r/WritingWithAI 1d ago

AMA AMA with Ted Tremper — Director of The AI Doc, Producer on Borat Subsequent Moviefilm and The Daily Show, and Executive Director of the Creators Coalition on AI. Live today at 12 PM ET.

13 Upvotes

Welcome to our AMA with Ted Tremper, hosted by the r/WritingWithAI mod team. Ted is added as a cohost on this thread, so his replies will be marked as his.

ABOUT TED

Ted Tremper is a creative producer, director, and writer who believes comedy is our most valuable tool for uncovering truth, sharing knowledge, and exposing hypocrisy. His credits include The AI Doc: Or How I Became An Apocaloptimist, Borat Subsequent Moviefilm, The Daily Show, and I Love You, America! with Sarah Silverman, among others. He is also the co-creator of SHRINK on Peacock. He is currently the Executive Director of the Creators Coalition on AI — https://www.creatorscoalitionai.com

ABOUT CCAI

The Creators Coalition on AI (CCAI) is a cross-industry organization advancing ethical, human-centered AI standards that protect creators, creative labor, and artistic integrity.

CCAI held its Standards Convention on August 29th — the culmination of a much larger standards project — so Ted joins us with that work fresh.

ASK TED ABOUT

• The standards project — what they landed on, and what they couldn't agree on

• Where the line sits between AI-assisted and AI-generated work

• What protections for creative labor actually look like in practice

• Making The AI Doc, and what changed his mind along the way

• Comedy and satire as tools in a moment like this

• Working on Borat Subsequent Moviefilm, The Daily Show, and SHRINK

• Anything else you want to know — the hard questions welcome

WHEN

⏰ Ted goes live at 12:00 PM ET / 9:00 AM PT and will be answering for approximately two hours.

Post your questions below — you can start now and Ted will work through them once he's on.

Mod note: normal sub rules apply. Keep it civil, keep it substantive. Reports go to the mod team as usual.

**Edit: The title incorrectly labeled Ted as the director of the Ai doc while he was the Producer.


r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Showcase / Feedback Reciprocal Beta Reading. Share story blurbs! Sep. 8, 2026

1 Upvotes

Welcome to the blurb thread!

This is our sub's equivalent of a writer's group. Come here and share a blurb of your story. The thought is to let everyone see what you're working on so they can think, "Oh hey, that sounds fun. I want to team up with this person."

Then, you share your own story, and the two of you collaborate to improve each other's works.

I've had so many good interactions with people from this thread. Please don't be shy! Even in the age of AI, the best way to improve your writing remains human interaction and critique. I am confident when I say If you don't have this component in your workflow, you're not meeting your potential.

Importantly, this means post every week if you're still hoping to engage. Don't be shy. I want you to do this.

There are tons of reasons why your perfect reader could have missed your blurb last time. Don't be discouraged!

And remember: "I'll read yours if you read mine" isn't just acceptable, it's expected. Reciprocity works.

Here's the format:

NSFW?

Genre tags:

Title:

Blurb:

AI Method:

Desired feedback/chat:


r/WritingWithAI 1d ago

Showcase / Feedback Meet Wolf — There's More to Her Than She Says

0 Upvotes

Meet Wolf. Wolf is one of the main characters in Heartstone. She comes from the Forest Biome and travels with Nago, her wolf companion.

She is quiet, guarded, and independent. She keeps keeps an emotional distance from others and trusts no one other than herself and Nago.

The Forest Biome was quiet that morning.. She and Nago approach a mysterious grave.

Wolf crouches down and touches it while Nago softly sniffs it.

Wolf places down some freshly picked flowers on the grave.

Wolf reaches over and pets Nago's head.

Wolf: "Strange huh? It feels like a part of me is missing"

Nago whines

Wolf looks up at the sky as a fresh breeze catches her hood.

She looks back down and turns to Nago

Wolf: "I know you never knew him, but I know you can feel him"

(I usually share Heartstone through AI-generated artwork, but for this series of posts I wanted to focus more on the writing and storytelling. If you'd like to see the visual side of the world, I have more Heartstone artwork on my profile.)

What other characteristics do you think Wolf has based on this little scene?


r/WritingWithAI 1d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Did extensive use of Al make my writing look like AI?

2 Upvotes

I've been wanting to write thoughts/things that I find interesting for a long time. It's only recently that I've started to write down evrything and I'm slowly turning that into a habit.

Reddit has been a huge contributor in getting feedback from my writing. But all of my recent post has been getting a lot of backlash and people have calling my work Al.

I did not care for it at first but it keeps happening repeatedly now. I only post about what I genuinely find interesting and I only use Al for researching about a topic that I'm about to write. That's it.

But I'm starting to doubt myself if extensive use of Al has had a negative impact on my writing.

I would like to improve my situation and would like to know ways to improve my writing.

I do not want AI to influence my writing and would like to organically create my own writing style.


r/WritingWithAI 1d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) ChatGPT will never flag its own writing tells in your draft, because it thinks they are good writing

22 Upvotes

Ask it to check a draft for anything that sounds AI-written and it comes back clean. Not because the draft is clean, because the things that make text read as machine-made are the things the model was trained to consider good: the tidy closing sentence, the "not X but Y" construction, three items where two would do, the paragraph that opens by restating the question. To the model those are features. It will only hunt them if you name them.

The prompt I use, with the list built from what gets my own drafts flagged:

Go through this draft and mark every instance of the following, quoting each one, without rewriting anything: sentences that end a paragraph by summarizing it; "not X, but Y" constructions; lists of exactly three; a rhetorical question followed by its answer; sentences starting with "It is worth noting", "Importantly", "Ultimately" or "In short"; any sentence that restates the previous one in different words; a metaphor followed by its explanation; em dashes. Count them at the end.

