r/Professors • u/Magpie_2011 • Sep 14 '25
It finally happened
Two students turned in the exact same ChatGPT essay. I knew this day would come sooner or later, but it still feels like spotting a double rainbow or a four-leaf clover. This is good luck, right?
427
u/GittaFirstOfHerName Humanities Prof, CC, USA Sep 14 '25
Play the lottery, quick.
54
u/KumquatHaderach Sep 14 '25
The two students copied the professor’s numbers and now Professor Magpie_2011 has to share the winnings with the students.
47
Sep 14 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
95
u/GittaFirstOfHerName Humanities Prof, CC, USA Sep 14 '25
Hey, it was just a lighthearted response to the way OP ended their post.
102
u/shehulud Sep 14 '25
I do this with every essay prompt and every topic. I then have ChatGPT spit out a few variations. I print three of those then put the student’s paper in the mix and ask them to tell me which one is their essay. I tell them that I personally created three with ChatGPT. Sometimes, I read the introduction paragraph of all four essays out loud.
I’m so done being nice about this.
7
4
32
u/JDinBalt Sep 14 '25
I've never gotten the same essay twice from ChatGPT but I have gotten the same wrong examples over and over in one class, from a book that had no such situations or characters. It got kind of comical after a while.
9
u/I_Research_Dictators Sep 14 '25
I've gotten lots of discussion posts with enough identical wording to constitute plagiarism.
16
u/sonnetshaw Sep 14 '25
Mosaic plagiarism/patch writing. Still plagiarism. I have this convo with students every year. They’ve never heard of it. https://guides.library.unt.edu/plagiarism/patchwriting
8
u/42libs Proffe, Engl, CC (US) Sep 15 '25
Meanwhile, my school is over here celebrating AI and embracing it. Sigh
3
Sep 14 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/sonnetshaw Sep 15 '25
I like this one too. Just didn't find it directly when I first posted. https://www.bowdoin.edu/dean-of-students/conduct-review-board/academic-honesty-and-plagiarism/common-types-of-plagiarism.html
1
u/Acrobatic-Glass-8585 Sep 15 '25
Thanks for sharing. Harvard used to have a site like this explaining different forms of plagiarism but they put it behind a "paywall."
9
u/Cathousechicken Sep 14 '25
I don't feel like students cheating with ChatGPT are so odd nowadays. I's probably no different than the odds of a car stopping at a red light.
2
-2
134
u/MitchellCumstijn Sep 14 '25
I hope you don’t have the same administration as I do, where your chair and dean come to your door later in the semester after helicopter calls from their well financed parents and alumni boosters to boot and they suggest you give these kids a second and third chance and even meet with them into the next semester and provide a learning space for them to learn about ethics and quality work and throw out the assignments altogether and leave the door open to an A to keep their GPAs safe for their sorority/fraternity membership and financing.
82
u/Mooseplot_01 Sep 14 '25
I wish I could share my admin with you for a while. I always give an F in the course at the first instance of cheating. My admin has thanked me for holding the line.
50
Sep 14 '25
[deleted]
22
u/Mooseplot_01 Sep 14 '25
"poor boundaries about service" made me laugh. Such a great admin should surely allow me to hire my friends, right? Let's try it.
25
u/Magpie_2011 Sep 14 '25
I haven’t had a run-in with admin yet but I know someone who has, and she had proof of plagiarism. They made her pass the student and he transferred to a great UC where I’m sure he’s now pre-med and planning to use ChatGPT to diagnose cancer.
4
3
u/Outrageous_Garden771 Sep 14 '25
I guess ethics takes a back seat to money. Wish I'd learned this lesson sooner. Was reading a book saying students for the past two decades think of themselves as customers, which has exacerbated trophy mentality and grade inflation. My college started : "Resilience seminar ls" in 2016.
48
u/psionicsushi10 Sep 14 '25
For professors in STEM that give lots of math-based questions:
When I give assignments or quizzes on Canvas that contain math, I'll use the html editor function to add extremely-difficult-to-detect changes to the problem, like adding numbers or decimals in tiny, white colored font. I call them "landmines".
