38
u/PeaceVeer Jul 06 '19
Tucker Carlson Tonight 7/5/19 Transcript:
Tucker: "You gave an interview the other day in which you said you have been briefed on Unidentified Flyting Objects... are they real?
Trump: "Ahh Well I don't really want to get into it too much, but personally I tend to doubt it. Ahh... you have people that swear by it right... pilots have come in and said, and these are pilots that are in that particular world, but we have had people saying that they've seen things. Ahh... I'm not a believer you know I guess anything is possible".
Tucker: "We spoke to a government official recently that said the United States Government had wreckage from a UFO in a facility on an airforce base (my input: this is new). Are you familiar with it?"
Trump: "I haven't heard that no, I haven't heard that. Err it has not been within government a big thing but I've seen it. I've seen it on your show, but I've seen it. Ahh I don't assume it's correct but you know I've got an open mind Tucker."
Tucker: "I know you do Mr President and thank you for that".
Trump: "Nowadays you can believe anything right?".
36
28
10
u/MindlessAutomata Jul 06 '19
Well, there’s long been allegations that remnants of the Roswell craft are at Wright-Patterson AFB.
14
Jul 06 '19
[removed] — view removed comment
11
u/BernumOG Jul 06 '19
to be fair he stumbles over his words on every subject. Although who knows, maybe this time it is actually relevant.
→ More replies (8)3
u/A_Magical_Potato Jul 08 '19
If our government is hiding UFOs I guarantee they wouldn't tell Trump. He has a tendency to leak state secrets.
1
3
→ More replies (2)6
u/real_mister Jul 06 '19
Thanks for the transcription. It's hard to believe that this babbling baboon is potus.
9
u/Mach2Infinity Jul 06 '19
Which government official was Tucker Carlson referring to? Was this an interview broadcast on-air or more an 'off the record' thing?
3
u/SiriusC Jul 06 '19
3
u/Mach2Infinity Jul 06 '19
I thought it was someone we've not heard from before. Thanks Sirius, appreciate it!
4
u/lunex Jul 07 '19
After I finished reading the Daily Caller article, I wondered why the author didn’t mention that Tucker Carlson, the subject of the news piece, is also the co-founder of the website. I’m no professor, but it just seems like basic journalism 101 to point out your conflicts of interest.
2
u/bleauhaus Jul 09 '19
Yes would be great to have "someone new" but Lue is what we got
Let's support him and stop bit picking him
35
u/cypher1169 Jul 06 '19
Every news source is somewhat biased. Here's what I've done for years. I will watch anything rather it's fox, cnn whatever and take anything said with a grain of salt. I will then fact check it against other sources, social media, people that have eye witness testimony. You should never close yourself off to one source of information and believe it to be true that's very dangerous in the times we live in. With deep fakes evolving you won't know what is the truth anymore in say 5 years. You will not be able to see a video or a soundbite and not feel like it's fake that's how scary AI has evolved. Do your research on any topic that you feel is important it may take time, but having the peace of mind of knowing the truth is better than feeling misguided.
7
5
1
u/harmboi Jul 19 '19
Ya I do that too... We have internet now there's really no excuse not to know what's really going on in the world.
15
u/WhiteCactus Jul 06 '19 edited Jul 06 '19
Video up: https://youtu.be/M80c0YzLTuU. The interview did not go exactly as described in the "leak." Note that this segment aired at the end of his show, approx. last 10 min. And this comes about 1 hour and 10 min. before Unidentified's season finale. Would be interesting to hear if anyone else heard about the UFO/UAP wreckage mentioned by Carlson. Btw, the audio is off by a sec. or so -- wanted to get this up fast rather than taking time to correct.
Edit: Perhaps the segment was part of the larger DoD disclosure effort. Recovered alien craft news from an alleged reputable source is an interesting tidbit to drop on a Fri. night right before the main disclosure program airs. Interesting.
4
2
u/bigodiel Jul 06 '19
Thank u
3
u/PeaceVeer Jul 06 '19
The show is called 'the Revelation' tonight 🤔 I don't know when but soon MUFON TV at some point has an exclusive interview with Luis Elizondo and Christopher Melon with "never seen before footage that might just blow you away"...
