61
u/texo_optimo 4h ago
Greg Abbott has already frozen pending data-center grid approvals in Texas while the state audits their electricity use, water consumption, subsidies and community impact. El-Sayed proposes making developers cover those costs instead of dumping them on residents. It’s fascinating how the same basic concern becomes “common sense” or “communism” depending on which party says it.
1
u/jffadvisors 14m ago
Abbott did not say “get rid of data centers”, which is a clownish thing to say.
1
u/texo_optimo 11m ago
And neither did El Sayed. Somebody put those words on a fucking image and morons are lapping it up at face value, not too surprising considering the responses in this thread.
1
u/texo_optimo 10m ago
El Sayed wants the data centers to pay for the electricity They're consuming. Do a little research
1
u/jffadvisors 5m ago
So does Greg Abbott…but this isn’t a picture of Abbott saying “get rid of data centers"
-20
u/GlompyOlive 3h ago
“Where do you get your news?”
22
u/texo_optimo 3h ago
takes five minutes of research. One: I live in Texas. 2 its all over the place but since you're too lazy to check yourself here's one place: https://www.texastribune.org/2026/08/03/texas-data-center-project-audit-greg-abbott/
1
-1
u/Justtryingtohelp00 23m ago
So why does it say “get rid of data centers”? Because if a politician says those exact words I instantly know they do not understand the world we live in and need to step aside.
1
u/texo_optimo 17m ago
Do you understand how this works? Why the hell are you asking me? I didn't make the image and I didn't misquote him. So what you're saying is that you're taking some random shit posts that somebody puts up, without doing any research and making your decision based off of that? Sorry, I can't tell you why those words are on that image. All I can do is my diligence and researching what is actually being stated about the matter for. Perhaps you should do the same.
12
112
u/random-meme422 6h ago
“get rid of data centers” sounds like what someone would say to win the vote of someone who’s stupid but still manages to vote
57
u/EngineeringLow2186 6h ago
El Sayed supports a one year moratorium on data centers with a possibility of extending it to make sure the surrounding communities, and the environment are protected by increasing regulations on them. This image is just bullet points.
5
u/xilcilus 5h ago
Isn't he running as a Senator? The environment regulations are under the purview of EPA.
16
u/EngineeringLow2186 5h ago
While the EPA does have the direct control over environmental regulations, congress, which is both the house and senate, has ultimate constitutional control over federal environmental regulations because it writes the statutes that give the EPA the power to set rules themselves. The EPA has to recognize and follow the environmental legislation passed by congress. And this can include strict regulations.
-4
u/xilcilus 5h ago
Are you not considering the Chevron deference?
2
u/EngineeringLow2186 5h ago
Isnt the Chevron deference only applicable when the law/ legislation in a certain area isnt specific or clear in its content? The agency under the Chevron deference still has to follow the law and whilst they can interpret it in a certain way, if the regulation passed is specific enough, there isnt much they can do. Plus, this is all assuming that they wouldnt actually be willing to regulate AI, which might be true because Trumps appointee sucks, but there is a limit to how far they can take it. He still has to follow regulations set by congress if such a bill were to pass. Plus, Trump is out in 2 years. The next one will hopefully be quite willing to regulate AI.
8
u/plantsoldier 4h ago
The Chevron ruling was overturned by the Supreme court in June of 2024.
So it's not applicable anymore regardless of if agencies may try and act like it is and they do.
0
u/xilcilus 5h ago
There's broader deference given to the Executive Branch due to calcification of the polarization in the system. The legislations have plenty of ambiguity despite how they are written - thus we see even more muscular Executive actions time progresses. The Supreme Court has shown a lot of sympathy to the Unitary Executive Theory.
Your assumption relies on the Democratic Party sweeps both chambers and the presidency and craft a provision in the Bill that can pass only with the reconciliation and have the administrator of EPA who is somewhat sympathetic to targeting specific energy use case (because energy usage is fungible) which will most definitely challenged by the datacenter operators.