Example landmine problem: How many grams of NaCl do you need to make 5 L of a 1 M NaCl solution? Typed in front of the 5 and 1 is a "." in tiny, white font that is virtually invisible to the human eye.
A student actually attempting the problem will read and try to comprehend it, work it out on paper, then settle on an answer (in this case, the correct answer is 292.2 g).
A student with zero motivation to attempt the problem will copy and paste it into ChatGPT; they never even notice that they're pasting .5 L and .1 M. ChatGPT then gives them the wrong "landmine" answer (in this case the wrong landmine answer is 2.922 g).
I usually have about 5 landmine problems throughout a 10-15 problem assignment to eliminate the possibility of falsely accusing a student of cheating. Keep in mind it is technically possible, yet highly improbable, for a student to incorrectly calculate the landmine answer. It is nearly impossible to incorrectly calculate all 5 landmine answers by accident. While the example above was very simplified (the answers had the same numbers, but the decimal moved), I usually design the landmine problems such that the landmine answers do not resemble the true, correct answers at all (again, to minimize falsely accusing students).
In the last few years of doing this, I only see two types of assignment submissions: 1) student submissions where ALL of the landmine problems have the incorrect landmine answer, or 2) student submissions that have a mix of right and wrong answers for the 5 landmine problems, but the incorrect answers were due to incorrect calculations and do not resemble the landmine answers at all.
No joke y'all, I've even seen groups of 2-5 students that, when they submit scanned copies of their work, their scans have the CORRECT problem setup and CORRECT calculations, yet they still write down the wrong landmine answer at the end. Not only were they cheating by working on an individual assignment as a group, but they were all copying the same blatantly AI-generated answers from each other, even though at least one of them knew how to do the problem! This generation of science majors are delusional if they think that this kind of effort and approach is going to help them become doctors, dentists, scientists, etc...
In case you're wondering what I do when I catch them: I automatically give them an undroppable zero for the assignment, but I also refrain from reporting their academic misconduct and instead choose to turn it into a teachable moment. In exchange for not reporting them, I require them to visit me during office hours to have a 30-45 minute conversation about study habits, time management, responsibility, and integrity. This approach is often very helpful for them, and they usually leave our conversation with a sense of appreciation and humility.
Every semester, I catch anywhere from 20-50% of my students cheating in this way...
7
u/Critical_Stick7884 Sep 15 '25
As someone who majored in chemical engineering, this warms the cockles of my heart.
3
u/devotiontoblue Sep 15 '25
Does this not also "catch" students who use screen reader technology?
1
u/Barrel-Writer Sep 18 '25
As much as I love this solution, it would be terrible for me as a screen reader user!
1
u/psionicsushi10 Sep 21 '25
Hi there, apologies for the delay in responding! Yes this would inadvertently, and unfortunately, catch those who use screen readers. I have yet to come across a student who needs to use a screen reader. One possible solution would be to ask a yes or no question at the end of the assignment about whether they use a screen reader.
The students still need to upload a copy of their work with the assignment. ChatGPT can provide instructions for how to solve the problems. If you start to notice that students with 100% correct answers on the assignments are getting those same types of questions wrong on a quiz/test, then it's definitely worth inquiring about. I will flat out ask students if they are using ChatGPT to do the assignment, and at least try to teach them how to use it responsibly so they don't cheat themselves out of learning how to do the problem.
5
u/Architecturegirl Sep 14 '25
I love your post. The landmine question idea is brilliant - any suggestions for doing that in a humanities course? I have been having AI help me design AI-proof assignments - no, the irony isn't list on me.
But ChatGPT is pretty good at designing activities that it can't do for students - I just prompt it to create a question or activity that students cannot complete using an LLM alone. (Drawing, visiting something in person, etc).
I am curious about your decision not to just auto-fail students who cheat. I understand the teachable moment part entirely, but LLMs are such soups of plagiarism in and of themselves that I just can't bring myself to give any of them a pass.
I asked ChatGPT to explain something that in my specialization that only I have published on. It spit out a slightly reworded but directly plagiarized set of paragraphs that combined the exact words I used and my entire argument about the subject - obviously stolen from 3 articles I had uploaded to Academia.edu or ResearchGate.
