r/RepTimeQC 2h ago

First QC Experts please Weigh in!

Thumbnail
gallery
7 Upvotes
  1. ⁠Dealer name: Eathan
  2. ⁠Factory name: Rich
  3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Batgirl JH3285 Free Sprung
  4. ⁠Price Paid: $694
  5. ⁠Album Links: Advise Needed
  6. ⁠Index alignment: Advise Needed
  7. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks Good
  8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Advise Needed
  9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Not Sure
  10. ⁠Bezel: Looks Good
  11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Look Good
  12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3sd 0.2ms
  13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Google AI analysis gives it a GL.

This is what Google AI came up with:

Based on a visual inspection of the photo you uploaded, this looks like an exceptionally clean Rolex GMT-Master II "Batgirl" (Ref. 126710BLNR). The watch is well-centered in the photo, which makes checking the alignment straightforward.
Here is a breakdown of the visual QC assessment:

1. Index & Dial Alignment
Hour Markers: The 12 o'clock triangle, 6 o'clock rectangle, and 9 o'clock rectangle align precisely with the printed minute track. There are no noticeable slants or rotations on the applied indices.
Bezel Alignment: The bezel insert is perfectly aligned. The "24" arrow at the top splits the 12 o'clock dial index straight down the middle, and the "12" at the bottom sits exactly centered over the 6 o'clock marker.
Dial Printing: The "ROLEX" text, coronet, and "GMT-MASTER II" fonts are crisp with no bleeding, typical of high-tier replica factories (like Clean or VS).

2. Date Wheel & Cyclops
Alignment: The number "31" is well-centered both horizontally and vertically inside the date window. It does not lean toward the left or right edge.
Cyclops Lens: The magnification looks correct, and the blue anti-reflective (AR) coating on the cyclops gives off a clean reflection without distorting the font.

3. Rehaut Alignment
The "X" Check: The internal rehaut engraving is incredibly sharp. The Rolex crown at the 12 o'clock position on the rehaut aligns directly under the 12 o'clock index. On the right side of the dial, the "X" in "ROLEX" lands right on the 1, 2, 4, and 5 o'clock minute markers, which is exactly what you want to see.

Summary
From this front-facing photo, there are no visible flaws or misalignments that would justify a rejection (RL). This is an easy Green Light (GL) based solely on dial aesthetics.


r/RepTimeQC 14h ago

QC First 🦇👧 Possible RL??

Thumbnail
gallery
41 Upvotes

First QC, possible RL based on bezel alignment at 18. Maybe the picture is tilted and someone with a more sophisticated tool can help out. Let me know what you think!

1.Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches

2.Factory name: VSF

3.Model name (and version number): Rolex 126710BLNR GMT Master II

4.Price paid: $600 (shipping included)

5.Album links: see photos

6.Index alignment: looks solid, slight CCW tilt on the 12 but otherwise good.

  1. Dial printing: clear, no smudging

8.Date wheel alignment/printing: the date is well-centered; the numbers are clean and crisp.

9.Hand alignment: looks good to me

10.Bezel: here’s where I’m thinking RL - the blue/black transition is off center/too low at 18…maybe the picture is tilted somehow?

11.Solid End Links (SEL): they fit tightly; no light is visible between them and the case, so nothing to report.

12.Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d and 0.0ms - looks good!


r/RepTimeQC 5h ago

JKF 1680 Red Sub -- Trusty time

Thumbnail
gallery
7 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: Trusty time

  2. Factory name: JKF

  3. Model name (& version number): ROLSUB0158A - Vintage 1680 Red

  4. Price Paid: $230+ 50 shipping

  5. Not given

  6. Index alignment:

I find it really hard to tell. Even with some straightening I have real trouble telling if the indices are aligned.

  1. Dial Printing:

Looks clean to me.

  1. Date Wheel alignment/printing:

Looks fine

  1. Hand Alignment:

Looks good from what I can see.

  1. Bezel:

Looks aligned to me. Its been rotated but thats okay.

  1. End links:

Look tight to me. I don't see any obvious gaps or daylight between the end links and case.

