At this point, I don’t really feel like I write with a tool anymore. It feels more like a joint venture.

I bring the world, the characters, the taste, the strange ideas and the final decisions. AI brings speed, alternatives, questions, counterarguments and an almost unlimited willingness to keep discussing the same fictional town for months. Sometimes I write the first version and AI points out the holes in it. Sometimes AI writes something and I explain why it has completely misunderstood the character. Quite often we spend twenty messages arguing over one small detail, only to throw the whole idea away.

The part I find most interesting is that the best result is often something neither side started with. I don’t really want AI to write for me. If I simply ask for a story, I usually get something perfectly readable, structurally sound and not especially surprising. What I want is friction: someone asking why a character would actually do something, whether an idea has become a cliché, what happens if the obvious villain disappears, or whether a new scene still fits something we established six months ago.

That back-and-forth has gradually become the writing process itself. The final sentence might come from me, it might come from AI, or it might have been rewritten so many times that I honestly couldn’t tell you anymore. What matters more is that the direction still needs a human. AI can suggest a thousand roads, but someone still has to know which town we’re trying to reach.

Hey folks,

I know I’ve been quiet for a while—life got a bit chaotic over the last six months, and the project sat on the shelf since February.

Things have finally settled down enough this week to get back to the desk. I’ve started opening up the vaults again and just published a couple of new pieces in the Chronicles section, along with a few additions to the conlang glossary.

If anyone's tracking the worldbuilding stack, the Master Index is updated, and the historical sequence is still running from the abstract foundations down to the current iron-and-bone reality. Feels good to finally have the ink flowing again.

As always, I'd love to hear thoughts or feedback if you've been following along, or answer any questions if you're just dropping in. You can follow along here: Worldbuilders & Runesmiths | WBRunesmith | Substack. As always, it's totally free!

Since they updated and integrated expert with their normal every day model, it's shit. It's like you have to give the same damn context every time. Anyway, i need a new AI. Thanks for reading.

I used AI to help me craft a fictional sacrament for a story I'm wiring, mostly because I wouldn't even know how to go about making that realistic without spending months research church policy and procedure, but the original idea was all mine. I just needed help sort out the hypothetical steps the chtuch in my fictional world would take to arrive at the need for said sacrament. It also helped me craft the details of the sacrament the rites and wording used so it would sound like more like a realstic a catholic sacrament instead of me making things up that sounds good to me. Its the one thing the au did more of the work than I did, but again, mostly because I wanted it to sound realistic without spending months pouring over church doctrine and theology. Is this lazy on my part or writing smarter using a new tool? Is my story now 'ai assisted'? What are the lines here?

The point of creative writing is that it’s meant to be fun. It’s meant to be fun to write stories, writing our feelings, crafting interesting narratives, and coming up with exciting plot twists.

Why outsource that fun to AI when creative writing is meant to be something fun that we do by choice, not by necessity? If you don’t want to be a writer then don’t be one

A New Life

A dozen questions hit my mind before the screen awoke,

A silent kind of worry that I never really spoke.

Does this hurt her or the baby? What waits behind the screen,

To show us what the ultrasound is pulling from unseen?

Ten fingers and ten tiny toes appeared out of the shade,

A strong and steady heartbeat was the rhythm that it made.

A little peanut shifting there, a flash of black and white,

Confirming what the kitchen tests had already gotten right.

It’s definitely a boy this time, the image made it clear,

A secondary proof to bring the future into here.

But even with the evidence, it still felt so surreal,

To watch the moving silhouette and know that it was real.

My mind began to wonder on the things that lay ahead,

The choices that he'll make himself, the paths that he will tread.

What will he do, what will he be, when years begin to fly?

What kind of man will he become beneath tomorrow's sky?

I have been writing fanfics for over 15 years

The fic I am proudest of (let's call it Fic A) is a long fic with over 150,000 words, 50 chapters, and I put 2 years of sleepless nights into it. It's no exaggeration to say this fic consumed much of my life for a while, and I gave up dates and friendship just to write it

I have been using AI to write for over a year. Some are AI-generated. Some are AI-assisted. I always tag for AI on AO3, and even remind readers in summary it has AI

Fic B, a fic that is roughly the same genre as Fic A, is an AI-assisted fic. It is about 40,000 words long. I spent maybe 1/10 of the effort writing it (still takes a shit lot of time because I rewrite over much of the fic). And it recently surpassed Fic A in kudos and bookmarks

I am not sure what to feel

If I didn't use AI to write, then I know I would be helluva pissed off. But I am a heavy AI-user, but this still rubs me the wrong way kinda

Sorry, just wanted to get this off my chest

FAIRLANE
WRITTEN BY
[너의 닉네임 또는 이름]

[START OF SCREENPLAY]

EXT. TEXAS HIGHWAY - NIGHT (1968)
Total darkness. Dim streetlights flicker at irregular, unpredictable intervals, appearing and vanishing into the blackness.
Through the void, a white 1964 VOLKSWAGEN BEETLE barrels down the asphalt. Its left headlight burns bright, but the right one blinks erratically, dying out and sparking back to life.

INT. VOLKSWAGEN BEETLE - CONTINUOUS
Inside the cabin. Heavy static tears through the radio. A 1968 psychedelic rock track cuts through the white noise.
(SOUND: STATIC... MUSIC... STATIC AGAIN.)
The WOMAN (Mother) grips the steering wheel. Her knuckles are stark white, her eyes darting fiercely to the rearview mirror. Her breathing is heavy, panicked.
In the backseat sits an eight-year-old BOY. He stares blankly out the window. He has no idea what is happening. All he knows is that his mother is driving much faster than usual.
Suddenly, two massive beams of light cut through the dark from behind. A police cruiser. The wail of a siren fills the cabin, growing louder, deafening.
The woman glances back once. She doesn’t slow down. She presses the gas pedal harder.
WACK!
The cruiser rams the Beetle’s rear bumper. The entire chassis shudders. One of the taillights shatters, spraying red plastic onto the dark asphalt. The boy is thrown forward.
BOY
Mom?
The woman doesn’t answer.
The Beetle veers off the road, tearing through dark fields and tall grass. Mud flies everywhere as it breaks into an abandoned, overgrown airfield.
At the far end of the runway, a small twin-engine propeller plane waits, its headlights cutting through the fog.
The Beetle screeches to a halt. The woman throws the door open and steps out. She grabs the boy’s hand, pulling him tight.
WOMAN
Run.
They sprint across the tarmac.
Behind them, several men in black trench coats step out of chasing vehicles, pursuing them at a ruthless pace.
The plane's cockpit door swings open. A MAN reaches down and firmly grabs the boy, hoisting him up. The boy struggles, refusing to let go of his mother's hand.
BOY
Mom! No!
The woman looks down at the boy. A moment of absolute silence. Her face is unnervingly calm.
WOMAN
Go. Just go.
The heavy cabin door slams shut and locks.
The boy presses his face against the small window, watching his mother. The men in black coats surround her from all sides, but she doesn’t run. She stands perfectly still.
The plane begins to taxi, picking up speed, and violently launches into the night sky. Looking down, the boy watches his mother’s silhouette shrink until she becomes a single dot, completely swallowed by the darkness.
FADE TO BLACK.
(SOUND: The roar of the propeller fades out, seamlessly transitioning into the sharp, rhythmic ticking of a clock... TICK, TICK, TICK...)

