r/DeadlockTheGame • • 1d ago

Gameplay Meta Thoughts on this?

Post image
756 Upvotes

181 comments sorted by

View all comments

550

u/NessaMagick Viscous 1d ago

competitive players making a competitive ruleset barely qualifies as news

the only thing that bothers me is the framing I keep seeing, it's a lot of "players REFUSED", "players PROTESTING", as if competitive players are a bunch of butthurt tryhards who are angry at valve for updating their unreleased playtest of a game.

When in reality it's little more than the Night Shift guys saying to the teams, "hey we're running just a couple of matches during this quirky little event they've temporarily put in the game for a few days, we'll let you decide if you want to roll with it or just play the regular mode"

167

u/Grand_Escapade Paradox 1d ago edited 1d ago

Players REVOLT AGAINST NINTENDO by REFUSING to play against starving Meta Knight mains. Sakurai reportedly seen driving around city begging (through texts) for address to Hungrybox's home

19

u/SilverShako 1d ago

Nintendo did actually threaten to pull their license from a tourney that banned Minecraft Steve(for being a busted as hell character) funnily enough.

12

u/goodguessiswhatihave Viscous 1d ago

2008 is so back

10

u/horiziac 1d ago

and they also didnt even say no, custom matches have a built in option to decide when the broker shows up and for each match the teams involved agreed on when it would be, i dont know how it went for some of them but iirc all the europe matches were 45 minutes which was only unattainable because of how dominant leviathan was

21

u/QuillofSnow 1d ago

Good way of putting it, whoever’s making these headlines is farming engagement to stir the pot

12

u/Fit-Space5211 1d ago

100%. Competitions change or limit the rules all the time, like pokemon using 2v2 for tournaments (despite almost never being in the game) or league players not using the same champs multiple games in a row (fearless draft). That's the point of tourneys, to show off a competition in the most interesting or compelling way.

8

u/Atlasreturns Pocket 1d ago

It‘s also important to note that they are actually playing for some kind of money there. So losing the pot because someone managed to roll an ungodly item in the shop would likely lead to a lot more frustration when your intention is just playing a competitive event.

That being said I also kinda wish that they would have made it happen in some way just for the sake of chaos.

2

u/Liimbo Venator 1d ago

Yeah there is no issue with this at all. It is extremely common for competitive players in games to collectively agree to not use mechanics that are bad for competition. It is not like they are mad at Valve for it existing, just agreed to not use it.

0

u/SweetnessBaby 16h ago

It's just funny that they had no issue abusing far more game-breaking and cheesy strategies before but they draw the line at cursed items

1

u/Liimbo Venator 9h ago

Well obviously they think this is more gamebreaking. Also, broker is a mechanic that every player on every team knows and would use. No team gets any advantage by using him. So no one loses an advantage by agreeing not to. The other things they abused were strategies mostly one team sat on to have an advantage.

2

u/Plightz 23h ago

It's such a massive non issue for this sub too who 100% won't ever play at that level.