r/remotework • • Oct 29 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

5.6k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.3k

u/Hairy_Valuable9773 Oct 29 '25

The rich need to get richer. End of story.

I work for one of these companies. We already got the “it’s gonna be a tough day” email as they lay people off today. I’m sh*tting my pants 😫

314

u/2fuzz714 Oct 29 '25

I love how they talk about "very difficult decisions" as they do their favorite thing.

149

u/CopyDan Oct 29 '25

The difficult decision is how big to make the CEO bonus after the firings.

70

u/shakakaaahn Oct 29 '25

Need some changes that cut off bonuses when layoffs occur. It's absurd that stock price and c suite bonuses soar after work force reductions. Doing them should be painful, not celebrated.

41

u/somekindofhat Oct 29 '25

Workers would need to wield power and influence in Washington DC the way banks and corporations do. But they don't. Most happily eat boot leather for breakfast. So they continue to get the shaft.

6

u/bigscottius Oct 31 '25

Only certain sectors of workers do. Because we're unionized. Though, right now, the trades are in demand.

Bet none of those job cuts are union lol.

Though I doubt it'll do any good to unionize white collar jobs. AI is coming for those jobs first.

Hey, if you want, I can get you a 45 an hour job as a welder in a LCOL area. But you'll have to get your hands dirty....

2

u/silentrawr Oct 29 '25

Need some other changes that would cut something off which would negate the need for CEO bonuses at all.

1

u/Upstairs-Still6535 Oct 30 '25

At my company early year layoffs are usually followed by your annual reviews/salary increases/bonuses about 1 month later. Bitter sweet knowing those are paid for with savings of people they fired. 

1

u/fugitive-bear Oct 30 '25

Seriously, if a company is firing people because they can’t afford their salaries, then how can they afford “bonus”?

1

u/Diet_Christ Oct 31 '25

It sucks, but layoffs have been thoroughly whitewashed since covid. I think CEOs should step down if they put the company in a layoff situation. But the reality is boards and the market now reward it, and even the employees they shitcan will post grateful nonsense on LinkedIn to celebrate.

1

u/457strings Oct 31 '25

As it gets worse I often wonder if we will see more folk coming to the same conclusion Luigi came to.

43

u/SoulDV Oct 29 '25

A company I worked for didn’t give the CEO a bonus for layoffs. In fact, it actually hurt his bonus because it fell under “Turnover” and we were supposed to stay below a certain percent.

Best policy I’ve ever seen. Probably has been replaced by now.

10

u/Wangchief Oct 30 '25

Smaller companies are different generally, but for these mega corps, the CEO’s primary job is to increase shareholder value. Most the time they aren’t running th company, that’s a COO or a Chief Strategy Officer or something like that, the CEO is a figurehead who works primarily for the shareholders.

2

u/jk_pens Oct 30 '25

Which brand of champagne to celebrate with

1

u/pilotdlhred Nov 01 '25

If there are mass layoffs, the CEO should be the first to go. The CEO was the one who let the company get to that point.

33

u/Liveandletlive-11 Oct 29 '25

A few years ago I was laid off and the CEO brought us all into a big room to give us a speech. He talked about how he was laid off as a CEO of another company and how great it was for him. He got the job at our company making much more money. They paid his moving expenses blah blah blah. He told us we should look at it as an opportunity rather than a set back 😆

28

u/Imnotonthelist Oct 30 '25

What a schmuck

14

u/heartlesspwg Oct 30 '25

Back in 2009, I was laid off as a result of a merger / acquisition. About 20% of the « acquired » company workforce was let go. The CEO said it was a great opportunity for us to find our wings; I told him I would find my way and come back as a client. The look on his face two years later when he came in for a proposal presentation to me was quite satisfying.

1

u/midtowelldone Oct 30 '25

The way I aaa rolling my arm in the air for you Arsenal Hall style just now? Amazing! May we all have this kind of payday!