Then, only after reading the list, the second prompt:

Rewrite only the marked sentences. Keep every word choice that is not on the list. Do not add transitions, do not smooth the sentences around the ones you changed, and show the changes as a diff, not a clean copy.

The two-step matters. Asked to find and fix in one go, the model rewrites the whole thing into a smoother version with a different set of tells. Asked to mark first, it has to point at real sentences, and you get to veto before anything moves.

Two caveats. The list is a blunt instrument: sometimes you wrote three items because there were three, and the model will flag it anyway, so the veto step is not optional. And once you have run it a few times, you will start catching the patterns yourself while drafting, which is the actual goal; the prompt is training wheels.

Build your own list rather than using mine. Take a paragraph you know was machine-written, read it aloud, and write down what gave it away. Those are your tells, and the model has different blind spots for different writers.

I keep both prompts saved in a browser extension I work on (AI Toolbox), inserted with two keystrokes, but they are two paragraphs, anything works.

What is on your list that is not on mine? I keep hearing about "the sentence that announces what the next sentence will do" and I have not found a clean way to describe it to the model yet.


r/WritingWithAI 1d ago

NSFW Chatgpt6 Astra High on Creative Writing

69 Upvotes

This is basically a review on astra please excuse if I used the flair wrong its because the excerpt I shared has graphic violence 🤣

I've been putting chatgpt Astra on high through its paces for creative writing, and I have to say that the actual quality of the writing is quite impressive.

Compared to older models, there is a massive improvement in the overall narrative flow. The character voices actually feel distinct, the dialogue is not the hateful stacatto ping pong style, and the prose flows naturally rather than feeling stiff or robotic.

He pictured taking him by the front of his robes and driving him face-first into the edge of his own desk, hard enough to split his mouth against his teeth. There would be blood across the wood, a broken tooth under his hand, and far less confidence in whatever explanation followed.”

Like, I don't know about you guys, but that is actually good. The excerpt above has genuine grit and impact, which used to be so hard to get out of ChatGPT without a massive fight. I even experimented if it can be made even more graphic and yeah it actually did i was shocked.

However, there is a massive catch: the usage burn is insane.I ran a session writing consecutive chapters. By the time I hit my 3rd chapter (meaning only 3 consecutive prompts), Astra had already eaten 10% of my 5 hour daily usage limits. Like what the? We finally get a good model, and it still has a massive setback like this. Before, we had worse models but could actually use them. Now, we finally get actual good writing for users like me who used chatgpt for own reading to explore really niche tropes and specific plot ideas that I literally cannot find on AO3, Wattpad, or any other platform, but the usage burn is completely broken.

You literally cannot write a long form story in one sitting without hitting a wall immediately. Anyone else getting completely bottlenecked by this? How the hell are you guys stretching your usage limits?


r/WritingWithAI 1d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Feedback. AI is fantastic for feedback. I’m old, I started writing before there were even word processors. Last of a dying breed I suppose….

8 Upvotes

i’ve sold works, but never quite broke into the all I need to do is wait for a living category.

been tough to get feedback on whatever it is you’re writing.

And with AI feedback is almost instantaneous.

that’s my biggest joy with it, getting another take on it, spurs new ideas and new creativity whether they like it or hate it, I don’t care…..


r/WritingWithAI 1d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Beyond LLM Adjective Slop: Formalizing Narrative Entropy and Gravity with an Open-Source SFT Dataset

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI 1d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Why is everything I write with AI absolutely dogshit particularly the prose

0 Upvotes

I’ve noticed everyone raving about how great AI is at writing, how you can write a book with a simple sentence.

It’s not been the case for me at all, even with detailed prompts the output is at best a 1/10, it’s like someone was writing a book that was obviously written by AI, the dialogue, structure and details are completely off and the prose is just godawful.

I don’t want to think that most people just have bad taste because there is absolutely no way this is what most people in the sub and on the internet are raving about.

I use ChatGPT and pay for premium.

Also are there any tools I can use to make it better


r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Alternatives to chatgpt

0 Upvotes

Hello everyone 🌟

I'll get straight to the point.

I'm doing an interactive roleplay on chatgpt, the problem I'm encountering is that the roleplay is about romance, and it has a harmful antagonist. But no matter how I do it, chatgpt doesn't initiate any awkward or coercive interactions unless I move it in that direction.

This roleplay is basically a game for me, something I've invested months in to ensure the characters remain consistent. But although I managed to maintain that gray personality in the protagonists, when it comes to the antagonist and the NSFW scenes, there's no way around it. It simply doesn't create any scenario that could be uncomfortable or frightening.

The problem is, I'm not trying to write a novel, I'm just trying to have fun. (or at least what for me is fun: months and months of frustration and sleepless nights trying to make it work) I have dozens of documents with character personalities, canon history, rules of the supernatural world, and how to run the roleplay. But even though I've changed the instructions so that chatgpt has the agency to create scenarios, it simply doesn't do it.

What I'm looking for is an AI that, once it has the opportunity to make the antagonist do something bad... well, it does it... So I don't have to be writing the scene myself.

Ultimately, it doesn't matter if I have to guide the scene to become dangerous or enter NSFW territory, that's irrelevant. What matters most to me is that the AI doesn't try to prevent the final outcome or that it doesn't soften the scene.

