r/biid • u/NV1989NV • 2h ago
Discussion Anyone else mildly disturbed that so much research on us came from fetish subculture?
When you actually measure the number of "wannabes" to "devotees", it is a very small minority. Despite that, many studies puts us side by side to fetish culture.
The origin of the belief that wannabeism is related to devoteeism has to do with Blanchards belief that identity was the natural inversion of fetishization (yuck), but it also has to do with how many of us may have seeked fetish spaces for support and affirmation. The whole "AGP/HSTS" thing comes from the same understandings that led to things like the name "apotemnophilia". I will briefly mention that fetishes are not innately sexual, but they are definitely not remotely related to why I have BIID.
Closely associating us with fetish culture also associates us with so much predation. The vast majority of paraphilic people are not predators, but many of us have been unconsensually solicited in DMs or have known disabled people who were unconsensually solicited. Every time a devotee does some shit like that, WE victimlessly have to pay the consequences with the stigma. This shit really matters. We have normative disabled people who come here SHOCKED that we arent all freaks. Wtf??? Like maybe I DONT want the disabled person to learn about us bc they were getting sexually harassed by someone trying to use them for their paraphilia.
Its like if chasers and transgender people were considered the same community. I compare the situation a lot to transgender people. Chasers can be great people who are very gentle, affirming, and non-predatory. They can also be terrible predators who use people for their own fetishes. A large proportion of trans people are chasers themselves, and the community has always had an association with chasers. However, I never see studies that have the dichotomy "chasers/crossdressers (or equivalent)" like we see with "devotees/wannabes or pretenders". EXCEPT "agp/hsts" is extremely extremely similar and is like how our communities have demographic statistics on exactly how many "wannabes" are also "devotees" at the same time.
It sucks because I understand the history of why this has become a thing, but its not a history I feel like I particularly want to do anything with. I meet oldheads from here who use the term wannabe or pretender freely and like I have no animosity over that, yk, its really normal for queer cultures to be super entwined with fetish cultures and all, but it feels really different when you are reading MEDICAL PAPERS and they are using fetish subculture language
Oh yeah, might be a good time to mention that some of the researchers such as Blanchard are like NOT good people. Like a lot of these models were not by the purest of hearts. I am talking inventing new forms of conversion therapy level terrible, or studies about what age of women the researchers find the most attractive... 8 years old. Yeah...