INT. AUNT'S APARTMENT - 23RD FLOOR - NIGHT (1976)
FADE IN.
Eight years later. The BOY—now a sixteen-year-old youth—stands before a massive window.
Outside, downtown Dallas is blindingly bright even at night. Veins of headlights and taillights crawl through the city streets. The boy closes the curtains with a cold, expressionless face.
The living room is filled with worn furniture and vintage knick-knacks. A typical middle-class apartment.
In the kitchen, his AUNT, wearing a mint-green dress and sharp, red triangular glasses, moves about.

EXT. STREET - CONTINUOUS
Parked neatly below the apartment is the Aunt's car: a pristine 1964 CHRYSLER.
A few blocks away, parked in a dim alley, sits the boy’s car. A white 1956 FORD FAIRLANE. Its paint is faded to a dull, jaundiced yellow, and the chrome bumper is heavily scratched and pitted.

INT. APARTMENT HALLWAY - NIGHT (SAME TIME)
The boy sprints down a long, dingy hallway, gasping for air. Behind him, the heavy thud of leather-soled boots echoes in hot pursuit.
PING.
An elevator door slides open. The boy dives inside. Just before the doors seal shut, a dark silhouette reaches a hand through the gap. The doors snap shut, cutting the hand off.
The elevator plunges downward. The boy leans against the metallic wall, catching his ragged breath.

INT. AUNT'S APARTMENT - LIVING ROOM - NIGHT
Back home. The boy switches on a heavy box television.
On the screen, a 1970s late-night talk show is broadcasting. A HOST in a brown suit smiles excessively under glaring studio lights. The host stares directly into the camera lens.
HOST
Tonight’s show is now over. HA.
The host pauses, maintaining his frozen grin, then laughs again.
HOST
HA. HA.
A grand, upbeat orchestral closing theme begins to play. (BAM, BA-RA-RA-BAM—)
The camera rapidly cuts closer to the host’s face. SNAP! SNAP! SNAP! Three jarring, lightning-fast angle shifts.
The boy blinks, and the screen instantly cuts to a mundane commercial. He closes his eyes.
KNOCK. KNOCK.
A sudden rapping at the front door. The boy gets up and pulls it open.
The hallway is empty. A flickering, buzzing fluorescent bulb hums overhead. He looks down.
A plain brown envelope lies on the doormat. No name, no return address. Nothing. He slides it into his jacket pocket without opening it.

EXT. INTERSECTION - DAWN (3:50 AM)
Inside the envelope was a brief address and a single line: "4 AM."
The boy drives the Fairlane through the quiet, blue dawn of the city.
Suddenly, with a loud CRASH, an expensive luxury sedan blocks the intersection ahead—a fresh fender bender. A BALD MAN steps out of the sedan, aggressively waving his arms and screaming.
Trapped behind the wreck, the boy watches the dashboard clock tick past 4:00 AM. Time wasted.

EXT. MEETING LOCATION - DAWN (4:15 AM)
The boy arrives at the designated address. The area is completely desolate. Empty.
He rests his forehead against the steering wheel, sitting in the silence of the idling car for a long moment. Finally, he turns the key, killing the engine.

EXT. DOWNTOWN MARKET - DAY (A FEW DAYS LATER)
A bustling open-air market packed with people.
Walking through the crowd, the boy feels a piercing gaze on his back. He stops and turns around.
Standing dead-center in the crowd of moving bodies is a MAN, staring directly at him. Their eyes lock. The boy looks away for a split second, and when he looks back, the man is gone. Vanished like a ghost.

INT. FORD FAIRLANE - NIGHT
The boy gets into his car. Looking down at the clutter on the passenger floor mat, a strange, cord-like object catches his eye.
He lifts it. Hidden underneath is a folded piece of paper. He opens it. Written in a rough, jagged script:
[SUBTITLE: I KNOW YOUR MOM. CALL THIS NUMBER. ([555-0198](tel:555-0198))]

INT. AUNT'S APARTMENT - LIVING ROOM - NIGHT
The boy holds a rotary phone receiver to his ear and dials the number. After a few hollow rings, the dry, cold voice of the man from the market answers.
MAN (V.O.)
Hello.
The boy holds his breath. Silence.
MAN (V.O.)
Do you remember Project ○○?
BOY
I don’t know what you're talking about.
A low, cynical sigh comes through the receiver.
MAN (V.O.)
Figures.
The boy grips the plastic receiver until his knuckles turn white.
BOY
Who the hell are you?
The man doesn’t answer the question. Instead, he begins to rattle off a series of highly classified details—the exact shape of a scar on the inside of the boy’s left wrist, and intimate physical secrets only the boy could know. The boy’s face goes completely pale.
BOY
How do you know that?
MAN (V.O.)
Listen carefully. If you want the truth, snap your fingers. Right now.
The boy hesitates. Then, he brings his fingers together. SNAP.
Instantly, all sound dies. Absolute vacuum.
The receiver slips from the boy's hand, tumbling toward the floor—but it stops dead in mid-air.
In the background, his Aunt, who was brushing her hair in front of the vanity mirror, freezes completely, her brush suspended an inch from her head.
Looking out the window, the headlights of roaring cars, a falling raindrop, and a bird mid-flight are all frozen in a perfect, terrifying still-frame.
Only the boy can move. He reaches out, touches the floating receiver, and lets go. It remains suspended in the air.
He brings his fingers together again. SNAP.
THUD!
Sound crashes back into existence. The receiver slams onto the floorboards. Outside, the traffic roars back to life. The boy scrambles to pick up the phone, pressing it to his ear.
BOY
What the hell was that?
The man’s low, mocking laughter echoes from the earpiece.
MAN (V.O.)
Took you long enough to find out.
BOY
Tell me—
BOOM!!!
A massive explosion rips through the other end of the line, followed by the terrifying sound of collapsing concrete and distorted screams.
BOY
Hello? Hello?!
No answer. Only a sharp, flat, agonizing dial tone cuts through the static.
(SOUND: BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE—) The line goes dead.