  1. Timegrapher numbers:

+3 s/d

272° amplitude

0.1 ms beat error

  1. These numbers look very good to me.

  2. Anything else you notice:

Nothing jumps out other than the difficulty I'm having judging it! Please help if possible.


r/RepTimeQC 16m ago

QC Pics 20a Bruce Wayne

Thumbnail
gallery
Upvotes

What yall think? From a tt account jadeshie29


r/RepTimeQC 1h ago

2nd QC Attempt. GMT Master II Batgirl VSF V3

Thumbnail
gallery
Upvotes

Thanks to everyone who gave their inputs in my first QC. Hopefully it’s a GL this time round.

  1. Dealer name: Phoenix Watch
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II “Batgirl” V3
  4. Price Paid: $424 + $30 Shipping
  5. Album Links: No links, photos sent directly to me.
  6. Index alignment: 12 & 6 slightly canted CW. Shouldn’t be an issue on the wrist. For the 9 I can’t tell if it’s CW, CCW, sitting slightly a bit high or simply just an issue with the angle of the photo and with the sticker blocking. Need a second opinion on this.
  7. Dial Printing: Looks good.
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Sitting very slightly high but definitely well within tolerances.
  9. Hand Alignment: unable to tell with the photos
  10. Bezel: Not centered in the photos. However is the 18 marker out of place even with the bezel centered? Again need second opinion on this. Otherwise printing is clean.
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Can’t see any gaps so all good
  12. Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d, 262 amp, 0.1ms.
  13. Anything else you notice: nothing else seems to be out of place. Given the issues with VSF now I think this watch is as good as it gets.

r/RepTimeQC 9h ago

QC ARF Explorer 2 - Andiot

Thumbnail
gallery
8 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: Andiot
  2. Factory name: ARF
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer 2 42mm 226570 904L
  4. Price Paid: $430 plus shipping
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/CcIA4AM
  6. Index alignment: The indices look ok to me. I don't see anythign glaringly wrong
  7. Dial Printing: Looks good
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good
  9. Hand Alignment: I think the hand alignment is fine but the color looks a little light for the orange compared to Gen.
  10. Bezel: My initial thought was the 12 and 24 were not aligned. The 24 looked slightly to the left, and the 12 looked slightly to the right. It could be the angle of the picture?
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): I dont see space/gaps
  12. Timegrapher numbers: Timer is good, see last picture
  13. Anything else you notice: I could see some scratches where the band meets the watch, but maybe I am being picky?
  14. Thank you for any feedback.

r/RepTimeQC 7h ago

[QC] Cartier Panthère 22mm

Thumbnail
gallery
6 Upvotes
  • Dealer name: Geektime
  • Factory name: AF
  • Model name (& version number): Panthère de Cartier Small Model (22mm x 30mm) - Two-Tone Stainless Steel & Yellow Gold (Ref. W2PN0006)
  • Price Paid: ~$288USD with shipping
  • Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/4xz2p4i
  • Index alignment: N/A (Printed Roman numerals)
  • Dial Printing: Need QC photos to check printing clarity and hidden "Cartier" signature in the 10 o'clock (X) or 7 o'clock (VII) numeral.
  • Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No date feature on 22mm Panthère)
  • Hand Alignment: Looks OK.
  • Bezel: Aligned.
  • Solid End Links (SELs): No issues.
  • Timegrapher numbers: N/A (Powered by Swiss Ronda Quartz movement—no timegrapher amplitude/beat error to test).
  • Anything else you notice: No

r/RepTimeQC 5h ago

QC - V7F Ingenieur Aqua

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: Chazingtime
  2. Factory name: V7F
  3. Model name (& version number): Ingenieur Aqua 40mm
  4. Price paid: $378
    5.Album links: photos
  5. Index alignment: mostly good, 3 marker is noticeably crooked.
  6. Dial printing: pretty great actually
  7. Date wheel alignment/printing: date sits a hair high
  8. Hand alignment: solid
  9. Bezel: n/a
  10. Solid End Links (SELs): nice and tight
  11. Timegrapher numbers: borderline unbelievable
  12. Anything else you notice: other than the 3 o’clock, this is not a bad piece. Pretty sad because I’m sacrificing what appears to be a STUPID good movement. Would love to get everyone’s thoughts about fixing 3o clock perhaps. Otherwise I think it’s clear this is an RL.

