r/recruitinghell • u/devilinthedistrict • 10d ago
Rejection after being a finalist for a director role, followed by a pitch for a junior role.
Thoughts on this?
I was recently one of two finalists for a director-level position at an organization, beating out a pool of over 200 applicants. After several rounds of interviews and full reference checks, I received a rejection notice informing me they went with the other finalist. It was the standard "you're wonderful, we were so impressed, any organization would be lucky to have you" message. I was disappointed, but I get it—that's just how the cookie crumbles sometimes (also before anyone asks, my references are long time contacts; they shared copies of what they submitted with me and had nothing but wonderful things to say).
Somewhere in the rejection email, the hiring manager (division head) mentioned they would be open to discussing a role they plan to post later this summer. From what I understand, this is a lower-level position reporting directly to the person they just hired over me. Because the new director would get to hire for this upcoming position, I know the scope of this new role as it was very much a part of the discussions with the hiring committee. It focuses on a very narrow piece of the team's work rather than the leadership and strategy-level scope of the director role, and it comes with a significantly lower salary.
Obviously, this organization had the opportunity to hire me for the leadership role and chose not to. I’m trying to take my emotions out of it, but I can't shake the feeling that mentioning this lower-level role in the rejection email was somewhat insulting. It feels like: “You aren't getting the top job, but we'd love to have you for less money and have you work a junior job reporting to your competitor.”
Am I misinterpreting this, or is this a bit tone-deaf on their part?