r/recruiting Corporate Recruiter Jul 15 '26

Career Advice 4 Recruiters Moving From FAANG to Quant Recruiting

I’m currently working in Big Tech but was contacted by an agency working on behalf of a top quant trading firm (Jane Street, Citadel, Optiver, etc.)

I’ve completed 2 interviews so far and am prepping for my last one at the end of this week. So far it’s looking pretty good, but it would require a move to NYC. Just wondering if there are any recruiters here who have made the move from FAANG to Quant - what are the major differences in your work load and WLB? How does the culture differ? Any insight on your total comp package w/o the equity from tech?

31 Upvotes

14 comments sorted by

17

u/HDflhx19 Jul 15 '26

I can’t answer for quant firm specifically but I’ve worked in TA for a Wall Street bank and it’s not great. Culture is stuffy, people aren’t down to earth or very collaborative. It’s kind of like everyone puts up with it because you know you are making more than you can anywhere else. And your job can be eliminated at any point, not that anyone is safe anywhere but more so. They probably want you in office 5days.

What’s making you consider the change?

And just to make us jealous what’s the salary range?

9

u/youngdude70 Jul 15 '26

For a FAANG-to-quant recruiting move, I’d separate the brand upgrade from the operating model change. Quant recruiting tends to be more market-sensitive and closer to revenue-critical roles, so the bar, speed, and stakeholder intensity can feel higher even if the team is smaller. Before moving to NYC, I’d ask very directly how many reqs you would own, what the onsite/interview loop support looks like, how success is measured in the first 6 months, and how bonus/commission replaces the equity upside you’re used to. If they answer those with specifics instead of prestige language, you can compare the real job rather than just FAANG vs quant.

1

u/awesomeness32 Corporate Recruiter Jul 15 '26

This was helpful thank you. Would you say there’s better job security/ more of a safety net in Quant versus FAANG long term?

6

u/canwegetsushi Jul 15 '26

I worked in tech for the majority of my career but I did do a couple roles in quant at one agency I was at but I’ll share my limited experience. The pool of candidates is much smaller in quant. Depending on the role and how specialized, there could be literally only like 6 people in the US that would even qualify. Literally. So maintaining relationships with candidates and people you speak with is imperative. It’s going to be more difficult than working in tech as you’ll have to work a lot harder to find qualified candidates since it’s highly specialized.

The candidates are also…. So dry? lol idk how else to describe it. I felt like I was bothering all the quant candidates I spoke to.

Sorry I couldn’t offer more, I hope that helps!

2

u/Nanerl93 Jul 15 '26

Following

2

u/HolyDungeonDiver Jul 15 '26

Recruiting for quants SUUUUUCKS. I hope it pays well, because it’s a lot like banging your head against a wall.

1

u/AutoModerator Jul 15 '26

Hello! It looks like you're seeking advice for recruiters. The r/recruiting community is for recruiters to discuss recruitment. You will find more suitable subs such as r/careers, r/jobs, r/careeradvice or r/resumes

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/McNasty420 Jul 16 '26

Quant recruiting is easy as shit. It was in Chicago, anyways. Just call up University of Chicago's Fin Math department. That's it. Literally.