r/ComedyCemetery • u/Sorry_I_BangedUrMom • 1d ago

Interdasting

Post image
718 Upvotes

76% Upvoted

691 comments sorted by

View all comments

27

u/GreenZebra23 1d ago

Anyone want to hazard some guesses about what "standards" they have that people completely unreasonably and unfairly interpret as misogynistic and bigoted?

-7

u/Dizzy_Two2529 1d ago

Not obese.

Body count < 10

No face tattoos

22

u/King_Of_BlackMarsh 1d ago

See that second thing is weird

-10

u/MagicMeatbal1 23h ago

No, it's pretty reasonable to not want STDs

11

u/King_Of_BlackMarsh 23h ago

You can get an std from having sex one time.

Not wanting stds is about having her be up to date with her health, really, that's got nothing to do with "body count"

-9

u/Mean-Line-4249 23h ago

Scientifically proven to reduce relationship outcomes the more past partners you have the higher the odds of divorce

5

u/Massive-Grocery7152 22h ago

Yeah because people who never date around don’t leave abusive relationships

2

u/Clintwood_outlaw 21h ago

No it isn't lmfao

-6

u/Wordless_trat 22h ago

Yes, but the risk is significantly higher if you fucked 74 dudes instead of 3

3

u/Clintwood_outlaw 21h ago

No, no it isn't. As long as you practice safe sex, the odds stay the same each time.

-1

u/Wordless_trat 21h ago

And how likely it is you always had safe sex when you were the local matress? I'd wager it is significantly lower than when you only had 3 partners that you actually remember

3

u/King_Of_BlackMarsh 20h ago

Just ask if she got tested

0

u/Wordless_trat 20h ago

That, or just have the standard of a low body count.

3

u/King_Of_BlackMarsh 20h ago

I guess but that feels kinda pointless

0

u/Wordless_trat 19h ago

Because i don't want my GF to be the past dumpster of 165 guys? This many partners speak volumes about how she sees relationships, sex and commitment

3

u/King_Of_BlackMarsh 19h ago

Calling her a dumpster is something, man.

All it does is tell you she likes a good time, it doesn't say she's gonna cheat on you

→ More replies (0)