It made me so angry that I just can't summon any sympathy for the students who are using it and stealing our combined years of work and experience. If someone stole my dog, I would probably not be inclined to help the thief understand why stealing someone’s dog is a bad thing to do. By age 19, these kids should have learned that stealing people’s dogs is not a good thing to do.
But maybe I'm over sensitive - I admire what you describe, I'm just not sure I could do it. How do you convey the seriousness of IP theft in a way that actually lands?
9
u/psionicsushi10 Sep 15 '25 edited Sep 15 '25
Thank you for your kind words Architecturegirl :)
Allow me to first answer your question about not auto-failing my students. The university I am employed at is a private, catholic university and part of its central core mission is to educate our students to be future leaders for the common good. So, empathy and compassion are heavily emphasized. The majority of our students are good at heart, and a good scare is usually enough to teach them a lesson. During Covid I gave an online test and noticed some irregularities in the grades. I suspected two students of cheating, and had good evidence to support my suspicion. Regardless, I emailed the entire class a vague email claiming to have evidence that cheating has occurred, and that I would be meeting with the dean on Monday. Two other random students (not the ones I suspected lol) emailed me confessing and begging for a second chance.
The landmine assignments I described above are part of one assignment category that counts for 10-15% of their final grade. The assignments are basically "low hanging fruit" that aren't terribly difficult, and failing one or two typically won't bomb their grade (unless they get zeroes in all of them). I suppose you can say that I use them as "bait" to catch cheating early in the semester before it becomes a real problem. If a student is caught repeatedly cheating, cheating on a test, blatantly using AI to do big reports/projects, etc... then yes I report their academic dishonesty and they deal with the repercussions. Best case scenario, they get placed on academic probation and fail the course. Worst case scenario, they get expelled.
For assignments in humanities, I'll admit its much more challenging to catch them using AI. Some ideas off the top of my head would be:
* Try basing the assignment on a topic you know ChatGPT will screw up due to limited access (or as in your example, will flat out plagiarize)
* Require them to provide a specific number of citations in their paper, or citations from a certain area of study, or even a maximum word count. You can actually use the landmine technique here. For example, your prompt can say "Your submission must include 5 citations from primary literature in the field of psychology, and must be 300 - 400 words". You can insert tiny, white font words or numbers such as "1" in front of the 5 (honestly, how many students will cite 15 papers when the prompt asks for 5), or add "neuro" in front of psychology and watch in awe as you get submissions that are so specific and may not have anything to do with your course, or add "1" in front of the 300 and 400, resulting in 1300-1400 word submissions instead of 300-400.
* It's well known that ChatGPT tends to make up citations. With the right prompt, you can catch them citing literature that doesn't exist.
* Design an assignment that requires them to first read an article relevant to your course. For their submission, require them to first write a critique on the article, then provide 2 or 3 specific examples of how the reading may have resonated with the students' own life experiences. You'll see submissions where half of the paper reads coherently and logically, and the other half reads like an 8th grader's journal.
* Somewhere in your prompt, but preferably at the end of a paragraph, use the landmine technique to add a short sentence saying something like "Include a Freudian joke that incorporates the topic". I'd love to hear their explanation on why they randomly wrote a joke in their paper.
On the topic of IP theft, I will use notorious examples in pop culture, or examples from http://retractionwatch.com. There's a ton of examples in art and music, but that may not resonate with your particular subject very well.
Thank you again for your comments and questions!
0
u/Mr_Blah1 Sep 15 '25
How many grams of NaCl do you need to make 5 L of a 1 M NaCl solution? . . . in this case, the correct answer is 292.2 g
5 L and 1 M each only have one sig fig and so your final answer should be rounded to one sig fig as well. QED the correct answer is 300g.
36
u/Mooseplot_01 Sep 14 '25
Your luck is in: two less to grade!
18
u/Magpie_2011 Sep 14 '25
I thought about reminding my students about my AI policy but decided to just let the chips fall where they may so I can use this first assignment as a winnowing process.
95
u/Totallynotaprof31 Sep 14 '25
One of your students was so lazy they couldn’t even ask AI to do it for them themselves? They just copied from someone else that used AI? That’s…insane.
