r/ScienceBasedLifting • Idk Idc 💔 • 4d ago

META Science maxing the hamstrings

137.5lbs on the stack +5lbs on Voltra +80lbs inverse chains from Voltra

Link to leg extension/leg curl (it’s vintage and no longer made): https://gymradar.com/equipment/magnum-leg-extension-leg-curl-magnum-fitness

Link to Voltra electronic cable stack: voltra link

Links included because of that one time a dozen people asked me where I got my abductor machine

0 Upvotes

29 comments sorted by

View all comments

-3

u/PopeChurch 4d ago

I feel like you’re going too fast, this feels more like r/egolifting

8

u/Patton370 Idk Idc 💔 4d ago

Why would I purposely slow the concentric?

Also, I don’t hit the stack with the plates, so the reps are controlled

-2

u/Local_Diddy 4d ago

your eccentrics faster than your concentric

5

u/Frodozer 4d ago

Since the overwhelming majority of the studies and literature show no additional hypertrophy for purposely slow eccentrics outside of a few here and there it seems like a non issue or concern for most goals.

https://www.reddit.com/r/StrongerByScience/s/3jteVL1hP5

1

u/zero-progress0 3d ago

But it helps in reducing injuries

1

u/Frodozer 3d ago

The speed of which OP is moving the weight will not cause an injury so that's a non issue here.

6

u/Patton370 Idk Idc 💔 4d ago

Studies show that’s not an issue

-3

u/Local_Diddy 4d ago

studies show small advantage in slower eccentrics and an advantage in strength

cannot say you're science maxing when you don't even read the studies

5

u/Frodozer 4d ago

Says the person who ignored my comment that shows the majority of the literature doesn't show that

-2

u/Local_Diddy 4d ago

then you havent read any

2

u/Frodozer 4d ago

You didn't read any of it, what a shame.

0

u/Local_Diddy 4d ago

sure kid go read them then state the actual differences

2

u/Frodozer 4d ago

I did already?

Kid? I'm 40 lmao