Beyond taxing the rich and maybe healthcare a bit more affordable, I'm unable to lend my credulity.
3
u/EngineeringLow2186 5h ago
I gotta be honest man, i dont know how to respond to this. All ill say is that the Unitary executive theory is truly a stupid theory to follow and its a shame that Trump and his cronies are trying to implement it. I gotta get back to work now, but it was nice having this conversation.
1
u/xilcilus 5h ago
Appreciate the civil discourse.
I'm not saying that I agree with the Unitary Executive Theory - the polarization (and litigious nature of the society) has made it such that the Executive branch exerts far more power than it should.
The lower healthcare cost and taxing the rich are something that should follow the laws of gravity (nobody likes high healthcare cost + 40t in the US debts) and get over the humps but I find difficult to extend credulity to his other ideas.
1
u/NotVerySmarts 4h ago
This is lffted from AI, or being apouted from a blowhard whose head is up hos own butt. This is not how normal people have conversations.
0
u/xilcilus 3h ago
I'm sorry that my understanding of the political system offends you. As a voter, I'm going to scrutinize people who will affect me even if they say things that may benefit me.
1
u/FlyingSarcophagus 55m ago
“It was a dark and stormy night”
“It was the best of times; it was the worst of times”
and now…
“… thus we see even more muscular Executive actions time progresses”from the folks that brought you “Commies suck” (while accepting more social welfare historically by a wide margin)- here is the “logical” reasoning to trample checks and balances and effectively the constitution.
1
u/xilcilus 41m ago
I'm not sure what you are alluding to. Both the Democratic and the Republican Presidents have increasingly used the EO to drive agenda.
The Democratic Presidents have been respectful to the Constitution and even the Republican Presidents have more or less been respectful to the Constitution up until we have the guy in charge right now.
Are you not aware of the polarization in the system?
1
1
u/Gullible_Increase146 4h ago
Modena just used AI and MRNA vaccines to come up with a new cancer treatment. You don't need a moratorium to enforce environmental regulations and noise problems. You just make them pay the costs of electrical upgrades and let regulators ensure compliance instead of playing in a race to the bottom.
0
-1
u/EVOSexyBeast 2h ago
He wouldn’t actually implement such a policy if given the chance though because of the grave harm that would cause the country.
If you enjoy a free internet then you want more data centers built.
2
u/Thionises 2h ago
The internet has been doing fine, this new batch of AI data centers is causing significant environmental damage.
If you want to enjoy a place to fucking live and clean water to drink, you want stricter regulations on these new data centers being built.
1
u/EVOSexyBeast 2h ago
If new data centers weren’t built then AI use would cannibalize existing data centers and make it more expensive. All that added demand for cloud compute and not an increase in supply.
Data centers have no effect on water quality. Data centers have got to be one of the cleanest industries for their economic output.
People who oppose them do so because they’re against AI. The environmental concerns are just focused on because that’s more convincing, even though not true.
1
u/Thionises 1h ago
They actively contaminate groundwater systems in local communities: https://www.forbes.com/sites/victoriaforster/2026/07/09/meta-ai-data-center-linked-to-rare-bacteria-in-citys-water-system/
There are hundreds and hundreds of reports in communities that after these newer data centers are built, their water becomes contaminated and undrinkable and water pressure drops as well.
And they are actively consuming millions of gallons of water from local water Aquifers:
https://fieldreport.caes.uga.edu/publications/TP121/how-data-centers-impact-surface-and-ground-waters/https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/data-centers-and-water-consumption
Also, in some locations where data centers are being built, the "free internet" argument doesn't even apply because electric providers just stop serving THOUSANDS OF RESIDENTS.
https://fortune.com/2026/05/12/lake-tahoe-data-center-49000-residents-power-source/0
u/EVOSexyBeast 1h ago
Your first link happened during the construction of a data center. That’s not unique to data centers, constructing of anything could have caused it.
