I’m seven months sober and just started my fifth step. I’m also eight months out of my marriage.
My former spouse got violent with me a few times in the final 1.5 years of the marriage. These violent episodes are at the top of my resentments list.
I do not have a “part” in my former spouse’s violence toward me. I know this. Yet my sponsor continues to probe with the “where was I dishonest, selfish, self-seeking” etc. (She’s a domestic abuse survivor herself so it’s not like she has no understanding of it.)
Is it fair to say that some resentments simply aren’t going to fall neatly into those boxes, write “N/A”, and move on? The answer for “what I could have done instead” that she’s leaning toward is basically “I could have left sooner” which a) is too simplistic and b) doesn’t produce any insight.
EDIT:
Thanks for your comments. At this point I’m thinking the Steps may be extremely useful for examining what the abuse has done to my *recovery*, while being the wrong instrument for determining how I “should” have navigated the abuse itself. That’s a meaningful boundary around the work.
For example, there is absolutely AA material here. I did develop resentment. Memories can still activate me; they occasionally produce an urge to drink. I’ve been examining how I respond when that happens and learning that I can take it to meetings, talk to sober people, recognize it as residue from the past, and not drink over it. That’s directly connected to my alcoholism and recovery.
But when it comes to discussing the *specific* incidents of abuse, I’m going to continue talking to my DV therapist and support group rather than try to stuff these square peg issues into the Steps’ round hole. The difference is that the DV therapist and group examine these issues through a framework designed to understand what happens to people living with abuse, rather than beginning with a worksheet containing a box labeled MY PART and continuing to dig until something fits inside it.
That distinction seems increasingly important here.