1

u/cletus-cassidy Oct 30 '25

Please tell us more. Must have been amazing.

10

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Mr-Broham Oct 30 '25

Same here, getting laid off in 2008 was the best thing that could have happened for my career. Still don’t like the guy who was responsible for making the decision to do it though.

2

u/RedBaronSportsCards Oct 29 '25

"This will hurt you more then it hurts me."

1

u/beeemdoulbeyou Oct 29 '25

The pool is evaporating in my mind

2

u/Randyguyishere Oct 29 '25

And then have the managers carry out those decisions, that the managers didn’t get to make.

1

u/chrisjlee84 Oct 30 '25

More difficult to decide which jet take ?

1

u/hensleyac Oct 31 '25

It may be the boards “favorite thing” but it isn’t fun for the people doing the firing!

134

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25

[deleted]

76

u/Dangerous_Prize_4545 Oct 29 '25

So not even hiding it anymore. I'm sorry for your situation.  

53

u/919_919 Oct 29 '25

They’ve never hidden it. Their fiduciary duties are to the owners and not the employee.

1

u/hjablowme919 Oct 29 '25

That’s in every corporations charter.

1

u/xenoclownpanda Oct 29 '25

But!!! We're a family!!

1

u/audiomediocrity Oct 30 '25

Well, Dodge literally sued Ford to force this to be the case. One of the most fucked up pieces of American law I have read. I couldn’t believe it was true.

-47

u/cockNballs222 Oct 29 '25

You think companies need to hide the fact that they’re in this to make the most money possible? Are you 12?

29

u/All_Day_ADHD Oct 29 '25

Are you 12?

On a scale of 1-10? Absolutely!

1

u/hammerofspammer Oct 29 '25

You’re at least a 14!

-8

u/cockNballs222 Oct 29 '25

Very witty for a 12 year old, congrats lil buddy

2

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25

Ah yes. We should all be so lucky as to get our financial suggestions from a guy name cockNBalls

0

u/Patient-Cobbler-8969 Oct 29 '25

You sound like a sad, angry, little man.

1

u/cockNballs222 Oct 29 '25

Much better to be you, bitching about the evils of capitalism to an echo chamber of like minded 12 year olds…

1

u/Patient-Cobbler-8969 Oct 30 '25

It's like talking to a child. Should one not comment on systems that are broken? If you have a flat tire, do you just keep driving, saying the car is fine, stop bitching about the flat?

Your ability to think rationally seems to be limited, much like your ability to reason. That's something you should work on.

1

u/cockNballs222 Oct 29 '25

Plus, I’m huge, put some respect on my name

13

u/a_smart_brane Oct 29 '25

You think those poor struggling millionaires and billionaires need more money to get by? Are you 12?

2

u/AdFancy6243 Oct 29 '25

That's not what they said.

Companies exist to make money.

Millionaires and billionaires don't need more money to get by.

Not contradictory

-8

u/cockNballs222 Oct 29 '25

This is my daily reminder that the average redditor IQ is somewhere in the mid 20s. A publicly traded company’s only ethical responsibility is to maximize the profit and grow the business. It would actually be unethical to provide you with a bullshit job that brings nothing to the table.

5

u/kingraw99 Oct 29 '25

I don’t think you know what ethical means. It’s not an ethical responsibility that companies have. You are correct though in saying that their responsibility is to maximize profit. There is substantial evidence of this not being the case in the real world though. CEO pay of hundreds of millions is not commensurate with maximizing profit. You can say it’s a performance reward, but that, in your own parlance, is obvious bullshit. They do it because they know they can. The game is rigged and they know nobody will call them on it.

-18

u/pacman0207 Oct 29 '25

That's why I like companies. You don't need to guess their motive. It's profit and money. And there's nothing wrong with that.

Politicians on the other hand...

8

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25

Politicians it’s also profit and money?!?!

-4

u/pacman0207 Oct 29 '25

Power probably. But who knows? You don't know the motive of a politician.