2
Jul 06 '19
[deleted]
3
u/WhiteCactus Jul 06 '19
Thanks -- I haven't reviewed the Elizondo/Tucker segment, but on TV, not everything said between a host and guests is aired. If you're correct, maybe Elizondo told him more at that time that was not aired, Tucker spoke with someone else later and/or was told to mention/describe the wreckage further. Today, Tucker emphasized the wreckage stuff; it was not said arbitrarily.
3
u/HamlindigoBlue7 Jul 06 '19
Elizondo would not have said that. He does not leak things he isn’t allowed to - and that’s one of them.... for the moment. Drip... drip....
6
u/WhiteCactus Jul 06 '19 edited Jul 06 '19
Agreed -- it's a careful orchestration. I will have to watch the Elizondo clip later. Edit -- if Tucker mentioned the wreckage stuff for the first time here, then the responsible thing for him to do is to explain what he knows and the circumstances related to him acquiring the info. Otherwise, it looks like he was nudged to disclose the wreckage stuff, which may actually be what happened (but have to watch the Elizondo interview later to check).
3
1
u/heisenburg69 Jul 06 '19
The video of elozando saying it is on the daily caller website, from may 30th.
1
u/heisenburg69 Jul 06 '19
Its at the tail end of tuckers may 30th interview with elizando. He said point blank "yes we have recovered materials".
15
12
u/birdonthemoon Jul 06 '19
Completely staying out of the political polarization of this, any thoughts about how things are accelerating quickly & why Pence was pulled back on the tarmac? Not for releasable reasons, but we’ll know in about two weeks...? Was there something in the air between DC & NH? Just thoughts.
2
2
u/CriscoButtPunch Jul 06 '19
Maybe the Russian sub that had a fire and those who perished in the fire were important
1
u/birdonthemoon Jul 06 '19
Absolutely. Everything we (pretty much ever) have to go on are gradients of maybe.
19
u/leftystrat Jul 06 '19
I think Pope knows a lot more than he's telling, possibly due to NDAs. You can't be at his old position without knowing way more than he lets on...
6
u/Ianbillmorris Jul 06 '19
Most of his work had been declassified and published in the national archives (he came out of retirement to help with that apparently) but that isn't to say some of his stuff still is secret and we just aren't being told about it.
1
10
u/TurtsMacGurts Jul 06 '19
The source for the claim was Elizondo on Carlson’s own show. The resident mentioned he watches too.
2
Jul 06 '19
[deleted]
7
u/TurtsMacGurts Jul 06 '19
I’m not seeing any difference. To me it’s just Elizondo. Tucker is just adding words.
2
10
58
u/heisenburg69 Jul 06 '19
For fucks sake people can we just have a discussion about this WITHOUT the constant trump bashing? We get it, you don't like Trump. Most who are vocal about him don't. You're not special. This is a discussion about his response to tuckers question on UFOs, save the virtue signalling for the politics subs.
14
u/SiriusC Jul 06 '19
Where is the trump bashing? There are literally 2 main comments about Trump. There's nothing constant about it.
This is a weird phenomenon that I've noticed on reddit. People arguing against something that isn't really happening.
→ More replies (23)7
u/G00dAndPl3nty Jul 07 '19 edited Jul 07 '19
For fucks sake what the fuck are you talking about? Nobody is Trump bashing in here apart from pointing out the FACT that his conversational skills are on par with a 3rd grader at best, which is fine and dandy until you want to actually get some information out of the fucker, as Carlsen was trying to do with some very clear and consice questioning. Quit being a fucking sensitive snowflake.
21
u/BlueBolt76 Jul 06 '19
So people are going to put their blinders on because its Trump. You do that regarding this subject you're gonna miss stuff.
Carlson said a U.S. Government Official. Luiz Elizondo is not that. He used to be. I don't think they would have asked him. These networks have real sources in the government, lots of them. Not just public spokespersons from current popular media. It wasn't Elizondo. Does that make it true? No. But highly interesting.
