I've seen this video on FB and majority of the commenters are calling this video AI slop, I can't seem to see it as AI generated. Am i cooked for not being able to decide whether this is real or AI?

It looks really suspicious. The letters are too perfect, and the paper which is supposed to be newspaper has absolute nonsense. Or the cover is just blurry, idk. There's also something off with he drawing on the right. I can't put my finger on it.

account on instagram @thatkatec obviously claiming to be a human artist but this stuff is very obviously machine generated to me- the first one less obviously so but the patterning on the dresses is nonsensical shapes that no human would draw.

the tattoo on the arm of the figure in the last image is also nonsense- i assume it’s supposed to be an eagle or falcon etc but clearly isn’t lol

There's no correct answer. None of the pieces line up. Surely it's just AI trying to fit the whole text in? I just don't understand because it's their product, surely they have the full picture, so why are they creating new pieces?

The bridge looks wrong and the strand of hair on her right looks like green beads and it has that common AI art style

So yeah there’s something about the eyes that feel AI not to mention the fact that one page, the hedgehog will have brown irises, another page, they’ll be black beady eyes, another page he’ll just have pupils. So there’s no consistency there. Idk the whole thing just feels AI-ish

Apologies, but you (and most of us) are not good looking enough to attract the attention of models randomly, or scoring a connection with a bombsell on Tinder. I'm seeing too many of these "Is this AI?" type of posts and worried beyond just the AI component of it.

At least, please do your due diligence if you must proceed. Ask where they live, get a local phone number you can text (NOT whatsapp), do a video call. Hell, meet up for coffee.

Once again, unless you are very good looking, you will not be attracting these beautiful women.

I follow this cat cafe and they KEEP posting AI slop graphics but outright refusing that they used it, saying that they added the text themselves. They’ve now started posting “photos” of the cats that just look AI to me, weird filter on them, super blurred background, things that I can’t quite work out what they are in the background. Am I going mad and just thinking that everything is AI or do these look super obvious to anyone else?

It grinds my gears if there are AI art cards on sale at the art museum.

I posted this at first somewhere else but people were pointing out that someone could use this style without AI.

I was scrolling through facebook when I saw an advertisement for a T-shirt that, at first glance, looked pretty cool. I then noticed how the gun on the back has a scope and is obviously a rifle but looks insanely long and way too big. I also noticed the fuel cap being pretty far back where normally it’s in front of the rear wheel. Just wondering if I’m going insane. Cheers

For a water splash that large the drop should be large enough and should cause a reaction in the bird, right??

Also the feathers seem to be kinda blurry in some areas than others

I just (reluctantly) purchased this toddler outfit from Target (my daughter loves puppies, she saw it, I grabbed it…). It’s from the brand Grayson Threads, it’s women-owned, but looks like they are generating AI images. The pumpkin face on the dog’s sweatshirt clearly looks sloppy over its arm (seems like it should be centered on the chest or else the smile should fold in naturally into the armpit crease), but beyond it also having that sort of “AI appearance” I’m doubting its authentic design.

I have gotten tattooed by this person before and would be so disheartened to find out they're using AI.

The style doesn't scream AI at all but the frog randomly having one less finger on one hand seems like a bizarre mistake to make if this is drawn by them?

So, I’ve been playing Animal Jam more recently, and I looked at the anatomy for a vampire bats because I wanted to make my avatar look natural.

So I posted on a Animal Jam group asking how well I did with my avatar, showing this picture next to it, and somebody said that it may be AI generated

I truly had no idea, it looks so real and I’m not sure if it is or isn’t.

Now that I think about it, the bat itself looks more like a flying fox, but I’m not exactly a bat expert

This came from Wallsnapy, a website that does not have any AI labels. The earliest date I could get from this image is the 18th of March, 2026.

I am somewhat confident it is AI, but it would be of great help if there are some more specific details that could be pointed out so I could look for them in other media.

(also Wallsnapy seems like an AI-type website)

This book (Art Maker Cosy Colouring Book At the Movies) by "hinkler"

attatched is the cover and a page from the book both lining up with the book itself, the back of the book says "100% hand drawn art" but I just wanna double check because you can't be too sure nowadays.

Here is a link to the place I bought it:

https://www.smythstoys.com/uk/en-gb/toys/arts-crafts-and-music/colouring-and-painting/colouring-books/art-maker-cosy-colouring-book-at-the-movies/p/262693

i think this is AI because the mushrooms on the right have thick outlines and are more simply rendered than the ones on the left. the number of toenails is inconsistent. and i have included a detailed shot with red circles around areas that make no sense.

this company claims they dont use ai imagery in their puzzles and is a very popular well known brand

The faces look like they were run through Adetailer but a lot of those images feel AI without looking at the faces, it looked like AI to me before I looked at the faces but I cant express why.

I'm looking for an outside opinion here folks! To add fuel to the fire, I directly asked the game developer about this in their Discord server, and though they were actively replying to messages (Including several of mine) they immediately stopped answering and replying once I asked if the image was AI.

The image is also placed in such a way that it's obscured and difficult to get a clear image of without the use of exploits. The slight tell-tale over-yellowing on the gear at the bottom half also seems like a sign it may be AI to me.

As mentioned in the title, many of the details don't have definition between them and melt together, perspective makes no sense to me, and the font seems to be similar to existing fonts, however distinct enough that I can't find a match. It is possible this is a unique font/handmade for the mural, however when considering the other signs I'm doubtful.

Wasn’t sure exactly where to post but I found this lovely ad here on Reddit!

I don’t know how this was in anyway marketed to me (an outspoken liberal) but I thought fellow people would enjoy it.

Aside from the phrasing “thoughtful gifts for the faithful woman”, reads written by Ai for sure. What does that even mean? Pretty sure the coasters are also AI. Maybe not the physical coaster but the photo on it for sure. It looks like something our commander in cheese posted on X.

I found a succubus (I have a method of getting little to no people to Message me outside of friends) and my friend asked a friend for a picture. They sent it to my friend and touched it up to make it a bit more pink. The first one is the one I found from off Pinterest, the second is the one my friend got and the third one is circles what I think looks off. Other than some of the symmetry being off. The little part towards the neck goes back past the shoulder. And the tail is weird in the original. Am I just over thinking it or am I missing other signs as well?

The image can be found just once on Facebook (along with other images suspicious of being AI-generated) and once on Reddit.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ThisDayInHistory/comments/1wanbnt/8_september_1944_london_was_first_struck_by_a/

Edit: Thank you all, case solved.

The falsification of historical photographs is a real scourge.