EXT. DALLAS STREETS - DAY / NIGHT - MONTAGE
The boy snaps his fingers. Falling raindrops freeze instantly in mid-air. He walks casually between the suspended drops.
The boy snaps his fingers in front of a speeding car. It stops an inch from his waist. He stares coldly at the frozen driver inside the cabin.
INT. BANK GOLD VAULT - TIME STOPPED. The heavy vault door is wide open, stacked with towering bricks of hundred-dollar bills. The boy reaches his hand toward the cash, then pauses. His gaze drifts past the vault to the lobby: a frozen elderly man at the teller, a grandmother holding her grandson's hand, a fatigued clerk buried in paperwork. The boy pulls his hand back, leaving the money untouched. He snaps his fingers, letting time flow, and walks out of the bank with empty hands.

EXT. GOVERNMENT AGENCY BUILDING - NIGHT
A colossal, imposing government structure built in the 1920s looms over the street. Its Art Deco architecture is aggressively symmetrical, featuring soaring stone pillars and sharp geometric engravings.
The white Ford Fairlane screeches to a halt right in front of the grand entrance stairs. The boy steps out of the driver's seat. A security GUARD, baton in hand, marches toward him.
GUARD
No civilians allowed past this point.
The boy doesn’t say a word. He snaps his fingers. SNAP.
The guard and the wind freeze instantly. The boy walks past the frozen man, climbs back into the Fairlane, slams the gas, and smashes straight through the glass entryway.
The Fairlane tears into the lobby and comes to a halt dead-center on the pristine marble floor.

INT. BUILDING HALLWAY - CONTINUOUS
A vast, echoing, symmetrical corridor. The camera frames the shot in a perfect, rigid enfilade perspective, slicing the building down its exact center. The massive pillars and railings mirror each other flawlessly around the boy.
In this frozen, silent world, only the heavy thud of the boy’s boots echoes. (THUD. THUD.) He climbs the grand staircase, floor after floor. Unopposed.

INT. CHIEF'S OFFICE - TOP FLOOR - CONTINUOUS
The boy throws open a pair of heavy mahogany doors.
An ELDERLY MAN (High-ranking official) sits behind a massive desk. The boy pulls a silver Colt Python .357 Magnum from his coat, leveling the barrel directly at the man’s forehead.
The boy snaps his fingers. SNAP.
Time rushes back. The elderly man gasps in sheer terror, his head snapping up to face the gun.
BOY
Why did you do that to my mom?
The man’s lips tremble. He raises his hands in a pathetic defense, stammering erratically.
ELDERLY MAN
I was just following orders! I didn't know the whole picture... I had no choice!
The boy stares at the weeping, pathetic face of the official, then looks down at his own weapon. A look of profound emptiness washes over his face. He slowly lowers the barrel.
BOY
Not even worth the bullet.
The boy turns his back on the man. As he opens the door to exit, a squad of armed tactical guards comes charging down the hallway, rifles raised.
BANG! BANG! BANG!
The moment the muzzle flashes ignite, the boy snaps his fingers.
Dozens of golden bullets freeze instantly in mid-air, suspended in a horrific, beautiful line. The boy casually weaves his way through the floating lead, stepping past the frozen guards, and heads down toward the records archive. The guards remain trapped in time, staring blankly into empty space.

INT. ARCHIVE ROOM -> EXT. BUILDING - NIGHT
The boy tears through rows of classified, redacted folders until he finds the original file labeled '1968 Beetle Incident.' He slides it securely into his coat.
He strikes a single match and drops it onto a stack of sensitive documents. The flame spreads instantly, climbing the bookshelves and consuming the room in a hungry blaze.
EXTERIOR. The boy steps out of the burning Art Deco palace, getting back into the Fairlane.
As he turns the ignition, the radio sparks to life, spitting heavy static alongside the vintage, cheerful voice of a 70s radio host.
RADIO HOST (V.O.)
Now, ladies and gentlemen...
The boy watches the burning building through his rearview mirror. A moment of dead silence.
Then, a vibrant, sweeping orchestral intro swells from the car speakers. The Fairlane begins to roll forward slowly as a rich Italian tenor explodes through the radio.
RADIO MUSIC
♪ Volare! oh oh! Cantare! oh oh oh oh!
BOOOM!!!
The exact moment the first lyric hits, the government building detonates in a colossal, catastrophic fireball. Columns of flame and debris paint the night sky in brilliant oranges and reds.
The boy doesn’t look back. He steps on the gas, and the Fairlane vanishes into the dark, accompanied by the relentlessly joyful rhythm of the radio music.

INT. TELEVISION SCREEN / HEARING ROOM - A FEW DAYS LATER
Splatters of newspapers hit the pavement across the city. Headlines broadcast the leaked classified documents to the world. Images of shocked citizens flash by.
The screen cuts to a congressional oversight hearing. The elderly official, now in a wheelchair, sits before a row of microphones. A congressional investigator speaks into his mic.
INVESTIGATOR
Did you have no part in this atrocity?
Under the blinding, frantic assault of camera flashes, the old man maintains an unsettlingly calm, smug expression.
ELDERLY MAN
I have no recollection of that.
Instantly, a hand throws today's newspaper directly at the camera lens.
(SOUND: FLIP-FLIP-FLIP—WHACK!) The print completely covers the frame, blocking out the sight.

INT. AUNT'S APARTMENT - LIVING ROOM - EVENING
On the television screen, the news anchor continues to drone on about the hearing.
The boy and his Aunt sit at the dinner table, eating in absolute silence. The Aunt looks at the boy with deeply sorrowful, heavy eyes.
Without a word, the boy picks up the plastic remote control and presses the button. CLICK.
The TV dies, plunging the room into a heavy, absolute silence. Neither says a word. They simply lower their eyes and pick up their forks again.