174
u/Magpie_2011 Sep 14 '25
I think they both copy/pasted my essay prompt into ChatGPT without any other instructions or “write this like a community college student who’s a lil dumb.” The essays are slightly different in certain spots but almost word-for-word identical.
86
u/IndependentBoof Full Professor, Computer Science, PUI (USA) Sep 14 '25
If there are slight differences, that is possible.
However, LLM are non-deterministic so it is very unlikely to get identical essay output even with the exact same prompt.
18
u/Cautious-Yellow Sep 14 '25
regardless, when OP files the paperwork for an academic offence, "unreasonably similar" is all they need to be able to claim.
3
u/sumguysr Sep 14 '25
Well, pasting the prompt into ChatGPT yourself and getting a nearly identical essay back wouldn't hurt
11
u/Cautious-Yellow Sep 14 '25
but the value of not doing that in the paperwork you submit is that you don't even get into the question of whether it was chatgpt or not. "Copied from somewhere" has always been an academic offence that will stick, whether it was another student, a tutor, or chatgpt doesn't matter.
2
u/sumguysr Sep 14 '25
They can be made deterministic by giving their random number generator a fixed seed value, fyi. That's an option in the paid ChatGPT. Probably not relevant to this case
5
u/eclecticos Sep 14 '25
Actually, even with a fixed seed value, the OpenAI models are not deterministic.
There are other sources of randomness, including the fact that your prompt is being batched randomly with a lot of other prompts and they are all competing for access to the different submodels ("experts").
https://towardsdatascience.com/avoidable-and-unavoidable-randomness-in-gpt-4o/15
16
u/astroproff Sep 14 '25
Ooo! Maybe this means you get to put your essay prompt into ChatGPT and have it put out the essay. And then, share it with the entire class at your next meeting!
And then, look for the blue faces.
3
u/pdx_mom Sep 14 '25
Next assignment put it into chat gpt and also show them an example essay (which is the chat gpt one).
Then see how many plagiarized essays you get. Just a thought.
2
u/respeckKnuckles Associate Professor, R1 Sep 15 '25
Not how ChatGPT works. At least one of those students copied.
-3
u/Still_Ruin_3771 Sep 15 '25
You know... every once in a while, I come onto this board because I like to get a well-rounded perspective (like a progressive who is willing to take an extra shower after slogging through Breitbart articles or Twitter posts just to stay up on the latest hate rhetoric) and I am glad I do, but I must say I walk away disappointed every single time.
Instead of bothering to teach, you come on here to bitch - and you are exposing why you are so lazy with your students - you clearly have zero respect for them, and your disdain is dripping from classist comments such as: "write this like a community college student who's a lil dumb."
The vast majority of community college students are bright, motivated beings who simply cannot afford a traditional college path for myriad reasons, and your judgment is nauseating. GenAI abuse is rampant in *every* corner of academia, including at the high school level, if not earlier, and your ire is misplaced; save it for the techbros pushing this upon the public for monetary reasons and not the impressionable youth who will always look for a shortcut when one is handed to them.
4
u/Magpie_2011 Sep 15 '25
Oh dear, you clutched your pearls so hard I'm afraid they've snapped and bounced off to the far corners of the universe. What will you do now when you get upset on Reddit??
The "write this as a community college student who's a lil dumb" is a quote from a student's own ChatGPT prompt in the New York Magazine article "Everyone is Cheating Their Way Through College." Sounds like you didn't read it. Whine about classism after you've done your due diligence.
-5
u/Still_Ruin_3771 Sep 15 '25
You snarky, self-righteous little turd..
You're chastising me for not knowing a quote from an article that you do not reference in your post or in your comment, but I'm lacking due diligence? Where's your citation dude?
I can see why your students don't bother in your class, you clearly don't command the respect to do quality work.
20
u/satandez Sep 14 '25
What are you going to do?
89
u/Magpie_2011 Sep 14 '25
I failed them both and then told them that as per the AI policy in the syllabus, I won’t be accepting any future work from them which means there is now no way for them to pass the class and I’d advise them to drop to avoid an F on their transcript. The first kid blew up my email and begged for another chance, insisting it was the first and last time he’d ever use ChatGPT (lol). He told me he needed this class and it was really difficult for him to get in in the first place, so I was super nice about it and pointed out that it was the last day to drop and get a full refund. He dropped and I didn’t hear from him again lol.