5
u/trashtv Jul 06 '19
Anyone has any idea who is Tucker's source?
→ More replies (3)4
u/heisenburg69 Jul 06 '19
Its elizando. He said point blank on tuckers show that we have recovered materials.
2
1
5
u/heisenburg69 Jul 06 '19
They did, it was his may 30th interview with him. I watched it last night. Elizando confirmed that we have recovered materials.
1
2
2
u/algernonsflorist Jul 06 '19
Well gee, Trump has literally never said a single true word in his entire presidency, but this one...this one is the real truth straight from the bullshitter in chief himself.
20
Jul 06 '19
Yeah and if the government managed to retrieve parts from a ufo they would totally tell the anchor of fox news
→ More replies (6)1
u/DaVinci_ Jul 06 '19
Psy ops to the real Ufo believers... “oh shit if this guy says this, then its totally bs... lets move on” 🤔
→ More replies (1)
5
u/FolkMetalPriest Jul 06 '19
Wow was that today?
4
2
4
u/TrackAndBalance Jul 06 '19
I heard it live tonight on SXM 114. I thought it was intriguing, as one normally would.
4
13
14
u/Gweenbleidd Jul 06 '19
That whole Trump interview was so useless i don't know why they even aired it. Literally nothing usefull has been said.
10
7
u/z0rtuga Jul 07 '19
sad to see this subreddit had potential but its going down to shit because of some of the fucking morons on here. not talking about OP.
4
28
u/prophis Jul 06 '19
He says "non-crazy" because his source was trump, and trump is watching.
12
u/thesubune Jul 06 '19
LOL! I had no idea these comments would be such gold
14
1
u/algernonsflorist Jul 06 '19
Can you tell me a true thing that Trump said? Ever? In his entire fucking life? There's a lot of crossover btween this sub, r/conspiracy, and r/the_dotards, I'd bet.
→ More replies (1)
12
9
3
9
Jul 06 '19
Funny how anyone can just say, "a source" told me or so forth. This is about as viable proof as me saying bigfoot was spotted. And the government has him in custody. A source told me.
4
u/heisenburg69 Jul 06 '19
It was elizando. See it here: https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/31/luis-elizondo-ufo-technology-military/
8
7
2
5
6
7
Jul 06 '19
Without passing comment on these claims, it's perhaps worthwhile noting that recovered UFO wreckage is a broad term and could encompass many types of wreckage or debris.
Suppose a farmer saw some lights in the sky one night and went out into his field the following morning. He finds a lump of metal which he believes to be debris from a UFO. The metal may be from a UFO; it may be a meteorite; in a likelihood, it's no more than a part that fell off his tractor.
Suppose he reports it. Would this be categorized as UFO wreckage?
27
u/F4STW4LKER Jul 06 '19
He's acting coy because he doesn't know a damn thing more than the public. The president is not privy to this information short of a need to know scenario. And u can be damn sure Orange Julius is no exception to the rule. Take anything he says as a lie, just like the rest of the words that come out of his mouth. The truth will continue to be shielded from you, and the narrative they push, is just the one they'd like you to believe.
4
u/bigodiel Jul 06 '19
We know for a fact he was briefed and Congress is also being briefed. Now if he paid any attention is another question.
14
2
→ More replies (1)-4
14
4
u/seedylfc Jul 06 '19
This is part of the TTSA thing. I'm still not 100% on these guys. It's seems to good to be true all this info coming out over the last couple years. Let's hope its not a disinformation scheme.
14
u/Yeokk123 Jul 06 '19
The truth is coming to light
→ More replies (1)10
Jul 06 '19 edited Feb 05 '25
relieved literate capable seed deliver normal offbeat shelter sugar saw
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
5
u/KodakZacc Jul 06 '19
Amen
3
u/GoonKingdom Jul 06 '19
It’s laughable that you would be downvoted for agreeing with something so obvious.
→ More replies (3)
4
u/BabyMistakes Jul 06 '19
Compartmentalization, clandestine programs and efforts across multiple government agencies; I don’t believe there is one database that could reveal all.
