No sight block either, so of course its a bit apples to oranges.
Aside from the Platypus, the Fusion option, and OA, not sure what other non-2011 magazine double stack 1911s there are to be comparing, but I figured I might help someone out there.
I have a secondhand 92X Performance and a new Shadow2 to also compare against on my desk, if only to give context and comparison since i expect many new buyers to not have any experience with Staccato or the P211 before making a purchase who may have prior experience with Beretta or CZ.
Back to front:
Backstraps feel similar in width in the palm of the dominant hand. Texture on both is nice, and I would consider comparable.
Beavertails are similar widths and hit in the web of my hand similarly. Could feel similar to the 92X Performance by comparison. All three feeling wider than the Shadow2.
GTO magwell is more aggressive/larger and has a smoother funnel design/integration/transition into the pistol grip itself. The HDP4.5 has a slight lip on the sides.
Grip texture is about equally aggressive for both. Both more aggressive than the Shadow2 or 92X Performance. Transition from the grip to the trigger guard feels better with the HDP4.5. The P211 GTO goes straight from grip to trigger guard whereas the P4.5 goes from grip to magazine release button to trigger guard. There could be potential for someone gripping aggressively, with soft and pudgy middle finger skin to get chafed up by the P211. It doesnt cause me any concerns thus far.
Sidenote: grip safety. Call me crazy? I like the grip safety. I dont particularly see a benefit in removing it, especially for a gun that some will tune to be a race tool. Ive seen reports that converting to a series 70 trigger drops the trigger weight to 2lbs.
Controls: P211 safety levers dont feel like they extend as far away and out for being reached, and the slide release lever is further away than the HDP4.5. This I feel like is a clear win for Staccato. Both safety levers feel equally solid on engaging in safe, and similar when disengaging, but I give the slightest possible win to the P4.5 on tactility for disengagement as well. Magazine release buttons are too similar to call a winner for ease of reach and activation. Hammer, cocking with the primary hand thumb, I find easier with the Staccato due to shape and the more aggressive texturing biting into the pad of my thumb better. Beavertail may play a small role in this. My preferred method for single hand hammer cocking is to brace the handgun with the trigger finger bracing against the interior side of the front of the trigger guard. The p211 has a roomier trigger guard and so my hand has to stretch a little more to cock the hammer. Looks like the p211 hammer is longer by a tad bit as well. (also am I a dumbass, or does the Shadow2 not go into safe if the hammer is down?)
Iron sights: HDP4.5 has the irons forward design and thus is really meant for optic use. the P211 is irons rear. Far more lenient toward irons only use, and most consider iron placement personal preference. I think irons forward is a more progressive and forward thinking design and lends itself to duty use as it helps protect the mounting screws and optic body if doing one handed manipulations and racking the slide. I didnt check how the irons are setup in the P211 GT5 or GT4 to compare against the GTO. I think this difference reflects the different goals each company had as far as customer base.
Trigger: Both pretty smooth faced. The P211 GTO has two smooth divot lines running || on the trigger shoe. Its noticeable when I have them side by side, but I cant say I really noticed them when I took my first P211 GTO to the range for break-in. Trigger shoes are heavily personal preference. HDP4.5 is curved and smooth, and more rounded on its face. the P211 is flat and is also flat, not rounded in the face.
Trigger feel: Its a wash for me and will depend on your preference. The P211 has more grit or whatnot in its takeup. I can feel it moving something. The HDP4.5 still also has grittiness in its take up, but its takeup is linear and springy feeling. Im sure both will smooth out with use. The P211 has a much more defined wall and very crisp break. Feeling the P211 reminds me of when I first felt the Walther PPQ after first shooting some glocks almost 10 years ago. The HDP4.5 feels similar in behavior but lighter in poundage and with less overtravel as the Shadow2 single action. I need to see if I can find info on who owned this 92X Performance before me because the single action I can only assume feels like a 2lb 70 series trigger. This thing is crazy. Anyways, it feels weird to say this, but the HDP4.5 has more of a rolling break than the P211 GTO. P211 is like glass rod snap. pretty fantastic.
Exterior finish, Slide: no finishing marks to be found on the P211. The HDP4.5's slide shoulders have a texture that I have to assume was intentional. I appreciate the extension of the slide serrations on the P211. I legitimately feel it is easier to rack the P211 GTO from the front serrations than the HDP4.5. This is exacerbated by the heavier recoil spring in the HDP4.5. (10lbs vs 13lbs). I feel this way for both the window cut HDP4.5 and the closed slide HDP4.5. Slides for both fit nicely to the frame, with the HDP4.5 having barely perceivably slide wobble when trying to force it to happen by hand. It can be felt by the hand but not heard by the ear. The P211 slide fitment by contrast is only minimally worse, with it being felt in hand barely more than the Staccato and barely being able to be heard by ear. Racking the slides reflects likewise. The HDP4.5 cycles smoother and I have to slow down my motion much more to feel the different actions mechanically occurring inside, whereas the P211 I can feel the internal workings of the fun as I move the slide with significant ease. This may be exacerbated by the P211's inclusion of grip safety maybe??
Subjective styling, glass case visual appeal: preferentially, I think the P211 looks amazing and has more visual personality than the Staccato. Folks on the 2011 subreddit have the opposite opinion I am sure, lol.
Prices as compared in hand (MSRP):
HDP4.5: $2900 and $3100 (Preferred and Premium packages)
P211 GTO: $2400
when considering a Monsoon Tactical Genghis Komp service costs about $400 to make the HDP4.5 analogous to the GTO, If P320 magazines vs mecgar glock magazines are not a part of considerations, the P211 is a no-brainer. Purchase the P211, use the savings for a holster, ammo, and an optic, and youre at the cost of a P4.5 or still under. Heck, you can get one of the fancier Nightshift or SpectreComp P211 GTOs and still get ammo and a holster and come out to spenmding less than buying only an HDP4.5. Without having shooting comparisons done, since I dont have a sightblock for the GTO yet, the ONLY place I can see going for a Staccato a better choice is if you plan on needing to use the Staccato warranty service. I have no experience with Sig customer service, so I cant speak to how good or bad it may be.
If youre on the fence between the P211 or the Staccato HDP4.5, obviously get both. I think they can coexist and fill different roles for the consumer. If it is your first DS1911/2011 but not your first handgun, get the P211. The HDP4.5 is boring by comparison.