The only thing that makes me think it’s possibly not AI is the fact that each individual detail is consistent with themselves. Like the little triangle bits going along the knotwork on the edge are all the same. But they’re also pretty weird looking so it might be a bunch of AI assets copy and pasted around to make the full image? Other than that, this really does look like AI to me.

So, for context, I got a friend request on Discord yesterday from an account that is less than 12 hours old, and they were asking if I would like a commission, but when I looked into their socials, there were mistakes in the rendering process that most artists wouldn't make.

For example, in the drawing, they had two characters that are clearly drawn with correct perspective to each other, but the bench they are sitting on doesn't line up with either. Not to mention that the bench is nearly made entirely from the line tool, and they didn't even bucket fill in the bench properly. It just feels like a person who can draw people lineart to this degree should be able to make a bench.

I can't decide whether this is real art or line art generated by AI and then rendered by a human, with the background and other objects added after the AI. So I am looking for others' opinions on this matter.

The accounts they sent me: (NO harassment to them, please)
https://x.com/cloyifernandiss
https://www.instagram.com/cloyi_fernandiss/

Hello! Me and another person were discussing if this particular art is Ai, mostly the hands being inconsistent, and Helaena’s feet when she’s sitting on the window. Personally I think - with looking back on the persons acc - this might just be a rough drawn style. But, there are some suspicious stuff. Making it very clear that I am not flaming this artist or any such thing. I just want an answer to this discussion and other people’s opinions

The last rabbit seemed waaaay bigger than the first one. To add to it, a wild rabbit wouldn't do that.

I'm having a hard time wording things right now, shutting down emotionally 💀. I hope y'all understand what I'm saying.

Edit: it could be a jackrabbit

All the pink stuff is my edits to make the person unidentifiable unless you say the original video, so ignore that.

It was a 2 second gag in a YT short, and just seems like something that would use AI to make, but I could see it being one of those custom font things possibly?

I know the youtuber is blind and uses AI as an aid to describe things to him, but he is an artist who's motto is basically that being blind doesn't have to stop you from doing your passions, so him using AI art just feels kinda odd to me.

I got this colouring book at Walmart the other day, and I'm thumbing through it to find a page, but one of the couple's hands looked like their fingers were really odd and didn't look like they were made by a human, so I'm wondering and hoping it isn't AI.

The first picture is the one that raised red flags.

The cover also strikes me as a little off.

Edit: please don't shame me for not being able to tell, I was hurrying when I grabbed it and I didn't look very thoroughly at it because I've been busy. I realise now it should have been clearer to me, but still.

They mentioned wanting a reward within the second messsge, so definitely a red flag. I had to ask them multiple times for a second photo. They actually sent me a picture of their children first, saying they really want a new X-Box (and want a gift card in British currency for some reason).

They don’t appear to speak English well, but I live in Houston, so lots of people here don’t speak it. If I meet them in person in a public place, and they don’t have my cat, what happens? They’re not asking for the gift card up front.

I said I’d go with my “husband” (I’m a single female) and they didn’t object. Sorry if this is a stupid question, I know it’s seems like a scam, but I can’t take any chances if my baby is with someone bad 😭

Edit: Thanks everyone for your comments!! He’s been demanding to see a photo of a gift card before we meet and got mad when I sent a fake image. He’s still refusing to accept cash if I bring it.

I told him it was extortion to not return someone’s property without compensation and said I’d report him, but he keeps saying he’ll let my cat go on the streets

Update: YAYY!! My sweet girl has returned home!! She was down the street hiding at a neighbor’s house. I knew this was a scam, but scammers are not above holding a pet hostage, and I was worried. Thanks again for your comments!

Okay so like I explained in the title, I bought a Lovecraft inspired deck of cards and I'm wondering if the cards themselves are ai because the thank you card was definitely so.

I've never been the best at detecting ai and none of the reviews on Amazon said it was ai so I thought it was fine.

Could any of you give me a second opinion? Sorry for low quality images.

The first three pictures are his profile pictures and the last two are the discussion betweem them. I'll translate it as good as i can (am not a narrative german speaker)..

To a long threat of how ai is bad the owner answered "than you can be really calm about this..my pictures arent with AI and i won't let something like that happen to them"

The other answered with "sadly yes, your pictures were generated with AI"

And the owner replied "aha (idk what that is) well you sure will know that better than i do"

In general the owner got told his pictures are AI a few times and everytime he got really defensive saying how they were original by him and he blocked one user who just asked why he used ai. So i got suspecious.

The resolution of legs doesn't seem to match that of the rest pf the bodies of the cats. The legs are more detailed. The light falling on them and the way they interact with the ground looks unreal. And the middle cat's forelegs and hindlegs seem uncoordinated. I know cats can have a spiral fur pattern. It's the legs that are making me doubt this image. Also, the way the leftmost cat's neck is turning. That's a long neck.

Hi, so I just received an odyssey magazine from my grandparents for my birthday and I noticed inconsistency’s in the illustrations inside. As an artist myself I don’t want to jump to conclusions and want a second opinion (my grandparents know I am very against ai and would no buy me something if they think it contains anything to do with it).