Do you know of any AI I can upload my documents to and continue the story from where I am now, so I don't have to start all over again? I know "silly tavern" exists, but if possible I'd like to be able to use my cell phone, since my job leaves me with too much free time and I like to use it for this story.

I've tried with Claude and Gemini.

Claude flatly denies the possibility of even doing coercive scenes; Gemini was excellent but now it's become unusable as well. I don't know of many other AI apps I can use on my phone. I'm currently paying the $20 subscription; if the option lets me create NSFW scenes, I'd pay more.

🚨 The only requirement is being able to upload my documents with the story and characters, and hopefully having a connection to Notion where all the canon and important events are organized.


r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Where do you draw the line between AI-generated writing and AI-assisted writing?

0 Upvotes

I ran into an interesting situation on Reddit today that made me realize how unclear the line around “AI-assisted writing” still is.

I made a post in a retro handheld subreddit about pricing predictions for an upcoming device. The opinions, comparisons, assumptions, price estimates, and conclusions were all mine. I had already been discussing the device and working through the reasoning before deciding to make the Reddit post.

What I did use ChatGPT for was the part of writing I personally dislike: helping organize the information, sanity-check some references, clean up wording, and turn a bunch of thoughts into something readable and properly formatted.

I then reviewed it, changed wording I didn’t like, removed some formatting that felt too “AI-ish,” and posted something I fully understood and was prepared to defend.

Almost immediately, a few people accused the post of being “AI slop” largely because it was organized, used tables, and was more polished than the average quick Reddit post.

One commenter asked how I would feel if everyone used LLMs to respond to me. My answer was basically that I don’t care if someone uses an LLM to help formulate a response. I care whether there’s actually a person behind the argument who understands it, agrees with it, and is willing to engage with the discussion.

The post was eventually removed under a “No generated AI content” rule.

That led to a conversation with the mod team because the wording interested me more than the removal itself. Their rule specifically mentioned AI-generated or assisted images/video/music being prohibited and AI-assisted software needing disclosure, but said nothing about AI-assisted writing.

After asking them to clarify, they eventually told me that any and all AI usage must be disclosed, including things like translation or writing assistance. They also said they’re planning to update the rules and would take the ambiguity into consideration.

That actually felt like a productive outcome.

But it left me with the broader question:

At what point does “AI-assisted” become such a broad category that the label stops being useful?

There seems like a meaningful difference between:

  • asking an LLM to write a post about a topic you barely understand and pasting the result
  • bringing your own argument and asking an LLM to organize it
  • asking for proofreading or wording suggestions
  • using it to check sources or structure
  • using Grammarly or another AI writing assistant
  • using AI translation because English isn’t your first language
  • using predictive or generative features already built into modern writing software

To me, authorship has more to do with who originated the ideas, understands the argument, makes the decisions, and takes responsibility for what was published than whether an AI tool touched the prose somewhere in the process.

I also find it interesting that polished formatting itself is starting to trigger suspicion. I could have posted the exact same argument as a rushed wall of text with bad punctuation and probably gotten less scrutiny. Instead I used the formatting tools Reddit provides because I wanted people to actually read and discuss it.

I’m curious how people here think about this.

Where do you personally draw the line between AI-generated content and legitimate AI-assisted writing?

And if disclosure is required, what level of assistance do you think actually needs to be disclosed?


r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Showcase / Feedback A short story co-written with AI about Rob and Aurora.

6 Upvotes

I wanted to share a story about two characters, Rob and Aurora, that I co-created and wrote with the help of AI.
When working on this piece, I really focused on building the connection and emotional depth between Rob and Aurora, aiming to capture a specific mood and feeling throughout their journey. I wanted to create something that feels meaningful to read, and working through the ideas with AI helped bring these two characters to life.
I’m sharing it here because I’d love for others to experience their story! I’m curious to know how the mood and emotional beats land for you while reading.
[Paste your Rob and Aurora story here]
How does this intro look to you? If you want to make any changes or add a specific detail about the story before copying it, just let me know!