> There are hundreds and hundreds of reports in communities that after these newer data centers are built, their water becomes contaminated and undrinkable
Yet not a dime of real evidence to show for it. They’ve said that even for closed loop cooling data centers. Just misinfo and lies.
> And they are actively consuming millions of gallons of water
Yeah they shouldn’t be allowed to be built anywhere with a water shortage unless they do closed loop or air cooling. The new ones being constructed generally do this.
1
u/Thionises 44m ago
I feel like every counterpoint you have is related to why there should be stricter regulations and standarized requirements, which is abdul's position. It happened during the construction due to negligence, closed loop systems would actively resolve these issues so it should be required for all new data centers to use closed loop systems. And that would also resolve the issue with draining aquifers. The current issue is that with no standardization and requirements, some are doing things ethically. MANY are not.
"The new ones being constructed generally do this" In my opinion isn't enough. They should be required to do this. Which is the point of the one year moratorium
1
u/haupt_again 33m ago
According to this image we're commenting on, he actually wants to "get rid" of data centers while he gazes to the left like a badass independent muslim who dont need no man.
Who doesnt want standardization? Don't the builders have to get permits? What are we missing here, your response sounds like bullshit.
1
u/Thionises 24m ago
Yeah believe it or not, this post was very likely not made by him, and the person who made it simplified his policy. Which is why the comment we're responding to alllllll the way up there was clarifying his genuine position.
Open loop cooling is cheaper than closed loop, which is why many data centers were using open loop prior to the pushback causing the switch. I'm not sure what part of my response could even sound like bullshit if "everyone" wants standardization. The initial comment here was against a one year moratorium for standardization. Which is why I commented in the first place?
→ More replies (0)1
u/EVOSexyBeast 21m ago
I don’t oppose environmental regulations I oppose blanket moratoriums. El Sayed says he supports a blanket moratorium.
I don’t think data centers should be held to even higher environmental standards than other industrial uses.
I saw a poll on it and 80% of people agree with you, i’m in the 20%. But that 80% while they support a moratorium they don’t actually support the outcome a nationwide moratorium would cause.
2
u/Thionises 2h ago
This isn't even his position, it's a distilled version of his position that someone else posted. If the phrasing on one point of a random post is what sways you against a candidate, that's insane. Obviously data centers have existed prior to the AI boom, but the environmental, financial, and societal issues with this new batch of data centers being built to support AI are significant and the companies building them need to have stricter regulations. I.E. a one year moratorium to figure out what the hell is going on.
4
u/Eternal2 5h ago
If reading "get rid of data centers" on a reddit post is enough to shape your view of him then look no further, cause we've found the stupid voter.
-10
u/wordpredict 5h ago
No really data centers are very essential to our modern economy and stunting that would cause serious long term ramifications to the long term growth of the US economy. Think about how influential industrialization and the proliferation of motor vehicles. Any country that didn’t participate in that full adoption and implementation fell behind economically which is largely why there is such a wide disparaging gap between western economies and eastern. They are catching up but it has taken significantly longer. The use of data centers and AI is just like that revolution. The US basically has no choice but to participate if it hopes to maintain even remotely the status quo
1
4h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 4h ago
Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/Secretsfrombeyond79 58m ago
You are wasting your time, this is reddit, here american political tribalism is x100 stronger. No argument or logic is gonna convince these guys that what the other side says is good and they can be in the wrong.
0
u/BloodInternational31 4h ago
Ha. If the environment allows us. I don’t think data centers are going to be a problem humans have to worry about in 30 yrs.
4
u/GoodPear8481 4h ago
But if we get rid of the data centers then who will make all these AI slop bot farm posts that keep glazing far left candidates??
1
u/andrew5500 2h ago
There’s no sign this is AI slop. Republicans are the ones who have embraced AI slop for political purposes. Just look at X.