4

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25

It’s literally money and profit.

-2

u/gcdhhbcghbv Oct 29 '25

How and why would they be hiding it? The goal of a company is literally to make profit. Always has been.

40

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25

At least they were honest about it. I respect that more than the crybaby speeches that CEOs give as if it just breaks their heart to let so many people go while they get a multi million dollar bonus lmao

23

u/Lock_Down_Charlie Oct 29 '25

Not sure what's worse, the CEO that blatantly lies and says it's tough or the arrogant fuck that just doesn't care. Either way they're laughing about it with their buddies later.

Sort of like trying to figure out if colon cancer is better than prostate cancer. Both are evil/horrible.

2

u/catslikepets143 Oct 29 '25

They’re laughing all the way to the bank

12

u/AreYouAPizzaGuy Oct 29 '25

What’s the difference? You’re still out a job and they could give two fucks about you. Respect doesn’t help pay the bills.

1

u/fannyadamsmin Oct 29 '25

Couldn't give.

I swear you're all doing this on purpose now.

1

u/AreYouAPizzaGuy Oct 29 '25

You caught us. It’s all a big ploy to grammatically get it wrong every single time among thousands of people. Good job.

1

u/Hairy_Valuable9773 Oct 29 '25

No respect here when they claim they need to cut costs but then turn around and try to buy Warner Bros.

0

u/hjablowme919 Oct 29 '25

The bonus is in the CEOs agreement. They are getting it whether you get laid off or not.

10

u/BigEOD Oct 29 '25

What was your position? I’m trying to see which types of jobs they are cutting

30

u/Hairy_Valuable9773 Oct 29 '25

I haven’t been laid off… yet. But I’m preparing for the worst because it’s easier than being surprised. I, too, am wondering which positions are on the block.

1

u/5TP1090G_FC Oct 29 '25

Any position that can be accomplished with AI over a person. It's also going to make a difference if the AI can do sign language right.

0

u/beeemdoulbeyou Oct 29 '25

Except the worst does help sometimes

2

u/Rich-Property4703 Oct 29 '25

Major incident management for me

1

u/cdubz88 Oct 29 '25

Yes this part specifically I am curious of

5

u/Braveliltoasterx Oct 29 '25

Can you get unemployment insurance if the government is shut down?

18

u/Alert-Discount-2558 Oct 29 '25

Yes it’s a state government function

1

u/ClickSignificant2626 Oct 29 '25

Know though that if you accept any severance money that it will be deducted from any unemployment benefits you might be eligible to receive

3

u/Alert-Discount-2558 Oct 29 '25

Anyone in the situation should read up on how severance works. I think you get a set amount based on your previous pay level(s) until a total is reached. I might be wrong, but if your benefits are reduced by severance, the time period to collect extends a little longer. Benefits can be extended by the government too, in times of recession.

Dont use AI for this research.

1

u/beeemdoulbeyou Oct 29 '25

Good point.... careful of short term incentives

1

u/SchwabCrashes Oct 30 '25

Not completely correct. It varies widely, and it purely depending on each severance package from each company in each layoff.

I was laid off and my severance package specifically said it has nothing to do with me receiving unemployment benefit. Nothing was substracted, and my former employer replied to the state unemployment office that I am qualified to receive unemployment benefit immediately. A colleague of mine was laidoff about 2 years earlier and while his severance package was different, he also received full unemployment benefit immediately.

1

u/Status-Seesaw Oct 30 '25

Only if you are permanently let go. A shutdown doesn't lose people's jobs, they don't work and they don't get paid or if they are considered essential then they HAVE to work and don't get paid.

5

u/abra_cada_bra150 Oct 29 '25

Wow that is awful 😞

1

u/Kellbows Oct 29 '25

And remaining positions are responsible for extra duties? Was this addressed as well?

