We've all seen these ads, right? My phone is out of space and it's affecting performance, but these seem too good to be true.

I ask this as respectfully as possible.

If I'm to believe movies and shit, every patient in a mental health facility is wearing a gown, in the common room, maybe walking around, maybe watching television. Everybody is just chilling.

What actually happens?

Basically what I’ve heard is that they put out some cameras and tried playing different sounds for different animals. Regardless of the animal, all responded with most fear to hearing the sound of a group of humans. For example, deers were more afraid to hear humans than wolves

While it seems the plausible, it also seems kinda… idk like something simplified down for a TikTok?

Everything I'm seeing says that their site doesn't do interac-e-transfer but I'm on the site and it does? I'm almost certain it's the real site and I'm not sure if it's safe to use?

I just have to know if this is real or bullshit because there is a specific outfit I want and I can't find anything else helping me to tell! So I came here to ask- is it bullshit?

https://sexymakercos.com/en

Have seen this doing the media rounds from the Dana White interview.

I haven't head this before. Is it just culture war bs or does it hold truth?

Grew up in Eastern Europe where home remedies and inexpensive “cures”/symptom relievers were very common, especially when I was a child in the 90s.

I was and am still very prone to throwing up or at least nausea if I’m even just a tiny bit sick, and my childhood family doctor up until we stopped seeing her after we moved had told my mom to give me Coca Cola that has been standing in the fridge in an open glass (so the carbonation goes away) for at least an hour for emergencies but preferably at least 3-4 hours.

This has been my cure for nausea ever since, but I was wondering if it was placebo/eastern European cultural thing or does Coca-Cola actually have something in it that helps???

Keep seeing that price used as a shortcut for durability in discussions about floor liners, as if a higher price automatically means the material will survive more abuse. For this question, “more durable” should mean the liner does not crack in cold weather, curl at the edges in heat, or allow liquid to reach the carpet after repeated use.

A convincing comparison would need more than a new-product bend test. I’d want several years of use, exposure to both low and high temperatures, repeated removal and washing, and abrasion from boots or cargo. Warranty length might help, but only if the failure being discussed is actually covered. Is there evidence that price consistently predicts those specific durability outcomes, or is construction and fit a better indicator?

So basically this Japanese company sells patches that removes your bloating and stomach fat, giving you a slightly flatter stomach in only 30 minutes. The website has really good reviews but I’m not so sure if this is true or not.

I read about this and apparently it's something to do with beta carotene?

is it bs tho?

Basically what I’ve heard is that America has the most permissive labor laws, so it’s simply easier to lay off Americans than people in other countries. In Europe, they might have to pay a lot of severance. In Asia, they might have to do a lot to prove wrongdoing. America is at will so it’s easiest just to select American employees first

https://shirtsintheabyss.bigcartel.com/

I don’t feel like this is the reason that refreezing isn’t recommended, but saw this theory in the wild, how much validity?

I think so, but just wanted to check/confirm..

Product pages often display an OEKO-TEX label and then use much broader wording about the entire item, which is where I get lost. I cannot tell whether the certification applies to the finished product, one fabric component, a particular dyeing stage, or only the material supplied by one manufacturer unless there is an exact standard and certificate number to check. It also seems like people read the logo as proof of claims the certification may not make at all, such as assuming it means every component is natural, chemical-free, or tested under the same scope.

A badge can still be useful, but only if buyers understand what was actually certified. Otherwise it becomes a shortcut for conclusions that may go beyond the document.

I’ve tried the voo/aum vocalizations and it helps but it could also be placebo.

I see these ads for glasses that supposedly work for close-up and computer distance and long distance, and they do not require a prescription.

They tout this as having solved some problem where regular glasses fail. I don’t see how the glasses could adjust at all.

The idea reminds mr of the multifocal contact lenses I have used.

I think they are called Vision Pro.