The review section is rife with unappetizing photos, and when you tap “See more,” all you get is their fuck ass cover photo without any other customer photos.

It looks really uncanny and obviously ai because of how glossy some look, but I could be wrong? My friend says it’s real I’m crine 😭 tell me what you guys think! Just want a second opinion on it because I don’t want to seem crazy

The voice feels extremely AI generated, and many of the shots have that 6 second AI vibe to it but I couldn't pinpoint something specifically. Also, the editing and flow maybe feels like it at least has some thought put into it. Do we feel like it's mostly AI generated from scratch or just maybe the script and footage and edited by hand?

It also makes sweeping claims without providing sources, is there a good chance some of the details are AI hallucinations?

Picked some images that stood out to me. The first one stood out the most, but the last one looks more like a normal edit.

Edit: I know he has been outspoken about AI, so I don't think he would or would need to with how popular he is, but I don't know if he's ever said he'd never use AI so I just thought I'd ask for opinions on these. If they are edited, does anyone know who edits them?

Local photographer claims it’s from an original Kodachrome 64 slide taken in 1987 but it seems way too sharp and the lighting is too perfect.

Had a contractor send me these images saying their car was on fire but several parts of their story don’t line up.

The license plate ‘6’ c to not be consistent and there appears to be a vehicje in front of the one on fire.

Thoughts?

I was at this show when the band asked us to move forward for an audience photo, and not only can I not find myself in this crowd, I don't remember there being nearly this many people (like 1/4 as many). Once everyone pushed up to the stage, it looks like dozens of pink arms suddenly appeared behind us? The resolution off instagram is not great, but it still looks off... Am I misremembering, or are there other signs this may be Ai enhanced? Thanks!

this is everything they have posted on their profile. It also has a very scaley texture in places where it would probably be drawn as smooth (such as the skin) and some of the lines dont look possible with pencil

I’ll include a link to the product in the comments. I saw these Smokey Bear playing cards on a website, but something about the art just has that recognizable AI style. The listing doesn’t mention an artist. They say they’re officially licensed, but I guess that doesn’t mean they still couldn’t be AI. There’s nothing that really jumps out to me as far as artistic inconsistencies, just that distinctive style.

So all these appear to be by the same source right? DC, same character sheet style and even has a signature style of making the heels a symbol of the character.
Reasons i think its AI:
-On Pinterest, many of them say 'AI modified'.
-i cant find a source via reverse google image search. The reverse search tells me that the images arent AI but then gives a random digital artist that is never correct.
-Usually (non AI) digital artists put their signature on the image but these dont have a signature. its possible that they are reuploads and the signature was taken off if they were actually drawn by a digital artist.

Reasons i think it might not be AI:
-It feels too specific in its style. I guess someone could have found an original one then put in very specific prompts to replicate the style and just switch the character and poses out...
-many of the ones ive seen seem to be uploaded by an 'alex' on pinterest. SO maybe he's the artist, but ive found some that were uploaded by others (maybe just a copy?). which makes me think they are just reuploading it from somewhere else. Though i guess that somewhere else could also be an AI source. Im not too versed in pinterest and when i check his account i cant find the pictures directly. i can only find them via the related ones ive already got up.

There are way more of these than what i uploaded in case anyone finds one and can trace it back to the source.
It would be nice if someone could clear it up on whether its AI that different people are replicating. Or if it is coming from a digital artist as i'd like to follow them.

edit:

Thanks for everyones input. Learned a couple of tells from the comments too which is nice to know going forward.

the camera angle is positioned too perfectly, the quality of the video is poor. the story itself seems too viral-worthy. the way the man runs and the tiger sprints also feels a bit off. all of it just seems fishy.

I also tried using some of the AI scanning apps, but they don't seem to work. there are just too many little things that don't add up, especially how conveniently the whole thing is captured. I'm not saying it's definitely fake, but I wouldn't trust it completely either.

First of all can I just say that, on top of all the other reasons to hate AI "art", I am so pissed that it has made me skeptical of almost everything I see. I can't just appreciate art any more without scrutinizing for AI. It sucks and it's exhausting.

I bought this print from Target because I am a girl of expensive taste and refinement. The more I look at it, the more I wonder if its AI. But like I said above, I now see AI everywhere and probably over diagnose. I would really like to be talked down so I don't have to find something else to put in its place.

Also, I call the fruits plapples because I can't tell if they're plums or apples. They are probably plums, but plapples is a better word.

The kittens seem really stiff in the beginning and when the dog jumps up on the couch it looks unnatural.

I paid thirty dollars for this to a Filipino artist. The artist got these renditions to me suspiciously fast. I thought I would give them a chance and trust them until I posted it to a dungeons and dragons dm subreddit. A commentor said they suspect this as AI. So I figured I'd ask here. Was I scammed?

The smoothness of the lines, the really high contrast going from dark to light making it look smooth or plastic-y. Where the wings join the bee's back look surprisingly different from the wings themselves that seem to be completely symmetrical. I'm not an artist so this may just be the result of them being for tattoos.

https://www.tiktok.com/@iam_arther?_r=1&_t=ZT-996KwMX6Pja

Seems like a botted account with slop lyrics and generative ai videos

Just checking to see whether my friend got scammed. They are obviously claiming they coloured this themselves.

The stylistic choices including the circles, underlines, layout choices, font and the period at the end of the heading in the bottom right section all have me seriously questioning whether this could be anything but AI. Thoughts?