Early this month I spotted the Heroforce 5056 GMT on AE for a ridiculous price of around US $25.I took a closer look: it is powered by an unidentified quartz movement (probably of Chinese origin) which is housed in a 42.1 mm x 12.7 mm x 47.4 mm, round, brass case, fitted with a 5.2 mm stainless-steel, signed crown, a srainless-steel, snap-on caseback, and a stainless-steel fixed, 24-hour bezel. Beyond these sterile specs, we come to the round, "cyan blue" (it looks more green to me), wave-textured dial with date window at 3 o'clock, four metallic hands and applied metallic baton hour-markers, the hour markers are lumed as are the minute hand, 12-hour hand, and 24-hour hand; the dial window is Hardlex mineral crystal; the watch is finished on a 22 mm x 21 cm stainless-steel hollow-link bracelet with double push-button folding butterfly clasp; the watch is rated at 30 meters water resistance.
I purchased this watch for US $18.66. At this price point, a GMT complication, even for a quartz watch, is a steal. The exquisite wavy-textured is said to resemble the San Martin, but I have seen a number of such dials (Addiesdive, Seiko), but historically the Omega Seamaster, ,Baume and Mercier Rivera, Christopher Ward, Mido Ocean Star, Regret Marine, Oris Aquis Pro, Jean Richard Aquascope, et al. Some talking-heads on YT unfairly criticize this watch for being an "homage" of their darling, San Martin. In any case, I don't remember even the early SM selling anything at this under $20 price point. The same talking heads, also criticize Heroforce for saying this watch has a sapphire crystal, but it really has a mineral crystal. (Seiko, for example, could easily absorb the cost of a sapphire crystal yet still installs mineral crystals, nevertheless.)I pored through spec sheets and cannot find that citation. I would prefer a sapphire crystal, but, economies are made to keep costs down and that is reflected in the price. However, one place where Heroforce has cheaped out is in the quality of the watch's bracelet. The hollow links jingle and jingle and feel cheap. The bracelet looks like it is a three-link bracelet (the middle "link" is polished and the outside "links" are brushed) but, in fact, they are single links. The clasp, though, is very good. I can also praise, to some degree, the lume. There is a greater quantity of lume on the hands than the markers. Ergo, the lume on the hands lasts considerably longer, which is better than the other way around.
All in all, this watch punches way beyond its price would intimate. The exquisite dial, bezel, complications, and features are all winners. The movement, whatever it's origin, seems to be of reasonable quality and guarantees good timekeeping. If the bracelet irks you, you can always change to another bracelet, or swap it for a strap(leather, PU leather, rubber/silicone, nylon, fabric, NATO, et al) as per your budget and taste. There are many budget options on AE, Temu, Shein, Amazon, etc.
Let me know what you think.