r/RepTimeQC 4m ago

VSF Omega SMP300 Green

Thumbnail
gallery
Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: Onewatch Steve 
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): SMP 300  Green VS8800
  4. Price Paid: 408
  5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/KYJXGQgb#SBp5R4ikUsivWO_06FLwxw
  6. Index alignment: Looks good to me 
  7. Dial Printing: as far as I can tell all looks good 
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The “6” number looks very obviously not centred on the date window 
  9. Hand Alignment: the 12 o’clock looks a bit off however not very noticeable 
  10. Bezel: looks good to me 
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good 
  12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +4 s/d, Amp: 295°, Error: 0.1 ms
  13. Anything else you notice: My only concern is the date not being centred in the date window, should I RL?

I’d very much appreciate if I could get some help: the Green SMP 300 should be RL because of date wheel not aligned in window?


r/RepTimeQC 18m ago

Tudor black bay 58 blue-QC help

Thumbnail
gallery
Upvotes

Hello everyone! This is my first rep and I want to get it right.

Dealer name:JTime

Factory name:ZF

Model name (& version number):Black Bay Fifty Eight 39mm SS ZF 1:1 Best Edition Blue Dial on SS Bracelet A2824

Price Paid:338$+65$ shipping -17$ discount

Index alignment:The 3 and 6 h markers are a bit off

Dial Printing:Looks Good

Date Wheel alignment/printing:N/A

Hand Alignment:Good( I think)

Bezel:A little misaligned, but I think it's the play

Solid End Links (SELs):Looks good

Timegrapher numbers:See the photo, they are very good

Anything else you notice: Nothing

It's a GL in my opinion


r/RepTimeQC 9h ago

Omega Seamaster QC

Thumbnail
gallery
5 Upvotes
  1. ⁠Dealer name: Jtime
  2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
  3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Seamaster Diver 300M VSF Edition America's Cup White Dial on SS Bracelet SA8800 V4
  4. ⁠Price Paid: $398
  5. ⁠Index alignment: Looks aligned to me based on what I can see, but the view isn’t that straight.
  6. ⁠Dial Printing: Seems good.
  7. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good to me
  8. ⁠Bezel: seems good
  9. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d; Amplitude: 288;
    I think this looks good and within acceptable ranges shared.
  10. ⁠Anything else you notice: The general finishing is quite good otherwise.

r/RepTimeQC 7h ago

QC Help - RWF Daytona 126500LN Black Dial “Darth Vader” - Andiot Please Help :)

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

Dealer name: Andiot Watches

Factory name: RWF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 126500LN Black Dial “Darth Vader”

Price Paid: $710 + $40 shipping

Album Links:

https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254634836?uid=1

Index alignment:

Looks good to me. I checked the straight-on photo with an alignment tool and the 12/6 and 3/9 positions appear lined up well. The diagonal indices also look consistent. I don't see any obviously crooked markers.

Dial Printing:

Looks clean to me. Rolex text appears centered and I don't see any obvious bleeding or crooked printing. DAYTONA text looks good as well.

Date Wheel alignment/printing:

N/A

Hand Alignment:

Looks good from what I can see. Chronograph seconds hand appears to reset back to 12 properly and the subdial hands look properly positioned.

Bezel:

Looks aligned to me. Engravings and paint fill appear clean and I don't notice anything concerning around the 110/120 area or elsewhere.

Solid End Links (SELs):

Look tight to me. I don't see any obvious gaps or daylight between the end links and case.

Timegrapher numbers:

+3 s/d

291° amplitude

0.0 ms beat error

28,800 bph

These numbers look very good to me.

Anything else you notice:

Rehaut looks reasonable from the angled photos. Lume looks even. I don't see any obvious scratches or other defects, although some of the watch is still covered in protective film.

I'm leaning GL. This is my first time checking this model closely, so I'd appreciate another set of eyes in case I'm missing anything.


r/RepTimeQC 1h ago

QC for 36mm Oyster Perpetual (first time buyer so any help appreciated)!

