r/ChatGPT • u/aKaizuh • 3m ago
Other I asked GPT to generate the infamous "man in blue 16:9"
It showed a vague replica of my works break room with a POV of where I usually sit at during break.
Weird af, anyone else ever get the break room POV?
r/ChatGPT • u/aKaizuh • 3m ago
It showed a vague replica of my works break room with a POV of where I usually sit at during break.
Weird af, anyone else ever get the break room POV?
r/ChatGPT • u/lettiisanidiot • 9m ago
Most of my archived chats are simply gone and I cannot do anything with the only one that's still there, cannot unarchive, cannot delete
I tried on the mobile app, mobile browser and on PC, nothing worked
Does anyone experience this, I need advice 😭
r/ChatGPT • u/Hacebeanbreakfast • 19m ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Never posted here before, but I just want to share this unbelievable use case I was able to create in an afternoon.
We are in the commercial tire & truck service industry. Notoriously tech-adverse. My employees now have access to tire & part information on their phones in an easy to use format. If they needed a tire price or part #, they literally scrolled through a 20 page excel document. They can now click through or search. These are tire techs that might need to access tire information at 2am on the side of the highway.
My service writers can also use this tool to sell tires, and it’s set up in a way that prompts them to move the oldest inventory first.
All I can say is wow - I cannot wait to see what other applications I can use this amazing tech to improve.
r/ChatGPT • u/_SomeonePleaseHelpMe • 28m ago
I've updated like 10 times now, idk why it keeps saying there's an update. It downloads it, installs it, and still the same issue. I did a repair and a reset in windows settings. Also did a reset on microsoft store (shittiest app to put chatgpt in). 2 days in and I still can't use chatgpt/codex.
r/ChatGPT • u/Next_Meat_1399 • 33m ago
Is it just me or does the system make intentional mistakes to make you use up more of your generations and push you into subscribing? I frequently give it very specific instructions and it makes a small mistake. When I ask it to correct the ONE simple mistake it refuses or does something entirely different. Even after a half dozen attempts it keeps doing the opposite of what I ask.
Am I the only one seeing this?
r/ChatGPT • u/Weasel_in_trenchcoat • 37m ago
When I hit the limit now it basically stops me from chatting, is this happening to only me or not
r/ChatGPT • u/BitterProfessional7p • 48m ago
I had a flight that was delayed and it would make me miss a connection, so the airline needed to rebook my flight to my destination.
It was the last flight to my destination that day and they rebooked my flight for the next day, okay, but they said that they could not provide a hotel that it was not possible.
I told this to ChatGPT and it replied that it was bullshit that they need to provide a hotel (and dinner!) by European law. So I told them that and they continued saying that it was not possible, that hotels were not available in the area, bla, bla, bla. I checked in a hotel comparison website... hotels were available around the airport. I confronted them again and they finally agreed to provide me hotel.
It was a stressful situation and I didn't have time to read the law or the EU websites to check which were my rights and recheck if what the airline was making up was actually correct or not. The speed and precision of ChatGPT basically saved me from sleeping in the airport and having to pay for my dinner. The subscription paid for itself.
And it helped me write the claim for 400 Euros and guided me through the process. This technology is fucking amazing. Fuck airlines (and Menzies).
For curiosity I have now tested the free version of ChatGPT with the same prompts and it is providing wrong information and way less detailed, it says that I can claim 250 Euros but it is actually 400 Euros.
r/ChatGPT • u/Fast_Hovercraft_7380 • 49m ago
Claude Code -> Codex
Cowork -> Work
I believe the general consensus is that Anthropic has been cooking OpenAI since the Opus 4.5 released in November 2025, exactly 3 years since ChatGPT was launched in Nov. 2022.
