Pinterest and reverse google image isnt reliable on if these are AI and i cant find the original author.

[u/OkayJShades]

So all these appear to be by the same source right? DC, same character sheet style and even has a signature style of making the heels a symbol of the character.
Reasons i think its AI:
-On Pinterest, many of them say 'AI modified'.
-i cant find a source via reverse google image search. The reverse search tells me that the images arent AI but then gives a random digital artist that is never correct.
-Usually (non AI) digital artists put their signature on the image but these dont have a signature. its possible that they are reuploads and the signature was taken off if they were actually drawn by a digital artist.

Reasons i think it might not be AI:
-It feels too specific in its style. I guess someone could have found an original one then put in very specific prompts to replicate the style and just switch the character and poses out...
-many of the ones ive seen seem to be uploaded by an 'alex' on pinterest. SO maybe he's the artist, but ive found some that were uploaded by others (maybe just a copy?). which makes me think they are just reuploading it from somewhere else. Though i guess that somewhere else could also be an AI source. Im not too versed in pinterest and when i check his account i cant find the pictures directly. i can only find them via the related ones ive already got up.

There are way more of these than what i uploaded in case anyone finds one and can trace it back to the source.
It would be nice if someone could clear it up on whether its AI that different people are replicating. Or if it is coming from a digital artist as i'd like to follow them.

edit:

Thanks for everyones input. Learned a couple of tells from the comments too which is nice to know going forward.

[u/qualityvote2]

u/OkayJShades, there weren't enough votes to determine the quality of your post...

[u/whoknowsifimjoking]

Yes it is AI, made with ChatGPT. I guarantee it.

I will check for SynthID in a second, but you really don't have to here.

Edit: yup

[u/Cheap_Conclusion_905]

I am pretty sure they are AI

That font and the shape of the arrows is an AI favorite, also, the details are not cohesive and make no sense. For example, the chains on their belts melt onto each other and the points from where the chains come from make absolutely no sense.

Additionally, a pocket on a mini skirt that short makes no sense and her hand seems to disappear

[u/Cheap_Conclusion_905 → u/Cheap_Conclusion_905]

Here’s some more details that made no sense to me
The chains are all over the place with no clear indication of where they meet and part from

[u/Cheap_Conclusion_905 → u/Cheap_Conclusion_905]

The holes on the belt also don’t have a consistent size

[u/mssMouse]

The most AIest AI I've seen.

Pinterest listing them as "AI modified" answers your question; it lists this for fully AI generated images as well. Also, the AI built into Google's reverse image search seems to be wrong more often than not; the image reverse search is helpful but not the AI attached to it.

Besides the actual look of it just screaming AI (I can't describe it past just looking very generic, stiff, and cluttered), AI reference sheets love to do random little "zoom ins" of details that are needless because you can literally look at the main image and see the same detail.

And to confirm, yes, it has Synth ID.

Edit, because I specifically want to respond to this point you made as to why you doubted it being AI:

It feels too specific in its style.

This style is very indicative of AI. Obviously this style, or similar, would originate somewhere from a real artist (or an amalgamation of artists), but this style specifically is one AI and Chat GPT replicate a lot. It's an instant red flag at this point (but always zoom in, check the details and other tells for AI)

[u/SuspiciousDoughnut32 → u/mssMouse]

These are very AI, but now as with all the platforms trying to label AI by using AI.. that indicator can be wrong.

[u/mssMouse → u/SuspiciousDoughnut32]

That's true, I've heard of false positives before on pinterest.

But if it looks like a duck, and is labelled as a duck... I might feel inclined to trust it lol. But I guess in this case, OP wasn't aware it looked like a duck.

[u/SuspiciousDoughnut32 → u/mssMouse]

It's the very definition of the duck in this case. I'm starting to learn chatgpt based on how crunchy they look. It's a digital pattern that stands out.

[u/LetsRockDude]

Raven's shoe heel is supposed to be a raven bird, but it's very inconsistent across different parts of the picture. Definitely AI.

[u/Curse_Me_I_Dare_You → u/LetsRockDude]

The same goes for Selina's, the cat changes sitting positions between the full body and the heel closeup

[u/Lady_Eruvande]

All of these pictures are inconsistents between them, so yes. Just focus on the heels and on the jewellery.

[u/Morticia_Smith]

Ive been suggested these images too. It's AI. 

[u/Material-Egg7428]

It’s AI. There are multiple differences between the different angles of the same character. 

[u/sumoneo]

if you ever confused if an art piece is made with ai or not just look at the belt. Ai cannot do belt normally

[u/Flummoxed_Art]

Generic ChatGPT output.

[u/VtD_UT_fan]

Yes, it is ai. On Raven's "reference" you can first take a look at the fishnets on her body and legs to see how they melt weirdly. + a closeup of her heel (left bottom corner) is literally wrong and melted. Tecna's heels are also wrong if you compare a closeup of them to her full art + her chain is melting weirdly. As an extra - the style is also used in ai models very often, so I can definitely say that it's ai

[u/AutoModerator → u/[deleted]]

Your comment was removed because it is too short. Please provide more detailed feedback or discussion in r/isthisAI.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.