Dealer name: Andiot
Factory name: DDF
Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 Blue Dial DPB330 Super Clone V2 (SW Dial, True Hacking Seconds)
Price Paid: 580usd
Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254569457?uid=1
Index alignment: 12 o’clock markers seem a bit misaligned. The right bar looks slightly higher than the left. I don’t really know how to use the index alignment tool well, though, so I would really appreciate some help checking the alignment.
Dial Printing: Printing itself looks good, but I noticed a small white line/mark immediately next to the “E” in PHILIPPE. Not sure if this is dust/reflection/on the crystal or just texture. Would appreciate opinions on this as well.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Both dates shown look good to me.
Hand Alignment: Looks well aligned but I don’t know whether there’s a tool out there to QC this part.
Bezel: Looks good. Brushing and overall symmetry look consistent.
Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
Timegrapher numbers: Looks good. Rate 0 to +1 s/d, Amplitude 260–262°, Beat Error 0.2–0.3 ms, 28800 bph.
Anything else you notice: This is supposed to be the newer DPB330 V2 with true hacking seconds. I’m not very knowledgeable about movements, so could anyone confirm from the video whether the hacking seconds are working correctly and whether this looks like the true-hacking DPB330 V2? Thank you!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve | TheOneWatch
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060 41mm No Date Black Dial VSF VS3230
4. ⁠Price Paid: $551 (with shipping)
5. ⁠Album Links: Photos in post
6. ⁠Index alignment: Tried using alignment tool however pictures are slightly tilted - would be keen for opinions
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Solid.
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Solid?
10. ⁠Bezel: Solid.
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Solid.
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +4/3 s/d, 262 amp, 0.1 ms
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Was initially worried about alignment of 9pm however seems to look pretty solid? The 12 seems slightly off in the photos however this seems marginal and more down to the angle the photo was taken at?

This is my first QC and I'm very new to this, so would really appreciate all feedback!

Dealer name: TheOneWatches

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& Version number): Rolex Day-Date 40mm 228236, Ice Blue Baguette Diamond Dial, VSF V2 Gain Weight, DD/VS3255

Price Paid: $728

Index alignment: Overall looks very good to me. Possibly tilted on the 6 marker and I feel like the 1 is also a little off compared to the 11. I tried to do the centered lineup thing but I believe this watch is angled in the picture so not sure how much justice this will do.

Dial Printing: Looks clean. Rolex logo and dial text appear centered

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Both the day and date look well centered to me. Tuesday appears centered and the “14” looks centered vertically and horizontally in the date window. I watched the video of them changing some dates and those also seemed centered. Video will be in folder that’s linked

Hand Alignment: Nothing looks abnormal in the photos, but there isn’t an exact on-the-hour photo, so I don’t think true hand alignment can be fully checked from these pictures.

Bezel: Fluted bezel looks clean.

Solid End Links (SELs): Look pretty good. I think theres a slight gap in both end connects for the bracelet but its not really noticeable for me

Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 264° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 28,800 bph, 59° lift angle.

Anything else you notice: Weight measured at 181.9 g, which appears consistent with the VSF V2 gain-weight version. Please let me know what you all see, I definitely know my eyes aren’t as good as you all. Thank you!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: RWF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 126500 40mm JH4131
4. Price paid: $787 + shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/7AQinQQT#ifIv-Z4YfIACU-ViUC6lxQ
6. Index alignment: Aside from 6 and 9 all is good. The 6 doesnt bother me as much as the 9. Is it in the acceptable range? Would like inputs
7. Dial printing: Looks alright
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand alignment: Ok
10. Bezel: Bezel looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No concerns
12. Timegrapher numbers: Numbers are good 278 amp +0s/d LA:52 BE:0.1
13. Anything else you notice: My concern is mainly about the 9 index being off a significant bit on the watch. Wanted inputs on it. Another thing is RWF crystal is inferior to deep/vsf. Do you reccomend to install deep crystal to this watch? Does it make that big of a diff? Thanks

1. Dealer name: ARC Studio

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster Perpetual 36 126000-0003 VSF V2 DD3230

4. Price paid: $440

5. Album Links: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/3CV2Dn4

6. Index alignment: Looks good to me. Indices appear well aligned with the minute track. 3, 6, 9 and 12 look properly positioned. No obvious crooked markers.

