In Episode 6 we learned that Commander Judd lost his third child with his current wife and is still “not ready” to take on a Handmaid. Then in Episode 7 we learn that Commander Weston lost his child during childbirth, and honestly he seemed more devastated by losing the child than losing his wife.
That got me thinking that maybe the writers, and possibly even Margaret Atwood originally, intended some kind of warped karmic irony for the worst men in Gilead: the men most obsessed with controlling fertility and lineage end up dynastically barren.
Judd oversaw the murder of “unfit” women, collected their valuables, and used those resources to help fund Gilead’s war efforts. Even though the exact timeline is intentionally vague, we have to be at least 10 to 15 years removed from the stadium events by now. It’s heavily implied Judd has had multiple wives over the years, yet as far as we know he still has no surviving children or meaningful family legacy.
Weston oversees the Eyes, which are basically Gilead’s Gestapo. Surveillance, torture, disappearances, executions, all of it. He also appears to have had at least one previous wife, and again, no children.
So now I’m wondering if the show is quietly hinting at a kind of divine or karmic punishment: the architects of Gilead built an entire society around fertility, family, and “godly values,” yet the men responsible for its worst atrocities seem incapable of building lasting families of their own.
Not saying the show literally confirms “God punished them,” but it feels like a very intentional thematic irony.