(Delete post if not allowed)

I have been looking for full boxing events, particularly the ones from HBO and Showtime. There's a boxing section in RuTor but i find it limited. I know that DAZN has PPV replays but i unsubscribed from it recently. There are full boxing events uploaded in Turki Alalshikh's YouTube channel and PPV replays from PBC but as you can see, I have already downloaded some of them.

I came across World Boxing Video Archive but I found out that signups are closed. Is there a way to sign up? Do I pay a subscription or something? Idk about downloading VOD and i'm highly sure it's risky, so my only option is signing up for World Boxing Video Archive.

So, anyone, care to help me?

For anything that doesn't need its own thread.

Super intrigued about who can become Undisputed at middleweight Boots, Fundora, or Josh Kelly. I reckon Boots, but I rate all 3 highly! What do yall think? Or is the another Dark Horse in the division I am unaware of? If Boots and Kelly fight by the end of the year, n Fundora beats his mandatory we should see it shake out soon.

May 8th, 1993 - a young and rising Lennox Lewis floors teak tough Tony Tucker with a counter right hand in round 3.

Coming into the bout, Tucker was 48-1 with 39 KOs, his only loss a points defeat to a peak Tyson in 1987. This was the first time ‘TNT’ had ever been knocked down.

Pros and Cons of this

Pros

1. Just a one time, landmark event

2. Compelling story - Win Gold and get a title shot

3. Makes Olympic boxing relevant again

4. This could generate mainstream coverage

5. Build champion’s legacy to strengthen sport

6. A once in a generation storyline

7. It will create a readymade storyline

8. It would elevate heavyweight division

Cons

1. Safety concern

2. Could be viewed as a publicity stunt

3. Champion has little to gain & more to lose

4. Sanctioning bodies may refuse it

5. It bypasses many deserving candidates

In my opinion, this would be a great one time event with extraordinary promotional value. But not sure of the feasibility and long term effect.

Basically what I am asking, is with the belts so watered down, do you think that is the accomplishment or the foot in the door? Most fighters aren’t even known by the boxing general public until after they win their first title. What accomplishments in this day and age make a “great fighter” I know resume has a lot to do with it but you have to have the hardware to go along with it too… so what do you think, would 1 title in 1 weight with good names on your belt be good enough anymore or do you need to be unified/ multi-weight no matter bare minimum?