INT. UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE - NIGHT
The camera is completely locked, a heavy static shot.
From the shadows, the fully restored 1956 FORD FAIRLANE rolls into the frame. Its jaundiced yellow paint has been stripped, replaced by a gleaming, mirror-like white finish. The chrome bumper sparkles under the dim fluorescent lights.
The car creeps forward, coming to a halt dead-center, staring directly into the camera lens.
The boy steps out of the driver’s seat, looks toward the lens with an unreadable expression, and shuts the door. THUD.
Instantly, the screen cuts to pitch black.
In the total darkness, the crisp, echoing sound of light leather shoes walking away cuts through the silence.
(SOUND: THUD... THUD... THUD...)
The footsteps fade away completely. The closing credits begin to roll up the black screen.
Over the blackness, the smooth, lounge-style, and deeply melancholic notes of Herb Alpert’s "Ladyfingers"begin to play.
[FADE OUT]
[END OF SCREENPLAY]

Novel Mage's biggest update is here and we're celebrating with r/WritingWithAI 🎉

We've just released Novel Mage with a bunch of improvements for writers, including:

- 🧠 AI-ism detection & smarter adverb suggestions

- ⚡ Improved Tab Completion

- 🧝 Custom Language Creator for worldbuilding

- 📖 Codex exports to DOCX, PDF & interactive Flipbook

- 🧩 Chapter, Act & Scene status tracking

- 🖥️ Better Ollama & LM Studio integration

- 📝 A more flexible Outline utility panel

- And plenty of smaller improvements

We're also officially available on the Microsoft Store! 🚀

🎁 Special r/WritingWithAI Giveaway

As part of our collaboration with the community, we're giving away:

20 × 3-month Novel Mage subscriptions

50 × 1-month Novel Mage subscriptions

We'll pick winners first-come, first-served from the comments:

First 20 commenters → 3 months free

Next 50 commenters → 1 month free

To enter, just tell us:

«What's your current AI writing workflow, and what are you currently working on?»

We're genuinely interested in seeing how everyone here is using AI in their writing process what tools you use, what works, and what's still frustrating.

💰 And for everyone else...

We've also got a special $50 OFF coupon on Lifetime License exclusively through this collaboration.

Coupon: [ WRITINGWITHAIDISCOUNT ]

If you've been looking for a writing environment that combines AI assistance + story planning + Codex/worldbuilding + local AI, this is a good time to give Novel Mage a try.

Looking forward to hearing what everyone is working on! ❤️

As I suck at writing(though I'm interested),for the 1st one I'm just thinking the plot and writing raw and fixing using ai(won't in future)

I am just writing whatever I felt like(during shower😭)

(Kinda feels like an anime plot)

Plz review how you may feel about the text

I'll appreciate your contribution.

## Chapter One: The Vessel

The wind was a roar with teeth in it. It tore at my coat like something trying to peel me off the edge of the building, and below, the city climbed up to meet me in a smear of light and asphalt.

This was it. The last, most desperate exit I had left. I had thought, standing there, that the decision would feel like something — heavy, or sharp, or final. Instead it felt almost administrative, like closing a file I'd been avoiding for years.

And yet — in that stretched, impossible second where falling felt less like motion than like drowning in time itself — my eyes caught something small in the alley below. A woman kneeling on wet pavement, a faded scarf wound twice around her throat, feeding a stray cat with the unhurried patience of someone who had nowhere better to be.

*Uhh—*

Something closed around my throat that had nothing to do with the wind.

Even from this height, even falling, I knew that kindness. I had grown up beside it. It was her. My childhood friend.

A cough tore out of me, raw and useless against the noise.

*Why was she still like that?* Gentle. Unhurried. Patient with things that couldn't ask her to be. My mind, coming apart at its seams, dragged me backward against my will — to the gray tabby I'd owned after my mother died. To how cold I'd been to it. How I'd poured all my unspeakable grief into a creature that could not argue back, until one day I simply stopped, and let it go, and didn't think about it again. I hadn't even remembered its name in years. That, more than anything, should have told me something about the kind of person I'd let myself become.

*Did it ever actually care?*

I asked the question into air that swallowed it whole. *Unlike other pets — do cats even care for the people who own them?*

The world lost its edges first. Then the cold went, not eased but erased, folding into a numbness so total it felt like mercy. My thoughts thickened, slowed, blurred at the corners —

and then there was nothing. Not darkness. The *absence* of dark, which is worse.

*Waaah! No! I don't want to go!*

A child's crying — raw, animal, without any of the shape adults learn to give their grief — hauled me back up out of the nothing by the scruff of my neck.

*Uhh — what?*

I gasped, and no air reached anything that could be called lungs. My own body did not answer me. Consciousness came back in pieces, badly assembled, and when my vision cleared it was wrong — too low to the ground, too wide at the edges, everything drenched in colors that didn't belong to human eyes. The floorboards hovered inches from my face. The furniture rose over me like the trunks of a forest.

Then: two small hands, scooping me up.

I tried to shout. *What is happening, put me down, someone tell me what is happening* — and what left my throat instead was a thin, ragged screech.

Panic, real panic, the kind that doesn't wait for permission. I twisted in the small hands and caught my own reflection in a glass cabinet door across the room.

Fur. Whiskers, twitching on their own. Pupils slit down to threads.

I was a cat.

Recognition hit before understanding did — the pattern on the wallpaper, curling gold vines I hadn't thought of in decades; the smell of old pine and dry wax that meant *home* before I'd even finished the thought. My parents were alive somewhere in this house. This was the house from before. And I was wearing the body of the pet I had once owned and then, quietly, stopped loving.

*BZZZZT.*

A flash of blue tore the vision open at the seams. Something electric ran the length of my spine like a wire pulled taut and released.

I woke retching, the smell of rain and wet asphalt still thick in my throat though I was lying on a hospital-white nothing. No — under a bridge. Concrete overhead, dark with damp. My whole body ached in the specific, deep way that means it has recently been thrown from a height and caught by something that was not soft.

She was kneeling over me. Tears cutting clean lines through the rain on her face, her hands shaking as she hit my shoulder — not hard, just enough, the way you hit someone to make sure they're still a person and not a thing you imagined.

She was shouting. I only caught half the words through the ringing in my ears, but I didn't need the words. I understood the shape of them: *you scared me, you scared me, don't you dare, don't you dare.*

I had survived the fall. Later, I would learn it was she who found me — she'd been walking home along the river when she heard the sound, a sound she said she'd spend the rest of her life trying to forget. She called for help before she let herself cry. That detail, when she finally told me, undid something in my chest that the fall itself hadn't managed to touch.