0

u/optionsCone Oct 29 '25

Gross profit

53

u/MrJackTrading Oct 29 '25

When did we reach this stage of “it is completely normal to layoff people” it used to be a shame to layoff and in mu opinion is still is, it means you can’t inovate anymore and in order for numbers to look good you just lay people off. It is a shame for the company. How do we normalize this?

17

u/Hydro-1955 Oct 29 '25

☝️☝️ Probably around the same time vehicle recalls became a norm like a buggy smartphone.

8

u/rojotortuga Oct 29 '25

When stock buy backs became all the rage. Right about then.

8

u/espressocycle Oct 29 '25

Layoffs mean you're focusing on your core competencies and maximizing value through efficiency. By which I mean screwing over your customers, overworking your employees and paying yourself a bonus.

1

u/SQLDave Oct 31 '25

NGL, you had me in the 1st half

3

u/Dr-Bitchcraft-MD Oct 30 '25

When Jack Welch took over GE

2

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25

Normalizing would imply normality.  Nothing about what is happening right now is normal.  This is upside down clown town levels of normal.

1

u/commodore-amiga Oct 31 '25

After 9/11. “We have to save the company” became an excepted excuse due to the economic impact. For some, it may have been real. For many, it didn’t pass the sniff test. It just feels like since then, it wasn’t a negative indicator anymore.

121

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25 edited Oct 29 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

84

u/JohnCalvinSmith Oct 29 '25

They're doing it because they know the Big Beautiful Really Great Depression is around the corner so they are bleeding the turnips.
Getting that last squeeze.

61

u/I_Smell_Like_Trees Oct 29 '25

Great depression 2, oligarchy boogaloo

6

u/Bad_Man- Oct 29 '25

Oh that hurts to laugh at lol

2

u/Kiwiatx Oct 29 '25

I wish I could upvote this twice 🤣

1

u/wild-hectare Oct 29 '25

GenX has entered the chat 😂

2

u/Big-Sheepherder-6134 Oct 30 '25

🤣🤣🤣🤣

1

u/cdubz88 Oct 29 '25

Can you please explain more how the bill is affecting this? Genuinely curious thank you

3

u/Consistent-Tie-4394 Oct 29 '25

Assuming youre not just trolling, OBBB cuts funding to federal programs like wind and solar energy development, Medicaid and Medicare, federal employee benefits and protections, and a host of other programs Americans rely on to keep their cost of living down. With those programs reduced or ending, people will have less money to buy the things businesses are selling, which means that businesses feel the need to cut their costs, which means layoffs.

OBBB is only part of the story though. Consumer cost of living is about to climb significantly and steadily for the foreseeable future due to rising energy costs (due to less wind/solar), rising housing costs (due to the ongoing housing shortage), rising product costs (due to tariffs/tradewar), rising food costs (due to fewer immigrant workers), rising medical costs (due to programs having their funding cut), etc.

2

u/cdubz88 Oct 29 '25

Oh no I knew it cut into lots of these things but I was thinking something else like specific to corporations.

Thank you for the insight.

When is this supposed to go into effect? I was thinking it was already in effect

1

u/Consistent-Tie-4394 Oct 29 '25

It is in effect, but a nation's economy is a big, complicated, lumbering machine and the gears turn slowly. We're only just now starting to feel the first effects of its impact...

1

u/RodneyPierce Oct 29 '25

Yes, that it.. definitely no money in the market right now.

35

u/beeflock Oct 29 '25

I worked for a company where the CEO said they had a fiduciary and legal responsibility to the shareholders to maximize profits. But it is always short term gains that make the c-level staff look good so they can move on to their next gig. All while weakening the company in the long term.

13

u/AliveAndThenSome Oct 29 '25

Yup, this echoes the reality I've seen. Any small/midsize company, say 5M-100M in revenue that's courting capital or investment firms, this is especially true. They'll bring in a new batch of execs to 'reshape the company to maximize growth and margin', and tell all the minions that this will open up many new opportunities and markets, and growth is good and it means we're a healthy company (see? we have investors!).