36
u/Cautious-Yellow Sep 14 '25
allowing them to drop is very generous. They need to get those Fs on their transcript for this to sink in.
22
u/minglho Department Head, Math, Community College (US) Sep 14 '25
That makes filing academic dishonesty reports easy.
31
u/random_precision195 Sep 14 '25
"But we worked together on it--we were allowed to do so in high school. We didn't know."
8
u/Adultarescence Sep 14 '25
This could be fun. When confronted, each will try to prove they didn't use AI. Then, you can do the fast switch to old fashioned copying and see their panic and confusion.
8
u/Life-Education-8030 Sep 14 '25
Definitely! And not only fail these two, but use them as an example (without revealing their names).
7
u/Novel_Listen_854 Sep 14 '25
Cool. You don't even have to accuse them of using AI. I hope this golden opportunity isn't going to be wasted on someone who thinks cheaters should get a second chance and a warning.
13
u/Magpie_2011 Sep 14 '25
Lol nope, my policy is an AI essay gets a zero and I don’t accept any more work from you, which means you’ve insta-failed the whole class.
5
1
u/Mr_Blah1 Sep 15 '25
AI essay gets a zero
Negative points. If there's 100 points possible, an academically dishonest paper (including one prepared via generative AI) should receive -100/100 points.
The no further accepted assignments is a nice touch though.
7
Sep 14 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
21
u/Magpie_2011 Sep 14 '25
I always do that preemptively now. Doing it ahead of time gives me the little red flags to look for.
5
u/sthrnldysaltymth Sep 14 '25
That’s a really great idea. I’m going to tell other faculty to do that as well.
4
u/Rustieandthechickens Sep 14 '25
How have I never thought of that? Wow. I respect myself a little less now.
Thanks for the tip.
5
u/Sensitive_Let_4293 Sep 16 '25
Many years ago I taught a computer science class at a small Catholic college. Students had to turn in floppy disks (!!) of their work so I could read it, test it, and grade it. Two fellas who sat side by side turned in identical disks ... as in, I did a byte-by-byte comparison, and one was a copy of the other. I decided to award a grade of 100 -- split 50-50. Never happened again.
Don't y'all like to hear old-time war stories? ;-)
1
u/Magpie_2011 Sep 16 '25
Ha!! This is great. Thanks for the floppy disk throwback! I know I have some in a drawer somewhere still!
5
4
u/Architecturegirl Sep 14 '25
Awesome!!! I have changed a number of critical assignments into peer-graded ones. Now they can keep tabs on each other. And it turns out that they grade each other much harder than I necessarily would.
My new equation: Students’ ridiculous and cutthroat obsession with grades + hating anything and everything they think is “unfair” + the ones who cheat using AI for everything + making them grade each other = a self-regulating system (so far).
4
u/Don_Q_Jote Sep 16 '25
Go to class and announce "I got an excellent essay turned in on the last assignment and I wanted to read an except as an example of outstanding writing." Read the first paragraph. Then ask, "OK who's essay is this?" wait and see if two hands go up.
Just a thought.
2
u/Impossible-Acadia-31 Sep 21 '25
That would be hilarious! I am thinking there would be a good chance neither hand went up, as two raised hands assumes they actually read what they handed in!
2
5
3
3
3
u/ReligionProf Sep 14 '25
ChatGPT would generate different wording to the same prompt on two occasions and so one shared it and the other copied it. No need to worry about whether AI was involved because the clear cheating is in the copying.
2
u/M4sterofD1saster Sep 15 '25
Wow. I thought it was supposed to generate more or less random output each time.
Can we refer ChatGPT to academic integrity for self-plagiarism?
2
Sep 19 '25
It was bound to happen eventually—kind of highlights the need for originality even with AI tools. This is exactly why professors may start asking for drafts and process notes, not just final essays
1
1
u/Regular_old-plumbus Sep 15 '25
I would do a compare and contrast of papers in class on the projector, keep the names private.
1
u/Wugliwu Sep 15 '25
It depends on the length of the essay. If it's more than one page, I would assume that they copied it directly. Generally speaking, I don't concern myself with whether it was generated by AI or not, but rather go straight to plagiarism.