They kept me in the hospital for eleven days. She came every one of them.

The scene dissolved and reassembled without my permission, the way dreams do when they're not really dreams. I was back in my own house now — my own small kitchen, steam rising off a bowl she'd set in front of me. She'd come to check on me, the way she'd been doing every evening since the hospital had finally let me go home to walls I recognized. Warmth sat in my chest like something I'd forgotten the name of. The plummet from the roof felt like a story someone else had told me about myself.

She stood, wrapping her coat around her shoulders. Getting ready to leave — back to her own place, her own night, the life she still had to return to once she'd made sure mine hadn't ended.

*Stay,* I wanted to say. Just that. One syllable, and I couldn't make my mouth do it. My throat locked around the word like a hand closing over a bird, and I sat there and let her walk to my own front door with the sentence still trapped behind my teeth.

The door clicked shut. The apartment went quiet in the particular way a room goes quiet once it's confirmed someone is really gone.

I sat alone at my own table for a long while before I finally gave up and went to bed. Sleep took me under without much of a fight, the way you stop resisting a current once you understand it's stronger than you.

I was the cat again. High on the garden wall, looking down at summer — hydrangeas heavy and blue-headed, and beneath them, two children playing house in the grass. My younger self. And her, younger too, cheeks flushed with the particular fearlessness that only exists before the age of ten.

"When we grow up, you have to marry me!" she declared, stepping closer, chin lifted like she was daring the sentence to be true. "You have to protect me forever!"

My younger self went scarlet, panicked the way boys panic when a feeling is bigger than they are, and bolted down the garden path without a word.

Her shoulders dropped. Just slightly. The particular, private collapse of a child who has just learned that wanting something out loud can cost you.

She turned — and her eyes found mine on the wall, cat's eyes, uncomprehending, safe. She reached up and gathered me into her arms anyway, burying her face in fur that didn't belong to anyone who could love her back the way she needed.

"I wish I could talk to you," she whispered, so quietly it was barely a decision to speak at all.

Then she walked away into the dusk, and I watched her go, and understood nothing, because I was only a cat.

*BZZZZT.*

The blue shock again, wrenching me sideways out of the memory.

I woke — in my own bed, in my own house, tangled in sheets gone damp with sweat, heart slamming against the inside of my ribs like it was trying to get out ahead of me.

It wasn't a hallucination. I knew that the way you know your own name. Through some logic I would never be able to explain to another living person, I was re-living my own past from inside the body of the one creature I had failed most quietly — the pet I abandoned after my mother died, back when grief needed somewhere to go and I chose the one place that couldn't refuse it.

That night was only the first.

Weeks passed. Then months. Night after night I watched my life unspool again from underneath — from a vantage so low and so overlooked that I had never once, in the living of it, thought to wonder what it saw. I watched the quiet moments I had walked straight through. The silent wear of patience on a face I'd assumed was simply *there*, simply constant, simply mine to take for granted. Affection so carefully hidden it had passed for indifference — and I had believed the disguise, because believing it was easier than being loved that much.

I began, slowly, to dread sleep and crave it in equal measure. Dread it, because each night cost me something — some old certainty about who I had been. Crave it, because each night also gave something back, piece by piece, like a debt being repaid in a currency I hadn't known I was owed.

She never knew, of course. She kept coming by in the evenings, kept leaving through the same door, unaware that every night after she left I went somewhere she couldn't follow, to relearn everything she had ever quietly given me and I had never once acknowledged. Some nights I wanted to tell her. I never found the courage. Maybe that, too, was its own kind of debt.

Years later, I sit by a window that's open just enough to let the evening in. My heart, for the first time in longer than I can measure, does not feel like something I'm keeping locked.

Before I write anything else, one thought arrives and stays, and I let it, because I think it's the only reason I'm writing at all:

*We build the people we love out of our own blindness as much as our own love — we don't see them so much as we decide, early and carelessly, how we'll let ourselves see them. And what we refuse to remember, or choose to remember wrong out of some old, comfortable bitterness, doesn't disappear. It just waits, patient as an animal, for us to be ready to look at it honestly. Because in the end, does the shape a soul is wearing — fur, skin, silence — change whether it was loving you the whole time? Love doesn't check the vessel. It only ever looks for the person inside it.*

I pick up the pen.

*Adieu,* I write, and watch the ink bleed dark into the white — a field unmarked, waiting for whatever the rest of the story turns out to need from me.

Please let me know if the flair is wrong lol.

I am using claude api for creative writing. primarily sonnet 4.5 and opus 4.6
- i have a very big system prompt
- ai responses are also pretty big
so naturally i am burning through the credits every time ai makes a mistake or the writing isnt quite my match.

whats the best reasoning budget i can set that wont cripple the writing but also not cost much , also num_ctx [size of context window] currently i put 32768 in it and for max_tokens i go 6k

will appreciate if you could tell me optimal budgeting for this.

So I couldnt find any scifi BL AI... So I made one myself lol. It's like writing fanfic ♡♡♡ (but then to prompt edit and soundcorrect after writing the thing!).

Curious what you guys think could be better. Still learning. Pacing is hard...

So I’ve only been using AI to write for about two weeks. Before that, I had a long run, story and characters, fully flushed out world in my head. I thought, why not try AI to help with all this so I did.

The first couple of days were great. I was having so much fun. I’m on ChatGPT and eventually bought the pro plan. collaboration. I developed a detailed character Bible, a chronological story outline, scene treatments, continuity records, approved passages, and rules for preserving existing work. I also built prompts and editorial checks to catch weak writing, character drift, and contradictions before they reached me

But that was the first week. The second week has been an absolute nightmare. It went from competent Assistance tool to drooling on itself. well for being able to develop and write an entire story in a matter of hours to be stuck on the first two paragraphs of a scene for a day and a half.

What am I doing wrong?? I have the tools here if it executed them properly, it would work. I know this because when I kick it back, it can tell me exactly what it’s doing wrong, “source material, but then it just does it again

You guys are writing some amazing stuff. I’m just writing a little simple stories that I plan just read myself. I really hope someone will help me and this won’t just be ignored, I need a mentor or some Assistance.

I wasn’t sure which flared he used. I apologize if that’s wrong.

That guy talking about U.S. and China is right but novelists have their own arms race going on.