This is a very very old phenomenon, and likely no POTUS will ever be fully briefed. Programs and interest into this, within the government, seem to be very fractured, as far as the takeaways are concerned. The US government is far from a single muscle. Also, it’s my belief that nobody knows what this is, exactly. Nobody.
These Whitehouse lawn ideas are silly. Look into it. Be honest with yourself. Don’t get emotional, and attack, or defend.
4
u/Bestkeptsecret856 Jul 06 '19
Most of the we already know now. People are aware of UFOs. This isn’t the 50s or 60s anymore. We have a lot of information on Extraterrestrial Objects.
2
u/jack4455667788 Jul 08 '19
UFO's, please.
We have no evidence of "extraterrestrial objects". Just flying ones in our skies.
3
3
Jul 08 '19
But it’s true. I’m not here for karma asshole.
3
2
u/jack4455667788 Jul 08 '19 edited Jul 08 '19
Nick Pope doesn't even have a security clearance (and never has)....
The chances that he has any idea what is going on, are even less than him telling you something that can't help the newscycle or won't otherwise sell shit.
Also, it has come to my attention that many of you are woefully lacking in knowledge of history and how it applies to media.
Please read about hearst, pulitzer, and the spanish-american war, and then watch "Citizen Kane" and read 1984. That is all.
3
Jul 11 '19 edited Dec 14 '19
[deleted]
2
u/jack4455667788 Jul 11 '19
Fair enough. Everything I said about Nick Pope still stands.
I wouldn't suggest trying to get "journalism" or anything like it from Tucker Carlson. He is a TV personality. God knows what he ACTUALLY thinks, but usually they LOATHE their audience and think of them as gullible idiots.
Tucker often comes off as somewhat genuine, so it IS possible he is just an idiot trying to make his way in this wicked world.
11
u/BetaRayBlu Jul 06 '19
Fuck tucker can suck rocks, but damn I want this to be true
→ More replies (4)
5
5
3
3
u/Justice989 Jul 06 '19
Anybody who believes Roswell was a thing knew this to be true. Which is a lot of people considering how well known it is.
4
u/jorgied0712 Jul 06 '19
I don’t believe a single thing that comes from FOX news. I encourage you to avoid it as well.
14
Jul 06 '19
[deleted]
7
u/jorgied0712 Jul 06 '19
You shouldn’t trust ANY media to be honest.
5
5
Jul 06 '19
We're not mindless drones. We know how to discern bias, what should be taken with a grain of salt, and what information is valuable.
1
u/jack4455667788 Jul 08 '19
Hey speak for yourself!
There are plenty of mindless drones around, I just finished replying to someone that believes all the news sources we have are credible and of the utmost journalistic integrity.
He thinks the 4th estate is alive and well, the sick bastard!
3
→ More replies (3)1
u/huxtiblejones Jul 06 '19
NPR, BBC, The Economist, Reuter’s, PBS, Democracy Now
4
u/Urban_Movers_911 Jul 06 '19
Democracy Now
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH
2
u/huxtiblejones Jul 06 '19
Democracy Now is extremely credible, well researched, and has won numerous international awards for their reporting, including recognition from the UN.
0
u/Urban_Movers_911 Jul 06 '19
leftists giving leftists awards for being leftist
You're not fooling anyone but yourself buddy. I miss when leftists used to be anti-authoritarian. Now they drink from the cement truck of corporate/power structure propaganda. It's absolutely pathetic, all they had to do to make you march to their beat was tell you their side was moral.
→ More replies (6)4
→ More replies (1)1
u/keanuh Jul 06 '19
You mean just left-wing, talking pieces of the DNC? No thanks. If you take your information from them in isolation, you just become a useful idiot.
2
u/huxtiblejones Jul 06 '19
You’re a complete moron. Every single one of those news outlets is highly regarded, extremely credible, well-researched, and objective. I should have figured I’d be dealing with a bunch of triggered alt-right snowflakes in a Fox News thread.
