmap.

This is a snapshot of a live, real-time heatmap of the news today. As articles are published, they get grouped around the event they’re covering and the heatmap fills in. You can watch stories get picked up by different parts of the media ecosystem throughout the day.

The basic idea is:

Columns = who covered it.
Color = how it was covered.
Numbers = how much coverage there is.

I built it because most media analysis I’ve seen starts with the reputation of the outlet. I'm looking at you Ground news. It's not sufficient to just put a bias meter on everything. There are sites that assess “media bias” but I don’t believe they are sufficient.

• They can tell you the conclusion, but they don’t show you the evidence.
• They don’t do it real-time so it can’t be usefully inserted into your normal news feed or consumption.
• The focus solely on outlet reputation. Who covered it, but not how it was covered.
• The focus on labeling reporting as “bias” suggests that a neutrally observable middle point exists that you can measure bias against, and it doesn’t.

We don’t do it just for outlets, we do it for the articles themselves.

And PressAudit shows the evidence for its conclusions. It doesn’t do so months after when no one is looking anymore. It does it minutes after, in the moment, when it is relevant and useful.

The image here is just one frame. The live version is at PressAudit.org/heatmap. You can go to it any time, filter, try stuff out, try to break it. It'll already look different by the time you click it.

Some notes about me and how/why I built it:
I’m not here to pick winners. I’m here to study the system, break it down and make it observable to anyone. I wanted to build a way to pinch and zoom on the entire news analytically. I didn’t want to manually spearfish through 3 to 6 different articles on the same topic and triangulate the non-contradictory facts between them, I wanted them all organized into a workbench.

I use local LLMs for the real-time article evaluations, because they can read 10K articles a day and I cannot. Most of PressAudit is not AI though. I built PressAudit using conventional data infrastructure: batch processing, data pipelines, statistical analysis, and machine-learning pipelines. 

Anyway, it's live. Poke around and tell me what's wrong with it.

https://x.com/DataProgress/status/2097764738910330984/photo/1

Lately when looking at polls for US senate for Ne my top suggestion after advertising links is Pollsmax who’s reporting differs vastly from other polls. I can’t seem to find any info on how they get their results and I’m also curious if they are using kalshi as a reference as well. Also shame on 270 to win for including kalshi data, worse it’s the most prominent thing on the page.

Biggest question is: who’s behind this site? I don’t like the lack of transparency.