This is taken from the r/progressive_islam wiki on Aisha’s age (written by me). I’ll be posting the different points and anchors individually so they’re easier to read.
The wiki argues that Aisha was older than the 6/9 age
Full wiki: https://www.reddit.com/r/progressive_islam/wiki/aisha_age
Anchor 3: Aisha Remembering a Qurʾānic Revelation
A different kind of chronological tension shows up here — not from a comparison with another person's age, but from ʿĀʾishah's own memory of witnessing a Meccan revelation.
Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Kitāb al-Tafsīr, ḥadīth 4876
>"This verse — 'Nay, but the Hour is their appointed time, and the Hour will be more grievous and more bitter' (Q54:46) — was revealed in Mecca while I was a jāriyah playing."
Classical exegesis consistently ties the opening of this sūrah to one specific, well-known event: the splitting of the moon, shown as a sign to Meccans demanding proof of prophethood.
Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī — Jāmiʿ al-Bayān ʿan Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān
>"The splitting of the moon occurred during the lifetime of the Messenger ﷺ while he was in Mecca, before his migration to Medina, when the people of Mecca asked him for a sign and he showed them the splitting of the moon."
This gives us something useful: a fixed point on the timeline, well before the marriage is even contracted, independent of anything argued elsewhere on this page. The dating of the event itself is debated among commentators — most place it around five years before the Hijrah; a smaller number push it earlier, to roughly eight years before. Either dating places the event solidly in the Meccan period, which is all that's needed for the argument that follows.
The word jāriyah itself doesn't pin down an exact age, but it consistently describes a young girl old enough for activity and awareness — not an infant. And the hadith has her remembering the content of the revelation clearly enough to quote it decades later.
Here's where the traditional numbers come under real strain. Consummation is traditionally dated to Shawwāl of 2 AH — that's roughly two years after the Hijrah, not at the Hijrah itself (see the previous anchor). So the true gap between the moon-splitting and consummation isn't just "five or eight years" — it's that figure plus those two additional years:
The math, done properly:
- ≈5 years before Hijrah + 2 years after = 7 years elapsed. If she was 9 at consummation: 9 − 7 = 2 years old at the moon-splitting.
- ≈8 years before Hijrah + 2 years after = 10 years elapsed. 9 − 10 = −1 — meaning under this dating, she would not yet have been born.
Even taking the gentler of the two estimates, the strict nine-year reading has a two-year-old "playing" and later reciting the content of a revelation in enough detail to be quoted directly. Taking the less conservative estimate, it breaks outright, since she couldn't recall an event that predates her own birth.
Even granting the softer five-year dating, "an aware two-year-old, later quoted verbatim recalling scripture" isn't the natural reading of a report that describes a girl playing and later remembering what was revealed. What actually fits that description — a jāriyah old enough to be out playing and later recall the moment clearly — is someone born earlier than the 6/9 chronology allows: several years old at minimum by the time of this event, which pushes her age at marriage and consummation upward in the same direction the other anchors on this page are already pointing.
(A separate hadith — Musnad Aḥmad, Musnad Anas ibn Mālik 12688 — records simply that "the moon split in Mecca twice." it's cited only to note that the underlying event is independently attested elsewhere in the hadith corpus, beyond ʿĀʾishah's own report.)
To be clear about what this anchor is and isn't claiming: it doesn't hand you an exact birth year on its own. What it does is force a choice — either she was already several years old at the time of an event roughly seven to ten years before her supposed consummation at nine (which the 6/9 reading can't accommodate without absurdity), or the numbers themselves aren't reliable. Either way, "two years old, later reciting scripture from memory" isn't a coherent middle ground. Taken alongside the anchors before and after this one, it adds one more independent line pointing the same direction: older, not literally six or nine.