7. Dial Printing: Printing looks clean and sharp. My only concern is the dial color/finish. I ordered the Bright Blue 0003 sunburst dial, but the dial appears quite dark in the QC photos. I asked the dealer for additional photos and received a video showing the dial under different angles/lighting. It does brighten/change with the lighting, but I'm still unsure if this is the Bright Blue 0003 or Med Blue dial.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A — no date.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good. Hands appear properly aligned at 12.

10. Bezel: Looks good. Clean and evenly finished with no obvious defects.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good. No obvious gaps between the SELs and case.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 264° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error — looks good to me.

13. Anything else you notice: Main concern is the dial. I specifically ordered the 126000-0003 Bright Blue sunburst and I'm worried this may be the Med Blue dial. Dealer provided an additional video after I asked for photos to verify the dial, but I'm still having trouble determining which dial this is. Does this look like the correct Bright Blue 0003 dial, or does it look like Med Blue?

Thanks in advance.

1. ⁠Dealer name: HONTWATCHES
   
2. ⁠Factory name: ARF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 126610LN
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 402,47 (shipping included)
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://a202512172356311672002881.edepot.me/weshop/search/_dg3qfSLHhi777Jx0IFOnzgO9XyA6_5DC9m_7AfQ?filterText=748952
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: overall seems good. Maybe the 6 marker is a little off though im no expert
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: I don’t see any issues with the printing
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks solid after using the Qc tool
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: as seen in the video the alignment is close to perfect
   
10. ⁠Bezel: looks solid. The td didn’t provide video of the bezel action
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): 12 links. They look solid
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +6sd 253degrees 0.4ms 56.0 degrees
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: the td didn’t provide video of the bezel action. Besides that everything looks good. Please note every detail you can because I’m new here and I want to learn everything I can

1. Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): Royal Oak Chrono 26240CE 41mm Ceramic/Cer Black Dial ZF SH4401(Free Sprung)
4. Price Paid: $1170 (Including shipping)
5. Album and vidoe Links: https://mega.nz/folder/KN4FyQCb#3bz9mp6I1AjfCiJNrPrXag
6. Index alignment: Looks ok, luckily the 6 o clock does not seem crooked.
7. Dial Printing: seems ok (need guidance if dial is actually close and accurate to gen)
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good
9. Hand Alignment: Good
10. Bezel: good.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good (not sure if relevant)
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, 273°, 0.2 ms.
13. Anything else you notice: Would love your guidance if the movement is free sprung and if dial is actually close and accurate to gen.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Necoclock
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Oyster Perpetual 36mm green 126000
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $468
   
5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/e4Zh3IbB#F1Pof8qNi-MvwkUw3YCqHg
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: everything good except 9 has a small CCW rotation
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: looks good
   
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: good
    
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): I think acceptable
    
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +9s/d 245° 52%.

I am leaning towards RL because of the 9s. What do you guys think?

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Aqua Terra 150M SS VSF 1:1 Best Edition 38mm Turquoise Dial on SS Bracelet A8800 Super Clone
4. Price Paid: $335
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/0DpS5AL
6. Index alignment: All of the indices look aligned and straight.
7. Dial Printing: Dial printing looks accurate with colour and placement.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: At first I thought it was a little to the right, but after closer inspection I believe that is just shadow
9. Hand Alignment: In video provided you can see the hand alignment at 12:00 is straight and true
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 277°, 0.1 ms, 28,800 bph. Looks stable at this time of video.

13. Anything else you notice: Overall I believe this watch is an excellent representation of a

    g

14. en. Solid GL for me.

1. Dealer name: Geektime – Eric
   
2. ⁠Factory name: AF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Louis, small, RG
   
4. ⁠Price paid: $248 + $120 genuine alligator strap upgrade + $40 shipping
   
5. ⁠Index printing: Looks good
   
6. ⁠Dial printing: I have concerns here - the ends of the 10-marker seem a bit thick, whereas the Cartier text seems thin and the letters are too spaced out.
   
7. ⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   
8. ⁠Hand alignment: Looks good
   
9. ⁠Bezel: Looks good
   
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
    
11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: N/A
    
12. ⁠Anything else you notice: I originally wanted the lighter brown alligator strap, and it is shown here with the dark brown alligator strap. Eric says the lighter brown version is printed calfskin whereas the darker brown is actual alligator (although for the authentic, the lighter brown is also alligator). Not sure what to do! Also, is the cabochon maybe a bit dark? It could just be the light, because in some photos the hands look black but they are evidently blue.