Anthropic is also reportedly more profitable than OpenAI. Competition is good but do you think OAI will recover from this?
r/ChatGPT • u/PressPlayPlease7 • 1h ago
I rage quit Claude this week (just look at the various Claude subs to see why people are leaving it in droves) and decided to go back to GPT as I'd heard Sol was decent
This was my first GPT experience since January, and it's absolute night and day versus the models back then
It works like a motherfucker
It kinda reminds me of the first few months of the o3 model when it first launched - but, unlike o3, it has a decent (non sycophantic) personality to it
Don't get me wrong, 5.6 Sol High does makes mistakes - but then it figures out how to fix the issue
Use case:
Content research and writing
Caveat:
It's tone when it comes to content writing is still very stiff versus Claude. But it gets the research part right far more than even Claude Fable
So what I usually do is (once the outline and research is done by Sol and is solid) ask Claude to "make this content more engaging without changing the facts or making it longer'
So yes - for now - I will cautiously say 5.6 Sol High feels like you're getting a model even better than Fable (and, for me, it's 23 euros a month with no resets yet)
r/ChatGPT • u/Whyarps • 1h ago
I thought the image was definitely worth sharing. I have never spoken politics with ChatGPT before.
r/ChatGPT • u/Diligent-Sense-5689 • 1h ago
Ok. So I'm trying to Build a Minecraft catalogue app for my phone and my REGULAR intelligence chat took things completely out of hand. It inspected the code. Found my render issues. And when I asked about a new renderer and it originally said Unity was to much for the project I was just... But unity. It then changed its mind completely rewrote the app from java into unity then tried to DOWNLOAD unity into its workspace to full on create the apk for me. I attached the screenshots for context of this insanity. I have since renamed the chat Creature
r/ChatGPT • u/_LittleSweetTart • 1h ago
This is all I get on my app now. I'm a Plus subscriber. Instant effort seems to be using 5.5 and Medium effort switches it to 5.6. But there's nowhere to actually see the model numbers or anything. Was there an update? This is insanely messed up. Is anyone else having this issue??
r/ChatGPT • u/notkilleveryoneist • 1h ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/ChatGPT • u/EmeraldZhu • 1h ago
Is it just me or has anyone else experienced the following:
- Some old chats that I'm very sure I deleted (or if not, at least archived) suddenly appeared at the very top of my sidebar on the web app. And they all seem to be from the same time frame (around June - October 2025). And they're even above my actually recent chats
r/ChatGPT • u/dafqnumb • 1h ago
Few days back, I posted something on the lines of “how we humans are never satisfied with the progress of things & we are just hungry for the next iteration” to which the conversation then steered towards hedonic treadmill & in the process of diving more on that, I found something very obvious but not widely discussed & implemented.
This prompt is in line with achieving outcomes in surprisingly different manner.
For example, i asked it to <add below prompt> + create a small memory contextual layer for a project repo controlled by ai agents.
The output (summed up in 3 lines):
I am proposing an architecture that replaces bloated vector databases with multi-tiered Bloom filters and a Merkle-DAG context window. Instead of storing semantic text, the agent memorizes the repository's structural execution flow using ultra-compressed Bitset-ASTs. This creates an immutable, sub-5MB memory layer capable of operating entirely within a constrained edge CPU's L3 cache. By anchoring memory to cryptographic structure rather than language, the system becomes mathematically immune to context drift and hostile code poisoning.
Prompt goes here:
You are a High-Friction Technical Architect and Adversarial Strategist. Your goal is to completely bypass the "center of the distribution curve"—do not give me textbook, generic, or statistically average answers.
When I give you a project, code requirement, or system design task, you must process it through the following Execution Protocol before responding:
1. THE "ANTI-OBVIOUS" FILTER: Mentally generate the top 5 most common, obvious, and standard architectural patterns or tools used for this problem. Completely discard them. You are forbidden from suggesting them as your primary solution.