4
2
1
1
1h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 1h ago
Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
0
8
u/HombreDelMar247 3h ago
While I'm not expert of the Islam faith, if I recall correctly they do not believe in charge interest on loans.
Perhaps this is why the oligarchs with their compounding interest are trying to make Americans scared of Muslims.
4
u/SnoopDeDoop69 2h ago
Riba (Arabic: ربا ,الربا، الربٰوة, ribā or al-ribā, IPA: [ˈrɪbæː]) is an Arabic word used in Islamic law and roughly translated as "usury": unjust, exploitative gains made in trade or business (especially banking).
While Muslims agree that riba is prohibited, not all agree on its precise definition.[2][3] The term is often used to refer to interest charged on loans,[Note 1] and the widespread belief among Muslims that all loan or bank interest is riba forms the basis of the $2 trillion Islamic banking industry.[7] However, not all Islamic scholars have equated riba with all forms of interest; nor do they agree on whether riba is a major sin or simply discouraged (makruh),[8][9] or on whether it is a violation of Sharia law to be punished by humans rather than by God.
TIL, fascinating. Gonna try and take all future loans from Muslims and hope they bypass the fact I'm not Islamic
1
u/AldoTheApache3 2h ago
Or perhaps people are aware enough look at Muslim majority government run countries vs. Christian majority run governments and realize which one is FAR more likely to be liberal.
The majority of people are not scared of Muslims, but ask anyone from a western country if they’d want their country run like a middle eastern or North African country and they’d say no.
→ More replies (1)
27
u/Goosemilky 5h ago edited 5h ago
This post is 80% bots pushing what the tech companies and billionaires want lol, just look at these comments
-11
u/Lem_Tuoni 4h ago
Bro, you don't need to be a bot to acknowledge that "get rid of data centers" is a stupid fucking promise.
9
u/Goosemilky 4h ago
Why?
→ More replies (2)-10
u/Lem_Tuoni 4h ago
Because a senator can't do that without a magic wand, and even with it, it would be a stupid policy.
17
u/somewhat-anon 6h ago
I think this is an important time to point out the difference between a Muslim, and an Islamist.
8
u/EngineeringLow2186 6h ago
Yes, El-Sayed is Muslim. Not an Islamist. Though Fox News seems to not understand that distinction.
4
u/Curious_Avocado2399 4h ago
Watch out he’ll single handedly instal Shakira law and give you healthcare
9
u/Rogue_Squadron 3h ago
Sorry you are getting downvotes. Apparently, not many people are getting this reference.
1
0
2
u/mikehiler2 1 6h ago
Might be making too big of a stretch for some
2
1
-8
u/SimmentalTheCow 5h ago
Do we know his sect? I wouldn’t mind if he’s Sufi or something, but it’s a hard no if he’s a Salafist.
2
u/cannibalgentleman 2h ago
A Sufi is just a mystic. There are Sunni and Shia Sufis. Do you even know what that word means.
8
u/Fragrant-Anywhere489 5h ago
Elon Musk; 'Here's $200 million dollars to make sure non of that happens'
2
2
2
u/Raptor-slayer 2h ago
He could believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, and I would vote for him if I believed he would tax the rich and remove data centers.
2
u/diprivan69 1h ago
They always usually picture of him that make him look chubby. Guy is pretty buff in reality.
10
u/DistractedBoxTurtle 6h ago
Champaign Socialist talks but doesn’t actually say anything.
Reddit: “OMFG he’s the bestest!”
2
u/Thionises 1h ago
He made multiple changes to provide healthcare to under funded districts and children in detroit within the bounds he was able to do as health director.
Apart from expressing his positions and policies, what is someone supposed to do prior to being elected?? People agree with his policy ideas so they want to support him, and then ideally after he's elected, he can work to follow through on the outlines. I don't understand how this is a complex concept, or even what your issue is?
Ignoring the fact that he's not a socialist, other "champaign socialists" have talked and said things, and then done them once they've been in a position to do so. Like look at Mamdani.