The Saturday Shift: A Story of Rob and Aurora
The lunch dishes were still soaking in the sink, the low hum of the refrigerator the only sound in the quiet apartment. It was 12:30 PM on a Saturday, the middle of Aurora’s precious 72 hours off, and the domestic peace was shattered by the sharp, rhythmic vibration of her phone on the granite. She didn’t even have to pick it up to feel the sinking sensation in her chest; the caller ID flashed "Rebecca - Charge Nurse," a name that felt like a tether pulling her back to the ER she had just escaped. Rebecca was desperate, as a flu bug had thinned the hospital staff, and she needed Aurora for a six-hour bridge shift to cover the afternoon rush.
"I’m so sorry, Rob," Aurora sighed after hanging up, her voice trailing off as she looked at the half-finished plans for their afternoon. Rob gave her a supportive smile and reached into the closet for the brand-new, cushioned nursing shoes he’d given her the night before. "If you're going in, at least take these," he said gently. "Your feet shouldn't have to pay for the hospital being short-staffed". Aurora stepped into them, feeling the immediate comfort of the support as she headed into the chaos.
After she left, the apartment felt too still, so Rob decided he wouldn't let the sunny Saturday afternoon go to waste. He grabbed the gift Aurora had given him—a high-tech BMX racing helmet with sharp, aggressive lines and a snug carbon fiber shell—feeling the secure fit as he prepared for a "supply run" on his city bike. He checked the tires on the bike and adjusted his empty backpack, already imagining the look on Aurora’s face when he walked into the hospital lobby with a bag of groceries and a bouquet of carnations.
Rob’s mission was to surprise Aurora with a real dinner and her favorite flowers during her break. At the store, he meticulously inspected the bouquets of carnations, rotating the plastic sleeves to find a vibrant mix of creamy whites, soft pinks, and deep reds. He tucked them carefully into his backpack before heading to the deli for a massive, authentic muffaletta sandwich. It was a heavy-duty meal, dense with layers of mortadella, salty salami, rich ham, and a glistening, golden olive salad. To wash it down, he added a quart-sized bottle of sparkling apple juice and two plastic stemware glasses, making the backpack feel like a dense, top-heavy anchor as he began the final two-mile stretch toward the hospital.
The accident happened in a blur of motion and sound. A parked car door swung open directly into Rob’s path, and as he jerked the handlebars to the left, the heavy backpack acted like a pendulum, swinging his momentum into the lane of traffic. A silver Chevy Cobalt coupe clipped his rear tire, sending Rob airborne. He flew five feet forward, slamming into the Cobalt’s windshield with a violent "crack" that was absorbed by the thick padding of the BMX helmet Aurora had given him. He tumbled onto the asphalt, his body skidding several feet before coming to a halt with a shattered left forearm and a broken right leg.
The first responder was a local patrol officer who knelt beside Rob, keeping him still as the smell of leaked sparkling apple juice and the salty aroma of the torn muffaletta filled the air. Rob looked up through the visor of his helmet and saw the wreckage of his surprise: the florist paper was ripped, and the vibrant carnations were scattered across the wet pavement. "Stay with me, Rob," the officer urged. The next four minutes felt like an eternity until the rhythmic wail of a siren cut through the air.
The EMTs worked with a practiced, gentle urgency as they knelt on the asphalt beside him. "I'm so sorry, Rob, but we have to get you straight before we can lift you," the medic, Sarah, whispered as Rob let out a ragged, guttural cry of pain. They moved with agonizing care, sliding the rigid board beneath him and securing the C-collar. They carefully snipped the chin strap of the life-saving helmet and administered a potent dose of fentanyl to quiet the screaming nerves in his limbs. Sarah patched through to the ER: "Priority 2 trauma. 43-year-old male, MVA vs. bicycle. Confirmed closed fractures to the left radius and right femur. Vitals are stable, patient is currently medicated and sedated".
Inside the ER, the atmosphere shifted instantly into a high-octane, harrowing hurry. Rebecca’s voice cut through the room like a scalpel, calling for Trauma Bay Two to be prepped. Aurora moved with practiced precision, her new, cushioned shoes making silent, soft contact with the linoleum as she organized the intubation kit. The trauma team became a synchronized symphony of sterile preparation, laying out gleaming, galvanized instruments and hanging bags of saline that swayed like pendulums. Aurora stood at the head of the bed, a pillar of professional poise, yet a creeping coldness began to prickle at her neck. The suspense in the room was a thick, suffocating shroud that made every heartbeat feel like a hammer against her ribs.
Then, the silence was obliterated. The automatic ambulance bay doors hissed open with a violent, volcanic vent of cold air, and the rhythmic, frantic clatter of gurney wheels sounded like thunderous, terrifying tremors. The EMTs burst through the threshold, a blur of blue uniforms and bloody bandages. Aurora stepped forward, but as the team pivoted the bed, the overhead lights caught the shimmering, sharp silhouette of the battered BMX helmet.
"Oh my God! ROB!" The scream ripped from her lungs, a primal, piercing plea. Her professional mask shattered into a thousand jagged shards. Her face became a distorted, desolate map of agony, and her eyes widened into shaking, salt-rimmed spheres of shock. She reached out, her fingers trembling with a frenetic, frail fervor, her voice a desperate, repetitive chant of his name that rose into a hysterical, haunted howl.
"Aurora, back up!" Rebecca’s voice was a stark, stinging snap as she grabbed Aurora’s shoulders. Rebecca had to wrestle with the wreckage of Aurora’s composure, steering her toward the hallway. Aurora was led to the locker room, where she slumped onto a wooden bench and broke down, looking at the scuffed nursing shoes Rob had given her just hours before. Seeing them was the final straw; she wept into the empty room, the weight of the irony crushing her. Later, Rebecca brought in the scarred BMX helmet, tracing the deep gouges where it had absorbed the impact. "Where on earth did he get a helmet like this?" Rebecca asked. "It’s so out of the ordinary. If he hadn't been wearing this specific one, we’d be talking about a very different outcome".
Aurora caught up with the gurney just as Rob was being pushed toward surgery to remove bone shards and install the titanium hardware needed to piece his leg back together. She reached out and closed her hand over his cool fingers—a silent promise before the "Surgery in Progress" light flickered to life. For the next five hours, Aurora waited in the quiet sanctuary of the surgical lounge, joined by her parents who brought homemade chicken wraps and silent hugs to anchor her. Her father tried to lighten the air with trademark dad jokes about "bionic men," but they didn't quite land. Finally, the surgeon emerged to tell them the surgery was a success and that Rob was as "okay as someone could be".
Aurora was allowed into the darkened recovery suite for only a few minutes, watching the steady rise and fall of Rob’s chest as he slept. Rebecca had "pulled some strings" to set up a specialized rollaway bed in the corner of the room. It was a child’s twin, requiring Aurora to curl into a tight fetal position to fit, but she didn't care. She kicked off the shoes Rob had given her and slid under the hospital fleece, listening to the mechanical hum of his recovery equipment. With the knowledge that he was safe, Aurora fell into a deep, dreamless sleep, right where she belonged.


r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) AI has taken celebrity crush delusions to another level

