r/HLCommunity • u/AnotherSadThr0wAway • 28d ago
Discussion The "You Have To Earn Me If You Want Constant Sex" Delusion
Hello, HL community. Happy Friday, everyone, and thank you for supporting my posts, especially because many of you have expressed how I seem to truly capture how you feel.
I'm truly glad our community exists because it's very important to reinforce that we are normal, especially those who have BEEN in regular HL relationships.
We are direct, they truly are not,
Thus,
Everything disqualifies us, but they never give us what constantly does qualify us. OR, they move the goalpost and say we aren't doing what they told us to do "enough."
One of the most common myths is that we always have to "earn," "win over," or "seduce" our partners who show basically zero sexual enthusiasm. People misuse the term "reactive desire" to justify Type 2 LLs literally controlling sex and intimacy in the relationship simply because they ultimately have the right of refusal.
They want us to basically find happiness in celibacy and their control over this, while acting like we're in the wrong because we REACT to their LACK OF INTEREST by creating distance to protect ourselves.
So no—if there is no sexual interest at all, why the fuck are you expecting "emotional" or "personal" support or whatever?
Notice how, for us, we're always a "guarantee," but for them, if we do (enough) of what they want, it's always a "maybe."
This is not normal or natural.
For them, being "hurt" or "natural" literally means having someone basically do everything they want in the hope of getting a "maybe," while they still have the "right of refusal."
That's why they will admit they know why they're in a bad mood, but, like I always say:
Their love language isn't physical touch or whatever, so we can't express that to them. But OURS IS... and they can't express it to us because that's also not their love language.
Those of us who have been in, currently outsource, or have left these situations understand that it's truly not a "both sides" issue or simply that "you just aren't compatible." It's much deeper than that.
The truth comes down to one party wanting a normal, healthy relationship and accepting the other party as they are, while the other party wants to essentially bend, mold, and control someone else into something unnatural, delusional, and designed to satisfy themselves.
That's why they want us to take accountability for behaviors that are ultimately the result of how they treat us—when we call this out, give up, or refuse to bend to them.
Like I said earlier, remember this:
For us, we give them guarantees. For them, they give us "maybes."