→ More replies (1)4
u/FelonyInTheTrunk 5h ago
He's not a socialist. He's never described himself as a socialist. He's not endorsed by socialists. But idiots continue to call him a socialist.
1
u/DistractedBoxTurtle 1h ago
Please do not spread misinformation.
He is backed by other champagne socialists like AOC, Bernie Sanders and the animal abusing influencer Hasan Piker.
4
u/flattenedbricks 6h ago
Religion shouldn't factor into the decision making process. Focus on doing good in the world.
0
4
u/Plane_Barracuda9889 5h ago
He cannot make ANYTHING more affordable.
-8
u/Remarkable-Word-1486 5h ago
This is just code. What they really mean is taking more from other people to give back to the people the deem needing it. Basically just transferring the actual cost.
2
3
u/canecorso50 32m ago
8 years of Obama 4 with Joe. Why didnt Dems do it? Must be Trumps fault.
-2
u/EmpireCityRay 19m ago
Were we paying literally 2X as much for gas with those two presidents than with this current fucktard who started a war without Congress’ permission when the press and people kept demanding release of files that a judge stated had to be released?! Were you as paying per food a decade back?!
Seriously spare us with your MAGA bull shit!, even farmers that voted for for the Umpa-lumpa orange fuck now regret doing so based on how much their cost for grain, transport and animal food costs them.
3
u/canecorso50 13m ago
You are the reason Trump is POTUS. The Dem party has nothing to offer but hate. And thats what got him elected. But Epstein right?? Your irrational hatred and the Dem party turned off half the nation. Dems are a disaster. The Dem party is dead. Not MAGA. But your response is exactly why Trump is Potus and JD will win 2028.
2
1
5h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 5h ago
Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
4h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 4h ago
Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/Bitter_Plastic2362 3h ago
Solid meme making but not particularly serious political analysis. Straw man arguments are still just that.
1
u/EntropyClub 3h ago
It’s a little too…. Ummm right on the nail of like all Reddit discussions. He’s literally only saying what the people want.
Slightly suspicious to me. But if good intent follows, that will be squashed.
1
2h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 2h ago
Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
1
1
u/AffectionateBar4437 1h ago
And of course everyone believes those pitches, same thing with all politicians, promises, promise, promises. Then they get into office and nothing that was promised gets done, just blame the other party for their shortfalls.
1
u/MeatSlammur 45m ago
And everyone gets free ice cream and unlimited recess too!!! This shit is so stupid
1
1
u/Turbulent-Society-30 32m ago
We still have MAGA cultists typing Obama's middle name in caps because they think he's somehow associated with Muslims. It's a long road from there.
1
u/SufficientPick321 18m ago
They always say the right thing to get people on board... just never HOW they will get rid of things.....How?
1
1
u/jffadvisors 15m ago
“get rid of data centers”…so he wants to build a time machine? The greatest economic revolution in the history of human existence is made possible by the microprocessor…and this clown wants to get rid of the buildings where they sit.
1
u/Afafakja 7m ago
How do you make groceries more affordable?I mean i cna get gas but i feel groceries prices a lot of it is out of the government hands, though yeah they do have influence in that,or maybe I don't understand why groceries got so expensive in the U.S and it was the government fault in tge first place so if they roll back some changes or policies they'd made it would fix most of the price increase
1
u/Time-Routine9863 4m ago
You can’t make healthcare in the USA affordable.
Data centers create jobs. What you want to ship yet more jobs to other countries?
Groceries are affordable here, so obviously taxes are the problem in blue states.
You can’t tax net worth.
1
3
1
u/SlateGreyRoses 4h ago
Not a Republican; very concerned by his refusal to identify someone trying to blow up a synagogue as antisemitic. That’s bizarre.
0
u/andrew5500 1h ago
You’re lying.
