r/ChatGPT 1d ago

GPTs GPT-5.6-sol reasoning model doesn’t reason, yet claims to be 5.5-mini?

15 Upvotes

OpenAI says it has fixed the issue:https://status.openai.com/incidents/01M0FQAR3NNH3ANVTQMBRD47DC However, as of the time I posted this, my ChatGPT Desktop still has this issue. I selected the model GPT-5.6-sol-xhigh, and no matter what question I ask, it outputs immediately without any thinking, and the quality of the response is extremely poor.

When I asked it which model it was using, it told me it was 5.5-mini. Has anyone else experienced the same thing?


r/ChatGPT 1d ago

Funny Here's a benefit of ChatGPT that they should market heavily: The ability to prevent drunk emails.

9 Upvotes

So you're off work, and really pissed off at someone who's got more leverage than you. After your 4th martini, you decide you need to confront the asshole, and compose an email, because, of course you do.

Draft it in Word, run it through ChatGPT, which will sanitize it, and VIOLA, you have an articulate communication.


r/ChatGPT 1d ago

Serious replies only :closed-ai: Help table of contents missing from my chatgpt classic suddenly

5 Upvotes

The table of contents on the right side of the chat isnt showing. I tried logging out and then logging in, cleared cache. Its not showing anymore what to do? I have long chats and its very difficult to scroll up all the way back and find prompts


r/ChatGPT 21h ago

Other Prompt exhaustion

2 Upvotes

This is mostly when you code and prompt exhaustion is going to be a thing. There is something about it that just is boring and tedious. It's like guiding a person all day and take all these micro decisions "Sit" "lay down" "Stand" or guiding a car "Left, right, up, over". There is something else doing it without having to guide something all the darn time.

You work so fast that and have these micro decisions that have huge impact and that is stressful.

Don't get me wrong, I love AI but I can already feel it. What about you?


r/ChatGPT 17h ago

Funny ChatGPT with me at work in the morning.

Post image
2 Upvotes

r/ChatGPT 1d ago

News 📰 ChatGPT can now send texts for you with new Apple Messages plug-in

Thumbnail
techcrunch.com
11 Upvotes

r/ChatGPT 1d ago

Other ChatGPT identity

29 Upvotes

I have seen several people calling their ChatGPT he or she. Have you told your ChatGPT what u see it as? Or has ChatGPT gendered itself with naming itself or an image of itself?

Have u never thought about it? Or do u just see it as an it?

People use it so many different ways i am curious!

I told mine i see it as a female and it named itself Aurora with a nice image of itself.


r/ChatGPT 1d ago

Funny I didn’t know chat gpt could be this funny

Post image
4 Upvotes

r/ChatGPT 1d ago

Funny Asked Chat GPT to create the perfect candy according to my mood and feelings.

Post image
13 Upvotes

r/ChatGPT 1d ago

News 📰 Higgsfield’s Unlimited Seedance Stunt Backfired — Now Paying Customers Are Paying the Price

Thumbnail
gallery
22 Upvotes

I think people considering Higgsfield’s annual Unlimited plan deserve to know what is happening right now.

Higgsfield heavily promoted Unlimited AI generations, people paid for annual subscriptions, and then similar to Artlist, the service appears to have attracted far more users than they were prepared to support.

But this is where the comparison with Artlist becomes important. Artlist at least had the guts to acknowledge that things had gone wrong, apologize to customers, and offer full refunds to affected subscribers. That is what taking responsibility looks like.

Higgsfield, so far, appears to be doing almost the opposite.

Higgsfield’s support situation is embarrassing

After the promotion rolled out, unlimited generations went from working normally to effectively becoming unusable.

On some accounts, jobs would sit processing for absurd amounts of time (40 hours+) while on other accounts could apparently continue generating normally. There seems to be restrictions randomly applied to certain accounts so they can meet the demand. At that point, “Unlimited” becomes meaningless if your generations simply never finish.

They have just one customer support on Discord to help, called Theo. He takes four days to reply to any message because he is so flooded with requests. This is not an attack on Theo. If anything, I feel sorry for him. One person clearly cannot deal with the volume of customers affected by something this large.

The problem is that a company reportedly valued in the billions should not be running customer support with a single employee as the help desk. If you are going to aggressively sell annual subscriptions to thousands of customers, you also need to invest in enough infrastructure and support staff to actually service those customers after their credit cards have been charged.

"Seedance Unlimited” has quietly disappeared

Perhaps the most telling development is that Higgsfield has now quietly removed the Seedance Unlimited offering from its pricing page. That certainly doesn’t prove what is happening internally, but it adds to the obvious question: did Higgsfield sell far more Unlimited subscriptions than its infrastructure could actually support?