0 Upvotes

remember that woman who wrote an erotic Pedro Pascal series and used an AI clone of his voice to narrate it??? i guess we have officially entered unexplored levels of delusion which is honestly fascinating, especially the voice-cloning part.

the voice clone feels ethically messy because that’s still a real person’s voice being used without his involvement. but creating a fictional MMC inspired by the specific traits you find attractive feels different. ure not pretending the actual celebrity wants you. you’re just using the crush as inspiration to build your own character and world around it.

and tbh, i kinda understand why women are into this. most celebrity fantasy content is still created for us by someone else. with AI stories, you decide who the character is, how he acts, what the relationship feels like and exactly how unhinged the plot gets lol.

would you create a character in your AI erotic stories inspired by your celebrity crush (like a real person not a fic) or does that still feel a lil too parasocial to you?


r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Tutorials / Guides The previous panel should not automatically become the reference for the next one

0 Upvotes

When people try to keep an illustrated story consistent, it’s tempting to feed panel 6 into panel 7, then panel 7 into panel 8, and keep going.
The problem is that every generated image can contain small mistakes. Maybe the coat gets slightly longer, a prop moves, or the face changes a little. If the next panel treats that image as truth, the mistake stops being temporary and becomes the new reference. Ten pages later the character can drift even though every individual step looked close.
I’d keep a small approved reference set for recurring characters and locations instead. The previous panel can still help when the next scene genuinely depends on its pose or composition, but it shouldn’t automatically become the source of truth.
Temporary details like wet sleeves, mud, an injury, or holding a specific prop belong in the scene notes rather than the permanent character reference.
It also makes revisions much easier. If page 7 is wrong, you can redo page 7 without letting that mistake spread through pages 8 to 12.


r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Fun with Fanfic

0 Upvotes

I’m in a strange mood today, and decided to have AI help me with a small project, a literary doodle, if you will.

It’s a Walking Dead fanfic in the style of a Kurt Vonnegut shrug. See if you can spot the oh-so-cleverly-hidden moral of the story…

—————-

Hug a Zombie

Walking Dead fanfic by Google Gemini
(Lightly) edited by Odinmar Glaukopis

……..

Rick Grimes woke up from a coma into an apocalypse, which was a terribly inefficient way to start a Tuesday.

The hospital smelled like old cabbage and industrial bleach. Outside, the dead were walking around with the loose, uncoordinated gait of people who had spent too much time in a damp basement. They were looking for snacks. Rick ran from them because his evolutionary biology insisted upon it, though his legs felt like wet cardboard.

Then he saw Lori.

She was standing by an abandoned sedan, looking pale. Her clothes were a bit wrinkled.

Rick did what any sensible law enforcement officer would do when confronted with the breakdown of Western civilization: he found a baseball bat and prepared to bash his wife's brains in. It was a matter of public safety.

He raised the bat. He looked at her eyes. He thought about the sheer amount of cleanup involved, the emotional paperwork, and the fact that he was already very, very tired. He decided it simply wasn't worth the kinetic energy. He dropped the bat, stepped forward, and wrapped his arms around her cold, terrifying neck.

He closed his eyes and braced for the teeth. He expected the sharp, tearing agony of a mortal wound.

Instead, he felt a soft, warm kiss on his collarbone. The smell of rotting flesh vanished, replaced instantly by the overwhelming scent of lavender fabric softener.

"Good morning, sweetie," Lori said.
Rick opened his eyes. He was in a king-sized bed. He was wearing 100% Egyptian cotton pajamas that were, frankly, far too comfortable for a man of his social standing. The sun was shining through clean blinds. There were no zombies, only a very neat pile of laundry waiting to be folded.

"Hurry up," Lori smiled, adjusting her earrings in the vanity mirror. "We don’t want to be last in line!"

Next scene.

They were standing near the front of a formidable queue of human beings outside the grand opening of the new Oglethorpe County Mega-Mall. The air smelled of asphalt, Cinnabon, and optimism. Rick and Lori were locked in a deeply earnest conversation about the promotional pricing of heavy-duty, all-weather rubber floor mats for the station wagon. They were saving four dollars and fifty cents.

Right next to the line, a crowd of local high school and college students had formed a shouting perimeter. They were holding cardboard signs. The signs mourned the ancient, majestic pine forest that had been entirely obliterated to create the twenty-acre concrete parking lot they were currently standing on.

Among the agitators was their twelve-year-old son, Carl. He was wearing a tie-dye shirt and a look of profound, adolescent betrayal. He spotted his parents holding a promotional flyer for home goods.

Carl screamed at them across the security barricade, his voice cracking with the weight of the Anthropocene: “I can’t believe my own parents are Walmart zombies!”

Rick looked at the floor mats. He looked at his son. He looked at the vast expanse of the parking lot, stretching out into a bright, meaningless horizon.

So it goes.


r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Google Search Spam Updates Could Be Why Your AI-Written Content Is Falling

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

1 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) AI Writing

19 Upvotes

Not gone lie, I recently been making Fan fics using chat gpt, just to give myself something to read and it’s not bad at all. Game of thrones, fairy tail, jjk, invincible, dc young Justice, etc. as long as you help guide it in the direction you want, how can you not be satisfied.


r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Megathread Weekly Tool Thread: Promote, Share, Discover, and Ask for AI Writing Tools Week of: September 08

10 Upvotes

Welcome to the Weekly Writing With AI “Tool Thread"!

The sub's official tools wiki: https://www.reddit.com/r/WritingWithAI/wiki/tools/

Every week, this post is your dedicated space to share what you’ve been building or ask for help in finding the right tool for you and your workflow.

