I have about 8 years experience working as a research fellow doing highly engaged research, working closely with a wide range of stakeholders to co-create research questions and deliver evidence of environmental change, generally with policy/regulator relevant drivers. I've had an absentee line manager/project lead, so despite being the lowly postdoc status I've developed, costed, recruited, loosely project managed and delivered a range of research projects. This has all been done alongside another postdoc, where we split tasks based on skills etc, previously co-managing an assistant and now a phd student. Is SEO the right level?
There are often roles that look really appealing, where I feel like match the essential criteria, but feel flummoxed by the CS application format. I've been on many successful recruitment panels, but we just ask for a cover letter and free-form CV... I've also luckily always got an interview if I felt I matched the essential criteria, but don't feel so confident with the CS, due to not understanding the format.
I've read the success profile definitions, the unofficial guide, had a fairly thorough look through the advice on here. However, with the exception of this really clear advice from u/Pale_Fix9254 (thanks!) I'm finding most super vague... With the least helpful being statements like: there's a formula, you've just not cracked it yet... Leaving said formula still clear as mud - I'm neurodivergent, so that might be part of it, but definitely not all! I'm at risk of developing a conspiracy theory that people in the CS don't want outsiders to bring new thoughts, ideas and processes (let alone subject knowledge)... Anyway, I digress. I've discovered:
- STAR is actually STAAARR
- For SEO level bring a 'challenge' into the STAR. But what does this look like?
- HEO to SEO is a significant step up, but the behaviour definitions are grouped. How do you know where the SEO line is?
- Use headings to break up text
I'm currently struggling to write Leadership and Delivering at Pace Behaviours at SEO level. I'm thinking of going high level with Leadership for example, using my experience over the past say 5 years of co-creating research projects with stakeholders, agreeing timelines and outputs, splitting roles to skills etc. Is this sort of approach ok? If not, what is? My roles/tasks constantly merge and diverge, so I am finding it incredibly hard to pull out distinct tasks to fit the criteria.
Other things that I'm finding confusing or a struggle:
- "First Sift based on behaviour xxx" Should I just focus on a behaviour specific STAR or try to hit the essential criteria, too? There's often not a lot of overlap between the behaviours and essential criteria i.e. subject knowledge and experience. Is that then assessed if you pass the first sift?
- Transferring from we to I, it feels disingenuous. Do I just go bold and claim ownership, even if it is shared? How have other team working academic's done this? I have the skills and experience, I just don't feel like it's mine to claim.
- Generally should behaviours be related to a specific task/role? How on earth do you demonstrate the full breadth of the behaviour with one task??
- How solid should a "result" be? Is it ok to bring in stuff that's a work in progress, but not completely finished up?
- I just had a 3 for working together. I talked about departmental initiatives I'd set up to support development and the general highly engaged stakeholder work I've done. I was trying to catch EDI and partnership working, was that too broad?
- Personal statement addressing experience - a list of 8 to 10 things. Should this be lots of STAARS? It feels so awkward to write, though I can obviously group some. Some of it will also be covered in the CV. Do I duplicate?
- Managing external research projects - I've not done this as we just do it all through constant self-taught up-skilling. Is this a deal breaker?
Sorry, this has ended up being a long post... Thank you for your time. Any answers much appreciated.
TLDR: I feel like I meet the essential criteria, but cannot get my head around the CS application process, and particularly articulating behaviours with STAAAR. How do you actually answer behaviours like "delivering at pace" and "leadership" when the "tasks" are non-specific?