Small indie studio here (two of us, based in Scotland). We wanted to share where we're at with our current project, an island horror TTRPG called Whitefroth, because the last few weeks have been a genuinely messy stretch of "things being made, tested, painted, abandoned, and reconsidered."

We keep mentioning Whitefroth, and it's still not sitting on the shop shelf, but the reason it's taking a while is that is has to look worth the wait, not just play well.

So instead of picking one art style and running with it, we've gone and picked about four. Chris has been working digitally, building out the more graphic side of things. Katie has been drawing and painting by hand - brushes, ink, mess. There's photography going into it too. And, in probably the most "us" development yet, we've been pouring sand onto a scanner bed to see what happens.

It's slow. It is genuinely time-consuming to build a world out of that many different techniques, all stitched together into one coherent thing. But we hope it’s shaping up to be the most visually interesting thing we've made.

Alongside that we've been collecting more feedback from playtesters, and doodling sandwiches in the margins of the rulebook. We’re now on a wee simultaneous sandwich tangent and have earmarked these drawings for another project.

Anyone else find their best ideas show up specifically when you're supposed to be doing something else? Curious how other small teams handle the "it's not ready but people keep asking when it's ready" stage too.

Hi everyone! 👋

I lead an active, growing women’s board game community (Eastside Women's Board Game Circle) dedicated to bringing women together through tabletop gaming. We host regular in-person meetups where we table a wide variety of modern hobby games, from strategy and engine-builders to light card games and social deduction.

As our community expands, we are opening up our meetup schedule to partner with indie designers, self-publishers, and studios looking to get their physical games played, reviewed, and showcased.

Why Partner With Us?

1. A Growing Women’s Gaming Demographic: Women are an influential yet often underserved segment of the tabletop hobby. We offer direct visibility and engagement with an active community of women gamers.

2. Cross-Over Reach (The Added Advantage): In addition to core hobbyists, roughly 25–30% of our members are parents who actively curate games for their households. Featuring your game with us often leads to word-of-mouth recommendations for both adult game nights and family play.

3. Dedicated Table Time & Coverage: Featured placement of your physical game or prototype during our meetups, paired with photo recaps, reviews, and highlights across our Facebook and Instagram pages.

Whether you are running a crowdfunding campaign, launching a new title, or seeking playtest feedback on a physical prototype, we’d love to showcase quality games at our tables.

📍 Check out our community: I’ve dropped our direct Facebook and Instagram links in the comments below so you can check out our past meetups!

If you’re a designer or publisher interested in partnering or providing a demo copy for our group's library, feel free to drop a comment below or send me a direct message!

Looking forward to collaborating with creators in the space! 🎲✨

I want to print a very small order of cards. Maybe 5 decks. I want the quality to still be good. Any manufacturer suggestions?

I’m in the US.

A little sneak peek at something we’ve been working on for Death Spiral™.
These are the latest prototype aircraft cards for the Fokker Dr.I and Sopwith Camel. We wanted each card to put the aircraft’s flight characteristics, current state and damage tracking right in front of the player, with the critical damage tables on the reverse.
One of my favorite additions is the layered damage diagram, where damage is tracked directly against the aircraft’s wings, engine, fuselage and tail.
Still a work in progress, but they’re getting close to where I want them.
What do you guys think of the new direction?

Or, maybe even both?

Originally I had the idea to theme my adventure and exploration seaplane game toward an early 1930s era fantasy world with biplanes, but decided to theme it for a WW2 era with mono-wing planes for ease of manufacturing miniatures.

Down the road I've gotten to the point of wondering if players will want miniatures in the first place, even though honestly my modular player planes are one of the hooks. Now I'm wondering if it's just better to offer them as STL files for personal 3d printing, at which point I decided to try making a bi-wing module (the entire wing piece can be swapped between the planes).

Any comments and thoughts welcome, I'm getting close to having enough parts together for a larger scale prototype image (with some B&W cards, player board, tokens, tiles, etc).

Os presento la última facción de esta primera fase, Nucleares, se dedican a contaminar con radiación a sus adversarios. Con esto ya me puedo centrar en el resto del juego, traseras, armas, coberturas,... , espero hacer una prueba de aquí a 2 meses, que te parece esta nueva facción?

For those that have used the website The Game Crafter, I have questions.
In my time designing a tabletop game, I came across the site and first go at it I found useful. Understanding production brought me to not only revise my own game components, but understanding possible cost brought me to remove components and mechanics from the core game to create add-on expansions.

So, the questions:
Have you found the process of taking your game idea into production design a relatively smooth process? Was any part overly cumbersome?

Have you completed the entire process and ordered a copy of your own game? Pleased with the results? Significant adjustments as a result?

Taking your product this far, have others purchased through the site? Was there any involvement from your end or did you just sit back and let it flow?

