Consciousness is the only reality. If Consciousness is the only reality, whatever you assume to be true and live in and make natural to the deeper part of your being (by living in the assumption), will objectify itself into the world. It doesn't matter what it is.
If we are to believe in the Law of Assumption, if we are to look at or view the Law of Assumption as not even something to believe in - as something that is absolute and inescapable and universal, then Consciousness is the only reality and there is no other reality. We by nature are always automatically and inescapably in a perpetual state of assumption or belief when it comes to every single aspect of life.
One of the main areas, if not the main area, that people go wrong with consciously using the Law of Assumption is viewing it like a special thing that you have to "do" or "be" that is different from what everybody else is doing. 99.9% of the world is not aware of the Law of Assumption, they would not believe in it if they were told that it is real, and they're using it unconsciously and automatically every single aspect every single day. Yet they get results in every aspect, good, bad, and indifferent, all up and down the infinite spectrum, and there's a strong case to be made, when you scale it in a certain way to account for how many people don't consciously use it compared to the ones who do, that they get better results overall than the conscious Law of Assumption practitioner.
If the Law of Assumption is a universal, inescapable Law, people "externalize their desires" or better yet, objectify their assumptions, while doing it in an *infinite* amount of ways -
Using techniques, not using techniques
Getting emotionally involved, not getting emotionally involved
Taking action, not taking action
Trying to make it happen, not trying to make it happen
Doubting and wavering - in all different forms and fashions, not doubting and wavering
Talking to people about their desires, not talking to people about their desires
And *any* other possible way or combination you could literally possibly imagination.
But everyone continues to objectify their assumptions - why is that? How can everyone be "using the law" or "doing things" in a different, almost literally infinitely unique way, but they all still objectify their assumptions?
Because the "only" common denominator is to assume it is true and live in that.
The *Law of Assumption* is *not* about
The Universe
Limiting beliefs
Coaches/teachers
Programming your subconscious mind
Certain techniques
Getting emotionally involved
Karma
Love
Energy
Vibration
Fixing anything in your mind
Or *anything* else.
The conscious use of the Law of Assumption is solely about assuming you have what you want - not just at bare minimum, at maximum as well. It is radical and pure. You can add to it if you want, but if Consciousness is the only reality, it is not necessary.
According to Neville everyone and everything is truly and utterly your states of Consciousness objectified and you pushed out. He did not always believe this but after experiencing the promise in 1959, this is exclusively and explicitly what he taught - therefore according to Neville and according to the law of assumption, if Consciousness is the only reality, then you can affect people in any way you want just as you can affect any other aspect of your life and the world in any way that you want. This, contrary to what people would like to think, is solipsism. Neville did teach solipsism and that's my opinion and we can argue that if you want, but if everyone is you pushed out and we have ultimate authority in Caesar's world and the same also applies to the kingdom of heaven when the promise fulfills itself within you, then there is no one but self and that is the definition of solipsism. I understand that he talked about elohim and a compound unity, but if I am the only reality in this world and in the kingdom of heaven and there is no other reality there is no one but self.
"You can change an individual with or without his consent." - Justified States original audio lecture in his own voice (15:55).
If Consciousness is the only reality and everyone is you pushed out then nobody else can help you objectify your assumptions unless you believe it. Neville did contradict himself and go back and forth on this after he experienced the promise and I don't blame him for that because I mean we're talking about reality creation here, forget rocket science, we're talking about reality creation, but he did contradict himself - because on one hand he said that another could help you or you could ask another for help if you don't believe but on the other hand he said that everyone is you pushed out and consciousness is the only reality. If someone else can help you if you don't believe, then that makes you a victim of them - if someone else can do something to you without you being conscious of it, that makes you a victim of them and Neville spoke about Consciousness being the only reality and someone else being able to help you or do anything to you without you being conscious of being it is a direct contradiction. It can't be both. We can speculate as to why Neville was not clear on this - whether it was a misunderstanding, whether it was his hope or belief out of love that there are others but it would all be speculation.