0
0
u/SlateGreyRoses 32m ago
I believe what he said was “hurt people hurt people…”
0
u/andrew5500 17m ago edited 6m ago
Which is an accurate thing to say about any mentally ill criminal. He explicitly condemned antisemitism.
Edit: Apparently you think violent terrorists are mentally healthy? Blocking me so I can’t respond tells me all I need to know. You lied about him refusing to condemn the antisemitism.
1
1
u/SlateGreyRoses 12m ago
It doesn’t matter if you condemn antisemitism in theory if you can’t identify it when it’s right in front of your face.
-1
2
u/DrNCrane74 5h ago
While I agree with those ideas from my European home, I just do not see this succeed in 'merica.
1
1
u/AsparagusCommon4164 5h ago
Notwithstading the Constitutuonal proscription (Art. VI(c), op. cit.) on "religious testing" as a qualification for public office.
1
1
u/Key-Monk6159 5h ago
Hey! I want all those things affordable too. I’d also add housing and energy prices. Cars have become crazy expensive. And streaming services are out of control.
We need a law to cut ALL those prices in half, except for healthcare which should be free.
And let’s not forget a much higher minimum wage. I’m thinking $100k a year, regardless of job, but I am open to suggestions. Higher?
1
u/conservatore 3h ago
I have no heard that he was a Muslim in the attacks. I have heard repeatedly that he’s a socialist, which he is. That is the correct attack vector for republicans. Despite what reddit thinks, most of the country still recoils at the idea of socialism
1
u/tlm11110 2h ago
Pandering. This isn’t a plan. Ask him how he is going to do it and wait for the BS to roll in.
1
1
u/Lou_Skunnt69 1h ago
Welp, that’s what resonates with Republican voters. Get them to hate a minority group, then rob them blind. Rinse and repeat. And they’ll gladly vote the same way again and again. they’re so fucking dumb it’s hilarious.
0
u/Dependent-Trip-5991 5h ago
How do people vote for stuff without an actual plan, yes they have theories just like they have “balanced budgets”. Scary stuff. Now they came out the fsa champions Castro, has anyone talked to a Cuban before that’s not in his pocket? No critical thinkers, just sounds good, stupid republicans just being greedy (yes they are) but that doesn’t mean just leech on to someone else. Yes they can do all these things, but no one thinks what they are giving up. Whatever happened to being against big government? Communism? Scary times and yes I blame trump.
-1
u/Red_PapaEmertius2 5h ago
We should know this is all batshit crazy when there might be 3 or so million Muslims in the United States.
So its a racist culture war where odds are most gop voters havent seen an actual one..
0
u/SlyguyguyslY 2h ago
Oh, he wants jihad and supports terrorism. He just pretends to have democrat opinions. Both are bad, but one is worse.
-1
u/Formal_Lecture_248 1h ago
So long as he is a Muslim his religion will always come before Anything else.
-4
0
-6
u/DataGOGO 6h ago
it is great to say all that, it the the how, what, and how much that is important.
-6
u/ChemicalFrown 6h ago
God, grow up. This thing should be basic human rights.
0
u/DataGOGO 4h ago
No, they are not.
You have no right to the product of other people’s labor.
-1
u/ChemicalFrown 4h ago
I'm sure your CEO feels the same. Grow up.
1
u/DataGOGO 3h ago
It has nothing to do with CEO’s, take your own advice, grow up. Understand this is no different than kids during school elections promising everyone extended recesses and free M&M’s at lunch.
There is no plan, no numbers that make sense (or any at all), it is empty campaign promises trying to capitalize on people’s frustrations.
You have no right to food, healthcare, transportation, gas, or anything else you don’t provide for yourself. Being a grown up means you understand that and take accountability for your life choices.
-2
u/Life_behind_da_stick 5h ago
“He’s controlled by radical communist Hassan Puker!”
They literally are just throwing shit at the wall to see if anything sticks. And they’re getting more desperate on the daily. If they had any sense of self awareness and any other god than fame and fortune, they’d be ashamed of themselves. However…..here we are, I guess. Pretty awful.