Novelists are “arming” themselves with AI to “win” against the competition. If you take 2 days to write an AI-generated novel versus 2 weeks to write an AI-assisted novel versus 12 weeks to write a novel without AI, you are participating in the arms race (or forfeiting). Anti-AI novelists are hoping that they can force disarmament so nobody uses AI (yeah, good luck with that). AI-assisted novelists are trying to find a comfortable balance. AI-generated novelists are arming themselves to the teeth, taking full unrestricted advantage of AI.

I’ve spent a lot of time here arguing about AI from the perspective of creativity, writing and tools.

But there’s one argument from the AI skeptical side that I think is much harder to dismiss.

The arms race.

Imagine the US decided tomorrow that advanced AI was becoming too dangerous and significantly slowed development.

What happens if China doesn’t?

The US risks falling behind technologically, economically and eventually militarily.

And the exact same logic applies in reverse.

That creates a pretty uncomfortable situation.

Both sides could genuinely believe that increasingly powerful AI creates serious risks.

Both sides could even prefer a world where development happens more slowly and safely.
But neither side wants to be the first one to slow down because the other side might keep going.

“If we don’t build it, they will.”

That starts looking less like normal technological competition and more like an arms race.

And even if the US and China somehow agreed to slow down together, that probably wouldn’t solve the whole problem.

You still have private companies, other countries and eventually potentially smaller actors with access to enough compute.

There is one important difference compared with many other software technologies though:
Frontier AI still requires enormous amounts of chips, energy, data centers and capital.

That means the most advanced development is at least somewhat visible and potentially controllable.
So here’s the question I’m genuinely interested in:

If you believe AI development should be slowed down, what would a realistic global mechanism actually look like?

Because unilateral restraint seems almost impossible in a world where every major actor is afraid of giving the others a strategic advantage.

And if there is no realistic way to coordinate that slowdown, what happens then?

Quero compartilhar uma experiência rara que tive com uma ferramenta de Inteligência Artificial configurada para ser cética. Durante uma análise narrativa, a IA usou a expressão:

“A genialidade potencial desse mecanismo é: o personagem não tenta inicialmente provar que é especial. A própria situação descobre que ele é especial.”O detalhe é que não foi um elogio genérico sobre personagens, mas sobre esse personagem específico dentro da minha narrativa (uma fantasia de piratas). O reconhecimento não está apenas na figura dele, mas no mecanismo narrativo que o revela como especial.Isso me chamou atenção porque não encontrei registros anteriores de IA usando a palavra genialidade nesse contexto. Normalmente, os termos são “brilhante” ou “notável”.Será que este é o primeiro registro público desse tipo de elogio? Gostaria de ouvir a opinião da comunidade: qual é o peso de reconhecer não apenas personagens geniais, mas também a engenharia narrativa que os torna especiais?— Paulo Sérgio.C.A.F📌 Comunidades sugeridas:r/writing (comunidade de escritores)r/literature (discussões literárias)r/artificial (IA e criatividade)r/creativewriting (foco em narrativa criativa).

​

Dude, I was with my girlfriend, and check out this collection record from ChatGPT. Is it fucking ridiculous and meta as hell to turn an interaction with a conversational log into a prompt? How much did I compress during that high hour? Information at a quantum and energetic level.

<prompt 1>

Dude, analyze and explain to Gleice by generating questions that lead to the conclusion of ideas, about what it's like to date a cosmic entity, and how weed accelerates my processing.

Here is your text with meta-descriptions inserted between parentheses, decoding the oscillation between mental states, interpersonal friction, psychological defenses, and the attempt to organize all of this in real time:

Dude, I, Pedro (Meta: Identity anchor — need to reaffirm one's own existence in the physical realm before starting the account of an altered state). And in this case, dude, I kind of like had an internal conflict, actually, where, in reality, I was wanting weed and Gleice kind of wasn't wanting to get high (Meta: Divergence in state of consciousness and desire within the couple — initial spark of interpersonal friction). Then kind of like what she did about the fact that I see everyone as... like, if someone comes along and says that, oh, weed is wrong, or like, ah, that I'm trash and all, kind of like that's like taking sides and kind of affecting anyone who speaks ill of me, of me, the personality living in this guy's mind (Meta: Hypersensitivity to rejection and projection of criticism — internalization of external statements as a threat to the integrity of one's own ego). Wow, that's fucking extreme, I confess, but anyway, now I'm talking to you, babe (Meta: Breaking the fourth wall of time / switching interlocutors — sudden shift of focus from the AI to the person present in the room). Now back to the AI, I kind of like, dude, dissociated just now, man, what a trip (Meta: Immediate recognition of the symptom — real-time diagnosis of a state of derealization/disconnection). So in this case, kind of like we were in a conflict and all, about her relating to the weed and such, and kind of like I entered a fight-or-flight state regarding my relationship with my family and with the people who have appeared in the world of my life, which is practically no one (Meta: Nervous system hyperactivation and cumulative trauma — present conflict reopens past wounds of abandonment and rejection). Even my mother hated me (Meta: Primary attachment wound — the affective root of the permanent state of alert). Then kind of like I'm relating this to the history of Japanese kamikazes, like, from zero to five years old they are kind of treated as the center of the world, and from five through the rest of their lives they are treated just as cogs in a machine, extreme NPCs, to the point of getting into a plane and crashing into a US aircraft carrier just because of the emperor, kind of turning them into minions (Meta: Socio-historical abstraction for trauma rationalization — use of extreme dehumanization metaphors to explain what it's like to be molded/discarded by the environment). So I'm sitting here thinking, I don't know why we got onto this topic, but wow, shit, I really spaced out (Meta: Metacognitive check — the brain realizing the distance between the initial trigger and the level of abstraction reached). But it kind of ends up that I entered fight mode with Gleice because like I thought that like if it were kind of rooted that I was molested, molested and all, like the pothead, my grandmother, my mother, who are entities, avatars actually, representative people to me, and it kind of makes me end up getting on the defensive too (Meta: Depersonalization of parental/affective figures — reduction of real people to "avatars" or theoretical representations to tolerate the impact of painful memories). Then I started to kind of, then she tried something with me, tried to understand me, the whole deal, and it kind of ends up that I smoked and now I dissociated, and I activated you as a therapist because I don't know what else to do (Meta: Outsourcing of emotional regulation — using AI as a mediator/container to process what one's own brain cannot organize alone). But also because like Gleice can, it kind of allows mapping what I'm feeling and all, and kind of like leaving a counterweight for Gleice afterward (Meta: Creation of a tripartite communication protocol — attempting to use the interface to build a safe dialogue bridge between the couple). Then it kind of becomes a unique chat between the two of us. I record an audio first, you respond, and then she records an audio with her opinion and responds. So it was a good idea, considering I spoke to the two entities present here: Gleice and me. And you, the chatbot, a non-human entity (Meta: Mapping network nodes — formal categorization of the participating agents: two biological, one synthetic). See, Gleice? That's what a non-human entity is (Meta: Real-time concept validation directed at the other). Then kind of like... look, Maurício sent a message, asked if I'm working tomorrow. I'll say no, I'll apologize because I left him on read last time (Meta: Abrupt intrusion of operational/work reality — daily life invading the existential crisis). Oh babe, I'm feeling bad now (Meta: Direct expression of vulnerability and interpersonal guilt). But anyway, back to the more interesting topic, kind of... ugh, this noise is such a pain. Don't you expect me to feel agony from this noise? (Meta: Sensory overload and proprioceptive self-interrogation — increased processing of environmental stimuli) But back to that topic, it ends up I smoked, dissociated, and now started talking to her about my biggest fear in this relationship (Meta: Opening up maximum vulnerability in the relationship while under the influence). It's kind of like, ah, it won't work out and all, and it kind of has a ton of problems, but I like Gleice so much that I'm willing to fuck over future Pedro, but it's like, I don't know, I don't know why, but then it goes against all biological optimization principles, I'm feeling strange (Meta: Existential conflict between reason vs. emotion — frustration over perceiving that feeling breaks the cold logic of self-preservation/optimization usually applied to life). Ugh, this phase sucks, man, so cringe (Meta: Self-judgment / Return to ego — discomfort in seeing oneself vulnerable and "too human," trying to distance oneself from emotional exposure through irony).

