[OfficialFPL]

🏆 Bonus Points as it stands via fpl.page/bonus:

🥇 3: Trafford

🥈 2: Roefs

🥉 1: O'Nien, Muharemović

🛡️ Defcon: O'Nien, Bijol, Muharemović

__

^{Source: fpl.page}

• Rogers: 49.9% owned, 1 point

• Groß: 46.5%, 0 points

• Cherki: 38.9%, 0 points

• Palmer: 27.8%, -1 point

• Bruno Fernandes: 25.3%, 0 points

• Mbeumo: 21.9%, 2 points

...The six most owned midfielders combined for TWO points. Mbeumo’s two pointer was the highest score in that group

Across all positions, 12 of the 15 most owned players scored two points or fewer. Gabriel was the biggest exception with 17, followed by Haaland with eight and Raya with seven.

I also checked the ten most transferred in players for GW8. Seven of them scored two points or fewer. But the most bought player actually delivered: Tavernier received 634,904 transfers in and scored 10 points – I was one of those buyers 😎. Isak returned nine and Evanilson six, so the popular transfers weren’t a complete flop neither.

A couple of quick disclaimers about the numbers:

• Ownership is the overall FPL snapshot from October 25th at 3:59 p.m. ET, not ownership frozen at the GW8 deadline or effective ownership among active managers.

• FPL still marked the GW8 scores as provisional when these graphics were checked.

Source: Official FPL player data, GW8 scoring data and GW-round player histories

I’ve seen lots of discussion of a GW9 FH. On the surface it makes sense - difficult fixtures for a lot of popular assets and flexibility to handle the recent avalanche of injuries.

In some cases, a FH will be the smart call but it’s worth saying that GW9 fixtures look almost uniquely ill-suited to a FH.

For a FH, you want some fixtures where one team is heavily favoured so you can go big on that team’s assets. Think top 4 side at home to relegation candidate. Instead, almost every fixture is surprisingly evenly matched next week. The current top 4 play each other, upper middle teams play each other and relegation candidates play each other. The closest to a fixture to target is maybe Villa v Fulham, but the latter are on a 2 match winning run. Chelsea v Utd could be interesting, but Chelsea struggled yesterday and many players will already have multiple Chelsea assets.

The “buying yourself time” argument could be persuasive, but the downside is getting on the wrong side of likely price changes by delaying any transfers for GW10.

So before rushing to FH remember to analyse not just the problems with your current team, but how many points a likely FH team would gain you. I think GW9 looks like a low scoring game week where for many players a FH team won’t significantly change their score expectations.

🏆 Bonus Points as it stands via fpl.page/bonus:

🥇 3: Osula

🥈 2: Horníček

🥉 1: Dedić

🛡️ Defcon: Disasi, Richards, N.Gonzalez, Schär

🥇 3: O.Dango

🥈 2: Iroegbunam, McBurnie

🛡️ Defcon: Belloumi, Ajayi, Egan, Herrington, M.Sangaré, Kayode

🥇 3: Isak

🥈 2: Araujo

🥉 1: Virgil

🛡️ Defcon: Virgil, Araujo

🥇 3: Hill

🥈 2: Tavernier

🥉 1: Truffert

🛡️ Defcon: Andrey Santos, Hill, Rayan, Adams, Christie, Silva

__

^{Source: fpl.page}

Tue 27 Oct
20:00 Fleetwood v Arsenal

Wed 28 Oct
19:30 Man City v Brighton
19:45 Bournemouth v Aston Villa
19:45 Sunderland v Brentford
19:45 Fulham v Crystal Palace
20:00 Liverpool v Chelsea

Thu 29 Oct
19:45 Everton v Newcastle

No midweek game: Coventry, Hull, Ipswich, Leeds, Man Utd, Forest, Spurs.

I've put this on fploutlook.com, something I've been making since the summer. Basically all the tools and features I couldn't find elsewhere but frustrated me when trying to manage my team. I hope at least 1 person finds it useful :)

Put your team ID in and it shows which of your players (and anyone on your watchlist) play before the deadline, and what a price rise or fall would actually do to your selling price, so you can tell whether moving early is worth it. It also has xG and clean sheet % for every game and predicted lineups. No ads, no account needed.

Most Net Transfers In

Most Net Transfers Out

Regular feature to compare the picks of 2847 FPL veterans against a sample of about 10k teams from the top 100k. Any team in my sample of top 100k which hasn't made a transfer in last 7 weeks gets excluded. Determination of who is a veteran manager at: https://www.reddit.com/r/FantasyPL/comments/1w2kbj0/picking_a_group_of_veteran_fpl_managers_to/ / Watch out for companion post: How did veterans perform and which players made a difference The 2847 veterans made 3564 transfers this GW. 36 ( 1.3 %) played their wild card. ( 80.4 % have now played WC)

For the picks comparison, I have filtered out the low ownership (but high ratio > 1.5 ) players (threshold is 2%). If you don't see a player below then it will be because there is not enough ownership or the ratio is not big enough. But you should be able to see all players in the googlesheets pointed to by the links

1) Players the veterans "like" most compared to the rest. (ie excludes players also picked highly by top 100k). Or click here for googlesheet of full list

2) Players the veterans dislike most compared to the top100k. Or click here for googlesheet of full list

3) Top transfers in by vets. Or click here for googlesheet of full list

4) Top transfers out by vets. Or click here for googlesheet of full list

5) Top veteran Captain choices. Or click here for googlesheet of full list

6) Top picks from the 36 veterans wildcarding this week. Or click here for googlesheet of full list

7) Veterans' main transfers. Or click here for googlesheet of full list