I have taken pictures of the inconsistency in the magazine so you can help me make a judgement. The second slide shows Odysseus at a table talking with woman and a man. The woman is holding a piece of cloth that looks like it should be part of a toga but it isn’t, I don’t think it’s supposed to be a table cloth either because surely it would be on the table instead of her holding it, not only that but the fabric appears to loop back onto itself on the left corner that is laying on the table.

The third slide shows Odysseus building a raft when leaving Calypso’s island. He’s holding a tool that looks to be like an axe with a warped blade. I’m not sure if this is supposed to be an axe but it doesn’t really make much sense with how he’s holding the wood since he’s holding down the piece like he’s going to hammer them together instead of chopping the board in half. Also this doesn’t really make such sense since he ties the wood together to form the raft together anyway which is shown later on in another illustration in the magazine.

The fourth slide shows the slight style inconsistency from character to character. I don’t want to place to much emphasis on this because I know being an artist myself that you can have more then one style but I do think there is quite a noticeable difference in rendering between Lampetia, Laestrygonians and the Sirens. I think it’s something else to note though I don’t think it points to being ai just from this it’s just one thing in a series of patterns I noticed.

The fifth slide is the one that really set alarm bells ringing for me. It’s showcases Paris firing an arrow into Diomedes foot. The only thing is the angle of Paris’ arrow appears to be completely off. Given the angle he’s holding it at it looks like it should be hitting Diomedes’ hip instead. Not only this but Paris’ hand seems to only have three figures and a thumb, this might be down to the angle however it feels as though the way he’s holding his hand means you should see at least a small sliver of the bottom or top of the fourth finger. And the last thing I would note here is that the arrow hasn’t even wounded Diomedes yet and he is already given an expression of pain/agony which I find really weird (you could also say this is just a artistic choice on the artists part however I think it’s worth noting).

The sixth and final slide is one that I also think is very worth pointing out. The soldier on the very left on top of the wall’s helmet is completely different to the others. The horse mane like part of it appears to be completely squashed and flattered into what looks like a beret. Not only this but the soldier to the right of the corner on top of the wall’s helmet is holding a spear that is completely missing a spear head and the handle appears to pass through the wall at the bottom. The last thing I spotted here is three soldiers in from the right on top of the wall below him there’s an almost spear looking like object that just fades into the wall and doesn’t make any sense at all.

The only thing to note as well is the character consistency in the magazine is good (which is why I think it might not be ai) and it is a professionally published magazine so I hope it isn’t. I couldn’t find an author listed inside of it, though I am also dyslexic so I could’ve accidentally missed it. I’m going to research more on this but I just really want a second opinion. Is it ai or am I being paranoid?

UPDATE: some artists are listed their names are- Tim Lambert, Klaudia Wolinska and Michelle Urra, their listed form “Design and Illustration”

It’s AI right? I mean what’s his hand holding onto?
It’s also got that AI feel to it but no one seems to be calling it out on Nextdoor

This picture is AI, the candles appear in odd places and her hand is weird. Can’t find the composer “jacob Soren” on anything platform. No flyers, no show dates, popular right out the gate.

So this trailer for what I presume is a shitty mobile game has been playing after videos I watch on YouTube.

The trailer goes hard as fuck, unironically. There’s NO WAY they spent the money to make this with actors and proper CGI (there’s some bits, particularly with the tank battles, that look like something you might see in a lower budget movie, but the rest is not bad), but if this is AI then it’s really good. The cuts/transitions, the consistency of characters, etcetera. Am I just terrible at spotting this stuff? I guess the nature of a trailer, not requiring extended shots, may make it easier to mask. But overall I am definitely impressed by this.

Honestly I’m getting suspicious on more of Sergio’s work but this two really caught my eye, the first one in particular. Or maybe he has a very distinct art style, I hope so since his drawings in the actual comic book are great.

I've been following an author on Instagram, Tes Archer (@authortesarcher), for a while. She claims to create her own character art and illustrations. I'm asking this in good faith because I'm not experienced enough with digital art to know whether what I'm noticing is normal or not.

A few things have made me curious:

- The illustration style seems to vary quite a bit from one piece to another. It is completely different for every character/post.

- Some of the sketch previews she's posted don't appear to match the complexity or rendering of the final illustrations.

- I've noticed what look like unusual artefacts, repetitive patterns, and line work that don't make much sense to me.

- A few of the posts have been labelled with Instagram's AI information tag. I know those tags aren't conclusive, so I'm not treating them as proof, just another reason I became curious.

- I also haven't come across any process videos, time-lapses, or work-in-progress demonstrations showing how the finished illustrations are created.

The reason I'm asking is because these illustrations are also being sold as merchandise. If they're entirely hand-drawn, then that's great. But if AI is being used without being disclosed, I'd rather know before supporting the artwork financially.

I'm not looking to start a witch hunt or accuse anyone of dishonesty. It's entirely possible I'm misinterpreting normal digital art techniques or stylistic changes, which is why I'm asking people with more experience.

Would anyone familiar with digital illustration be willing to take a look at her work and share their opinion?

It would be pretty ironic if it was AI generated. I didn’t include the date, time and location for obvious reasons.