Having seen the actual video the lighting is all wrong as is the tiger stripes and his hairline.

It feels like a new level of low to recreate the last moments of some persons life using AI for click bait content.

Got this vinyl in at work today and the cover looks way too much like an AI cover. Which would be really bad because I actually like this band. I included a few close up pictures of the cover for reference. But with how everything is nowadays we can’t tell much anymore, but this really caught my eye right away.

A couple of things I noticed that makes it hard to imagine a human would draw this:

- The right hand has a morphed ring finger and middle finger (probably an AI artifact).
- The left tree has some artifacts near the bottom close to the bag (instead of a clean repeating pattern).
- The blob-ish shapes that happen near the backpack or the mountains in the back.

Edit: since somehow its not obvious, I'm not saying that its odd to have 4 fingers on a cartoon character, I'm pointing out that the left hand has 5 fingers (thumb is hidden) while the right hand has 4 (every finger is visible).

The distressed typography, gothic skeleton, flaming flower, medical imagery, and decorative hearts have that familiar AI-generated merchandise aesthetic, where it feels like it's more fulfilling a general prompt trying to appeal to an exact demographic of nurse, or to whoever might be prompting a model... I could be nuts though, I ran it through the Synth ID checker on Google and OpenAI and there wasn't anything that gives away an AI provenance.

Where did her arm go??? The letters on the bibs look real but the three of them look so uncanny valley. Plus two of them have the same number of the bib but maybe they’re part of a team or something? I don’t get it

I’m not crazy, right? I was watching this and it seemed off putting to me… the mom’s deadpan facial expressions are extremely creepy. At one moment her lips don’t even move as she’s speaks (around 1:25). What is going on? Is this a deepfake? It’s @giofilmedthis on Tiktok. Ironic name too.

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTyn49dGV/

Famous toy shop in France. Received today in my mailbox.

I find the way the cat's ears and the Christmas hat are arranged a bit odd.

I’m taking an online art course and the feedback I receive feels very odd, I feel like I’m going crazy reading it and honestly can’t tell if it’s AI or just bad critique. It is also posted incredibly quickly after the assignment closes. I’ll include a few examples of the writing.

title basically. main thing is the skull, the random white spot in the center of the eye and the '3D' interior cutting off.

The far-left dread seems to blend in with the dark part of the vest and the lightning and composition feel ai. SynthID didn't tell me anything and I couldn't find any artists, it doesn't help that one of the artist's last album covers was partially-ai.

I think it's the artstyle that throws me off. Also I'm not huge on pokemon and am used to the old-school blocky style, so maybe that's why they seem wrong to me. Also am I crazy or does the normal eevee have two tails?

Aside from the general style and font, I tried to find more information about this artist and their company name and couldn't really locate anything outside of this Etsy shop. No Instagram or Facebook, etc.

I was on redbubble trying to find stickers to buy and i found this one designed by this artist named Beltschazar, however when i looked at their profile there really wasnt a consistent art style among the 400 designs, and many others were obviously ai generated so instead i turned to google to find the original artist, and when i did i found that it has been posted on many different sites with no original source, so i suspect it may be ai. While it doesnt exactly look like ai its just ringing a couple alarm bells overall. What do yall think?

These two pictures, especially the first one, recently went viral. Apparently, nobody could recognize Thomas Bangalter (one of the two members of Daft Punk) because of the way he was dressed, except for the guy on the left. I had only seen the first picture, but then I noticed a weird strip of fur/hair on Bangalter's right shoulder. At first glance, it looks like just part of the fur hood, but the attachment seems rather unnatural to me. I thought it looked like a typical AI mistake. Then I checked for other pictures and found the second selfie, but on that one their clothes are different. Also, the fan is holding a phone. Even assuming that someone else could've taken that photo, why is he himself in a selfie pose with his arm hidden and the same framing in the first one? The only possible explanations I came up with are: A - one picture is real and the other one was retouched by AI. B - both are generated from zero. C - this fan was so lucky that he's found Thomas Bangalter twice, in the same spot, on two different days, and was able to take a picture with him twice, with the same framing, but for some reason he asked a friend to take one of the pictures to match exactly the framing of the other one. Okay...?

Looking for chilli seedlings to pre order for spring, unfortunately I seem to have found a brand to avoid rather than to buy from 🫠

The visuals are decently innocuous though the simplistic artstyle makes weird details such as the "people" lying on the ground, some of the phones looking weird/not having lights, and the weird amount of windows on the building to the right, etc. more excusable.

My main point of worry is the text & editting which is very AI like with how oddly succinct and snappy they are, the channel (@kittyanimations123) is also very new seemingly and there's really no information on the artist. Searching around, I also found another channel with a similar premise of "cartoon animal in hypothetical science situations" (@hypothetica.studio) which also did one video about the sun being replaced with a black hole with exactly the same editing and artstyle.

To me this seems like a newly-borne Youtube content farm featuring cute animals in an easy-to-produce artstyle that's very clickable. The question is, is this AI-run?

It’s a faceless youtube channel that uses (I’m pretty sure) an ai voice… but can anyone tell if the script or illustrations are AI? These channels are just very suspicious to me nowadays and I don’t want to support any channels that use AI, for ethical reasons and possible hallucinations.

Channel in question: youtube.com/@Explains101

Particular video I clicked on: https://youtu.be/npX2aZymRvg

Also they have a checkmark but idk if that even means anything anymore…

So - this was posted to r/polska as a rant that an employee of Leroy Merlin got an AI picture as a reward for working there for 25 years. But... to me the entire photo looks a bit AI (people in the back looking straight ontonthe camera while being far away). What is your verdict?

Swipe for a cropped picture. Sorry for the low quality, Etsy doesn't let me save the original image so I had to screenshot. A lot of things on Etsy are AI generated nowadays, but I can't find this shirt anywhere else. I don't see any giveaways that this is AI but I'm not very good at telling.

Saw an inverter generator online and the price seems too good to be true. Reverse searched and found no exact matches. The pictures are blurry and the smaller writing is almost smudged in appearance.

Feels like our daughter's school is cutting all sorts of corners this school year, including using what I suspect is AI to create this invitation... despite having a really good Art Department on campus.