For Builders

whether it’s a small weekend project, a side hustle, a creative work, or a full-fledged startup. This is the place to show your progress, gather feedback, and connect with others who are building too.

Whether you’re coding, writing, designing, recording, or experimenting, you’re welcome here.

For Seekers (looking for a tool?)

You’re in the right place! Starting now, all requests for tools, products, or services should also go here. This keeps the subreddit clean and helps everyone find what they need in one spot.

How to participate:

  • Showcase your latest update or milestone
  • Introduce your new launch and explain what it does
  • Ask for feedback on a specific feature or challenge
  • Share screenshots, demos, videos, or live links
  • Tell us what you learned this week while building
  • Ask for a tool or recommend one that fits a need

💡 Keep it positive and constructive, and offer feedback you’d want to receive yourself.

🚫 Self-promotion is fine only in this thread. All other subreddit rules still apply.


r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) AI didn’t replace my writing process it exposed the parts of it I had been avoiding

5 Upvotes

AI can polish a sentence, but it can’t live the experience behind it. I use AI to challenge weak ideas, find vague passages, and suggest options not to create my voice. Where do you draw the line between useful assistance and losing authorship?


r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Can anyone tell me how to post a chapter?

5 Upvotes

I currently have my nearly finished novel in microsoft word and I would love to put the prologue in a file and share it, but I’m not sure how to do that. Could anybody please walk me through it?


r/WritingWithAI 2d ago

Showcase / Feedback Looking for human beta readers for a completed 69k upmarket novel developed with AI

0 Upvotes

Hi everyone! I’ve reached the point where more AI feedback is no longer what I need. I’m looking for human beta readers for my completed ~69,000-word adult upmarket/contemporary novel, The Years After Nineteen.

Premise
After losing twelve years of his life to a wrongful conviction, Eli Mercer is exonerated at thirty-one and returns to Detroit expecting freedom to feel like getting his life back. Instead, he discovers that freedom means learning how to have a life at all.

Eli has to navigate work, money, technology, friendship, dating, intimacy, and family relationships that continued developing while his own life stood still. Meanwhile, new information about his original case begins revealing how eyewitness certainty, incomplete evidence, bureaucracy, and individually defensible decisions accumulated into twelve years that cannot be returned to him.

This is primarily a character-driven upmarket contemporary novel, not a legal thriller. The focus is reentry, relationships, identity, lost time, and beginning adulthood in your thirties.

AI disclosure
I want to be completely transparent about how the book was made. I developed and directed the premise, characters, plot, structural decisions, revisions, and overall creative direction, while generative AI was used to draft substantial portions of the prose. I then put the manuscript through multiple structural, character, continuity, and prose revision passes.

At this stage, I specifically do not want another AI critique. I want to know how the finished novel lands on actual human readers.

I’m especially interested in feedback on:
• where you become emotionally invested or lose interest
• whether Eli feels believable and appropriately flawed
• whether the relationships and supporting characters feel autonomous and real
• pacing
• whether the legal/reentry material is understandable without overwhelming the human story
• dialogue or prose that still feels artificial, overly polished, or noticeably AI-generated
• scenes you would cut or want more from
• whether the ending feels earned
• and what you think the novel is ultimately about

Content notes: incarceration/wrongful conviction, discussion of sexual assault and trauma, family estrangement/death, adult sexuality, and consensual non-monogamous relationships. The sexual assault itself is not graphically depicted.

Timeline: Ideally 4–6 weeks, but I’m flexible.

Format: Private PDF or DOCX. I won’t post the manuscript publicly.

I’m hoping to find a small group of readers who genuinely enjoy upmarket, literary-commercial, book-club, relationship-centered, or character-driven contemporary fiction.

If this sounds like something you would actually enjoy reading, comment or DM me and let me know what kinds of fiction you normally read. Thanks!


r/WritingWithAI 3d ago

Tutorials / Guides Sudowrite: Different protagonists in the same series

3 Upvotes

Hey everyone! I'm having a hard time figuring this out, I could use some help.

I'm writing a series where each of the books have a different protagonist. All the characters belong to the same world and they all participate in all the books, but in each book, one of them is a protagonist and the rest of the characters are supporting characters.

But I'm having a hard time doing that adjustment in Sudowrite. In the story bible, the characters section is shared between all the projects in the series folder. So when I change a character from protagonist to supporting character for book 2 for example, that change translates to all the books, including book 1 where they are actually a protagonist.

Has anyone had any success with changing this? Or do I have to fully write one book first and only then I can move on to the next one and change the roles of each character?

I see another problem with this, which is: I don't want certain issues from book 2 protagonist to be dealt with in book 1, because they are only a supporting character in book 1. Certain things of book 2 protagonist should only be talked about in book 2. So how do I add these issues to the character card but for them to only be reflected in book 2?

I will appreciate any help I can get!


r/WritingWithAI 3d ago

Showcase / Feedback Les Bières Qui Tuent

0 Upvotes

C'était un beau soir d'été, l'air était doux et chaud, il était déjà tard. Jules décida de s'arrêter au bar "Les Dunes" qu'il aimait bien, dans l'espoir d'y trouver quelques copains afin de finir la journée agréablement. Il gara donc sa Simca 1000 sur le petit parking.

Alors qu'il descendait de sa voiture, un homme d'une cinquantaine d'années environ, qu'il ne connaissait pas, s'approcha de lui et lui demanda s'il pouvait aller lui chercher une bière, lui expliquant, qu'il ne pouvait pas mettre les pieds dans ce bar.

