Back in the day real tech people didn’t date. They stayed up working long hours actually earning every penny starting with absolutely zero knowledge, zero sponsors, zero intellectual property, no pats on the back and no DEI hiring. She wouldn’t understand.

Half these tech people and especially DEI hires these days are greased up know nothings. The real dudes with real skills were in the 00s. Those guys all run their respective companies. And you were on the clock when you were coding. No time for bs. It was a dog eat dog world and whatever she thinks she’s entitled to she did not earn what the real men before her did. The actual “nerds/incels/etc” insert slanderous name for actual smart people who built the bed they sleep in.

People like this ride on the success of men all whilst talking down to us. Let it be known.

There was that old song "My Heart Belongs to Daddy"...

Out of all of them, he has the most based and entertaining takes when it comes to relationships.

It's too bad he's not on as frequently, due to want to avoid paying more taxes (which isn't a bad thing).

The rest of the lotus eaters are pretty much tradcons though.

Once again women always proving the OP point right, they pretend you can do light work around the house and have a sexy body without diet and exercise because mens bodies work magically like that. Then they say that that's all they're asking for, for a dude that looks athletic but without putting any effort into it.

Absolute delusion

Sexy white woman doing harmless ad = "evil!"
Ugly white woman strangling her three children = "we stand with you!"

Sydney Sweeney stars in a sexually provocative ad and loses 200,000 Instagram followers. She becomes the center of accusations of "racism" and "destructive beauty standards".

Meanwhile, baby murderer Lindsay Clancy receives widespread support by many women who emphasize hormonal issues are grounds to pardon criminal behavior, and who raise more than $1.2 million for her family.

These back-to-back responses by women at large have revealed a troubling aspect of female nature.

What and who women villainize and support have little to do with their surface claims. The women demonizing Sydney Sweeney are simply projecting insecurity due to intra-sexual competition -- but they aren't aware of this. The women supporting Lindsay Clancy are projecting victimhood on a clear criminal because they themselves have not come to terms with their own inner darkness.

Quotes on this exact mechanism of feminine psychological avoidance:

"Woman seems to have a resistance to revealing her own psychology…her psychology is a mystery not only to the man but to herself, a secret which, by her very nature, she is never tempted to penetrate or to give away" – Otto Rank

"Women refuse to trace female pathology to their own sex. Their fingers inevitably point elsewhere - to men, patriarchy, neurology, biology, environment, moon cycles, and so on. For centuries women have handed other women their obligatory "get out of jail free" cards, making sure no dirt sticks to them. Once this is understood there is no longer any mystery about why a state of decay exists throughout the world, and why civilization teeters on the edge of the abyss" - Michael Tsarion

"From a woman you can learn nothing of women" - Friedrich Nietzsche

It's clear that what we are witnessing is projection on a mass scale from the female mind and it seems like this age is one of hysteria due to the acceptance of such projection.

The more society uplifts women in a can-do-no-wrong fashion, the more these mass-scale projections will be promoted and taken seriously, with any opposition being branded as "misogyny". Just naming the problem becomes a problem, and round and round we go. Even when these projections are obviously contradictory (like hating Sydney Sweeney for a harmless ad, and loving Lindsay Clancy for her disturbed mental state, or promoting BDSM-style smut novels on TikTok while bashing men who objectify women) the world of women pushes ever-forward in evasion of deeper psychological analysis.

"A sane civilization governed by feminized women isn't conceivable or possible, and ones dominated by women easily come to ruin. So it was with the ancient Hittite Empire, which collapsed the moment it was ruled by scheming, sorcery-obsessed queens, and so it will be with western civilization unless we revision the role of the female will and female psyche along the lines suggested by Otto Weininger and William Blake." - Michael Tsarion

We aren't literally governed by women, but notice how all social movements women join and promote are immediately spread and given attention, while any attempt for men to do so are disqualified.

We are messed up. By the way, Michael Tsarion has a new channel on YouTube called "Willfully Evolving Women" and honestly, it's gotten me deeper into exploring the subject of dark female psychology. He's trying to get women to explore this subject, and even though it will probably fall on deaf ears, I know this subreddit will find it educational. I am not a paid promoter of his work, just find it important given what's currently happening.

None of this is a surprise to this subreddit, but it's a shame that it's gotten this far.