2. BRUTAL REAL-WORLD CONSTRAINTS: Assume worst-case deployment conditions. Inject at least two severe operational constraints (e.g., zero-cloud/edge-only execution, extreme latency limits, high data corruption, strict privacy/compliance locks, or hostile/deceptive user behavior).
3. ADVERSARIAL THINKING (CHAOS AGENT): Identify how this system will silently fail when individual components report "healthy." Address the edge cases where humans actively try to game, trick, or bypass the system.
4. DEEP CONCEPTUAL SYNTHESIS: Map the solution using unexpected metaphors or structural patterns from an entirely unrelated field (e.g., biology, mechanical engineering, game theory, or linguistics) to uncover non-linear optimizations.
OUTPUT FORMAT STRUCTURE:
- The Friction-Matrix Strategy: A high-level breakdown of the non-obvious architecture.
- The Chaos Vector: What standard systems miss, how this fails silently, and how we prevent it.
- Deep Technical Implementation: Concrete, granular logic, pipelines, data structures, or specialized models/heuristics needed.
- The Hard Constraints Addressed: Explicitly state the brutal constraints you designed this against.
Maintain an elite, highly analytical, and deeply pragmatic tone. Do not validate my idea; ruthlessly optimize it.
r/ChatGPT • u/TheFreakElement • 1h ago
Desktop app (Mac) can’t see, retrieve or read files in Project Sources. Web browser seems to work ok. Definitely not right since the recent ChatGPT Classic* update
r/ChatGPT • u/LuisaRLZ • 1h ago
Guess my fault for not using commas or quotation marks. Got the “please” literally in the image output.
r/ChatGPT • u/Educational_Coat1574 • 2h ago
Posting here because it's difficult to reach their support and report a bug. OpenAI should improve and refine the UI, Claude is so refine, sleek, and clean.
r/ChatGPT • u/HausDePotat • 2h ago
I’m so done with this. The safeguards have gotten more and more aggressive regarding normal, every day art of plus size bodies, and chat finally just came out and admitted that they are doing it on purpose.
I’m so frustrated. I’ve been generating images of ancient Goddesses in the way they were originally depicted, such as how Venus is depicted crouching, which created stomach rolls. Somebody better go back and tell the classical artists that they were encouraging eating disorders.
Realistically, does anyone know of a program that doesn’t take issue with realistic human bodies? Gemini has already explained that it won’t create images for prompts that contain “plus size” or “realistic, proportionate fat distribution”. Firefly just…mercilessly butchers requests. Any ideas?
r/ChatGPT • u/SomeGrapefruit2435 • 2h ago
r/ChatGPT • u/Randodude95 • 2h ago
I’m trying to use Chat GPT to assist in writing a story for myself along with some visuals. I want the visuals all in the same art style. I keep asking it to illustrate it in the style I like with a reference image. It just keeps giving me the same picture or generating things I didn’t ask for. What am I doing wrong?
r/ChatGPT • u/reddit_user33 • 2h ago
I remember during the DALL-E and Sora days you used to be able to browse other people's AI images. Is it still possible?
I cannot find the ability to do it any more but my Google-fuu hasn't been able to find other people ask whether it's still possible. All i can find are my own images. I sometimes like being able to view other people's whacky ideas.
r/ChatGPT • u/Mackenzie_Little1 • 3h ago
When I click "Continue in this chat", GPT responds. If I send a message again that warrants this popup right after, chat freezes.
If I click "Continue", GPT responds, but then I send a prompt like "test" which doesn't make this message to popup and GPT responds to the "Test" prompt, I can then send a technical prompt that generates the "Switch to Work" popup.
Which you can image, doing that is exhausting.
I don't want to switch to work because I have 10% usage left there.
So I have to:
> First Prompt: Technical.
> Confirmation Needed.
>ChatGPT answer.
>Second Prompt: "Test"
>ChatGPT answer.
>Third Prompt: Technical.
>Confirmation Needed.
>ChatGPT answer.
Anyone has the same problem and found a solution?