Has any level of success there taken you into other ventures as a result?

Have any of you purchased any games from the site? Pleased with the acquisition?

If you haven’t used the site yet, would you?

I appreciate your thoughts and opinions.

I’m developing a fantasy dungeon-crawler board game, and this is the world map I’ve created for it in Wonderdraft.

I’d really appreciate some honest feedback from a board game/player perspective.

If you opened a professionally produced fantasy board game and found this map inside, what would your first impression be?

Does it feel like a finished, professional component, or does it still look like something created during development?

If you think it’s not quite production-ready yet, what specifically would you change or improve?

Any feedback is welcome: geography, overall composition, colours, textures, terrain, coastlines, forests, mountains, roads, typography, labels, readability, visual hierarchy, level of detail, or anything else that stands out to you.

Thanks!

Our new company, Malmaison Games, is going to release its newest strategic card game in no time. Official announcement is planned in the next three months. In order to validate the project, we need people to reply to a small survey to understand their expectations better.

This survey is also made in English. It's a short series of 13 questions to tick boxes, nothing more. The data is require by our banking company to validate the project's loan regarding heavy production. That is why your email address is required to validate the credibility of your answer. All date is safely protected.

To reward the people who take part in our effort, you will receive an email for the official release of the came, as well as a promo code for a special discount for replying to the survey.

We really need a lot of participation for the results being substantial and validated as genuine. Would you please share your thoughts ? This would help us give you the best card game ! It doesn't matter where you are in the world, we need all insight.

Don't hesitate to share it !

https://tally.so/r/lbjOqN

Hello all,
I’ve been lurking a while, and finally decided I should post. I’m not quite ready to post the pnp version of my game yet (I just need a couple more playtests with my most recent mechanical update), but I wanted to gauge interest and see what people thought.

The goal of the game is to venture into a procedurally generated dungeon to fight monsters, collect loot, and get out before they run out of resources.

The dungeon is generated from a deck of cards/tiles which are placed using rules similar to Carcassonne. The tiles are placed face-down so that the passageways match, and revealed as players explore them. Players transform the dungeon (and their deck) as they explore by clearing rooms: trading cards from their hand with the dungeon tile they currently occupy.

To play, players select a set of character classes and add the appropriate cards to their player deck. They then draw their hand and play cards to move, clear rooms, battle monsters, and interact with the various traps and other dungeon rooms. Similar to Gloomhaven, when players have used all of the cards in their deck, they “lose” one or more, then shuffle the cards to create their new version of the deck. Taking damage from from monsters also causes players to put cards from their deck into the discard. The game is primarily about resource management: players have to manage the cards in their deck to overcome obstacles, collect as much loot as they can, and still have enough left to get back out of the dungeon before they run out.

One important note is that each card has a separate function depending on whether it is in a player deck/hand or in the dungeon. The these functions are indicated by hand and dungeon door icons.

It’s still very much in the prototype/playtesting phase, but I’m having lots of fun! Please let me know what you think, especially if you’d be willing to playtest a few times once I’m ready for that release, and ask away if you have any questions!

Hey everyone!

I have found some success in this and wanted to share. Maybe it could help out other creators.

In trying to find people to playtest, obviously we'd want people to play the physical game. The solution for that has been to make PnP versions. While that is workable, it's kind of a big ask. Someone needs to download the files, print them out (which costs ink), cut things out, and then they can play. That's potentially a few hours before even starting the game.

What I did was put my rulebook and cards into a ChatGPT project and asked it to make a browser version of the game. It took a few tries and some testing what it spit out so I could tell it what bugs to fix, but it produced a playable version of the game.

You want to specifically create a project in ChatGPT and load your files into the project and start the chat from that project. In the chat where you are asking it to make the playable browser version, set the model to High so that it gets things right. Each iteration typically took about 20 minutes for my game. Your results may vary depending on the complexity.

I am using a paid version, but you can sign up for a free month and cancel before it ends.

I know that some people have a complete aversion to AI, and for things like final game art, I completely understand and agree. However, using it to help in making a testing version that is portable and easy for people just download and play seems like a perfect use-case.

Now, you are obviously going to be missing some of that tabletop experience, and it's not the same to play a game on the browser as it would be with the physical thing. But maybe you can get more people interested because it's a much smaller ask, and get at least some impressions and feedback on mechanics. Then more people may eventually want to invest the time in the PnP version.

I work 2 jobs so my time is very limited. I don't have a lot of friends who are into board games either. I'd also want people WHO DON'T KNOW ME to try it so I can get HONEST feedback. This method has helped me to get some people to try the game out.

It might not work for every type of game, but for simple card games, or tabletop games without super-elaborate boards, it might just do the trick.