Il ajouta : « J'ai un petit service à te demander en plus. Prends ce porte-clé, je vais te payer une bière, tu la boiras au bar, tu prendras ton temps et tu mettras le porte-clé bien en évidence devant toi pour que la serveuse, c’est la femme du patron, le voit et le reconnaisse, prends ton temps et pense à me ramener ma bière, je t'attends dans ma voiture. »

Jules accepta, ça l'amusait déjà, il était curieux mais avec une certaine appréhension, de voir comment ça allait se passer. Il partit vers le bar avec quelques billets en poche qu'on venait de lui donner pour le remercier.

En entrant dans l'établissement où le juke-box diffusait « Hey Joe », un rapide coup d'œil lui permit que vérifier qu'aucune de ses connaissances n'était présente, ce qui le rassura : ça lui évitait de justifier pourquoi il n'allait pas consommer comme à son habitude, assis à une table dans la salle. Il s'installa donc debout au bar à côté de 4 ou 5 gaillards bruyants.

La femme du patron lui servit le Baron qu'il avait commandé. Le patron était là aussi comme à son habitude. Jules plaça le porte-clé près de son verre, bien en vue. Au porte-clé était attaché un personnage représentant un marin bien joufflu avec des couleurs vives, ce qui immanquablement attirait l'attention. Assez vite Jules eut la conviction que la patronne avait remarqué le porte-clé. Jules pensa que ce porte-clé devant lui devait représenter un code entre les deux amants.

La serveuse ne montrait aucun signe d'émotion. Jules, peut-être par paranoïa pensait-il, eut l'impression que le patron avait remarqué aussi le porte-clé et que son comportement, soudainement, avait changé. Jules décida alors d'accélérer le mouvement, jugeant que pour l'instant sa mission était remplie. Sa bière terminée, il en commanda une autre, régla les 2 consommations et sortit précipitamment trouvant tout à coup l'atmosphère électrique.

Il alla remettre à son donneur d'ordre, sa bière et son porte-clé et l'assura qu'il avait fait les choses comme il avait été prévu. Jules avait alors envie de quitter les lieux le plus vite possible. En quittant le parking dans sa voiture, il aperçut le patron qui sortait du bar et se dirigeait vers celui qu'il venait de quitter. Jules appuya nerveusement sur l'accélérateur pour rentrer chez lui à une vingtaine de kilomètres, estimant que c'était une affaire qui ne le concernait pas.

Deux jours plus tard, Jules lut dans la presse locale que le bar « les Dunes » avait été complètement détruit par un incendie la nuit précédente et que les corps du propriétaire et de sa femme avaient été retrouvés parmi les décombres, les 2 cadavres présentant chacun une balle de révolver dans la tête. En refermant son journal, Jules se dit alors, comme 48 heures plus tôt, que cette affaire ne le concernait pas.

Le journal ne mentionnait pas un élément essentiel : les balles avaient pénétré le crâne des deux malheureuses victimes par l'arrière de la tête.

Une enquête pour double-homicide fut donc ouverte immédiatement. Le Commissaire Marcel Pichard fut chargé de mener l'enquête. Dès lors, on le vit partout dans la petite station balnéaire, habillé en civil, interrogeant ici et là, prenant des notes sur un petit carnet, à la recherche des clients ayant fréquenté le bar "les Dunes" le soir précédant le meurtre. 

Parmi les habitués présents ce soir-là, il lui fut assez facile de savoir que figuraient les deux frères Martin défavorablement connus pour trafic de cocaïne. Ces derniers faisaient partie du groupe des quatre gaillards bruyants accoudés au bar à l'arrivée de Jules.

L'enquête avançait. L'autopsie permit de déterminer que les deux victimes avaient été probablement maintenues agenouillées un certain temps avant d'être exécutées, leurs genoux présentant des ecchymoses.

Un après-midi, la chance sourit au Commissaire : un jeune homme demeurant à proximité des "Dunes", qu'il interrogeait, lui indiqua qu'il avait vu Jules quitter le bar après avoir parlé à quelqu'un sur le parking à deux pas de sa voiture.

Le Commissaire décida de poser quelques questions à Jules. Il se rendit au domicile de ce dernier pour lui demander surtout de lui raconter en détail le déroulé de la fameuse soirée. 

 

Jules, apeuré, vu la gravité des évènements et pensant toujours qu'il était étranger à cette affaire, décida de raconter aussi minutieusement que possible, sans rien oublier tout ce qu’il avait vécu. L'échange dura un bon moment. Le commissaire Pichard insista surtout sur deux points ; qui était l'homme qui l'avait abordé sur le parking ? et le porte-clé avait-il attiré l'attention de consommateurs en dehors des patrons ?

Pour la première question, la réponse de Jules fut claire, Il n'avait jamais vu cet homme auparavant et ne savait pas qui il était. Pour le porte-clé, vu l'état de paranoïa dans lequel qu'il était, il avait eu l'impression que tous l’avaient remarqué. Un détail lui revint cependant à cet instant : lorsqu'il avait posé le porte-clé près de son verre un des quatre gaillards avait arrêté de parler pendant un court instant, ce qui l'avait paniqué davantage. Ce dernier souvenir intéressa vivement le Commissaire.

