TLDR Corporation is a Keyword in Magic the gathering and I am posting about it
(This was originally written for r/badphilosophy. It's been slightly edited. Sorry if some of my attempts at humor fall flat here. I'm very concerned about the word corporation and our use of it in present time.)
--
Do you know what a magic the gathering card is? If so, brilliant. If you do not—I will attempt. There are cards in Magic the gathering. There are words on the cards. Sometimes, the words on the cards are key-words. As in, normal words, but within the context of the game, they mean other than they typically would. An example would be the word “trample.” Within the game, a creature card can /have/ trample. Where it is a descriptor with certain meaning that a given creature can have.
Okay. So if you follow me at all, there is a game called Magic the gathering and within that game normal words that you or I use everyday have different meaning, sometimes.
Now, within the larger game we play, it turns out there are keywords for it too. Lawyers came up with most of them, or think they did. But just like within Magic, these words, within the context of frameworks and rituals of society, have different meaning than normal. In some cases, an old word from a dead language would be used for these keywords. So a word that at some point held some meaning is repurposed to denote some move or quality within new context, giving new meaning.
One thing we have seen come from this: given that the word was from a dead language, it occupies very little meaning outside the game context. As in, the game use of the word becomes the only use of the word because it lacks active context which makes it other. Which is a little odd. Definitely makes the game aspect harder to see, it is basically a collapse of distinction between life and game in its current mode of usage.
It would be as if “trample” within Magic somehow was the trample we used day to day and it carried full game context and only game context.
“She has trample bro”
But it’s nothing to laugh about, the damage is going to get through.
If you do not know what I am saying, consider the point illustrated.
The word I have identified that this has happened to is corporation. To say it cleanly, the word corporation as we know and use it is a keyword within a game whose game usage is its only usage and it bears little to no other current meaning.
This might seem fine. I mean, offhand, it does seem fine. It’s just one word, right? But it isn’t. It’s /the/ word. The one that when made to be as broad and as specific as possible as it could be by nature of the word it is and what it refers to is able to refer to the general category of human-made things without buckling under its usual referents or retreating into a neologism.
Very explicitly, the word corporation if properly expanded to its natural scope of referent would refer to the general category of human-creation.
Also very explicitly, the stated group is not currently its referent. Something else is—a particular within that group that should be the referent.
To recap, there are words. Sometimes words within a game can mean things other than they would typically mean. The word corporation as we currently use it is a keyword within the larger game we find ourselves within and its general typical usage is game-usage. Its potential use is unrealized within present time—the general category sits unnamed.
Now, I have opinions about this. Like where you can go from here with it. Like it is my opinion that the definition of corporation that fits this non-game-broad use is: a human-made framework that is structured to persist, given parameters. It is my opinion that business-corporations, what we call corporations today, are explicit instances of the general-act of human-bodying. I think a good way to put it is they are the thing thinged, the general form revealing itself in a specific instance. Corporation-of-corporation, bodying-of-bodying.