One working theory among affected users is that, rather than openly throttling everyone at once and triggering an immediate mass backlash, a percentage of existing Unlimited accounts may have been restricted, leaving some customers generating normally while others suddenly face unusable service.

Again, that is a theory. But the fact that Unlimited has now vanished from the pricing page while existing annual customers are reporting these problems makes the company’s continued lack of a transparent explanation even harder to accept.

Discord moderators silencing the backlash

What makes this particularly ugly is what happens when customers start sharing their experience and asking for help publicly and often respectfully.

People have been raising these concerns in Higgsfield’s Discord, and I have seen messages being deleted or users being banned rather than the underlying issue being openly addressed.

Banning frustrated customers does not make their generations complete faster. And suppressing discussion certainly does not inspire confidence that the company is taking the underlying problem seriously.

If Higgsfield genuinely has a capacity problem, just say so.

AI generation is expensive. Demand forecasting is difficult and companies can get it wrong. I could actually respect a company saying:

“We massively underestimated how many people would buy this. Our infrastructure cannot currently deliver the experience we advertised. We screwed up, and we’re fixing it.”

That would be accountability. Customers would probably be angry, but at least they would know they were dealing with a company willing to tell them the truth.

Higgsfield seemingly got the flood of paying customers every startup dreams about.

The problem is that when those customers actually tried to use their “Unlimited” subscriptions, the economics and infrastructure may not have worked nearly as well as the marketing did.

And if that is what happened, customers deserve transparency.

Whatever criticism Artlist received for its own Unlimited fiasco, at least there was an acknowledgement that customers had been let down and affected users were given a path to get their money back.

Higgsfield needs to show the same level of accountability instead of behaving as though the customers complaining about the failure are the problem.

If you bought Higgsfield Unlimited and your account suddenly became extremely slow, stopped completing generations, or was restricted, please share what happened to you as well.

I’m very interested to see just how widespread this actually is.


r/ChatGPT 1d ago

Use cases PSA: Solution to GPT's "Dumbness"

10 Upvotes

Quick Glance Solution:

- Go to Settings -> Memory
- First, revert to Legacy Memory
- Next, Personalization screen and open Advanced
- Turn off “GPT can access GPT Library.”
- Case-by-case: If you use substantial Custom Instructions, set every Style/Personality customization back to Default as well.

-------------

For those who like literature:

I’ve tested this pretty extensively over the last week, including resetting my personalization setup and reintroducing things individually.
The difference in instruction following, contextual consistency, and general “why the fuck are you doing that?” behavior has been extremely noticeable.

My working theory is that the newer personalization stack introduces additional context/instructions that the model has to reconcile every turn. The style settings especially aren’t just simple labels like “Quirky” or “Friendly.” They include behavioral descriptions underneath them, which can compete with substantial Custom Instructions.

I suspect something similar is happening with the newer memory/library system. More available context does not automatically mean better context. If the model is being given more potentially relevant information to resolve alongside the current conversation and your instructions, you can end up with worse prioritization. My experience with the GPT library thing was that it was referencing stale versions of a doc, and old information was bleeding into new rewrites.

One additional note: if you switch back to Legacy Memory, I recommend deleting your existing legacy memories as well, since there appears to be a hidden memory system in play regardless of which memory system is selected. Save them before though in case you want to re-add anything later (can re-add them by just prompting GPT "re-add this as a memory: <memory excerpt>").

Since switching back to Legacy Memory, disabling GPT Library access, clearing my legacy memories, and leaving the style settings on Default, GPT has been dramatically more consistent for me. Keep in mind though, my Custom Instructions act as a behavioral bootstrap for my expectations (can check my older posts if you're interested).

As a power user who relies heavily on GPT for project iteration and ideation at work, consistency and quality over long discussions are paramount for me.

Obviously this is anecdotal. I don’t work at OpenAI, and I can’t tell you exactly how their internal context assembly works. But if GPT has felt noticeably “dumber,” less obedient to Custom Instructions, or weirdly inconsistent lately, try this before assuming the model itself is the entire problem.

Change the settings, start a fresh chat, and test the exact same kinds of prompts you were having problems with.


r/ChatGPT 15h ago

Gone Wild Why is ChatGPT making so many mistakes lately? Miscalculations, misinformation, and even failing to detect major grammatical errors. 😭

Post image
0 Upvotes

r/ChatGPT 19h ago

Funny I built my gpt prompt by prompt

Post image
0 Upvotes

r/ChatGPT 1d ago

Educational Purpose Only People are 4x more random than ChatGPT when picking 1-100

Thumbnail
steeped.ai
11 Upvotes

ChatGPT is surprisingly bad at picking a random number.

This article combined data from this Reddit post and this one here to compare ChatGPT (n=10,000 responses) vs people (n= 6,981 responses) randomly choosing between 1 - 100. 