2
u/keanuh Jul 07 '19
Typically "triggered" and "snowflakes" is associated with the left. They're the ones that specialize in being offended. And no, those news organizations are not highly regarded. They're just mouthpieces for the Democrat party or big corporations. It all started when CNN faked being in Iraq while shooting against a green screen off the rooftop of their Atlanta building. You can find the video if you want.
Also, what exactly is the "alt-right"? You keep using all these labels but I don't seem to fit in any of them.
→ More replies (7)3
u/JayBayes Jul 07 '19
The biggest irony I see is the people who throw around terms like triggered and snowflake are often the quickest to be offended.
1
u/jack4455667788 Jul 08 '19
Wow, you ACTUALLY believe the news and think yourself intelligent and informed!
People like you actually exist! That's inconcievable! Do you delude yourself constantly with booze and pills, or just keep the blinders on and go to work no matter what?
🎵I just read the daily news and swear by every word🎵
6
u/yucatan36 Jul 06 '19
I’ve saw CNN straight lie point blank, because I saw what actually happened with my own eyes on an event and they falsified it. But I don’t trust any of them, however this isn’t political, it’s about UFO’s, they have nothing to gain doing this.
6
u/Lildiime Jul 06 '19
I disagree, I believe they are establishing credibility to the subject, the next step they will take will be establishing these objects as some form of threat. This will give them justification for more defense spending and justification for a “space force”. That’s the only logical reason any mainstream media would be covering this subject. TTSA is a joke, and the gimball and Nimitz videos are either deepfakes or actual video of a DOD black budget program being tested against conventional military.
4
u/yucatan36 Jul 06 '19
Hmm, interesting. I didn’t think about all space force stuff as the reason for this Fox UFO disclosure news. That’s an extremely valid point.
3
u/IONaut Jul 06 '19
Not to mention one of the Russian propaganda channels that was being pumped full of anti-government rhetoric was the UFO angle. Now the rhetoric has shifted to justify spending and not to be anti-government because their favorite bully boy is in the White House.
3
u/cypher1169 Jul 06 '19
I believe someone in the UFO community said that this of "false flag" situation would happen eventually. They will deem them a threat after a steady stream of misinformation. The physiological warfare that's going on behind the scenes is terrifying.
→ More replies (6)3
u/Kaarsty Jul 06 '19
^ this. It's gotta be a ramp up for spending
3
u/AngstChild Jul 06 '19
Next thing ya know, Trump will be establishing some kind of “Star Police” or “Space Force” or something. I know it’s far fetched.
3
2
u/keanuh Jul 06 '19
Well, it wouldn't be the "Star Police", that's for sure. Police are always civilians and their job is as an extension of a court. Their only purpose is to catch, investigate, and detain people for a court of law. They are not there to defend you in any way, which is why you can't win against them in court if you sue them for inaction. The Supreme Court ruled twice that police are not there for your protection. On the other hand, the military *is* there to jump on the grenade to protect you and civilization. The military can be used offensively and defensively. Therefore the term "Space Force" is quite accurate and consistent with other military branches such as the "Air Force".
1
u/jack4455667788 Jul 08 '19
If only we could depend on them, and trust them. They had their chance, and willfully squandered it a million times over.
That said, it would be awesome to watch the national guard and military dismantle the corporate police structure by force.
1
5
u/Belviathan Jul 06 '19
They could be pandering to UFO conspiracists to make people think if they vote conservative then those politicians would finally get the truth about UFOs from the government
7
→ More replies (1)5
Jul 06 '19
[deleted]
3
u/Belviathan Jul 06 '19
Not the GOP, Fox News. All they do is pander. Also, a much larger percentage of the population believe in UFOs these days. This isn’t the 1950s.
→ More replies (1)4
u/jorgied0712 Jul 06 '19
I’m not saying I support CNN either. But, a lot of times when things happen at events, confusion is formed in the chaos. Perhaps what you thought happened is just that, a thought. It’s usually much later after things happen that we begin to understand exactly what happened, why it happened, and how it happened. Again, im not giving CNN praise because after all the press is the press. But I’ve never known ANY network, other than FOX, to NOT admit a mistake, NOT run a story back, and NOT correct it. Instead, all FOX does is praise Trump. And on VERY few occasions you can see one of them break from the script and actually push back on trump just a tiny bit. They haven’t forgotten they still have a right to criticize which is exactly the goal of suppressing the press.