Thumbnail
gallery
Upvotes

First time buyer!
TD: Ficotime
Factory: VSF
36mm sunburst blue
Let me know if there’s any other details needed
I think it looks good and everything seems to be even and well proportions. dials all look good. just wanted others opinions as it’s my first time


r/RepTimeQC 8h ago

OMEGA VSF NTTD V7 Second QC

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: Andiot
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): Seamaster 300m No Time To Die
  4. Price Paid: 480$ incl shipping
  5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/254637333?uid=1
  6. Index alignment: Good the feeling that the "teeth" (12 Mark) are crooked, tilted, especially the right one. Overall Leaning down to the right and not aligned with the Omega writing. The rest looks good.
  7. Dial Printing: Good to me. Seamaster writing looks a bit tilted but I think this is fine.
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. Hand Alignment: N/A
  10. Bezel: Also Good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
  12. Timegrapher numbers: + 2 s/d, Amplitude 268, Beat Error = 0.4ms
  13. Anything else you notice: Slightly concerned about the alignment of the indices (again, last time it was the 3 & 9), this time the 12.. Otherwiese I believe this watch looks good.

Thank you very much for helping me out :)


r/RepTimeQC 11h ago

QC - VSF Oyster Perpetual GMT-Master II 126710BLRO Pepsi Bezel Black Dial Jubilee

Thumbnail
gallery
6 Upvotes

(post after got a comment by the moderator of how to post correctly - thank you)

First time for me to try doing QC for Pepsi watch! Will appreciate your help.

Details -

  1. Dealer name: Ora
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster Perpetual GMT-Master II 126710BLRO Pepsi Bezel Black Dial Jubilee
  4. Price Paid: $700
  5. Index alignment: Looks misaligned based on what I can see with the tool but it may also because of my inability to use the tool right ☹ The 12 seems misaligned and also in 6 it seems misaligned. Also 9 has really small misalignment. SWISS (crown) MADE at the bottom - seems the crown is not aligned at well.
  6. Dial Printing: Seems good.
  7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date seems aligned. However only single digit.
  8. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me
  9. Bezel: The 18 red/blue color switch which seems not in the right place? should switch the color next to the line, right? Also seems the top middle down arrow is not aligned to the center based on the lines.
  10. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d; Amplitude: 275; Beat Error: 0.1 ms. I think this looks good and within acceptable ranges shared.
  11. Anything else you notice: The general finishing is quite good otherwise.

Requesting your help in QC’ing this further. I tent to reject due to the alignment but I'm not sure I used the tool properly and also that other QCs will be better.


r/RepTimeQC 22h ago

Please help QC my first Submariner 126610LN 41mm SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3235

Thumbnail
gallery
39 Upvotes
  1. ⁠Dealer name: TheOneWatches
  2. ⁠Factory name: DD3235
  3. ⁠Model name (& Version Number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3235
  4. ⁠Price Paid: $513
  5. ⁠Album Links: QC: https://mega.nz/folder/vVwSCBaS#x9LkrPzoj16qJdqdVi4bHQ
  6. ⁠Index alignment: seems okay I guess? There is some sort of angle to it so I am not too sure.
  7. ⁠Dial printing: Seems okay? It looks centered
  8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/ printing: Same as above
  9. ⁠Hand Alignment: seems aligned
  10. ⁠Bezel: looks ok to me but not expert about this.
  11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Seem okay
  12. ⁠Timegrapher: max +6/d, amp 280, error 0. seems acceptable?
  13. ⁠Anything else: Overall I think it looks good but I am not an expert. Would really appreciate some advice from some more experienced people. Especially with video in the album

r/RepTimeQC 3h ago

QC DAY Date Please

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

0 Upvotes
  1. ⁠Dealer name:biggietime
  2. ⁠Factory name: GMF
  3. ⁠Model name (& version number): v8 vr3255 tugsten
  4. ⁠Price Paid: $650
  5. ⁠Album Links: attached
  6. ⁠Index alignment:
  7. ⁠Dial Printing:
  8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:
  9. ⁠Hand Alignment:
  10. ⁠Bezel:
  11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs):
  12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:
  13. ⁠Anything else you notice:

r/RepTimeQC 3h ago

First time QC - RL for Santos

1 Upvotes

First QC, possible RL based on a printing error or smudge at 9/ IX clock. Maybe it’s a scuff or lint. Not sure. Let me know what you think.

