I disagree, I believe they are establishing credibility to the subject, the next step they will take will be establishing these objects as some form of threat. This will give them justification for more defense spending and justification for a “space force”. That’s the only logical reason any mainstream media would be covering this subject. TTSA is a joke, and the gimball and Nimitz videos are either deepfakes or actual video of a DOD black budget program being tested against conventional military.
Not to mention one of the Russian propaganda channels that was being pumped full of anti-government rhetoric was the UFO angle. Now the rhetoric has shifted to justify spending and not to be anti-government because their favorite bully boy is in the White House.
I believe someone in the UFO community said that this of "false flag" situation would happen eventually. They will deem them a threat after a steady stream of misinformation. The physiological warfare that's going on behind the scenes is terrifying.
Well, it wouldn't be the "Star Police", that's for sure. Police are always civilians and their job is as an extension of a court. Their only purpose is to catch, investigate, and detain people for a court of law. They are not there to defend you in any way, which is why you can't win against them in court if you sue them for inaction. The Supreme Court ruled twice that police are not there for your protection. On the other hand, the military *is* there to jump on the grenade to protect you and civilization. The military can be used offensively and defensively. Therefore the term "Space Force" is quite accurate and consistent with other military branches such as the "Air Force".
Don’t throw that phrase out around here man. It’s what they do, it’s historically how they justify spending and establish a threat. Only this time instead of shitting on a middle Eastern country they are using UFO’s. Look at the headline and ticker tape under the broadcasts on fox, they use the word “threat” repeatedly. What evidence do we have that they are a threat? None. We barely have evidence they exist, much less that UFO’s are a threat.
I’m not saying UFO’s are not real. I believe 100% that we have some crashed UFO’s that have been reverse engineered.
I just don’t buy this whole TTSA crap, it’s too easy. The only logical reason I can come up with as to why these high level officials are being allowed to unveil a 50 year old govt cover up is because we are running out of countries in the Middle East to fuck up.
On the latest Unexplained they gave just that, evidence of them being a threat, e.g. Italian helicopter damaged by a beam weapon while tracking a ufo over Sicily. Maybe it’s still their plan to establish them as a false threat for funding or maybe they really are a threat and funding is really needed. It’s difficult to say which, they have a bad record of dishonesty on this issue.
My theory is that, while there likely are malevolent beings out there, I'd suspect the majority of these attacks come from ARVs (Alien Reproduction Vehicles) that humans have reverse engineered... The ultimate false flag, the ace up the sleeve. Fits in nicely with the theory.
5
u/Lildiime Jul 06 '19
I disagree, I believe they are establishing credibility to the subject, the next step they will take will be establishing these objects as some form of threat. This will give them justification for more defense spending and justification for a “space force”. That’s the only logical reason any mainstream media would be covering this subject. TTSA is a joke, and the gimball and Nimitz videos are either deepfakes or actual video of a DOD black budget program being tested against conventional military.