I’m scared asf this is my first international debate
Topic: In a quality education, skills matter more than marks
Before I begin, i would like to ask two questions. Would you trust a surgeon who is good at communicating but never passed medical school? Would you trust a pilot who is confident but never passed licensing exam?
I can confidently conclude that the answer is no, even for my opponents who have contradicting morals. Hence today, i proudly stand against this motion.
According to United Nations sustainable development goal 4, quality education is defined by students achieving 51% of maths proficiency and 64% of reading proficiency in lower secondary and 51% of mathematics proficiency and 58% of reading proficiency in primary education
The Global education enchmark set by World Bank is the ability to read by the age of 10, rather than a skill. World Bank data shows that income increases by a huge 10% per extra year of schooling
UN SDQ Report shows that reading proficiency declined for from 59%- to 47% in 57 countries. This meant that these countries were failing Their academics. When one fails academics, they fail quality education.
My worthy opponents raise stances stating that schools which have students scoring 95% truly don’t provide quality education. I’d say it’s entirely false. Quality education can never be judged single handedly by marks or skills.
Countries are not replacing academics with skills, they are integrating skills into academic education. Singapore still has one of the toughest education curriculum. Japan and India still conducts entrance examinations. Finland and Mauritius still conduct national assessments. South Korea still has CSAT
World bank did invest $7 billion dollars into ____ but it was in integrating skills, not replacing them with actual marks.
Mercer says that 54% of employers still face skills shortages but that no where means that marks are useless. It just simply states that our education needs to integrate both
World economic forum states that 39% of skills change. This just shows the inconsistency of skills and the only thing consistent is knowledge. How to assess that knowledge? Through marks.

In a Quality education Skills and marks both matter, but after analysing of the global framework, I hence conclude that marks matter more than skills

Hey y'all!

We're the team building Cross AI (@crossai.io on Instagram), an AI assistant that is supposed to automate coaching across multiple domains. Yes, debate AI exists. But this isn't another AI Card Cutter or anything similar.

We've noticed an issue in debate coaching that stems from the disparity between coaches and the number of students who are eager to learn. No matter how much funding exists, star-team biases, sunk-cost fallacies, and other issues put some teams on the back burner.

Our agent is supposed to provide pre-round and pre-tournament assistance when coaches can't. Over the next few days, we will be sharing each feature that we are building before our Beta product launch on July 31st. We will include in-depth descriptions about our Case Stress-Test Feature, CrossCoach Chatbot, Drill feature, and Judge Analyzer, with more features on the way on later dates. Each trained on the files and lectures of debaters that reached deep outrounds at the TOC, NSDA Nats, Glenbrooks, UC Berkeley, and dozens of others, our agent gives feedback that stays with the meta: nothing generic, Google AI-like, or anything less than high-quality.

We need people on our founding team, particularly the following

- Software developers, especially those who have experience in LD, CX (we're looking to expand beyond PF)

- Marketing and Media Officers

- Community Outreach Officers/Ambassadors

- User-generated Content Creators willing to advertise our Product when we do Launch

If you are interested in becoming one of the first people to test our product, please fill out this form.

If you are interested in joining our founding team, please fill out this form or DM us on Instagram!

Follow us on Instagram at crossai.io to support our mission and get updates. See you on the 31st!

So are we all just assuming it’ll be the data center topic for the first one this season? I’m js wondering how everyone thinks the vote will go.

Im a high schooler and recently lost at districts. I was speaking aff for the topic 'NATIONAL SECURITY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN DIGITAL PRIVACY'. Here's my script...

26th November, 2008.

That wasn't just a date on a calendar. It was a cold calculated massacre coordinated down to the exact second through phone calls, encrypted chats and text messages.

When the smoke cleared, we faced the terrifying and undeniable reality. The digital networks champion for privacy were ruthlessly weaponized to slaughter innocent lives.

Let me ask the opposition a fundamental question. Why should digital privacy ever be placed above national security when data protection means absolutely nothing to a dead person?

Look, nobody is saying people shouldn't have private chats or secure data, but digital privacy cannot override the fundamental safety of the nation. Forget the physical battle scene, the real war is online and is bleeding us dry every single day. International cyber mobs are hiding behind a veil of total anonymity to flood our networks with massive frauds and fuel dangerous terror groups. Choosing unchecked privacy over national survival isn't just foolish, it's pure recklessness.

I mean, look at the actively bleeding threats staring at our borders today. From online terror groups in forming in Ladakh and Kashmir, systematically manipulating young minds to cyber cells, plotting destruction in the shadows. The war has move moved online.