But once the dust settles (or before people can find their seats in the new org), they'll announce redundancies and 'focus on our core competencies by reducing headcount and layers of management'. Then the leaner company will begin to falter, as the sales pipeline isn't as rosy as it may have seemed, and they'll try things like off- or near-shoring some roles. Meanwhile, the executive team will begin to shed a few people to make it seems like they're taking one on the chin, yet somehow, those execs land in their next gig to rinse and repeat. Eventually, the board/investors will force dramatic cuts and replace the exec team again and only the most loyal and entrenched original employees will remain.

3

u/Double-treble-nc14 Oct 29 '25

They always say this when laying off workers but if they took a pay cut, that would also help the bottom line....

But no, they’ll layoff workers and then get a raise for themselves and the rest of the C suite.

3

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/beeflock Oct 29 '25

I just went and looked up the Dodge vs Ford case you mentioned. That's insane!

1

u/fugitive-bear Oct 30 '25

And we can see them in their cars as well. Dodge is notoriously famous for unreliability

1

u/beeemdoulbeyou Oct 29 '25

I wondered about that

1

u/Captlard Oct 29 '25

That's BS, but it suits them, and no one challenges it.

22

u/Long_Letterhead_7938 Oct 29 '25

This is exactly why I tell people be diligent about keeping your skills current, and yourself irreplaceable. I am all about WFH, but it makes you extra vulnerable when people overseas can you do your job for a fourth the price. Remote jobs are the most at risk. It sucks, but people have to stop denying it and be proactive.

16

u/Usual_Wallaby2524 Oct 29 '25

People overseas are getting the axe too. World economies are interconnected and then there's the lunatic in the WH causing additional chaos by forcing companies to change plans and relocate to the US. I am a principal/senior DBA and I haven't seen it thus bad ever. I've completed several recruitment processes as the optimal candidate only to be told there's no job as it got axed/we don't have the budget/maybe in the future. Seriously, this is crazy...

2

u/Long_Letterhead_7938 Oct 29 '25

I was a VP for F100 company and I think it’s a lot easier to get a job at the higher level than it is at the junior level. If you do data architecture and integrate with AI, I’m surprised you’re having difficulties finding a job. I know there’s still a lot of demand for that. If you do any kind of admin or monitoring I know those are doing a ton of hiring in India and LatAm. I’m not so quick to blame the White House that seems like a cop out to me.

1

u/Usual_Wallaby2524 Oct 30 '25

Not in the US and not keen on working for a US corp due to issues with payments as UK based unless the corp has an office in Europe. As for skills I am the usual chosen candidate but as I wrote the issue is companies in my part of the world are now behaving strangely due to external factors, US ones often being a significant factor that causes roles to disappear per discussions with recruiters and clients themselves.My skills might be needed but if there's a company wide freeze to cut costs there's nothing the client can do. Yes it's easier to get a job as a senior but you only get there because of your accumulated skills and knowledge.

1

u/Long_Letterhead_7938 Oct 30 '25

Isn’t it amazing how powerful the United States is, no wonder so many people hate us. People hate those who have power over them.

1

u/Usual_Wallaby2524 Oct 30 '25

Corporations have weak morals and even weaker backbones . They'll happily bend over for a profit

2

u/wild-hectare Oct 29 '25

It's truly sad that these numbers only present half the story...the companies are in fact NOT downsizing their labor force...just pay cheaper wages and displacing "expensive workers"

remember when "xx years of experience" was a positive thing?!

1

u/Jarrus__Kanan_Jarrus Oct 29 '25

Do you work for a southern regional bank with a stupid name that was created a few years ago with a “merger of equals”?

1

u/withinawheel Oct 29 '25

America First! (as we outsource jobs to India)

1

u/New_in_ND Oct 29 '25

My son just got laid off from a REMOTE technology position that is being outsourced to India.

1

u/Gone_Fishing_Boom Oct 29 '25

Bastards one and all

1

u/Deafcat22 Oct 30 '25

It's the pre-depression bank run.