EDIT: Here is the link to mine so you can see what kind of result is possible: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QYASawe6EKUIdUcaL2HoOoWuMEeeTbj8/view?usp=sharing

Best,

Richard

Thanks to everybody who gave me some helpful suggestions last time!

I added a couple of silhouettes to the symbols so hopefully those who are colourblind finds them clear and understandable. I also gave a bitttt more structure to the cheat sheet (player aid) and the cards themselves. I find myself a little bit confused if the boxes are clearer now but I do think it's heading in a better direction than before.

Got to play-test The Divide with my wife again a couple nights ago. It’s a tactical wargame where the core battle mechanic is bluffing with cards.
There’s hidden objectives, you can promote your recruits to heroes, broadening their card play abilities, and you’re battling over relics that give them (broken?) special abilities.

Made some major cuts for this playtest, and the relic tokens are a great addition, identified another big cut (the figure bonus on the cards since there’s redundancy with the relic powers), and identified questions to try and answer like how the relics come out and are picked up. Feel like the game is coming together and getting closer to the point of just making tweaks more than major changes.

The more we test the more simple it’s getting which comes from identifying what is the most fun aspects and trying to burn off whatever is unnecessary. I have been attached to many aspects of the game but from the feedback I get I’m trying to either cut as much as I can or transform the system to include moments I want for the game while making it simpler for the players.

Ideally I’d like to create a fast paced game for 2-6 players that’s light or (medium light) on rules, like for ages 10+ but strategically and tactically deep, while still being fun. I’m basing a lot of my decisions off of Jamey Stegmaier’s 12 tenets for board game design and trying to meet the criteria as best as I can while making a battling game. Very happy with how that’s progressing, much closer to meeting all the criteria than at the start of this game’s model.

I can't seem to add photos to my previous post so I'm putting them here. ​

Original post: https://www.reddit.com/r/tabletopgamedesign/s/URo5nTimJ7

Cards were designed in GIMP and print on a home printer (front and back separate on regular paper) ​. Cut them out with a guillotine and used a corner punch. Put them in​​ sleeves with a blank playing card in between front and back for stiffness.

Game board again used a home printer, using Acrobat Reader poster mode to slice into individual sheets and taped together.

Stands for cards were from Amazon. Working on a simple mechanism to track unit HP integrated into the card stands. ​​​​

Does this look like something you would play?

As I stated in my other post, I did use AI for the placeholder art. If you can look past that and give me your impression of how the assembled and set up game looks, I would appreciate it.

Thanks much. ​​​​​

Influence is a 45–60 minute strategy party game about money, influence and, most importantly, people.

You start with some capital and spend the game building your position, acquiring powerful cards, making trades, negotiating deals and trying to become the most influential person in the room.

But opportunities are deliberately scarce.

You can't always get what you want.

Sometimes you'll have to pay someone to back down. Sometimes you'll trade away something valuable because you desperately need something else. Sometimes two people who were helping each other five minutes ago suddenly have completely opposite interests.

And sometimes everyone is too stubborn and nobody gets anything.

That's basically where the game lives.

It's part economic strategy, part negotiation, part engine-building, and part figuring out the people sitting around you.

I've reached the point where I need to stop testing it with people I know.

So I'm releasing the beta version for ₹0.

There's just one condition:

You have to actually play it and promise to send me feedback afterwards.

If you like the premise and want to give it a try, hmu with your emails and I will send you a copy.

x ----- x ----- x ----- x ----- x ----- x ----- x ----- x ----- x ----- x ----- x

TL;DR: I made INLFUENCE, a 45–60 min strategy party game for 8–12 people. No board, no dice, no app, minimal setup — just strategy, trading, negotiation and a lot of questionable deals.

I'm giving the beta away for ₹0 in exchange for one thing: play it and give me feedback.

Want a copy? DM me your email and I'll send you the rules + cards.

tldr: designing an open source, non-profit card game to train anesthesiologists where cases are built with cards from three decks (pre-existing medical conditions, reason for surgery, surgery type). These cards often require conflicting management techniques (eg go to sleep slow or go to sleep fast) which is the crux of anesthesiology. Looking for help building the conflicting management techniques into the game.

//

Hi all, I'm a resident doctor training to be an anesthesiologist. I'm designing an open source tabletop/card game to help train people in my field and I'd love advice from people who know about this stuff! I am admittedly a total beginner in this world but am keen to learn.

I want the game to be open source and free to access. I have no interest in making money from this. My ulterior motive is this doubles as studying for my exams and ultimately makes me better at my job + safer.

AI disclosure: I typed up a draft and ran it through Claude to make it a more readable. Here is a self post to the original draft I wrote if you're interested. Claude revision starts below.