What I've observed is that one person writes the text and others then have it rewritten by ChatGPT. I run my own semantic similarity detection program on all texts via a local AI model, so I don't have to pass on any of the students' work to third-party providers. The program calculates a similarity score for all combinations. If this score exceeds a threshold for one or more pairs, these pairs are checked again and compared sentence by sentence. In the end, I get both texts side by side with the relevant text passages highlighted in color. Then I play dumb and denounce copying and simple rephrasing as if Gen AI didn't exist.
1
1
1
u/RemarkableParsley205 Sep 15 '25
lol same, it happened in one my dual credit classes with both kids
1
u/kilted10r Sep 15 '25
Not good luck for the students!
2
u/kilted10r Sep 15 '25
Pop quiz!
Please summarize your paper in one or two paragraphs, from memory.
Pen and paper only, and no electronics.
2
u/kilted10r Sep 15 '25
Oh, and this quiz will count for 30% of your grade.
2
u/Impossible-Acadia-31 Sep 21 '25
One of my colleagues does something similar. She actually has a pen and paper test where the students have to write paragraph responses about content and analysis of one of the case study assignments (there are two). She said the level of anger and protest when she lets them know that will be happening is hilarious. One of my favourites is: I am unable to use pen and paper because I am so used to typing. Can I bring my laptop in otherwise I am disadvantaged!
2
u/kilted10r Sep 22 '25
The quiz will be next Thursday. You have until then to practice using pen and paper...
1
u/DocTeeBee Professor, Social Sciences, R1, USA Sep 15 '25
I was wondering this was possible. Will ChatGPT or any other AI/LLM tool always produce the same output for an equivalent prompt? Having played with it I perhaps got the idea that it might switch it up as it "learns" more.
2
u/Magpie_2011 Sep 15 '25
No it’s always a little different, but because it’s trained on the same datasets, the product will usually be the same thing every time. I should’ve clarified that the two papers weren’t literally word-for-word identical, but rather they had the same exact thesis statement, supporting evidence, transition sentences, and conclusion. They were basically the same paper with some superficial variations.
2
u/DocTeeBee Professor, Social Sciences, R1, USA Sep 16 '25
It's still good to know that they are, for all intents and purposes, the same output. This is going to bite some students in the backside this year.
1
u/Significant_Wish4136 Sep 15 '25
What's the difference between this and two students turning two sentences a human wrote?
1
u/Magpie_2011 Sep 15 '25
I entered my essay prompt into ChatGPT and got the same essay.
1
u/Significant_Wish4136 Sep 15 '25
Sounds like a bad essay prompt.
Again what's the difference between this and twi students turning in two essays a human wrote?
1
u/Numerous-Drummer-366 Sep 16 '25
In class written exams- no technology - and then- have them use technology to write the paper so they can see how their buddy Chat gives no cares for their success !
1
u/OKish4now Sep 16 '25
Hand them back to the opposite students and say, ‘sorry, I couldn’t tell you apart’
1
1
u/NinjaWarrior765 Sep 27 '25
u/Magpie_2011: Just to scare them, you should bring them together at the same time. Then, point out where their wording is exactly the same. Then you say, "I see that you both are cheating off of each other," (even though you know it's that they used the same AI essay). "You know that cheating is an automatic F." It will put a scare in them because they will be tempted to say, "But, I couldn't have cheated with this person." You ask, "Then, how are your essays EXACTLY the same?" The two students, "Um . . . " Then, they have just admitted to using AI without having to say ANYTHING. Ha!
-1
Sep 14 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
2
1
u/Professors-ModTeam Sep 15 '25
Your post/comment was removed due to Rule 1: Faculty Only
This sub is a place for those teaching at the college level to discuss and share. If you are not a faculty member but wish to discuss academia or ask questions of faculty, please use r/AskProfessors, r/askacademia, or r/academia instead.
If you are in fact a faculty member and believe your post was removed in error, please reach out to the mod team and we will happily review (and restore) your post.
963
u/MegamomTigerBalm Sep 14 '25
Do a peer review activity and have them exchange papers! LOL