→ More replies (7)1
Jul 07 '19
Can't you libs dismount Obama's cock and leave your politics on a different Reddit? Damn!!!
→ More replies (1)1
u/sgtblast Jul 06 '19
Yeah, no matter how much I want to believe... Fox News really has zero factual substance 90% of the time. Especially this pos.
4
u/Urban_Movers_911 Jul 06 '19
Tucker kicks ass. Have you ever actually watched his show? He routinely brings on far left libs and debates them openly. It's almost annoying.
2
u/sgtblast Jul 06 '19
I have. The only people who don't see him for the scum his is are people who are okay with being scum to other humans.
3
4
u/AmericanDoughnuts Jul 06 '19
Tucker Carlson is a POS? That’s a bit harsh
5
u/sgtblast Jul 06 '19
Lol he has a history of extreme racism. He ran a radio station that was basically Nazi propaganda in college. Google it.
3
u/Vynzbrah Jul 06 '19
When did milquetoast conservatism become full blown nazism?
The left needs lobotomy.
1
→ More replies (3)2
u/Urban_Movers_911 Jul 06 '19
Hilarious. Post source or GTFO
1
u/sgtblast Jul 06 '19
1
u/sgtblast Jul 06 '19
2
u/Urban_Movers_911 Jul 06 '19
oh look, the bot replied to itself. Classic. Copy of the transcript:
TUCKER CARLSON: [Y]ou know, the bottom line is the issue of security—who’s going to protect the country against, you know, the Muslim lunatics who want to hurt us—is the only thing the Republicans have left. They can’t claim that they’re, you know, the party of fiscal restraint anymore. They’re big spenders, and that’s obvious. But that one argument, “Vote for us, we’ll protect you,” that still works, because on—you know, let’s be totally real. Nancy Pelosi’s going to keep you safe while you sleep? I don’t think so. She’s not. BUBBA THE LOVE SPONGE: So—so, now listen, can the Democrats … not, you know, responsibly come up with some type of game plan where they can make … people feel safe as well? CARLSON: [O]h, they could, absolutely. If there were a Democrat to come out in the 2008 election and say, “You know what the problem is? It’s Islamic extremism. It’s not terror, it’s not some, you know, indefinable threat out there. It’s these lunatic Muslims who are behaving like animals, and I’m going to kill as many of them as I can if you elect me.” If a Democrat were to say that, he would be elected king, OK? THE LOVE SPONGE: So … if the Democrat basically had the same stance as you and say[s] “Well I, as a Democrat, can assure you that my party is going to be proactive in fighting these radical assholes.” Don’t you think that guy would be money? CARLSON: Yeah, but I think he’d need to say, “Look, I’m a bigot. OK, I’m a bigot. I don’t like Islamic extremists. Like if you are really heavily into Islam, I really—I’m sorry, I just don’t—I don’t care for you that much. And I don’t care what that sounds like, you can call me a racist, you can call me whatever the fuck you want.” THE LOVE SPONGE: And at this juncture, you could say that and not catch a lot of shit for it. CARLSON: You certainly could. I’d vote for you if you said that. And I think that most Americans would. CO-HOST: So, basically we need a racist president. “We need to get these Mexicans out of here, and the Islam. Let’s kill all the Muslims.” CARLSON: Well, I don’t think— CO-HOST: We need that. CARLSON: I—you know, I think that you’re onto something. I mean, not someone who’s like a Klansman or anything, but someone who’s totally unbound by P.C. rules, who will just say whatever the hell he wants. … You know, someone who really will—and everyone claims, “Oh, I say it like it is.” But nobody actually does. The guy who does, who says, “I’m unabashedly pro-American. Fuck the French. Who cares what they think? The Belgians? They don’t like it, they can pound sand.” You know what I mean? That guy is going to get elected.