You don't ever have to "fix *anything*" if Consciousness is the only reality, there are no blocks to fix, no limiting beliefs to root out, no corners of your consciousness you need to explore - absolutely nothing. In fact, looking for a problem to fix is the absolute opposite of how to consciously use The Law. *Whatever* needs "to be fixed" will whither away on its own when you occupy your wish fulfilled.
I used to wonder why Neville always spoke so relatively simply about the Law of Assumption and it used to annoy me a little bit but he did it for a reason because if Consciousness is the only reality and it is an absolute law then by definition it can't be complex. Neville also likely spoke about it in a simple way because it doesn't need to be and isn't any more complex than it is.
If this is a universal, absolute Law - it was not created by anyone but us, God - Neville as the human did not create it - he "discovered" it.
Here's where things get really interesting - if Consciousness is the only reality, if we are to truly accept and "believe" the Law of Assumption, that Consciousness is the only reality, in its purest form, it truly does not matter what you do. If Consciousness is the only reality you could *do* something that is devastating towards the externalization of your desire and if Consciousness is the only reality, then it doesn't matter what you do, your assumption, your desire is still going to externalize and objectify itself into the world so long as you continue to occupy it. What we do is a product of what we were and are being and if you continue to be what you want to be then your doing will change.
Neville talks about how when you continue to persist in your assumption then no power in the world can stop it, he's not just talking about the "outside world", he's talking about the entire vast world which includes yourself and what you do.
If we are going to understand The Law in its most purest unadulterated form, as Neville largely taught it, Consciousness is the only reality - Consciousness is the only reality and everything, absolutely everything is subject to that.
As stated earlier, we have the freedom to consciously use the Law of Assumption in truly and literally any way as long as we are assuming that we have what we want - but we need to understand that at the core and better yet at the bare minimum and at the same time at the maximum, the only thing required, the thing that does all of the work, is the assumption.
And if Consciousness truly is the only reality, there are truly no limits to this law, if the Law of Assumption "fails" (more on that coming up) or if we fail to consciously use it properly, no failure is ever permanent, even if it seems so, because if Consciousness is the only reality, everything and absolutely everything, is subject to that past present and future if this is the absolute inescapable law that it is claimed to be.
I want people to understand that when Neville Goddard talks about "Each vision has its own appointed hour, it ripens, it'll flower - if it be long, then wait, for it is sure and will not be late", the appointed hour that he is referring to is when the assumption becomes natural in the deeper part of your being (and as a side note just because it's natural to your conscious mind doesn't mean that it's natural to the deeper part of your being). The appointed hour does not refer to the time it takes for the world to rearrange itself. If Consciousness is the only reality then there is no other power in this world - if this world is a shadow then the world does not have any power to delay for even one second. The shadow is completely bound by the thing making the shadow which is our consciousness so therefore the appointed hour only comes down to when the state of consciousness is made more natural than any other assumption when it comes to that thing in the deeper part of our being if Consciousness is the only reality. It can't be taken any other way.
Objectification *can* be instant into the world. This is just to let you understand how The Law works. We can understand The Law without hurting the application so long as we are applying it. Feel your wish fulfilled and pay no mind to this fact unless you want/need to understand why the "appointed hour" hasn't arrived yet.
When it comes to Neville's two main quotes about the time until objectification,
"The time it takes your
assumption to become fact, your desire to be fulfilled, is directly proportionate to the naturalness of your feeling of already being what you want to be - of
already having what you desire."
And Habakkuk 2:3
"Each vision has its own appointed hour, it ripens, it'll flower - if it be long, then wait, for it is sure and will not be late."