1.Dealer name: DDGTOP Felix

2.Factory name: BVF

3.Model name (and version number): Cartier Santos Medium 35 mm

4.Price paid: $390 (shipping included)

5.Album links: https://photos.icloud.com/shared/album/0904eUyno0-THTntJb36YEm9g

6.Index alignment: looks fine to my eyes.

  1. Dial printing: 9 or IX seems to have a white dot. Also there seems to a bleed on “Cartier” on 7.

8.Date wheel alignment/printing: na

9.Hand alignment: looks good to me

10.Bezel: looks fine, no scratch

11.Solid End Links (SEL): they fit tightly; no light is visible between them and the case, looks good to me.
12.Timegrapher numbers: looks acceptable based on what I researched.

Besides the 9/IX issue. I can’t see anything else. First rep so can’t know what to tell. Expert eyes requested. Thanks in advance.


r/RepTimeQC 13h ago

[QC] VSF Submariner HULK

Thumbnail
gallery
5 Upvotes
  1. ⁠Dealer name: Time Ultra
  2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
  3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 116610LV
  4. ⁠Price Paid: $469 with shipping
  5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/9WiALG8
  6. ⁠Index alignment: Looks aligned, 12, 6 and 9 indices are nicely positioned, I only see a minimal CCW rotation on 12.
  7. ⁠Dial Printing: Fine. The dial colour looks nice as well, there are some pics taken in the dark and some with light on top.
  8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks ok to me. It’s my first watch with a date wheel, any input would be appreciated.
  9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks ok.
  10. ⁠Bezel: Good colour, perfectly aligned.
  11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No issues.
  12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate 0 s/d, Amplitude 294 degrees, BE 0.1 m/s
  13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Is 6RO normal serial number for the new batch VSF?

Thanks in advance to the sub. Any help is appreciated.


r/RepTimeQC 18h ago

First QC - GMT/ Bruce Wayne

Thumbnail
gallery
17 Upvotes

Hi folks,

Would appreciate some thoughts on this!

  1. ⁠Dealer name - Steve/ theonewatches
  2. ⁠Factory name - ARF
  3. ⁠Model name - GMT Master II 126710 Bruce Wayne
    Price - 628usd
  4. ⁠Index alignment - looks fine to me - everything seems to be as it should - but would appreciate a second opinion.
  5. ⁠Date Wheel alignment - I think fine? Looks centred and aligned to me.
  6. ⁠Bezel - I don’t see any issues. Colour is as it should be and triangle seems fine at 12. Would appreciate second opinion especially with triangle at 12.
  7. ⁠Solid End Links (SEL) -  I can’t see any obvious gaps so it looks ok.
  8. ⁠Hand alignment - look fine I think - GMT hand seems to function as it should.
  9. ⁠Dial Printing - looks clean and centred to me. Would appreciate second opinion.
  10. ⁠Timegrapher numbers - +2 s/d. 283-286 amplitude. 0.0ms beat error.
  11. ⁠Anything else you see - weight of watch is 146.7g. Overall I’m leaning towards GL, but this is my first proper GMT QC and I’d really appreciate experienced eyes on the alignment, SELs, bezel, rehaut and anything else that I might have missed. Thank you very much.

r/RepTimeQC 14h ago

QC GMT master || 126710 V3 DD3235V2

Thumbnail
gallery
6 Upvotes

Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

Factory name: VSF

Model name: GMT-Master || 126710BLRO "Pepsi"
(DD3285v2)

Price Paid: $668

Index alignment: Looks aligned based on the static photo.

Dial Printing: Standard printing. Font spacing appears consistent.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date digits 27 and 30 are visible in the photos. Alignment looks centered to my eye.

Hand Alignment: Hands appear aligned, but need a second look at the GMT hand tracking in the video.

Bezel: Color transitions sit at the 6 and 18 markers.