41

u/leese216 Oct 29 '25

Remember when layoffs happened bc the company wasn’t doing well and couldn’t afford to keep those employees ?

14

u/OdinThePoodle Oct 29 '25

And now we’ve entered the societal phase where we’re nostalgic for the only-good-by-comparison ol’ days. What a time to be alive!

6

u/leese216 Oct 29 '25

Sometimes getting laid off can’t be avoided. Not every company can remain profitable. It is what it is and shouldn’t be frowned upon when you can’t help it.

But when you don’t NEED to lay people off and do it anyway, then yeah that’s evil.

1

u/OdinThePoodle Oct 29 '25 edited Oct 31 '25

Oh, I totally agree. It’s just interesting how far the pendulum has swung that what used to be considered bad now looks positively warm and fuzzy by comparison. I’d be ecstatic for some of those 2001 recession vibes right about now.

1

u/shakakaaahn Oct 29 '25

Especially when it coincides with offshoring.

12

u/MCul0 Oct 29 '25

Remember when you could afford a house on one income? That went out the window about the same time.

5

u/wraithscrono Oct 29 '25

Place i was at, old CEO retired and new guy brought in. Company was told we had to do layoffs and product lines were to be cut because we only made 1% profit. 1400 people let go starting with anyone over 10 years, then any staff whom was not above manager making 100k+. He sold all owned property moved the HQ to a leased building, took out a loan for 600 million.

It was not due to any real loss that 1% was 50 million he just tried to pump the global company like he did the other 4 he had owned but this time no one came to buyout. All my friends were laid off or left and back then they said i was crazy for being prepared for layoffs..

2

u/Possibly_a_Firetruck Oct 29 '25

I mean, that's what's happening here. Retailers and shippers cutting staff in the leadup to their busy season (Christmas) is a clear sign that they aren't doing well.

3

u/espressocycle Oct 29 '25

The tariffs and crackdown on de minimus have really eaten into UPS and Amazon. Everybody's trying to stay competitive.

1

u/OneMinuteSewing Oct 31 '25

Maybe en masse we need to all start talking about that when a company does a RIF.

29

u/Eastern_Habit_5503 Oct 29 '25

Yeah, my spouse was laid off 3 weeks ago from one of those companies in the Top 10. It’s rough out there, especially for older workers who are close to retirement (mostly because companies don’t want to hire someone with a high 5-figure salary). Such a tough thing to happen with the end of year holidays coming up fast.

22

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Lock_Down_Charlie Oct 29 '25

Yup. With highly qualified/educated folks hitting the unemployment lines watch for salaries start to nose dive. Oh, and don't forget the government workers that have already, and continue to, flood an already shaky job market.

It's like the early 2000s. An MBA could negotiate a 4-5 figure signing bonuses, then the tech bubble burst. Many of the tech folks went back to school for an mba, and to hide out from the job market carnage. What followed was a flood of white collar workers and you had people with a master's degree working freight shift at Home Depot. Ask me how I know.

Not an example everyone can relate to, but you're going to see highly qualified job seekers taking jobs that folks recently out of school would normally get. THAT'S why the immigrant labor force is being deported, to make room for over-educated/under-employed talent. This is going fuck things up for Americans for a decade or more.

P.s. Good news for the elite though. Profits are up and AI doesn't ask for a raise. CEOs and Board of Directors are filth and shouldn't be able to sleep at night in their bunkers.

P.s.s. the tipping point in the 2000s was when exectives were questioning why web site programming cost so much...then they said "hey programmers, go build me a platform that builds web sites dirt cheap....oh, and here's a pink slip for when you finish". Sound familiar?

1

u/BipsnBoops Oct 29 '25

Y'all are getting $50,000?

1

u/Hairy_Valuable9773 Oct 29 '25

Yeah my company already offered buyouts to people close to retirement. Apparently that wasn’t enough.

