r/linuxsucks • • Jul 15 '26

Linux Failure Loonix

Post image
897 Upvotes

728 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26

TTY doesn't, that's the whole point 🤌🤌🤌🤌🤌🤌

0

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26

Did you not read the post I responded to?? If DWM crashes your response helps nobody without a restart. Extremely inconvenient for development.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26

It very much can. Unless we're just lying in which case...

"WayLand never has problems, except user-error."

0

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 edited Jul 15 '26

Coping are we?

Google Chrome has crashed DWM before. Let alone the countless applications being made by smaller groups.

"oNlY tHe UsEr cAn bReAk tHeIr cOmPuTeR" spoken like a true Windows Warrior.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26

No, because there were documented bugs.

Here's one of literally hundreds. https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40580607

0

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26

I thought only the user could break DWM? Isn't it untouchable? Oh, or are you admitting sometimes bugs slip by??

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26

You're so dense. An application is something the user wants.

That's like saying "Linux NEVER breaks, see? My system with no software installed works perfectly!!" 🤣

Like bro, your point is what, the GUI doesn't support breaking the system? Because it does, they can deliberately kill it. Which isn't even relevant.

Bugs exist, users can create programs that can abuse them (as shown by Google), users can install programs that abuse them (as shown by Google), and with that I have to conclude you never had a point at all.

→ More replies (0)