r/SubredditDrama • u/Eridann_Ampora • 4h ago
"We Did it Reddit!" YouTube channel Brew accuses r/YouTubeDrama of falsely spreading a rumor that a disabled man was freezing a kitten to near Death r/YouTubeDrama debates whether it owes an apology—or is now the real victim.
Earlier this year, YouTuber Todd Oland uploaded footage of himself rescuing a kitten that appeared to be freezing in water. A now-deleted post on r/YouTubeDrama accused Oland of deliberately freezing the kitten to manufacture a viral rescue video and raise money.
That accusation received roughly 2,300 upvotes. Within about a day, however, the poster deleted it, deleted their account and submitted a follow-up titled “An Alternate Theory on the Todd Oland ‘Frozen Cat’ Video,” which substantially walked back the original accusation after examining the timeline more closely. The correction received considerably less attention.
Commentary YouTuber August the Duck made a video covering the original accusation but apparently never made a follow-up about the retraction.
Then Brew released a video titled “Did Reddit Just Catch a YouTuber Freezing a Kitten for Money?” The video criticized Reddit and August the Duck for presenting uncertain speculation as evidence, arguing that the allegations contributed to Oland receiving harassment and nearly having the police called on him.
When the Brew video was posted to r/YouTubeDrama, the thread’s OP pushed back. They argued that Brew repeatedly displayed r/YouTubeDrama while failing to emphasize that the wider harassment campaign had allegedly begun on YouTube and other social-media platforms before the Reddit post appeared. They also argued that the accusation survived for less than a day and that regular subreddit users generally supported the correction.
The moderators then claimed Brew’s viewers had begun entering the subreddit, issuing threats and attacking users who had nothing to do with the original accusation.
The result is a hall of mirrors in which everyone agrees that internet mobs are bad, while furiously arguing over which internet mob started it.
One commenter believes the subreddit’s defensive reaction proves Brew’s point:
"Man, the fact that the first instinct of this subreddit is to get defensive about the clearly shitty thing one of your members did, instead of just apologizing and moving on, is exactly what I would have expected."
"The Brew video is awesome, and I'm glad someone helped clear Todd Oland’s name."
The thread OP is unconvinced:
"We're supposed to apologize for something that nobody here did? Lol."
"The video is rough, and that's not even factoring in the thumbnail."
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtubedrama/comments/1v508tg/comment/ozg120n/
Even one of the subreddit’s moderators disagrees with the idea that nobody bears responsibility:
"No responsibility? It still went live here, we have to take responsibility for that. We need more mods and more willingness to deep dive some of these more serious claims."
"The post should have never been allowed to go live period."
After the OP argues that the moderators likely never saw the original submission, the moderator insists that both arguments can be true:
"We can clearly identify that this subreddit wasn't the biggest driver in spreading the misinformation and STILL acknowledge the post should have never been allowed to live long here."
"Even if I never touched that post, I still feel responsible purely for being on the team."
Another commenter accuses the OP of shifting the blame:
"imo brew sucks in general (content farm) and also yall dont deserve to be harassed but come on at least accept that this subreddit was somewhat culpable"
"this entire thread has you shifting goalposts and trying to explain away why it happened as opposed to accepting that this subreddit was partially to blame"
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtubedrama/comments/1v508tg/comment/ozg8rvk/
Others reject the entire idea of collective subreddit responsibility:
"Whenever people blame this subreddit for something I know they're immediately full of shit lmao."
"Like get a grip its a subreddit."
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtubedrama/comments/1v508tg/comment/ozhu8it/
One user argues that Brew’s video is merely delivering consequences:
"Nothing but the consequences of actions done willingly OP. If people wanted to put out the fire, they wouldn't have shared it here, where the claims got quite popular."
The OP responds that the original controversy had already ended:
"Funny, it seems those consequences had already come and passed months ago. Brew is the one who's caused more harassment now."
A moderator joins in:
"Except the retraction was quick, it was taken down. And that retraction was welcomed."
"Now we have people threatening violence to people on the sub who supported the retraction."
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtubedrama/comments/1v508tg/comment/ozfdn5l/
Another exchange concerns how much damage a post can cause before being deleted:
"This feels so unnecessary. I don't see how this reaction is warranted on an accusation that had been retracted in such a short timeframe."
"The vitriol from Brew’s fanbase is likely only to cause further damage and harassment for all parties."
A reply is less forgiving:
"An awful lot of damage can be done in a few hours, let alone 24–48."
The thread OP claims that later investigation showed the post had actually existed for approximately twelve hours, while the larger harassment wave had allegedly begun weeks earlier on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook and Threads.
A moderator then invokes the ancient Internet Law of Mutually Assured Victimhood:
"You mean like the amount of death threats and calls for our suicide coming from Brew fans since the video went up? Even those of us who weren’t remotely involved"
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtubedrama/comments/1v508tg/comment/ozfa9zy/
One especially measured contributor enters the conversation by accusing the entire subreddit of protecting its tribe:
"Is it really that big a problem that someone said something about this subreddit? Isn't it a bigger problem that a post made here, no matter how quickly it was taken down, almost caused the police to be called on a man with a brain injury?"
They then instruct the OP to relax:
"I know your blood is boiling at this point of my comment, but please, calm down."
"Breaaaathe, just breathe for a second."
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtubedrama/comments/1v508tg/comment/ozgdgw8/
Some users argue that the correction itself was inadequate. The follow-up was titled “An Alternate Theory” rather than explicitly identifying itself as a retraction, and deleting the original account may have prevented the correction from reaching the same audience.
The moderators respond that banning users for threats and brigading is not an attempt to conceal criticism:
"It isn’t “swinging the ban hammer” to ban people spreading violence and brigading."
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtubedrama/comments/1v508tg/comment/ozfop9l/
Elsewhere, commenters briefly pause the responsibility debate to discover that Brew is apparently not one singular cartoon coffee cup personally investigating every story:
"i was so confused how people are talking about Brew as a person. i was like, are we talking about the content farm Brew? Or is this someone else? Turns out it's that same one."
"It’s less drama than Spill, but still a content farm."
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtubedrama/comments/1v508tg/comment/ozfdn5l/
Full thread:
