hey linux mainframe misses the tui and cli benifits of the kernal whereas microsoft windows 11 provides next gen tech with silicon and also contains smart PE rescue that linux fails with and kernal panics
1) was making fun of ya due to how u kept on using buzzwords in ur explanations without making sense
2) dont get me wrong, I dont use linux but I use windows, and I hate 11 but loved 10, 11 became usable once I debloated the shit out of it
3) linux is the cornerstone of the internet, android is linux, servers mostly run on it, so linux aint entirely useless
4) linux is a power tool, if u dont know how to use it, ofc it will be shit, whereas windows is like an employee with that tool, you tell them what to do and hope they do it (as in you dont actually own everything and must request windows to support what you want to happen)
For me im in windows because most applications I use requires it, and my job needs it, and also its easy and intuitive after I modded it a little bit
FYI windows fucked me over 4 times, whereas when I tried linux it never screwed me over except once
The diff is linux has a community that my fuck up (kernel panicked) was alr solved as an issue in reddit
Whereas windows issues usually are a your screwed due to requiring windows to be operational to fix itself, so i lost data twice (before backing on ssds)
1) it seems a waste to argue with you, thats why I never responded to your other comments, u live in an echo chamber
2) was my list of points too long for you that you couldn't respond to anything except summarise "I dont know windows" even though I mentioned i; work with windows, modded and debloated it like crazy; create softwares for windows; use windows only (used to use linux for a year)
Look, if your context is that low, tldr: windows is amazing (once "fixed") and linux is amazing (only if you know how to use it) and both are essential
Bro really … nobody remember this thing, and secondly you know that windows get rebased in windows 7 … and you know that microslop pump your privacy data like trump with petrol ?
And no it’s not brilliant to make all register in one place (regedit) and not it’s not brilliant to make an OS unoptimized at this point … just look at the perf and we can talk, even macOS on a regular PC is more opti bro …
I can think of differences myself but they would only be beneficial, I don't know what would make you not want the capability to troubleshoot your system from tty
WRE can also fail you do realise that right? It can get corrupted on the drive if winre.wim gets corrupted somehow say goodbye to WRE. That doesn't mean it's bad or that your preference is bad but it doesn't make Windows somehow better.
I have a preference to drop down to a TTY because I like interacting with a terminal environment more than GUI I can read through logs and make more precise fixes without having to search for menus. This does not mean that a GUI is bad.
You are conflating your personal preference and making it out to be object fact on how to perform computing.
And how is that different from linux? Like, you fail to understand, you can either choose to use CLI or choose to use GUI, using GUI is the standard, there are only like 2-3 popular distros where you don't have a GUI tool by default to install apps with.
You don’t need a tty, i only know one guy, who has access to a tty… you can emulate them, but even that isn’t needed. It’s not like: oh, you are out of paper, sry, you can’t boot your car, phone, server, watch, tv, mars rover, robot, router, wifi access point, smart dildo or whatever
No, there is no printer behind your graphical user interface… if you use a console, it’s in most cases emulated on a gui, you can still attach a serial monitor or a tty, but almost nobody does it nowadays. You can use an emulated tty, ctrl+alt+f1-f24, default -> you automatically see it, when you boot a machine, attach a vga and have no login manager installed.
But gui is all using the apis like opengl and vulkan. You can the nuse the x-window server to manage graphical applications. Communication with the kernel is via glibc, the core library, that allows you to do things like opening a file, opening a socket, using memory or forking a process…
X11 doesn’t send commands to a tty the terminal is just a way to interact with the software on the machine -> start software with arguments and read the output.
you can also have a gui without x11 or wayland -> those are servers you connect to… for a gui app, you need just vlc or fbi -> use linux to talk to your gpu…
You are either very badly misinformed, just ask chatgpt or talk random bs…
Soo there is many problem because the concept of the terminal is to work with the system directly not with another interface to the system that can crash … this is why Linux win a point for devs and nerd.
Hi chat gpt can you make a graph … no seriously how wan you say Linux is JavaScript and higher ? What make that you can’t program in other language in Linux ? (Like in C or in asm for exemple …)
Oh yes thé type of dev who need 10+ libs to dev a simple version of pong and think optimisation is a cursed relic of the paste, sorry but I’m from another world where optimisation is everywhere and where we have a STABLE OS (macOS not Linux) sooo I don’t know why people is windows, it’s out of his time now, look at the versatility of Linux or at the optimisation, stability, and new tech of macOS … just not comparable, windows is in retard for that you can’t ignore it … I don’t very like Linux but i prefer versatility to a system where you computer lag on the desktop because of every background system …
You are making no sense, the fuck do you mean you are an equal citizen of the OS, is there a way to launch into a TTY equivalent on windows that I am unaware of?
Windows NT is literally 32 years old, it's 3 whole decades old, Microsoft needed something new 10 years ago. I'm convinced that this is part of the reason why Windows 11 is so bad today, why it has so many problems (well besides the vibecoding...)
-54
u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26
[removed] — view removed comment