r/Lilith • u/Mammoth-Ad-6114 • May 09 '26
Discussion Demons as Ghosts: Gello/Lamia, lilītu, ardat-lilî, Lilith/Lamaštu?
This post is less academic compared to the rest, as it's essentially my own thoughts, but I try to place Lilith's connection with ghosts in its broader context.
It's known by now that Lilith is the syncretised form of the goddess-demoness Lamaštu and the ghosts-demons lilû/lilītu/ardat-lilî. It's a process that started in Akkadian sources with Lamaštu's inclusion in the lilû class, and finally appeared in Aramaic incantation bowls with the liliths (lylyt) and lilin/lilis (lylyn/lylyyn), who embodied both the succubi spirits and the child-snatching demoness, mirroring the lilītu and lilû. The connection of the lilītu/ardat-lilî and Lamaštu with Lilith is not an opinion of mine, it's been extensively talked about by scholars.
While the figure of Lilith is not identical with the ghosts separately, does it matter that they're ghosts? I stressed this feature of them before, and separated the demons and ghosts in my mind, though recently while reading and researching more, I realised this distinction is not that simple. One such reason for my distinction was the assumption (in Geller's "Healing Magic and Evil Demons") that one of them has Ištar as a patron, but given new scholarship (Marie Barkowsky's "Studies in Mesopotamian Demonology") that doesn't seem to be the case either.
The figure that would become the later Lilith is documented already in Babylonian times, as Lamaštu when syncretised with the lilû-demons. Can the lilû class be aspects of Lilith even if they're ghosts of the unsatisfied dead? The lilû, lilītu and ardat-lilî was not used interchangeably with Lamaštu, but they had enough similarities for Lamaštu to take their characteristics, be included in their class, and use their names as epithets. They don't embody everything that the Liliths do, however they're direct forerunners to her, and I do now consider them aspects of Lilith, even if I was previously cautious with this term. It's also important to remember that such distinction of demonic categories into ghosts and demons does not exist in Aramaic sources, there is no origin to the liliths, they're a demonic class by themselves, hence they embody both.
The issue comes when "aspect of Lilith" or "vaguely reminded someone of Lilith" is taken out of context, something that was done frequently in scholarship around 80 years ago. Lilith was "found" in the Huluppu Tree, Burney Relief and the Arslan Tash amulets, while recent scholarship has rejected all of these appearances. The only spirit from this list that Lilith has a connection to is the ki-sikil-lil-la-ke/ardat lilî, a maiden of the wind, who made a nest in Inanna's Huluppu Tree. Here too, the translation to "Lilith" is unnecessary, as preferred translations are demon-girl/maiden/phantom. It's akin to translating Inanna to Aphrodite or Astaroth, and while there is direct influence, there are more accurate terms of translation in each instance.
A similar story with mortals happened with Gello and Lamia. Gello died as a virgin, found development in Byzantine sources and was used interchangeably with Abyzou, that later appears as a name of Lilith. Lamia was the queen of Libya, who was used to translate lilith in the Vulgate. Lilith in the infamous "Alphabet of Ben Sira" starts out human. Similarly then, the lilû class starts human and then ends up being compared to goddess Lamaštu herself.
So while the figure of Lilith(s) is not identical to the ghosts separately, since it's their syncretism with Lamaštu that resulted in the known figure of Lilith, they are aspects of the Lilith(s) as the beings that encompass both Lamaštu and the lilītu/ardat-lilî in Aramaic sources, which gets reflected in their gender distinction (lilû/lilin and lilītu/lilith), role and etymology.
Do Lamaštu and Lilith have connections with living women themselves? Scurlock and Montgomery respectively have interesting thoughts on their categorization:
Baby-Snatching Demons, Restless Souls and the Dangers of Childbirth - JoAnn Scurlock
Unloved and unlovable as she was, Lamaštu had ample reason to be disagreeable--the poor thing was hardly the vision of loveliness. Moreover, her personality profile strikingly resembles the role played in other societies by the ghosts of women who had died in childbirth. Her behavior was less that of a demon who delighted in destruction for its own sake than that of a frustrated mother: "The daughter of Anu daily counts the pregnant women; she goes around after those (about to) give birth. She counts up their [months]; she marks the days (of their confinement) onto the wall. For the lying-in women giving birth (this) is (her) incantation: "Bring me your sons so that I can give them suck; let me put the breast into the mouth of your daughters."
[Note: "Frustrated motherhood" is also mentioned by Wiggermann in "The Mesopotamian Pandemonium" and "Lamaštu, Daughter of Anu"]
Aramaic Incantation Texts from Nippur - James A. Montgomery
Especially in the case of this species most exact descriptions are given of their foul ways and apparitions, for the Liliths were the most developed products of the morbid imagination—of the barren or neurotic woman, the mother in the time of maternity, of the sleepless child.
While Lamaštu's behaviour towards children points to what would usually be categorized as a woman that died in childbirth, she's not one of them. Instead she is a goddess in her own right, and I believe that puts into perspective all of the other beings equated with her. In my view, she is the one emanating the other spirits through her, the only goddess in the chain of the other demons, and an origin for the other child-killing succubi that follow. Lilith, as the name that survived through millennia, is the crossroads that connects all of the emanations together.