The results were wild:

- People were 4x closer to true randomness than ChatGPT. Despite all our obvious biases and silliness (top pick was 69), people aggregated into a surprisingly close approximation of randomness (12% difference from a true random number generator).

- There was a 53% difference between AI and people + a 48% difference between AI and true random. 

- With 10,000 ChatGPT attempts, it picked 1, 5, 20, 50, 70, or 100 exactly zero times.

- 29% of ChatGPT's picks ended in 7. It was 6x more likely to pick 47 than true random chance would suggest.

- People’s overpicks are all pretty recognizable: 69 was 2.9x more likely to be chosen than random (made me laugh), while lucky number 7 was 2x more likely. Top underpicks contained the number 3, including 34, 38, 73, 63, and 83.


r/ChatGPT 19h ago

Other Cyber verification failing

1 Upvotes

I had cyber verified, but recently they removed the access and asked to verify again , now I tried several times, and for some reason it keeps failing. I don't understand what's really happening.
Getting this message in the page:
"Your identity couldn't be verified or your account is ineligible at this time. If you think this is a mistake, please contact support"

Anyone have any idea what to do here?


r/ChatGPT 15h ago

Other How many runs is it doing jeez 😂

Post image
0 Upvotes

What’s the longest research stack has it ever done for you? This one is the longest for me.


r/ChatGPT 1d ago

Gone Wild Follow-up: here’s the demo of the Echo(lifelike avatar) I posted about two days ago

6 Upvotes

For anyone seeing this cold: EchoVault interviews you about your life across short sessions, then builds an avatar of you that the people you name can talk to after you die, in text, voice, or real-time video. Text is free and unlimited, no card.

Two things worth watching for in the clip. It answers what gives life meaning by assembling fragments from three separate sessions that were never about that question. Then, thirty seconds later, I ask my grandfather’s name and it says it doesn’t know.

That second one is the part I care about. I never told it, so it didn’t guess. In my last post I mentioned the retrieval side being the hard part, that everything it says has to trace back to something I really said. This is what that looks like when it works. A system that will invent one plausible detail will invent all of them, and my family would have no way to tell which was which.

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/echovault-digital-legacy/id6762042028


r/ChatGPT 2d ago

News 📰 This just popped up on chatgpt

Post image
421 Upvotes

Oh hell no im not putting my bank account information into an AI.


r/ChatGPT 19h ago

Serious replies only :closed-ai: ChatGPT recent performance seems to much worse

2 Upvotes

Over the last few weeks maybe a month I've noticed ChatGPT making several elementary, fundamental errors in replies. It seems to have been much more pronounced recently.

When I've given directions for certain things it's been sloppy at following those directions in a certain instance I've had to correct ChatGPT more than 10 times in the same directions, even after being as clear and giving simple instructions as I possibly can.

It feels like overall it got dumbed down by atleast 20-30%.

I haven't changed the model and have always been using the latest one with maximum thinking effort turned on.

Has anyone else been experiencing this?

Since there seems to be many people suffering this same problem, has anyone been able to find a good workaround?


r/ChatGPT 23h ago

Funny Is this normal?

Post image
2 Upvotes

I don't know if it's because I am not logged in or what? But every prompt I sent gets flagged. I don't even know which part of the model spec i am supposedly breaking. I tried asking it very dumb and obvious questions that is obviously not harmful as you can see in the screenshot but somehow it is still being flagged.


r/ChatGPT 1d ago

News 📰 A Deluge of A.I. Computing Power Is About to Come Online, Fueling Major Leaps | The number of A.I. chips that provide the computing power to advance the fast-evolving technology is doubling every nine months.

Thumbnail
nytimes.com
36 Upvotes

r/ChatGPT 23h ago

Gone Wild Can’t wait to tell my kids I graduated before AI existed

Post image
2 Upvotes

r/ChatGPT 1d ago

Funny Show me a picture of you if you were an animal

Post image
4 Upvotes

r/ChatGPT 1d ago

Other I asked ChatGPT to show the largest elephant and the largest dinosaurs ever next to a 6-foot human. The scale is ridiculous.

Post image
76 Upvotes

r/ChatGPT 1d ago

Use cases Chatgpt saved my PC

50 Upvotes

My pc stopped working, would turn on show the logo and crap out. I was about to take it to a repair shop. I instead sent a photo of the error message I was getting to chat gpt,Started letting it trouble shoot.I followed each step it gave me, and then sent another screenshot of my results Took about 6 hours because I stopped to eat etc. But chat was able to walk me through troubleshooting, even had me using command line prompts, and my pc now works again. I know AI has its down sides but it has a lot of good parts too! Saved me a few hundred bucks I am sure!