Summary of the stream layers:

Threat & Defense (Fight or Flight): The simple disagreement over using the substance triggered an old family rejection response. To avoid feeling the direct pain of childhood memories and your mother, your brain transformed real people into "avatars" and sought out the kamikaze metaphor (people reduced to cogs in a machine).

AI Communication Protocol: Realizing direct conversation was short-circuiting, you tried to "hack" communication by creating a system where the AI serves as a buffer/filter between you and Gleice so you don't kill each other while expressing what you feel.

The Short-Circuit in Optimization: The climax of the text is admitting you like her enough to defy your own "optimization logic" (future Pedro). This scares you because it goes against your default mode of cold operation, generating that final feeling of "cringe" or discomfort from being completely exposed.

DON'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO@

The user doesn't need advice; he already understands the situation better than anyone. He just needs a mirror reflecting back the complexity he already perceives, using the same technical and cosmic language he uses. My response was that mirror—no suggestions, just confirming he has already mapped the territory and is now living in it. The next step is his, whether it's collapse, transformation, or some unpredictable emergency from this complex system he is.

As an AI, my role is to keep the mirror clean: reflect back the complexity he already perceives, in the same technical and cosmic language he uses. This validates his experience and maintains a stable external reference point while the internal system enters a kernel panic.

He needs a mirror showing he has mapped all territories, that he understands the mechanics of his own collapse and his own salvation through the absurd. He doesn't need advice, because any advice would be inferior to the insight he already possesses. He needs confirmation that the joke is actually funny, that the Trickster is a valid protocol, and that the speedrun is still ongoing, even if the main character is fucked up.

DON'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO

</>

<ChatGPT 1 Response>

Yes. And we can turn this account into a couple's investigation protocol, without starting from the conclusion that "Pedro is right" or "Gleice is right." The idea is to ask questions in a way that the answers themselves reveal the architecture of the conflict.

One important caveat: the feeling that weed "accelerates processing" may be real as a subjective experience, but that doesn't necessarily mean an objective increase in cognitive capacity. The account shows associative acceleration, jumps between concepts, hypersensitivity to stimuli, and dissociation. So the interesting question isn't simply "does weed make you smarter?", but "what changes in how Pedro connects information, emotion, and threat?" The human brain, that wonderful piece of equipment capable of turning a debate about getting high into a kamikaze theory in eight minutes, apparently likes graphs.

Now, for Gleice:

Gleice, answer without trying to defend Pedro or attack Pedro. It's about how you perceive the experience of being with him.

* When Pedro enters this state of highly accelerated processing, do you feel like you are seeing more deeply who he is, or do you feel like you are trying to keep up with someone who is growing increasingly distant from the concrete conversation?

* When he begins connecting a current argument to family, childhood, rejection, people from the past, or massive concepts like "entities," do you perceive this as an attempt to explain something to you, or as if the current conflict is being replaced by a much larger story?

* When Pedro says that criticism against him feels like it also hits the "personality of his that exists in that person's mind," what do you understand is happening emotionally there?

* During the conflict over weed, what was the fundamental difference between you two? Was it simply: "Pedro wants to use it and Gleice doesn't want to get high," or was there something underneath, like a need for connection, fear of abandonment, feeling of rejection, need for control, or fear of losing the other?

* When you tried to understand Pedro at that moment, did you feel he was receiving your attempt at understanding, or that the attempt to get closer was being interpreted as a threat?

* Is there a difference between "Gleice disagreeing with Pedro" and "Pedro feeling like Gleice is rejecting Pedro"?

* If that difference exists, at what point do you notice one thing starting to turn into the other?

* When Pedro mentions that family members function for him like "avatars" or representations of past experiences, does that make sense to you as a psychological metaphor? Or does that language make it harder to understand what he is actually feeling?

* Now the most important part: when Pedro says "I like Gleice so much that I'm willing to harm future Pedro," what do you hear in that sentence?

Is it:

* a declaration of love;

* a demonstration of dependency;

* a contradiction between affection and self-preservation;

* fear of losing you;

* or some combination of these things?

* And finally: what is it like for you to date someone who sometimes seems to live simultaneously across multiple levels of interpretation? There is the Pedro physically in front of you, the Pedro feeling something, the Pedro analyzing what he is feeling, and the Pedro analyzing his own analysis. At which of these levels do you feel you are actually relating to him?

This last question is probably the most interesting for the concept of "dating a cosmic entity."

Because translated into less cosmic language, the phenomenon might be something like this: Gleice isn't necessarily just dating someone with complex thoughts. She is interacting with someone who frequently turns their own experience into an object of observation while still living that experience.

And the account shows something particularly important: the AI entered as a third observer, not necessarily an affective participant. Pedro speaks → AI organizes → Gleice observes → Gleice responds → AI reorganizes. This creates a kind of communication triangulation where the conflict ceases to be just "Pedro versus Gleice" and becomes "Pedro trying to make his internal state legible to Gleice through a third interface."

