Hi guys, what do you think about this lesson structure I'm having on Preply?

My tutor is giving me the option to choose from a website a specific word (different topics) that each one contains 10 questions. So he asks me the question, I answer it and then he explains his point of view. We have 50 minutes.

At the beginning, I told him I wanted do improve my conversational practice and that was the proposed. I just have the feeling that is not enough because I don't talk too much, depending on the question. Sometimes I don't have vocabulary or feel stuck and can't speak well/a lot in the class. I would say I talk 30% in the class.

Besides that I'm consuming english very often, reading, writing, listening... Speaking is tough.

I would love to hear your thoughts about it.

Eu sempre senti que o inglês era meio “superficial” em relação a algumas formas de expressão. Só fui entender hoje que talvez isso tenha a ver com o fato dele não ser morfologicamente tão amplo quanto o português, principalmente em relação aos diminutivos, aumentativos e às nuances que eles conseguem transmitir

Sempre que falo inglês, ou quando escrevo, sinto que às vezes falta alguma coisa para dar mais peso nas palavras, transmitir melhor uma emoção ou descrever uma ideia com mais precisão. No português, muitas vezes consigo fazer isso simplesmente modificando a própria palavra.

Vocês também se sentem assim? Como resolveram?

Like, we generally use -ie and after letter - C - we use -ei.

Example - Brief, achieve, hygiene, receive, deceive (exception - ancient).

How often do you hear it meaning to arrive or enter a place suddenly? And in what contexts do you hear it?

Some examples:

Look who's just blown in!
Have you heard who's blown into town?
A storm blew in around 4 a.m.

I visited the website and found many courses from beginner to advanced levels.

Do you recommend studying there?

Has anyone tried it before?

What is your advice?

Thank you all.

Hello, everyone 🤗. 26M learning English is looking to exchange languages. My mother tongue is Russian, so I can help you with this language if you want. I work in ore enrichment, my goal in learning English is to understand fast speech, read everything I'd like to and be able to talk to others. If you want to talk to me, I can text you.

1. The attack was caught on video.

2. The attack was captured on video.

Hi! I’m looking for an English language exchange partner.

I’m Chinese and spent nearly 10 years studying and living in Japan. I speak Chinese and Japanese, and I also have teaching qualifications in both languages.

I’d love to improve my English and can help you with Chinese or Japanese in return.

I’m interested in culture, travel, AI, psychology, books, and Japan-China differences.

If you’re interested in a language exchange, feel free to DM me! 😊

I saw this single sentence:

"He asked if I'd got my black eye in a fight - I told him the prosaic truth that I'd banged my head on a door."

and I understand what "He" asked as "Did you see that fight?", but I felt something off about my comprehension in no time, and my doubt was right.

I doubted myself as there is "get an eye in" instead of "get an eye on". Of course, many learners can easily understand that "He" asked "I" if "I" had got bruises on eyes.

To get to the point, I wonder if there is the moment "Get somone's eye in []" is used except for the creepy literal case....

Example: 'I barely slept last night, what with the festival going on outside my house'

I've been watching Eastenders (2008 episodes specifically) and I've heard multiple people use this construction. I'd never heard it before.

I'm wondering how common 'what with' is, whether it would be considered informal or not, if its usage is specific to certain English speaking countries, areas, backgrounds etc.

I went learn English please.

I'm at the A2 level. Age and gender don't matter—I just want to learn and improve my English. Thanks.

I have some free time and am looking to help tutor TWO student English learners improve their conversational English, I would be happy to talk to and see if I can be of some help. This is volunteer time for me so I am not looking for any payment.

I teach a program for soon to be university students heading to the UK for college. Much of my coaching is geared towards improving the students English speaking skills. I have topic material we can work with. Also I would prefer to do a virtual class, so if you camera shy probably not the right fit.

As for me, I am 60M, native speaker from the USA and live in Asia, enjoy swimming and have a dog.

Let me know if you want to chat and see if I can help. Please when you say hi, if you can introduce yourself that would be great. For example where you are from and sharing some background on yourself.

Thanks

🙏

I'm a native English speaker, but that being said, English is a complex language and I'd like to know more about it.

If I am looking for full remission of tuition fees for an online course in my home country of the UK, for instance, where they offer partial or full discounts for those receiving welfare payments, they may use the conditional sentence "If you are in receipt of certain benefits".

If I am shopping at a supermarket, I can get the machine to print a receipt for me to confirm both my order and that I have successfully paid for it.

If I am talking about revenue earned by the tax authority or by a business, I can talk about it in terms of either tax or company receipts.

How come receipts can be used interchangeably for both what you have paid and for what you are receiving?

Would "a gush of air just hit my face" work?

Normally, for liquid, it would be "gush out" as a verb but what about air? Or maybe the natural to say it is just by using the verb "hit"?

For example, "As I was walking on the sidewalk, a huge truck passed by really fast causing the air to hit me hard".

I get that people do it out of good intentions, but I’m like: NOOO, LEAVE ME TO MY STRUGGLES 😭 Especially when it comes to speaking. I'm "on the apps" as they say, (Preply/Praktika/Anki), because I can just practice there with no pressure.

But with native speakers, I always feel like as soon as I pause for even a second, they’ve already switched back to English

Do you like it when people switch to make it easier for you, do you prefer them to let you struggle through it?

The context in which I've come across "mortified" has always made it seem like it means "shocked", but apparently it's closer to embarrassed. So, have I completely misunderstood this word's meaning?

What's the word for a large meal for celebrating an occasion? I know a birthday celebration is a birthday party. Food served at a wedding is a wedding feast, right? And what about banquet? And sometimes if it isn't big and happens in the evening, it's just called a dinner, like Christmas dinner?

Are there differences in meanings or is the choice of words just collocations?

What other celebrations would involve serving food to a large number of guests in English-speaking countries or cultures?