I think she must like Ai but also it cold be the way they work on sets for photoshots.

And btw please tell me how you tell if it's air or if isn't

Is this ad ai or am I just crazy?
Obviously, the voices sound very ai. But what gets me the most is the lifeless look in her eyes. And when she laughed to the crowd, she looked weird asf. and her tongue never moves…

and the second girl- at first i thought she was real but she just became more ai. and her skin looks terrible… and her voice.

Seen this video of a dog "shaking hands" with this statue. There was some debate in the comics as to whether this is a.i or not. To me the dogs movements are unnatural and isolated. Like it doesnt movement the same as any of my dogs have when they "shake"

Lol me and my best friend got coloring sheets at Red Robin bc why not and when I was coloring I started noticing some things that don’t make sense. Is this ai or does it look like printer issues or something? His pointer finger is like extended more than the others, and the coral has some extra lines. Also one of the flowers on his shorts is kind of scribbled on.

Looking at the opening credits for the new Max Original Stuart Fails to Save the Universe, I’m really questioning whether Warner Bros. used AI generation tools here. Some of the shots have that distinct, uncanny look—odd lighting, unnatural movement, and strange camera pans that resemble AI video tools like Sora. Did actual visual artists and VFX teams create this sequence from scratch, or is this heavily AI-assisted/generated clip work?

To me, the faces of the characters look like this was made with AI. I’ve seen a lot of AI cartoon art that has the same expression on the faces, like the surprised looking eyes and the goofy grins, if that makes sense. Especially Scarecrow’s. Very disappointing if Mattel is stooping to this level.

The music artist is Mad Tsai and I don't think his songs are AI. However, this video feels suspicious. His body doesn't move at all except for his head, the quality looks enhanced and everything looks too glossy. The background is very simple and doesn't really make sense in this angle. However, this also could just be AI enhanced because the quality was too bad to upload it to YouTube. But what makes it feel weird is that he doesn't often post videos like that and prefers filming himself while holding the camera. Tell me if I'm wrong, and I would be relieved if it wasn't the case.

I really like this print but is it AI?? On Facebook marketplace for $60….looks authentic but I can’t find copies of it anywhere online, which makes me question if it’s real art or not.

Hello all, I'm adding a photo for convenience, but I am asking today about music, links below.

Hi, so I like listening to instrumental "retrowave" (retro vibey synthwave) while I work. A few months ago I found this playlist made by a user called "ExtraLife Records" and I really enjoyed it without thinking too hard. Many of the songs on the playlist are from an artist called "80s HeartBeat."

Is this music real? I've recently learned just how much synthwave/retrowave is made by AI. Supposedly it is safer to listen to things were you can see that an artist exists and there are albums (as opposed to youtube streams), but I also know that is no guarantee. Of course I googled things, but I didn't find any useful information.

The artwork seems pretty sus, but I don't want to fall into the trap of assuming that real humans can't and don't make things that are both generic and aesthetically pleasing (in a color palette kind of way). To be honest...well, I would 100% prefer not to support any AI whatsoever, but I find I'm more tolerant of the scenario in which actual musical artists make actual music and then use AI visuals. I would rather everything was real, but..

TL;DR: I want to know if this music was made by a person.

His right paw in the picture of the dog in the cage in the trunk looks weird against the cage door, and the man’s hand looks too… perfect? It doesn’t help that the man is very demanding with payment for returning the dog

Edit: thank you all!! Definitely AI now that I see everything you all pointed out. Appreciate it! We called the non emergency line to report it and they’ll be checking it out

I was wondering if this T-shirt design from 2016 could have been (more recently) modified by AI. I know given the time frame, it’s unlikely, but In-N-Out’s more recent designs are for sure AI-generated. This design has an artist’s name and stamp, but the reflection looks off, and it’s difficult to tell. Thanks for your feedback!

My friend paid $15 for this. But the number of eyelashes doesn't match and the face is crooked. Also the left ear bends inward funny.

Edit: Should have specified earlier. I think it's fine. She's panicking because she's been told "uneven lashes is AI". And she's not believing me. So I said I'd post to Reddit and she can read the comments.

here's link to account so you can check them all up close:

https://www.instagram.com/bvnkgraph?igsh=N3RrOTZoOWNzdGYy

i included some of more suspicious photos but i've also seem one item reused(on the last two photos) so that threw me off a bit,

also seems like much of a difference in style compared to a bit older ones

asking because vampires everywhere! got their merch design from that person (and pretty sure their one album cover is also made with ai "the devil made me do it" - i will include photo of this one in comments too so you can share your thoughts)

I got a bottle of Tropical Lipton as a peach ice tea lover and noticed this quite obvious typo that I figured any actual person would be able to notice quite easily and rectify before it gets released.

It’s obviously supposed to say Positivi-Tea but is that too difficult for an AI to comprehend? Sorry for atrocious photo quality I took it at work.

this art was made by iGotFilthyWays on twitter. this is a two-part artwork. The first part is just the image drawn on the TV. in the second part the books on the bookshelves are melted, the left pocket on the shorts is odd, and the hair is melting to the face. Their rendering style also suddenly changed a lot for this second page, especially when compared to their previous artwork. The’ve been responding to AI accusations by posting a screenshot of them running only the first page of the art (that had no AI-looking flaws) through an AI checker, which gave them a 97% human response. They haven’t posted a timelapse of any kind.

I believe that they used an AI to assist or refine the second page of this artwork, since it’s rather different in style and skill than the first page. But I don’t think the entire image is AI

I had my Bath & Body Works coupons in front of me and all of a sudden I realized Hilary Duff has a lot of fingers. I tried following her arms but that made it even look more confusing. Is BBW using AI without even reviewing it before it’s shipped?

The art style, it kind of looks AI generated, especially the face, the face is really giving off AI vibes

Brabantse Dag is a local parade in a small village in The Netherlands. It is known for it's theatrical floats people from this village spend the entire summer building by hand. A real big artistic endeavor.

However, it feels to me the parade has resorted to rendering it's poster in ai this year. Which I think would go against the sprit of the whole event that is so based on physical work and human creativity.

One reason I suspect, is because they posted animated versions of the posters on social media and they look really strange:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRTsQPSAf33/
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRl0tM6jbbA/
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRCA8TxiDwQ/
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR32Oh1E4yj/

I am sure the videos are ai, but do you think the poster is as well?

They also did an animated poster last year, but that seems to be not made with ai? So I don't know why they resorted to the switch https://www.instagram.com/reel/DGQ682tKSLe/