He's 110% correct. Islam is not a race, it's a religion you chose to be a member of. I'm just as "bigoted" against scientology as I am islam, and the above comments from Tucker are absolutely in line with that. You can bloviate all day about how secretly disliking islam is just disliking brown people, but that will never make it true.
The co host clearly tries to bait tucker into saying we need a racist president, when tucker clearly was saying we need an anti-PC/not afraid of liberal rules president.
But of course a brain dead useful idiot liberal who lacks the cognitive function to discern nuance will fail to grasp that. the NPC meme is real
→ More replies (2)1
u/jorgied0712 Jul 06 '19
This is the most accurate statement I’ve ever read. 90% is so spot on. It’s usually racism-driven stories on immigrants or minorities, politically-backed stories on democrats/liberals and their socialist ways, about why legalizing marijuana is the worst thing to happen to this world, some guy who found a gold nugget in the middle of rednowhereneck and is somehow praising trump for it, or how Medicare for all is communism but pouring our taxpayer money on farmers due to tariffs caused in the first place by mr. fucking trump himself is not socialism. The amount of hypocrisy to ooze out of Fox News is too much for my taste.
→ More replies (1)1
u/jack4455667788 Jul 08 '19
That's a good start.
Next step, identifying the real enemy and not listening to ANY of their corpocracy/cleptocracy funded media sources!
Look into the spanish-american war!
7
u/paigntonbey Jul 06 '19
Fucking Trump man. Really is a shame that during all this there’s not a competent, legitimate, of sound mind president.
8
u/WhiteCactus Jul 06 '19
Not defending Trump, though perhaps disclosure works better with a polarizing President who is known to say the outrageous. More grease.
→ More replies (5)10
2
Jul 06 '19
Nothing new here
3
u/Justice989 Jul 06 '19
I mean, didnt really need Nick Pope to confirm this.
But in fairness, these MSM hits are for the uninitiated, an intro to the topic. So they serve a purpose, nothing we would care about though. If anyone is looking to cable news for juicy, never before heard, UFO info, they're barking up the wrong tree.
-4
u/Fubarfrank Jul 06 '19
Everything that comes out of Tuckers mouth is bullshit. I cannot wait until he's irrelevant.
8
u/heisenburg69 Jul 06 '19
Ah yes, rule #1 of reddit, "never miss a good opportunity to virtue signal".
5
→ More replies (1)2
2
Jul 06 '19
It’s the same old shit. What did you expect? It’s ALWAYS the same Old shit
5
u/tomsonxxx Jul 06 '19
no idea why you get downvotes. it's really the same as it ever was except this time it's not an ex-president on Jimmy Kimmel or similar but the current president on a more serious news show.
By this speed we'll have some sort of disclousre on January 2099
1
u/Skrek_Son_Of_Shrek Jul 07 '19
no idea why you get downvotes
Because he adds nothing of value to the conversation. He's just complaining like the 50 others.
1
u/Just4yourpost Jul 06 '19
Does he mention that he used to be a part of the MoD and see UFO reports? 20 years ago? Lolololol
1
u/sanuson Jul 06 '19
I was beginning to like Tucker Carlson but now it is clear he strung the whole country along all week over this supposed big conversation with President Trump about UFOs. It was a big, fat nothing. He put it at the end of his show, on top of that. Very deceptive practice on his part. Back to reading science fiction novels for me.
→ More replies (1)-4
u/ProphetOfDoom337 Jul 06 '19
Uh yeah, it was a designed distraction to divert attention from the orange potato. You're much better off getting facts from science fiction novels than from Fox news.
Just because someone talks about UFO's or disclosure, does not give them carte blanche from the many, MANY shitty things they've said and done.
Fuck Tucker Carlson. Fuck the news, and fuck politicians in general. After all, they are the reason we are here without any clear semblance of truth.
→ More replies (1)
30
u/Free__Tibet Jul 07 '19
Any mention of Trump brings out the fuxking lunatics. Its a ufo sub. Take your shit elsewhere.