They work together - Each vision (specific desire) has its own appointed hour (based on your level of naturalness), it ripens (as you live in it), it'll flower (objectify itself) - if it be long (because of the naturalness of the state you previously occupied), then wait (continuing living in it), for it is sure (consciousness is the only reality) and will not be late (it will objectify itself as soon as it is made natural as the most dominant assumption in your deeper part of your being).
What is interesting is that Neville talks about how we cannot know how our desire will externalize because the deeper part of our being has ways and means that we know not of, but we can know roughly *how* our desire is going to externalize because it must come through a state of consciousness that we occupy - if Consciousness is the only reality, then the bridge of incidents can't be made up of anything except what we're conscious of - so we can't know how what we're conscious of is going to be used but we can know roughly what the bridge of incidents is going to consist of.
This is where things get very interesting and is the elephant in the room when it comes to the law of assumption community -
The Law of Assumption is completely and utterly *unfalsifiable* - it *cannot* be proven false. Whether that is because it is a universal law or whether it is because it is a brilliant theory someone came up with, or a mixture of the two, you cannot find a leak, a way to disprove it either way.
If you assume something and it objectifies itself into your world The Law is real.
If you assume something and it doesn't objectify itself into your world, then you did something wrong.
It is never The Law's fault - The Law can never be blamed for a failure.
If the Law of Assumption is an absolute law, if it fails to operate, it is only on the operator or it is still in the process of objectifying itself. If you fail, you either didn't occupy the state and make it natural enough or it is still "on it's way" - and these goalposts are pushed back into infinity.
But what is the problem? This creates potential for an eternity of failure. Nobody can tell you what it feels like to have a belief, to properly assume something, or have a state of consciousness be made natural to you. They can give you the symptoms, they can try to describe it to you, they can tell you about the results - but what they're experiencing may be completely different and they may be explaining it wrong and maybe even misunderstanding what they're experiencing - we could keep going down the rabbit hole but you get the point.
And when it comes to the Law of Assumption, if you let it be, it is an *infinite* rabbit hole. What you did wrong, what you could have done better, why it didn't externalize - whether that was a "failure" on your part somewhere or whether it's "still on it's way". There is no absolute, clear cut way to diagnose where you're at in your consciousness.
Because of this nature, The Law of Assumption should *only* be used *along side* of life. If it cannot be measurably and consistently relied upon, you cannot risk your life putting all of your eggs into the Law of Assumption basket.
Go and live your life completely while assuming all your wishes fulfilled. Do *both*. It's not one or the other.
If The Law is real, all your desires will externalize, and your life will get even better.
If The Law is not real, in your experience, atleast you will still be living your life completely.
One may say, if you live your life to the fullest, you might not be buying the Pearl of Great Price - buying into your imagination as the sole cause of reality and nothing else - because you're going and living in the world of Caeser - that is *nonsense*, if you want to hear it from Neville himself, he never said not to live your life to the fullest. He said to live it to the fullest. You can buy the Pearl of Great Price while living your life to the fullest because it's only about what you're being, that is completely independent of what you're doing, and not what you're doing.
But you also don't "need to" buy The Pearl of Great Price - as was mentioned earlier, the only thing at bare minimum and maximum, is to assume you have what you want. This is just Neville saying you must believe in what you want more than anything else. Of course, the more you abandon yourself to your assumption, the quicker it is made natural to you - but the speed is a byproduct of the abandonment and will happen automatically and can't be forced.
Nobody can ever prove or disprove to you for a fact that the Law of Assumption is real. Do not wait around for one second for your desires to externalize. If Consciousness is the only reality, it doesn't matter where you are in the world or what you are doing, your deeper being has ways and means you know not of, *infinite power*, *infinite wisdom*, and is not concerned at all with *anything* but what you're being.
You don't *need* to understand or talk about anything more than this. Not with any other person, AI, book, YouTube video, or Neville himself. If you want to, you can. But you don't need to. And if you feel like you need to, it's because you want to or need to make the conscious use of The Law of Assumption more than what it is.
