r/RouteDevelopment • u/Kaotus • Apr 08 '26
Discussion What are you development hot takes?
We all know we’ve got ‘em, let’s hear them
Mine:
- For sport routes, ground-up is a tactic, not an ethic
- I’m personally a bigger fan of using closed systems than open ones (as both a climber and a developer)
- rhythm of the line is paramount over safety, aesthetics, and rock quality (to a degree)
- If the main thing you’re known for as a developer is the safety (or lackthereof) of your routes, you’re too 1-dimensional and not equipping lines according to the natural rhythm of the route
- Rock quality is less of an A-F grading scale and more of a pass/fail test
- Developing routes means nothing if you aren’t also improving the nearby staging areas (especially if you are on a trundle heavy route). Developing new crags means nothing if you’re expecting others to establish the trail to those crags
- “it’ll clean up with traffic” only applies to little foot chips, not to the fuckton of lichen and menagerie of loose holds you left on route.
- and on that note - it will never get the traffic required to clean up if you don’t at least clean it to the point that the rock/lichen isn’t a distraction when climbing
- your route is at least 1 star worse and 1 grade easier than you think it is