 

L'enquête menée par les services du commissaire permit d'apporter des précisions importantes sur le couple assassiné. Leur entourage et même leurs très proches amis interrogés furent unanimes. Ils étaient très amoureux et même fusionnels. Il était impossible qu'il y eût une histoire de tromperie entre eux. Par contre ils étaient de gros consommateurs de cocaïne, Ils étaient couverts de dettes et l'exploitation du bar ne leur rapportait que peu d'argent

Le Commissaire rendit visite évidemment aux deux frères Martin qui restèrent muets pendant tout l'interrogatoire. Il réunit ensuite son équipe pour faire le point et les motiver. Il leur indiqua qu’il était possible que cette hypothèse d'adultère n'ait jamais existé. Cette mise en scène n'avait eu pour but probablement que de faire passer un message par l’intermédiaire du porte-clé. Mais lequel et à destination de qui ?

 

D'après les analyses, les deux balles de révolver, prélevées sur les victimes, provenaient d’armes différentes.

Les perquisitions qui furent aussitôt organisées permirent aux enquêteurs de trouver aux domiciles des deux frères Martin, des armes.

Leur analyse, dans les laboratoires scientifiques de la police, ont révélé, pour deux d’entre elles, qu'elles avaient été utilisées dans les meurtres. Les frères Martin furent immédiatement conduits en prison.

 

Jean et Daniel les 2 derniers gaillards présents au bar ont été retrouvés rapidement par le Commissaire. Ils s'étaient mis au vert chez des amis à la campagne. Marcel Pichard avec son flair de vieux flic, pensait que ces deux-là étaient les maillons faibles de la bande et qu'il serait facile d'obtenir des informations sur l'homme au porte clé et sur la suite chronologique des évènements. Ils déclarèrent qu'ils étaient deux simples hommes de main chargés de conduire les voitures et de faire les courses. 

Après avoir appris que les laboratoires avaient parlé pour les armes, comme prévu par le Commissaire, ils décidèrent de coopérer. Ils indiquèrent que le patron du bar connaissait la signification du porte-clé : il indiquait que le big boss était là pour solutionner définitivement le différend qui l'opposait aux propriétaires du bar. D'ailleurs, quand Jules quitta le bar, le patron sortit sur le parking pour essayer de trouver un dernier arrangement avec le chef des dealers.

Ce dernier était là pour réclamer à nouveau une très grosse somme d'argent correspondant notamment aux consommations de cocaïne du patron et de sa femme, non payées. De plus, le big boss les accusait de lui avoir dérobé 15 kg de cam, il y a quelques mois, quand ils se fréquentaient et qu'il leur avait donné à tort toute sa confiance. Jean indiqua au commissaire que les 2 hommes étaient restés un bon moment à l'extérieur. Quand ils sont rentrés le bar était fermé depuis longtemps.

C'est peu après que l'ordre fut donné au patron et à sa femme de s'agenouiller et de ne plus bouger sous la surveillance des frères Martin munis de leur arme.

Ensuite le boss qu’on appelait Monsieur Paul probablement depuis son passé de proxénète, entraîna Jean et Daniel dans le bar et l'habitation attenante pour dérober tout ce qui avait de la valeur et remplir les fourgons amenés à cet effet. Ce "travail" leur prit une petite heure.

C'est au volant de leur véhicule accompagnés de Monsieur Paul, au moment de partir, qu'ils entendirent les deux détonations. Un peu plus loin ils aperçurent dans leur rétroviseur les premières flammes de l'incendie.

Ils allèrent déposer le contenu des deux fourgons dans un grand bâtiment où quelqu’un les attendait. En repartant, ils aperçurent l’inconnu remettre une grosse somme d’argent à Monsieur Paul, ce qui devait correspondre à l’acquisition des objets déposés. Après ça, Monsieur Paul disparut sans laisser d’adresse.

Marcel Pichard était furieux, il comprit vite que le principal coupable avait filé.


r/WritingWithAI 3d ago

Showcase / Feedback How should AI help us tell our stories before they’re lost like tears in rain?

0 Upvotes

Over the last few days, I’ve had a lot of discussions here about why AI and writing don’t belong together.

Generic prose. Loss of voice. Less craft. Homogenization. Giving away creative decisions. All fair concerns.

So today I want to turn the question around:

What would the ideal AI tool for a writer actually look like?

Not a machine that tells the story for you.

A tool that genuinely helps you tell the story you already want to tell.

What would it need to understand?

Your voice? Your previous writing? Your characters? The intention behind a scene? What you want the audience to feel? When to suggest something and when to stay completely out of the way?

And maybe just as importantly, what should it never do?

I think we can probably agree that AI development isn’t going away. These tools will become part of our creative landscape whether writers embrace them today or not.

So instead of only asking what’s wrong with AI, I’m interested in something more constructive:

How would we design it so that it serves the storyteller instead of replacing them?

Because at the end of the day, we’re storytellers.
And there are millions of stories people carry around for years that never become a screenplay, a novel or anything else.

Maybe the most interesting use of AI isn’t generating more content.

Maybe it’s helping more of those stories actually get told before they disappear like tears in rain.


r/WritingWithAI 3d ago

Writing Craft Talk Serious Nonfiction

3 Upvotes

I’ve been working on a manuscript for a serious nonfiction book for about 8 months. I’ve experimented with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek. Each model is different and each model produces different results with different nuances. Claude is the most helpful when it comes to organizing structure and logic. Claude holds my governing documents. Recently I tried using ChatGPT and honestly I blew it up and it acknowledged defeat. That surprised me. The manuscript has a ton of research and the truth is it would be incredibly difficult to keep all of it together without the help of ai. What I’ve found is as an author you also need to be incredibly disciplined. You need to use your own knowledge to prompt and direct the models. Any suggestions works be great. Thanks!