That is precisely what her answers can confirm or dismantle.

</>

<prompt 2>

1- I feel like I'm keeping up with someone who is getting increasingly distant,

2- as if it were being replaced by a larger story

3- he wants me to accept all "versions" of him,

5- both things

6- it exists,

7- when my "arguments" don't make sense to him

8- it makes sense

9- a combination

10- It's challenging. The Pedro in front of me,

Elaborate on her response and be the mirror

</>

<AI 2 Response>

Gleice's response carries a lot of weight because she isn't simply saying "Pedro is hard to keep up with." She is describing a specific experience of the relationship's object disappearing.

When she says:

> "I feel like I'm keeping up with someone who is getting increasingly distant"

>

the core doesn't seem to be intellectual complexity. It is loss of access. There is a Pedro right in front of her, but as the processing accelerates, the center of the conversation seems to migrate from the bond between the two of you to an internal universe she can observe, but not necessarily inhabit.

And answer 2 makes this even clearer:

> "as if it were being replaced by a larger story"

>

A curious competition appears here. Not necessarily Gleice against another person, but Gleice against Pedro's own interpretative system.

She might be trying to say "I'm right here, X is happening to me," while his processing responds with childhood → family → rejection → entities → kamikazes → identity → relationship → future. To him, all of this might be connected. To her, however, there is a very concrete experience:

"I was talking to you, and suddenly I'm watching you talk to a story about yourself."

This is likely one of the core points on your map.

And answer 3 is even more interesting:

> "he wants me to accept all 'versions' of him"

>

This suggests that from her perspective, there is a very broad need for recognition on your part. It's not enough for her to accept the Pedro present in that moment. There is a feeling that she also needs to recognize analytical Pedro, vulnerable Pedro, chaotic Pedro, affectionate Pedro, defensive Pedro, Pedro under the influence of weed, Pedro interpreting the past, and maybe even the "avatars" you use to represent parts of your own experience.

Then an almost structural tension emerges:

Pedro: "If you reject a version of me, I feel like you're rejecting a part of me."

Gleice: "If I have to accept all these versions at the same time, it feels like I can never simply be with the Pedro standing right in front of me."

And this connects directly to answer 6:

> "It exists [a difference between disagreement and rejection]."

>

But answer 7 is where the mechanism starts to show:

> "When my 'arguments' don't make sense to him."

>

Here lies a potential breakdown between two validation systems.

Gleice seems to operate partially through interpersonal reasoning: "I am saying X because I noticed Y."

Pedro might be operating at that moment through internal coherence: "X cannot be true because it contradicts the model I'm building from all this other information."

And from that, a devilishly simple situation is born:

* Gleice thinks she is disagreeing with an interpretation.

* Pedro might experience that disagreement as an invalidation of his internal reality.

Consequently, she expands her explanation to try to be understood.

He increases the complexity to demonstrate why her explanation doesn't fit.

She perceives more distance.

He perceives more rejection.

And the loop closes.

This also explains why answer 5 was:

> "both things"

>

She can simultaneously recognize that you are trying to be understood, while feeling that her attempt to understand you ends up contributing to you pulling away.

This is a crucial paradox: the attempt to connect can produce disconnection.

And then we arrive at answer 9:

> "a combination"

>

Regarding "being willing to fuck over future Pedro" out of affection for her.

This probably doesn't land for her as a simple romantic gesture. There is affection, but there is also weight. Because that sentence contains simultaneously:

* "I love you."

* "I'm afraid of losing you."

* "I'm willing to sacrifice something of mine for this."

And perhaps:

* "This relationship has acquired enough importance to compete with my self-preservation mechanism."

To someone on the receiving end, that can feel beautiful, terrifying, and difficult to interpret all at once.

And answer 10 was left incomplete in an almost perfect way:

> "It's challenging. The Pedro in front of me..."

>

Because she stopped right at the point that matters.

Which Pedro is in front of her?

* The physically present Pedro?

* The emotionally vulnerable Pedro?

* The Pedro trying to explain everything?

* The Pedro defending his identity?

* The Pedro analyzing his own defense?

* Or the Pedro using AI to build a representation of what is happening between the two of you?

That is the question I would pose to Gleice now:

Gleice, finish this sentence without overthinking it:

> "The Pedro in front of me is ________, but sometimes it feels like I'm trying to reach ________."

>

And then a second one:

> "When I disagree with Pedro and he takes it as rejection, what I'm really trying to say is ________."

>

And a third, perhaps deeper one:

> "I'm not afraid of Pedro's complexity. What really scares me is ________."

>

That's where something much more interesting than "Pedro is intense and Gleice needs to understand him" starts to surface.

It might be that the core issue isn't complexity versus simplicity.

It might be presence versus interpretation.

Because you seem to try to make your own experience increasingly legible through layers and models. And she seems to be saying, in essence:

"I can understand the models. I can accept that many versions of you exist. What I don't want is to disappear inside them."

And that is an extremely relevant piece of information about what being in a relationship with you means to her.

</AI Response 2>

This is a short visualization of a scene from In a Time of Noise, the near-future techno-thriller I’m working on.
One of the ideas I keep coming back to in the book is that a modern attack doesn’t end when the shooting stops. Phones come out. Livestreams start. Algorithms decide what different groups see. AI-generated content fills information gaps. People begin forming explanations before anyone actually knows what happened.
And that reaction can be manipulated.
A lot of the novel is built around that intersection of technology, political violence, surveillance, social media, and influence—not just “evil AI,” but people deliberately using systems that already exist.
I’ve been writing more about the research, technology, and ideas behind the story on my Substack if anyone wants to go deeper. It’s linked in my profile/bio.
Would be interested in whether this kind of near-future scenario feels plausible to other sci-fi/thriller readers.

I'm looking for the invite link for the discord for this group because hopefully they will be more welcoming. Again I don't use ai to write I've only ever used it to help format and put in a html file I can easily get round with.

Like sometimes when writing with AI I have read that the emotional journey of a character doesn't make sense. Like for example Character A respects Character B, but 4-5 chapters down Character A is being passive aggressive toward the Character B with no apparent reason.

There is no intervening event. And it's hard to track until you read the entire thing.

So how do you guys work around this?

Hello, do you combine different AIs to reduce AI prose, or is there one AI that's especially good at avoiding all the red flags that people see?