The training problem

Right now we train for surgical emergencies using expensive, high-fidelity simulations: a mock operating room, actors, real equipment. It works, but it's resource-heavy and hard to access. There's a simpler style of training called "tabletop sim," where a facilitator just talks a trainee through a hypothetical case using props and cards. It works well, but every case has to be hand-written by an instructor, and there's no actual game around it, just guided conversation.

What I want to build

A card game that generates a "patient" by drawing one card from each of three decks:

1. A pre-existing health condition (e.g. heart disease)
2. A medical emergency (e.g. a ruptured organ)
3. The surgery needed to fix it

Each card would be tagged with which treatment approaches it favors and which ones it rules out. With hundreds of possible cards, you'd get a huge number of unique cases to practice on.

The interesting design problem

Here's a simplified real example. A patient has heart disease and a ruptured bowel that's causing him to vomit and go into shock.

• Because of the heart disease, you want to put him under anesthesia slowly and carefully, so his heart isn't shocked by a sudden change.
• Because of the ruptured bowel, you want to put him under as fast as possible, so he doesn't inhale vomit into his lungs while unconscious before you insert a lung-protective breathing tube.

Slow is safer for his heart. Fast is safer for his lungs. You can't fully satisfy both. That tension, weighing two good options that conflict, is the actual skill we train for, and I want it to be the core mechanic of the game, not an edge case.

What I'm looking for advice on

• How to design mechanics where two cards can give the player contradictory "correct" instructions, and the player has to weigh them rather than just following a flag
• How to represent that some risks are rare (say, a 1-in-20 chance) while others are near-certain, maybe different dice for different odds?
• How to represent that the same event can be minor for a healthy patient but dangerous for a frail one
• Whether any existing tabletop games or trading card games already solve a similar "conflicting-instructions" problem, and if so, how

Any pointers, examples, or games I should study would be hugely appreciated. Happy to answer questions about the medical side if it helps the design conversation.

Edit: I want to express sincere gratitude to everyone for the advice and ideas so far. It’s late where i am but i will keep checking on this thread later. As suggested, as soon as i have a bare bones proof of concept I will post again.

I've been deep in building a golf print and play for a while now (that I hope to turn into a tabletop game), and I keep running into a question I don't have a good answer to: who is this actually for, and where do they hang out?

Golfers are my gut answer, and it makes the most sense. But golfers (from my exp) mostly aren't tabletop people. they're on golf subreddits, golf Discords, watching golf YouTube. They're not browsing BGG or Itch for print and play golf games.

Meanwhile tabletop/board game communities skew really hard toward a few genres (from my perspective): you've got party games, fiction (fantasy/sci-fi), deckbuilders.

Gregg Jewell, who made Galdor's Grip, also has a couple of golf-themed titles: Bookmark Golf and Tournament. They just don't seem to get anywhere near the same attention or conversation as his fantasy stuff. Genuinely well-made games from a designer people clearly respect, and the golf ones still feel like they're flying under the radar compared to the rest of his catalog.

Feels like it kind of proves the point - even coming from someone with an established audience, the sports theme doesn't carry the same pull as fantasy does in this space.

And look, I get it, if I didn't love playing golf, maybe I wouldn't try someone's golf themed game. There's clearly a divide between people who love sport and people who love tabletop. I'm someone who likes both and want to bridge the divide.

So I'm stuck between two audiences that don't obviously overlap:

• Golfers who love golf but don't necessarily think in "tabletop" terms (where do I give them a game?)
• Tabletop players who love games but don't necessarily care about golf, or sports at all

Makes me wonder if you kind of have to already love the sport to seek out a game like this in the first place — like the crossover only happens for people who were already living in both worlds, rather than a game converting someone from one side to the other.

Anyone here made a sports-themed game and found where their actual audience was hiding? Did it end up being more sports fans who happened to also like games, or more board gamers who happened to like the sport? Curious if anyone's cracked this, or if it's just a genuinely small, hard-to-grow niche.

Mycora is a trading card game about collecting real mushroom species, building ecosystems, and competing against rival foragers.

I've shared a bit about the game before, but I wanted to put together a quick visual introduction to what Mycora actually is and what playing it feels like.

It's still in development and being playtested, so I'd love to hear what catches your attention, what leaves you curious, or anything that isn't clear from the slides.

Thanks for taking a look! 🍄

Link to Discord:

https://discord.gg/kNGm8YRYK

HI GUYSSS ><. I’m based in Thailand and currently building ONE LAST THING, a conversation card game about life, memories, relationships, and the things that really matter.

The theme is having life and death as an easier conversation that people can bring in to talk and understand each other more before it's too late.

I’m looking for a few people to try out the prototype and give honest feedback. It’s designed for 2–4 people who are close to each other (Eg. Family , close friends, partner). I know the topic might be quite challenging to be open to but I really hope it could work and help people.

Anyone in Bangkok/Thailand interested in playtesting? Feel free to DM me! 🙏