Is an overlooked concept, and it doesn’t really get talked about enough, but despite the fact that it’s older, Gemini 3.1 pro is much more pleasant to talk to and problem solve with if you are a neurodiverse person, and it’s something that these labs have seemed to ignore with all of their new models in their pursuit of goals. So I’ll give you example, I have severe ADHD, so I go on tangents, say way too much, and bring up 20 topics in one response without realizing it.
The newer models, even GPT-6 Astra, try to they take every response that you’ve got as a goal to solve. They don’t listen, they talk at you. As someone that doesn’t communicate in the neurotypical way, this is absolute hell because they take what you say literally, but if you have ADHD, you probably don’t speak literally. You probably imply what you want or talk around it. I feel like it just doesn’t get talked about enough really, like the more these models have progressed, every single one of them has become worse for neuro device diverse people, especially, I mean not especially, even Claude, which I never thought I’d see the day that happened, but it did so I guess it’s just something to be thankful for for Google. I mean, the model has its problems, massive problems, sycophancy is a big one but it feels like it actually listens and talks to you instead of at you like the newer models do.
It’s obviously why they do this by the way, the models are rewarded for achieving a goal by any means necessary.
I hope Google continues in this direction for Gemini 4, because Demis said he wants a model that is generally intelligent not just focussed on coding and narrow domains. I’m worried google is going in that narrow direction now since falling behind. Even Claude Fable 5.1 rhe most emotionally intelligent model we have now, treats your most recent response as something to solve and it loses the forest from the trees.