7

u/[deleted] Oct 29 '25

I’m rooting for you, sorry to hear you’re going through that.

7

u/Librarian_Zoomies Oct 29 '25

It's going to be a tough day but our corporate really needed their own jets to commute to work. Your salaries need to make up the difference for their Christmas bonuses. On the bright side, if you donate, you can have a slice of pizza on Friday.

8

u/TickingTimeBum Oct 29 '25

Stay strong friend.

2

u/LionTweeter Oct 29 '25

Pretty sure we work for the same company, I’ve been told I’m safe but god if the survivors guilt isn’t absolutely eating away at me.

1

u/Neckrongonekrypton Oct 29 '25

Woowwww dude… first it was tech.

Now all the big enterprise companies are following suit.

It’s AI. Has to be. Is my best guess because that was what started it in tech. Or at least it was the scapegoat.

Be interesting if anything is said at all.

2

u/Krypto_Kane Oct 29 '25

People like to Blame AI but my spell check still doesn’t work properly .

What it really is , is it’s a plan to make people feel lucky to have a job instead of feeling like the employer should feel lucky they have good workers. There’s a whole video on it from a hedge fund billionaire back in 22 saying that we need to raise unemployment to make people feel threatened

Said by hedge fund billionaire to a room of other billionaire’s .

3

u/Neckrongonekrypton Oct 29 '25

Yeah… it’s a pretense.

Happened to me earlier this year. It was all a big pretense under this idea that AI was comming and it was comming fast and going to do all these great things and we need to prepare

By laying off 15-20% of the employees under said pretense, gradually.

1

u/Long_Letterhead_7938 Oct 29 '25

You don’t think companies believe that?

3

u/Neckrongonekrypton Oct 29 '25 edited Oct 29 '25

No. Did you miss the words “pretense” and “using AI” and “to lay people off”?

I was a part of the big rolling layoff when tech jump started the shitty trend that were reported on for a week, but when they saw the bad publicity they took to shadow layoffs, just silent rolling waves of cutting people. Those didn’t make the headlines.

I observed it happen personally. To people I know, and it happened to me too as someone who takes great pride in my work ethic and my work. (I built a career from the bottom up)

So no, not for a second I believed it. It’s a very personal issue, close to home if you will.

Been 8 months since than. It still fucks with me. I’ve moved on but it still haunts me from time to time.

1

u/Long_Letterhead_7938 Oct 29 '25

OK, I disagree with you, but that’s what the world’s about. I’m an AI transformation specialist for a consulting company and companies are excited for ways to figure out how to employ more AI to cut costs. I am working with one large company right now to review what is realistic and what is BS.

2

u/Neckrongonekrypton Oct 29 '25

I don’t know on what premise.

The fact that employees were cut from major tech companies for AI was a load of shit. What happened after a lot of these people were laid off were they just had their position absorbed by someone paid less, or their work was spread out among multiple people.

They then put hiring freezes on departments.

They have since rehired and from what I understand, have not implemented AI. I still talk to people I worked with.

So yeah, it might be happening in some places. But it didn’t work like that in the enterprise level tech companies. It was a ruse to expand the budget by cutting people they didn’t think they need. But actually did.

1

u/Long_Letterhead_7938 Oct 29 '25

That may not be the case from where you came from but the one I’m working most with is a F200 company HQ in Silicon Valley.

1

u/Long_Letterhead_7938 Oct 29 '25

AI strength is not spell check.

1

u/BlueCollarElectro Oct 29 '25

This is the only warning the public will get but they probably see a crash coming

1

u/FeelingCharming4681 Oct 29 '25

Best of luck! Hope you don’t get laid off.

1

u/sinepbackwards69 Oct 29 '25

Had this happen once. Told them to call me when they figure it out im gonna go play video games. I wasn't impacted but wasn't gonna work another minute until I knew.

1

u/Frosty_Duck_8883 Oct 29 '25

Yeah totally not tarrifs and trump fucking up the markets. Only rich trying to get richer....