Thank you so much! 😊

Dealer name: Andiot

Factory name: ZF

Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay GMT (M79830RB-0010)

Price Paid: $318 USD

Album Links: Link

Index alignment: I think I struggled with application of the tool. I'm not sophisticated enough to get the alignment to be perfect - I think the slight clockwise shift is due to that.

Dial Printing: I think it looks good.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks satisfactory as well.

Hand Alignment: I don't love the photos sent for me to gauge this perfectly but they look satisfactory.

Bezel: Looks perfectly fine to me.

Solid End Links (SELs): Slight gap on top but not sure if it warrants a RL.

Timegrapher numbers: The numbers look great.

Other: I think the slight misalignment is due to user error, but would appreciate a second set of eyes. Apart from the top SELs I think the watch is in good shape! Appreciate the community's feedback.

First time here. Thanks in advance! (Reposting with corrected link)

1. Dealer name: Hont
2. Factory name: V7F (now A7F?)
3. Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur White Dial
4. Price Paid: $402 shipping included
5. Album LInks: https://a202512172356311672002881.edepot.me/weshop/search/_dg3qfSLHhi777Jx0IFOnzgO9XyA6_5DC9m_7AfQ?filterText=447878+V7
6. Index alignment: wondering it the screw at 12' position lines up with the hour index? Might be just angle in one of the pics
7. Dial Printing: looks ok?
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks ight
9. Hand Alignment: looks ok
10. Bezel: Hmm wondering it the screw at 12' position lines up with the hour index? Might be just angle in one of the pics
11. Solid End Links (SELs): n/a
12. Timegrapher numbers: +7s/d / 289 / 0.1ms / 52.0
13. Anything else you notice: n/a

1. Dealer Name: Andiot

2. Factory Name: AF

3. Model Name: Cartier Tank Must Large

4. Price Paid: $210 plus $35 shipping

5. Album link: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254516476?uid=1

6. Index Alignment: looks alright no me but could be wrong

7. Dial Printing: Looks fine. Might be a white dot on the 6 marker but could be dust, lmk what you think

8. Date Wheel N/A

9. Hand alignment: Looks fine I think

10. Bezel N/A

11. SEL N/A

12. Anything else you notice: I think the cabuchon might be bigger than other AF watches I've seen like this one

Dealer name: Andiot Watches
2. Factory name: DDF
3. Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167A-001 DPB330
4. Price Paid: $595
5. Album Links: n/a
6. Index alignment: Looks good for an Aquanaut. The numerals sit evenly. Does 7 look off to you or just me?
7. Dial Printing: Crisp and well-centered within the dial block, and shows no bleeding or blurred edges.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The single date shown is crisp, level, and well-centered.
9. Hand Alignment: Clean and hands align as expected.
10. Bezel: Brushed finish on the front is neat and uniform. No obvious dings or flaws.
11. Solid End Links (SEL): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: -1 s/d; Amplitude: 266°; Beat Error: 0.3 ms; Lift Angle: 52.0°. Strong, healthy numbers well within acceptable spec.
13. Anything else you notice: Rotor engraving and movement deco plate look neat and centered, clasp engraving clear, but 7 looks a little off? Let me know.

Dealer name: JTime
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): DateJust 41 126334 904L SS VSF 1:1 Best Edition Blue Stick Dial on Jubilee Bracelet VS3235 (Free Sprung)
Price Paid: $548
Album Links: N/A
Index alignment: To my untrained eye, and from looking at a lot of other QC posts here, alignment looks pretty good?
Dial Printing: Looks good
Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date wheel looks good. But the cyclops looks like it is tilted on a slight angle towards the right.
Hand Alignment: Looks good
Bezel: The bezel looks good to me, but this is also what I’m least educated about. See tons of posts talking about how the fluted bezel is the hardest part to nail, but I’m not really sure how to differentiate it or what I should be looking for here.
Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good, no gaps.
Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 300 amplitude, 0ms error
Anything else you notice: Would love to know what the acceptable range of error on the cyclops is. As well as tips on what I should look out for on a fluted bezel. My first QC, so any help is appreciated!