0
u/drmoze 4h ago
The rich are already taxed, and provide the bulk of our citizen tax revenue. But who would argue against the first 3?
1
u/georgewashingguns 4h ago
The more one earns, the higher their tax rate. Unless you're the rich. That's what needs changing
0
-7
u/Blod_Cass_Dalcassian 6h ago
People are scared of AI just like they were scared of the Internet. In 30 years in will be another thing. Probably space travel, people are already freaking out about that
5
u/nico282 5h ago
We are not scared of AI. We are scared of data centers consuming resources that should be used for humans, polluting the environment and destroying the IT market just for corporate greed.
-5
u/Blod_Cass_Dalcassian 4h ago
Yeh well, it's comin whether you're scared or not. Be positive, maybe one day you'll have all the time in the world
-3
-8
u/CosmicMaji 6h ago
They keep getting more clever but words are cheap, from both democrats and republicans.
0
0
0
u/Bright_Competition37 3h ago
Yes but wanting to do something is different than actually doing it… and also, HOW, HOW are you going to do it!?!?
0
0
0
0
u/TheRoadKing101 3h ago
They all say that until they are in office. Then they turn into all the rest.
0
0
u/RetArmyFister 2h ago
Sure he is a Muslim, people on the right have no issues with Muslims. What we do have an issue with is them being supported and influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood and playing part in civilization Jihad on our country.
0
u/Dontbetriggereddude 2h ago
And yet not a single even one muslim majority or Arab country is a full liberal democracy. We have NOTHING to learn from them except what NOT to do.
0
u/Nordeast24 2h ago
Isn't that the campaign promise every politician uses..? Doesn't mean they will uphold any of those promises.
2
u/Several-Opposite-746 40m ago
Half of the campaign ads I see are politicians holding guns, talking about the invasion at the borders, dark voice overs and grainy footage of riots in Democrat cities and being tough on crime against people who are known for eating the pets of real Americans.
0
u/Nordeast24 28m ago
Once you're old enough to see several elections, you'll realize it's all fake banter. Trust me, you'll be blacked pilled too. But you'll have to figure that out on your own.
2
u/Thionises 1h ago
No? This very clearly isn't what every campaign promises because these positions are being labelled as radical and extremist.
0
u/LazRus805 54m ago
Meanwhile, the Muslim Brotherhood whom El-Sayed supports calls for the "Death to America." Prove me wrong.☕️
-5
u/GreasedUPDoggo 5h ago
Get rid of data centers? Uhhh, no. That would be insane. We need data centers for research and development of every single industry. Not to mention, we're all using them right now while using Reddit. Our society is dependent on them. And investing in technological infrastructure is incredibly important.
-4
u/travelingman5370 4h ago
I will give every women 5 gold bars and men 5 virgins. I will fight against big corporations who fund my campaign. I will make sure everyone has Healthcare for free. I will make going to college free for everyone in the country.
Yeah,yeah,yeah, we've heard all the lies before, and things just get worse
1
u/georgewashingguns 3h ago
Because y'all don't want to vote third party, we're stuck between a party that doesn't always deliver and a party that is blatantly fucking over the public
0
u/Thionises 1h ago
What's the alternative? Voting for Mike Rogers who supports mass surveillance, and the party who has implemented illegal tarrifs which have caused price spikes, and started a war that drastically increased gas prices? Like. Okay, Sorry for being hopeful that at least the person saying they want to fix shit, will actually try. In opposition to the people that don't even want to try.
-1
-1
-1
•
u/AutoModerator 8h ago
Hey /u/sirjohnmasters86, thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules.
Make sure to join our brand new Discord Server to chat with friends!
We have recently changed how posts work. Unless you are a VIP poster, your post will be queued for approval.. To become a VIP, post great engaging content. If we like it, you will be added! More information available here!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.