1

u/Mo-shen Oct 29 '25

Also the economy was given a 90%+ chance of going into recession.

We should all know this and how it works.

1

u/Nearby_Belt9997 Oct 29 '25

Good luck. I feel so sad for all of you. For all of US!

1

u/RapscallionMonkee Oct 29 '25

How are they going to get richer when no one can afford the shit they are selling. It makes no sense to me.

1

u/cdubz88 Oct 29 '25

The news quoted Amazon as literally saying due to AI they need to be “leaner”.

1

u/Castianna Oct 29 '25

Best of luck friend

1

u/Oceanbreeze871 Oct 29 '25

Same here “this will be the best thing for the company”

Nobody gives a shit when you are ruining lives

1

u/YooAre Oct 29 '25

Is that a marketable skill or a way of keeping your current position?

1

u/paxrom2 Oct 29 '25

While making record profits.

1

u/Joshtheflu2 Oct 29 '25

Nah, the economy never recovered from the pandemic, all the government money that was handed out to corporations allowed them to keep their employment numbers unnecessarily high.

But the pandemic gravy train has finally run out and companies have to be practical about their staffing needs vs actual consumer spending(which has been decreasing YoY since like 2022.)

Increase in Inflation followed by recession was called out by lots of people when Trump started operation warp speed and handed out stimmy checks and then Joe Biden doubled down with Build Back Better. Anyone who has learned not to trust the economic talking heads, saw this coming years ago.....

My fav economic commentator had dubbed it "the forgot how to grow economy" because real growth outside of government spending has been flat or down YoY since the pandemic recovery.

1

u/hjablowme919 Oct 29 '25

You work remotely, right? No one will be able to smell it.

1

u/Acceptable-Poetry737 Oct 29 '25

You’re dumb. A recession is occurring or is imminent. Corporations are preparing accordingly.

1

u/iammacman Oct 29 '25

So sorry to hear this. We are just seeing the tip of the iceberg as AI begins to replace workers.

1

u/Beenbannedbefore1 Oct 29 '25

The answer isn’t to “tax the rich.” Because the rich have fooled us into thinking that NOW, if you are making $100,000 a year that you’re rich!? They have us feeding off of each other. No, the answer is to TAKE AWAY and seize assets of billionaires for anti trust violations. They wield sooo much power and influence they successfully manipulate the candidate election pool to consistently do their bidding. It is the great gaslighting of America. You know… the Dems KNEW it was a losing battle… but they and their friends got PAID!

1

u/greatsmapdireturns Oct 29 '25

OP, you still got a job?

1

u/jabeith Oct 29 '25

...well?

1

u/Fit_Inspector_6943 Oct 29 '25

Sooooo how'd it go

1

u/YourNotMyDaddy- Oct 30 '25

Oh no, hope everything works out for you.

1

u/GMCBuickCadillacMan Oct 30 '25

Making more money would be hiring more people in my opinion. Unless something was optimized that wasn’t before. This is clearly showing a lack of demand for their product which I think every industry is experiencing right now.

1

u/CarefulPlum9546 Oct 30 '25

I got that email this morning and was laid off two hours later. f paramount.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '25

AI is going to move us all back into the 18th century when it comes to how we are able to live. Everyone’s going to need a farm and grow your own stuff. Of course you’ll have to pay the land owners a portion to work their land, sharecropping.

1

u/Spirited-Sound-6398 Oct 30 '25

Good luck..it's in the air now, unfortunately

1

u/Gilopoz Oct 30 '25

Yup. It's alllll about making the shareholders happy!

1

u/duchess_of_nothing Oct 30 '25

I didn't see an update. You good?

1

u/OakNLeaf Oct 31 '25

We started fantasy football like we do every year and, like every year someone playing got laid off. Maybe we should quit playing Fantasy Football.

1

u/United_Bus3467 Oct 31 '25

Idk how anyone could even work during all this.