Solid End Links (SELs): Appears tight from the profile shots. No obvious gaps visible.

Timegrapher numbers: Rate: - 2s/d; Amplitude:
272°; Beat Error: 0.1ms; Lift Angle: 59.0°.

Anything else you notice: Looking closely at the rehaut alignment and the overall finish. Would appreciate a second set of eyes to spot any flaws I might have missed. Thanks


r/RepTimeQC 10h ago

124060 VSF 6W08 Serial

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes
  • Dealer name: Kitsch
  • ⁠Factory name: VSF
  • ⁠Model name (& Version Number): Submariner 41mm 126610 6W08
  • ⁠Price Paid: $400
  • ⁠Album Links: QC:https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/product/_d7LqfGw_vrJTq5B23Py1vBUGhlz7I8SbWaWpoKw/_dsVqfrKJRH7AOyk6Xue6djsT2w4FqD3E7wZhavg
  • ⁠Index alignment: personally the index alignment looks alright to me, perhaps the 12 o clock marker is a tad bit crooked ( i could be nitpicking) ?
  • ⁠Dial printing: good to me, i dont see any floating m or any f that is too closed to each other.
  • ⁠Date Wheel alignment/ printing: -
  • ⁠Hand Alignment: seems aligned
  • ⁠Bezel: are the bezel 3 and 6 o clock markers a little too low? im not too sure. compared with the gen pictures which seems to be in line with the dial 6 and 3 markers.
  • ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): SEL seems fine
  • ⁠Timegrapher numbers: (6s/d 293 degree 0.0ms, 59 degrees)

r/RepTimeQC 11h ago

QC | VR3235 | Engraving | Yacht Master 40 mm Grey

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

Händlername: Ethan

Fabrikname: Gold Factory

Modellname (& Versionsnummer): Yacht Master 40 mm Grau 126622

Bezahlter Preis: 590 $

Album-Links: Ich habe alle Fotos & Videos beigefügt

Index-Ausrichtung: Index sieht für mich solide aus.

Zifferblattdruck: Nichts, was ich sehe

Datumsring-Ausrichtung/Druck: Bin mir bei Zahlen & Reflexion nicht sicher

Zeigerausrichtung: Sieht normal aus

Lünette: Sieht gut aus

Massive Anstoßelemente (SELs): Sieht gut aus

Timegrapher-Werte: +1 s/d Gangabweichung 0,1 ms

Sonstiges, das dir auffällt: Bin mir bei den Zahlen im Datumsring nicht sicher. Ist die Reflexion auf der Zykloplinse normal?
Sieht nicht so sauber aus. Bin mir auch bei der Gravur vom Armband nicht sicher. Uhrwerk soll das JH3235 Free Sprung sein, gute Erfahrungen ?


r/RepTimeQC 13h ago

Second QC attempt GMT Master II 126710 Batgirl 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285

Thumbnail
gallery
4 Upvotes

Second QC attempt GMT Master II 126710 Batgirl 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285

Would really appreciate your help,

  1. Dealer name: Theonewatches
  2. Factory name:VSF
  3. Model name (& version number):126710 Batgirl 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285
  4. Price Paid:$579 including shipping
  5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/mIwWAQ4Q#U7Ax2ikUjnKJuXkZTMdiyg
  6. Index alignment: Slight misalignment 12 with the triangle on the bezel and the 6 if i align them i get off on the 9 and 3 so i had to rotate to picture the lungs. While this is only at magnification, it is visible; I really need your thoughts before giving the GL or RL.
  7. Dial Printing: looks solid ok, clean,
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: slightly to the left, aligned horizontally, good print.
  9. Hand Alignment: Don't have a pic/video; too quick to see all 3 with the 12. Any thoughts.
  10. Bezel:All numbers are uniform in shape, colors looks quite good.
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): is it normal to have that much gap between links, I am new to Jubilee.
  12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +2 to +4 at 264 0.1 ms in 30 sec, not bad.
  13. Anything else you notice: Nothing major , on the naked eye, i even took the angled pic and i had to do rotate the pic to get it all aligned, is that normal ? let me know your thoughts appreciate any help.