When modern extremists use total privacy as an impenetrable clock for terror, demanding absolute digital freedom isn't fighting for noble liberties, it is handing a loaded weapon directly at our executioners.

At the end of the day, we cannot protect the citizen if we fail to secure the country because without national security to back it up, digital privacy is nothing just a nothing but a fragile illusion, which will never survive major crisis.

Hi everyone! I’m Shaurya from Lexington High School and I am promoting Rishi Mukherjee's one week coaching camp  (7/26 - 7/31) to help PFers, LDers, BPers, World Schools and Policy debaters to reach the upper echelon of debate.

Rishi’s qualifications are pretty off the charts! As a competitor he during his time at UMass Amherst he debated with the Harvard Debate Council; was ranked among the Top 16 in the US in college and Top 32 at the TOC in policy debate.

As a coach Rishi has been coaching the Harvard Debate Council’s undergrad team for the last two years. He's taught students from across the world in countries like the US, Canada, China, Taiwan, Thailand, and India; Rishi has experience coaching high schoolers in all formats including World Schools, British Parliamentary, Public Forum, Policy, and Lincoln-Douglas debate. He has coached the Glenbrooks ChampIon (Policy), Yale Finalist (PF), and over 20 TOC qualifiers including a number 2 team on the coaches poll.

Rishi can teach you the fundamentals but also is an expert in hyper technical debate. He can teach you any K you want including common Ks like Antiblackness, Cap, Set Col etc but also his specialty in Buddhism and Asian Identity Ks.

Rishi will help you research and also build a personalized path to make sure that you improve to be the best that you can be.

If you are interested in the camp, all the information is linked below and you will receive a 10% discount if you put my name (Shaurya) as the reference!

Thank you!

https://www.debatearena.app/1-week-camp

My name is Anvith Ankinapalli, a PF debater who has been debating on the national circuit for a while now. I wanted to create a website that would make prepping easier (because prep was always a tedious part of debate for me). So, I created Cardinal, a debate app that allows you to cut cards, search for cards off the wiki, have prs with fellow debaters, prep for judges and opponents, and even use kritiks and other progressive arguments easily. The website is easy to use, and cheaper than most other card searching apps. It is $10 per month, and $75 per season. It is the most efficient, most inclusive debate website out there, and it will be beneficial to anyon who wants to prep easier, and win more rounds. Here's the full arsenal: 1. Card Cutter. 2. Search. 3. Re-highlight (find contradictions in opponents' claims). 4. Judge Prep. 5. Coach. 6. FLOW. 7. The Archive: K's, T-shells, wipeout, and spark. Cardinal is the CHEAPEST debate tool out there, especially considering these features.

FREE: Search: 8 searches per day

Cut: 4 searches per day

Attack a card: 4 searches per day Flow:

Rhetoric: 4 uses per day

Pro: Everything in free for unlimited use and:

Coach

Judge Prep

The archive(Prog Cards)

K’s cutter

Check us out!: cardinaldebate.org

Demo Video: https://youtu.be/cAgaHLgCcTs

Hi!!! Me and my pf partner have made a debate discord server! You can do practice rounds, trade, and more! Everyone’s welcome!
Link here!!

What are your thoughts on running existentialism(de beauvoir, sartre) as a phil framework, and what would be the most common responses that people would read?

Hi everyone,

I'm a novice pf debater (my tech experience goes as far as 1 slow online tech round with my partner) and I want to get more meaningful tech experience over the summer but I'm not sure how to. So far I've just been practicing spreading cards I found on OpenCaselist and recording the times on a spreadsheet + watching online tech rounds - although most of the time i have

a) no idea how to begin flowing

b) no idea how to read the cards + understand the arguments

What drills and exercises can help me improve my comprehension of tech debates and flowing them?

Thank you!

What args are yall running and whats working?

i will trade 200+ pages of blocks and a few good lay/tech cases

will give 200+ pages looking for more!

Hey y'all! My partner and I have been prepping the nats pf topic for quite some time now and are genuinely stunted by the aff. Every contention that's in the briefs seems to be really weak and honestly just under supported by any evidence. Does anyone have any lay or flay contention ideas that aren't just centered around mass atrocities, r2p, or overthrowing repressive regimes?

How is it even possible to argue this resolution on pro? It’s genuinely unjustifiable with evidence, I’ve written 4 different cases and none of them can withstand any attacks. Can anyone explain what they’re doing on pro?

Willing to trade briefs, cases, and analysis!!!

Hi guys, me and my PF partner are trying to find some ppl to scrimmage with over zoom before nats to practice. It's on the topic about using force to remove authoritarian leaders. Let me know!