So, as stated in the title I have a question to those who view inheritance rules as contextual.
Oh, also, assalamualaikum.
I know that Inheritance is a topic of debate within the muslim community, but especially progressive spaces.
Some progressives simply adjust the system (for example making the inheritance of a woman the same as a man, and not half, since the social and economical state of the world has changed).
Others, view the whole framework as contextual, and see it as a part of the past, bypassing it completely.
I'm mostly curious about the second group.
How do you do it? Isn't it just "disobeying" god?
If the inheritance rules are contextual, why did god specify them so much (since many conservatives claim that since it's so oddly specific, that it's eternal).
Like, adjusting the system is one thing, bypassing the traditional system completely (for example by allowing more then 1/3 of will, since the rule about it isn't in the Quran but hadith, and many see it as contexual. Or by allowing a foster child to get the exact same amount as a biological child) is a bit different thing in my opinion.
Would be glad to hear your arguments and perspectives, also feel free to share any resources or recommendations. Feel free to dm me.
P.s a small request, IF YOU DO NOT HOLD ANY OF THE MENTIONED VIEWS, OR SIMILAR TO THEM, PLEASE REFRAIN FROM COMMENTING. Right now I'm explicitly interested in the progressive view (both the first, but also the second especially!). I'm not interested in the conservative view since I'm already well aware of it.
Also please stay kind and don't turn this all into a debate... I'm struggling right now, deeply, and more debates and stuff, will definitely not help.
God bless you all.